This forum is for discussing political issues -- local, state, national or international. The same standards of behavior apply as are spelled out on our home page in the introduction to Speak Out.
|
|
|
|
|
Fog/Mist ~ High: 72°F ~ Low: 61°F Friday, May 24, 2013 |
|
Speak Out [politics] January 1 through April 1, 2013This forum is for discussing political issues -- local, state, national or international. The same standards of behavior apply as are spelled out on our home page in the introduction to Speak Out. © Copyright 2013 Marshall Democrat-News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
Related subjects |
Comments
Newsacross writes (again): "Capitalism is a failed system."
We've never had a system of true capitalism.
What we have instead, is crony capitalism, which is closer to socialism than true honest capitalism.
The bond of big business and government is the very definition of fascism.
The bailout of the private globalist bank engineered failures (gambling casinos and public plunder) are communist at the bottom and fascist at the top.
It's a lie to call it capitalism. The failures are engineered and allowed to happen as a last giant transfer of wealth..
We peons, get sacrifice and austerity while the private bankers gain control of all real assets. We are literally taxed to death to support a corrupt system that systemically loots and plunders with no negative consequences.
The 'tooling' of this fascist government/corporate collusion, is the Keynesian economic theory of throwing money into the wind (to select crony capitalists) advancing the destruction of the bottom tax cow peons.
"There are elements of socialism in most guided capitalist countries."
Exactly. Guided Capitalism = Crony Capitalism
OKR,
Interesting article mate.
There are elements of socialism in most guided capitalist countries.
Take Australian socialized medicine for example. We have it. We love it, and we have utilized this socialist approach to medical care since the mid '80s -- long enough to see its effect of providing medical care to everyone at no direct cost to the patient. Its worked much better than the old "root, hog, or die" approach of capitalism the Aussies used to use.
Capitalism is a failed system.
Its time we try something else.
North Dakota State Bank, socialism at work for the people. Just one example of socialism helping the people. Who is against? The big banks of course.
Right wingers, I dare you to read this. I will be surprised if any of you knock it. The very conservative folks in North Dakota sure as hell don't! http://www.alternet.org/corporate-accoun...
;)
OKR,
No offense to your old friend, but I am afraid I will have to side with Occam on this one mate. No hard feelings I hope.
I can't say News. Penrod just left under cover of darkness. His parting words were, "think on my last name, and law". I am assuming that he meant the law of parsimony. He is a confusing conversationalist, but may be on to something. I am hoping that some of those better minds on these blogs, better than mine, yours, or even Nana Dot's may get to the bottom of it.
Or perhaps its...oh wait...tell me its not them, OKR
not...
Los CHICENISTAS!!!!!
Why don't you just say it mate,
ITS THE COMMIES!!!!
If they just would have let Generals Patton and Macarthur and Senator McCarthy do their jobs back in the day, we wouldn't have this problem now.
We all know its the Commies OKR.
There is no need to be shy about it.
Right DO?
I am visiting my friend, whom I have not seen in fifty years. He showed me this blog, and I have been immersed in it for three days. I am amazed at the progression through layers that has occured. I'm thinking that a couple of you are beginning to get whas happenin'. Far out!
O. K., see a couple of youse guys have the second layer figured out. You got it, New World Order. Beyond a doubt. I don't know why everyone else can't see that? It is frustrating.
Stay with me now because here is what frustrates me. Before I go further focus on what you see so clearly, but others don't. Frustrating huh? Think deeper now, think to the next layer. First a little more background. Yes you are dead on about the Jews, and control of money. It's been that way a long time. Remember Shylock? Uh hu, thought you did, see what I mean? You are right about the menacing powers. You are ready to understand the Third Layer. Don't feel alone, there are others who know, but are afraid to speak directly to the threat, for instance most of the writers, and artists of the super hero comic books know. Their work is largely a symbolic, and metaphoric act of resistance to the multiple layers of menace. Though at the moment it appears passive, they are telling us that it will take the development of super powers within we ordinary Jacks, and Jills to effectively thwart our enemies. Thus we need to pay them their due, and confine our reading to Super Hero Comics. But I digress.
Those who tell you of those existing cabals of The New World Order, are secret agents of the Third Layer. Their warnings of the second layer (New World Order) are simply a smoke screen, an attempt to obfuscate the even greater Third Layer threat. Do not listen to Alex Jones, I repeat do not listen to Alex Jones. His goal is to confuse you, just as it the goal of the other third layer minions. Be on your guard for one, or more of the lesser ones could even appear on these blogs. Be aware that one of their favorite tricks is to convince you that something that makes no sense, is entirely reasonable, and that if you would only try harder, or if you were just a little smarter, you would see the sublime rationality of what they profess.
At this point you are probably thinking just who, or what is this Third Layer? For now it will suffice to tell you that they are not of this world, but have visited this world many times. They became interested in the sentient beings of this planet who in one sense, or another traveled outside earthly boundaries long ago. The Mormon story is a garbled version of the truth of those trips, garbling courtesy of the Third Layer.
I probably should not tell you more at this time. Too much at one time would be such a shock to your systems that you would be in great danger. So for now, be vigilant, consider who might be controlling the New World Order, and why. I think that the fertile minds, and imaginations who are beginning to frequent these blogs will soon understand the greater peril, and share with others.
I must now go to comfort my old friend Oklahoma Reader who is in a dither because he just can't grasp the truth of all the ins, and outs of The New World Order. I think that he may be relieved to hear that it is a smoke screen. I may even share a little more about The Third Layer with him. I don't know if I will be able to communicate further about the menace, they are after me. I may need to go back into hiding. If I can I will send news to you through OKR.
Sincerely,
Penrod Parsimon
DO
Show me where capitalism existed during feudalism -- it didn't.
But we gave it a shot anyway, unproven though it was, and clearly even before feudalism gave way to capitalism, it had advantages over feudalism.
But it was just an economic theory.
Capitalism has clearly failed to adequately answer the 3 societal questions we Economists study. It has failed to adequately address societies needs in terms of Allocation, Technology, and Equity.
Its time we abandon the old broken down system and take a look at what other ways we might address those needs. You know, the same way we tried out capitalism when feudalism was the law of the land -- even though nobody could guarantee capitalism would work adequately?
If you want to see elements of what I have suggested then we can begin with China. A key part of Deng's plan includes 51% ownership of every business in China by the People, collectively -- and that plan is working beyond even Deng's best dreams -- currently far outpacing the American Capitalist approach.
Other elements of a socialist economy can be seen in the World's top 2 economies -- Norway and Sweden -- both of which have incorporated such things as co-ops into their systems. However, having mixed capitalist/socialist economies we still see that old vestige of capitalism, taxes, still being used in those countries. However, its used to re-distribute wealth to the People and is doing so spectacularly. Compare that to the broken economy of the USA.
Modern socialist theory is young and has yet to see full implimentation in a free and open society under a democratic government which is the only way any socialist system can be successful. However, As Dr, Wolff points out the idea of co-ops is alive and well in Silicone Valley and by merely extending the same tax and legal benefits to co-ops that we allow for corporations we could easily already be utilizing the 2 systems concurrently. If we like the socialist approach, we can try to elect a majority in Congress who support such an approach and expand it.
The idea of overnight revolutions is a thing of the past mate. Modern socialism is a system that develops slowly over time just as capitalism did when feudalism was all the rage.
But one thing is for sure, capitalism is not working and we need a whole New Deal mate.
Why Anti-Depressants Don't Work & How We Can Heal Ourselves
http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/the-truth-abo...
"Taxes are unnecessary in a socialist economy because the People own the means of production and distribution and thus benefit directly from the profits. Perhaps you should go back and read my synopsis again. - Posted by news across on Sat, Mar 30, 2013, at 9:42 PM
Perhaps you should read my question again. Where is the empirical evidence that your 'theory' has ever worked, anywhere? This is Missouri, mate. Show me, or it's not true.
DO
I thought we were discussing Economic Theory.
After all, I am an Economist. Its my thing.
We have the empirical evidence of what happens in guided and unguided capitalist systems -- see crash of 2008 for more on this.
Ya know the funny thing is that the Feudalists said the same nonsense about capitalism. But change things did. Captitalism was a step -- a small step -- in the right direction, after all anything is better than being a serf directly, literally, physically owned by the local rich guy, but it has some serious problems not the least of which is the 5-6 year boom-to-bust cycle, its sensitivity to decreasing consumption, its failure to equitably distribute goods and services to all the members of the society, as well as its tendency to concentrate the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the very richest in said economy.
Capitalism does not work well, but we will save that discussion for another time mate.
However the Economic Theory I partially described, Modern Democratic Socialism, is an entirely different matter.
Take taxes for example:
Taxes are unnecessary in a socialist economy because the People own the means of production and distribution and thus benefit directly from the profits.
Perhaps you should go back and read my synopsis again.
News:"Taxes are not necessary with a socialist economy."
I didn't know.. can you tell us where this is working?
Schism "I don't understand what you are saying here. I implied just being older does not make you wiser."
Read it slower?
{Wisdom generally tracks age, but it's such a rarity these days it's more like, 'we may be gettin' older, but we ain't gettin' better.'}
"If just growing older made you wise, our government has laws about age."
Now that, I don't understand.. laws against wisdom in old age?
"If older people were more wise than we simply pick the age where people make the best decisions and that's our leaders. I don't believe that is what wisdom is."
That would surely be better than now, thinking we are 'choosing leaders' with our Diebold black box voting machines. Vote rigging with paper ballots was so much classier..
DO
Laugh away mate, it remains true. Taxes are not necessary with a socialist economy.
Its a whole other economic system mate.
You might even want to learn something about it sometime.
"And hey DO, here is something you might like, under socialism there are no taxes. There are no income taxes, no sales taxes, no real estate taxes, ect. Socialism is designed to be tax-free." Posted by news across on Sat, Mar 30, 2013, at 1:15 AM
You are a laugh a minute, News. Keep 'em coming!
"How come we can't trust our peers but we believe the lies fed through corporate media?"
"Peers" on the internet are fictitious cartoon characters, while the corporate media talking muppets have nice hair. Why wouldn't people trust them?
ND,
I think that Korean kid is just crazy enough to launch. If he launches a nuke on South Korea it too will be shot down. But what happens after that? Korean War II?
DARPA can intersect an aircraft anywhere in the United States in less than 10 minutes, except for September 11, 2001 when it took over 80 minutes because the government was running simulations that day that involved terrorists high jacking planes and flying them into building. The dispatchers didn't know what was real and what was practice.
My logic is explained in the religion forum.
You don't have to believe in religion to be effected by those who do. We all know a family of converted Jews control the finances of the world. Controlling the finances is controlling the world.
We know the American media lies, could that be why Fox is reported that North Korea is backing down on television? Does someone tell them what to report?
For all we know Kim Jong Un and the rest of the Rothschild's tools can be sitting in fallout shelters built by the American government to protect the American government. The ISS would hold thousands of people and for all the people know there may be something larger sitting in space we don't see. Not everyone has telescopes powerful enough to see certain things and even if I came to this forum and reported seeing something I would undoubtedly be ridiculed for my lack of credibility.
How come we can't trust our peers but we believe the lies fed through corporate media?
Any disaster would be the perfect opportunity to move in and set up the fema camps for a New World Order the United States presidents can be quoted speaking of for over 30 years.
schism369
I think the Army can shoot down his missiles moments from take off.
These systems have come a long way since the first Gulf War when we placed patriot missile systems in Israel. it was a new frontier especially since the patriot system was not originally developed to shoot down missiles but rather to shoot down much slower aircraft. Never the less, the system performed well given its shortcomings and it spurred a whole new area of research. all that is primative, ancient history relative to what they have developed since then. They will shoot his missiles down.
The bigger question is, then what do we do?
"It was probably egged on my the media so people would ignore logic and reason at this moment."
Bad wording. It could have been the media proliferating rumors, is what I meant to suggest.
North Korea has officially declared nuclear war on the US and South Korea.
The 31st is a traditional American holiday and there are conspiracy theories revolved around the numbers in our calendar that I believe have relevance. Not like Y2K or 2012, that was mass hysteria. Any reasonable person knew the world wouldn't end on those dates for the reasons people claimed. It was probably egged on my the media so people would ignore logic and reason at this moment.
I feel that nothing you have to do for the next two days is more important than spending time with people you love. If I'm wrong, we have enjoyed quality time, I want to be wrong. :'(
http://www.news.com.au/world-news/asia/g...
http://rt.com/news/north-korea-vicious-c...
http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflic...
http://www.businessinsider.com/north-kor...
DO
In a Marxist system the banks are owned and controlled by the People -- not just 1 primary stockholder or just 1 family of primary stockholders. The People, jointly, have far different motivations and goals than do the rich fat cat bankers in a private banking system.
In regard to modern Democratic-Socialism, some economists (such as Richard Wolff -- with whom I concur) have suggested the replacement of corporations with cooperatives jointly owned by the People and the employees of that co-op. The corporate structure would remain but the board of directors would be elected by the employees -- the only stockholders.
Of course, there are some areas where direct ownership by the People is far more efficient and automatically directs profits to the public use -- rather than helping a gazillionaire buy that new mega-yacht. Areas such as energy, something that goes directly to national security because it is so necessary in our society, should be nationalized. Finance, oil production, medical care, all should be nationalized as soon as possible.
But there is no reason that most of the goods and services available in our society today could not continue to be made available through the co-op process just as it is done today by privately held corporations, but with the exception that the benefits go to the employees of the co-op and the People and there are no private owners.
By going to direct employee ownership but keeping the corporate-type operational structure, we keep intact, and utilize more efficiently, important economic forces we typically associate with capitalism, such as competition and synergy, but the profits are directed to the employees of that co-op and to the People for public use (think free, widely available, public mass trans for everybody as just 1 possible example -- said public benefit being whatever the People decide it should be through a democratically elected government).
Competition for customers within a particular market would help keep prices stable and still retain the limiting effects of Price Elasticity of Demand. Efficient, effectively operated co-ops would be rewarded with more sales and higher profits, and yes, conversely, inefficiently and ineffectively operated co-ops would go out of business -- contributing to an economy which would move constantly towards more and more efficient, and less costly, systems, contributing to an overall increase in supply and downward pressure on price. In fact, employees of a co-op would be very motivated toward efficient production and operation since their jobs and their profits would be directly tied to the success of the co-op in its particular market.
Motivated workers would also compete for the better paying jobs at successful co-ops ensuring efficient, effective allocation of labor as well as increasing productivity.
Under socialism, the employees would decide through democratic process who would manage the co-op with periodic elections held at pre-determined dates. The employees would decide what would happen to their portion of the profits. This may be a direct payout in cash or a partial pay out in cash and maybe a new employee break room complete with hot spa and swimming pool (just as an example of 1 possibility).
And hey DO, here is something you might like, under socialism there are no taxes. There are no income taxes, no sales taxes, no real estate taxes, ect. Socialism is designed to be tax-free.
Or panic rooms in your mattress. :(
http://www.businessinsider.com/north-kor...
I wonder when they are going to start making mattresses with built in safes?
http://truth-out.org/news/item/15401-it-...
["If wisdom was purely the result of age, there would exist no problems in the world today."
Well that's quite a leap. Wisdom generally tracks age, but it's such a rarity these days it's more like, 'we may be gettin' older, but we ain't gettin' better.']
I don't understand what you are saying here. I implied just being older does not make you wiser. What you experience, how you reflect and apply what you learn from the reflection is how you develop wisdom. If just growing older made you wise, our government has laws about age. If older people were more wise than we simply pick the age where people make the best decisions and that's our leaders. I don't believe that is what wisdom is.
NanaDot,
Everything that exists is mathematical. Just because we don't know the equations yet, they are there.
Illogical mathematics are called paradoxes.
Schism: "Do, Your argument is invalid."
What argument?
"... after you clearly schooled me."
If you are referring to my last comments, they were just comments. Don't take them as an attempt to school you.
"If wisdom was purely the result of age, there would exist no problems in the world today."
Well that's quite a leap. Wisdom generally tracks age, but it's such a rarity these days it's more like, 'we may be gettin' older, but we ain't gettin' better.'
It's past bedtime for this old buzzard. Maybe when I wake up the worlds problems will all be solved. Nite..
"after you clearly schooled me"
I meant to say he not you.
My point being you are telling me how the world is because of how people are.
Weeks ago I would have responded to attacks on my ideas the same way you have. You choose the way you feel. You do that by learning to control your emotions. I did that by reading about Buddhism: a pacifist philosophy, Taoism: a philosophy of balance and self-preservation and Hinduism: because I understand scientific theory to support my interpretations of their beliefs. Combined with the ideas I've learned from reading Islam and Christianity that inspire me to share my spiritual enlightenment with everyone. I'm not suggesting a religious belief in God. I'm suggesting an educational solution for the control of emotions and developing the ability to understand others. I feel that if more people work toward the same mentality, we won't be the people so many stereotype us to be.
Furthermore, the belief structure I am building for myself does not violate the majority of religious doctrine. Unless they are truly ignorant to the point of WBC. :)
Do,
Your argument is invalid. In the religion thread I projected an idea that I had no evidence to support. I believe it is right. News believes I am wrong based on his knowledge. He provided a resource to help me learn more about what he knows so that I may evaluate what I think I know and present a better solution. I will work on that and thanked him for his support, after you clearly schooled me.
I didn't get upset because someone thinks I am wrong and has more evidence to support their argument. I believe after I learn what he knows, if I again present my idea with more understanding and a better explanation, he will be more inclined to discuss my ideas due to my lack of aggression.
If wisdom was purely the result of age, there would exist no problems in the world today.
NanaDot,
Thank you. I know my posts can be overwhelming to some. I don't know what others know compared to myself so I typically try to project with the assumption my audience knows nothing I do. I don't want to persuade anyone to believe what I think is right and wrong. My morals are based on my experience of the world. I simply want to encourage critical thinking and independent research from ALL points of view so the world can be better for my family. So my daughter will have a world to grow up in with the opportunity to do anything she pleases rather than the conformed slavery we are indoctrinated to. It is my belief, based on my experiences and observation of others, that what I think would help a vast majority of our planet as well.
Schism: "your negativity and accumulated responses creates a situation for sociological observation."
My sociological observations began long before you were born. I've observed that each generation believes themselves to be the one that is 'special' in the grand scheme of things, unknowing that they are programmed to come up with answers and solutions provided by an unseen guiding hand.
"Take time to reflect and understand the progress you made thus far and what other's have done better, and what each of us can do to move this discussion to a more productive tone that offers examples to problems and logical solutions, while educating our peers."
I doubt if anyone is going to educate anyone, here. On the internet, everyone is an expert in most things, already. This is our programming. We know everything and we know nothing. Sorry I can't put a positive spin on that.
I agree with some of your concepts, but..
"I said the ponzi scheme would last a lot longer if we printed the funny money ourselves instead of allowing private bankers to "create" money out of thin air as debt."
Your argument still appears contradictory to me.
Why does it matter who prints fake money as long as we are using fake money?
Use a fake money system to build a new world that creates a free healthy environment for all life on Earth. Once that's built everyone will have everything they need. When it's done you retire to a life of learning, exploring, teaching and loving so we develop the mindset to sustain that world that will constantly improve.
Guns won't need to be taken away from anyone. When no one has need for a gun anymore, reasonable people will put them away.
Crime is almost completely eliminated. If you don't have to compete to receive what our technology can provide, you would have no reason rob and steal.
Eliminating greed will limit the medical field to people who choose that profession because they want to help others, not collect a paycheck.
When a healthy intelligent doctor with no desire for money treats a sick person their focus is the health of the patient, not whether the patient can pay or insurance will cover them.
I would propose sending the Corporations from the higher developed countries into third world nations. We can generate income for our people to continue to survive while helping those who need it most.
Then, or at the same time even, we build up our homes so we can do the same. We could transition the entire world within a few years.
People have all the right to choose what they want in life. If some don't want to participate they are free to continue the proven failed systems in place now outside our new cities.
You can better convince people what's best for them by showing them it works, rather than sticking a gun in their face and forcing them to submit.
NanaDot,
For clarity, please remember what the science of Economics is:
Economics is a specialized field of Sociology where we study 3 human behaviors:
1.) Allocation of goods and services -- how we as a society decided what package of goods and services we want in our society.
2.) Technology -- how we will produce that package of goods and services.
3.) Equity -- how we will distribute these goods and services.
Currently there are 3 major Economic Theories:
A.) Guided Captitalism
1.) Neoclassical (unproven, failed to meet its predictions) (IE: so-called "trickle-down," aka Reaganism)
2.) Keynesian
B.) Marxism/socialism
C.) Unguided Capitalism:
Classical
An old, Economic model that is what is commonly known as "Free-Market" but better known to Economists as Classical Theory (disproved hypothesis) -- a failed hypothesis not used since the 19th Century which resulted in mass poverty in the USA and Europe and is in use today in places like Haiti, Mexico, and the Philippines.
By the way, the Tea Party is endorsing the bringing back of the Classical approach.
Do,
You make points that I do agree with. I think people will be more inclined to listen to you if you can find a more assertive method to express your ideas while being a lot less negative.
All input is valuable, your negativity and accumulated responses creates a situation for sociological observation. Take time to reflect and understand the progress you made thus far and what other's have done better, and what each of us can do to move this discussion to a more productive tone that offers examples to problems and logical solutions, while educating our peers.
Schism: "DO, I can not agree with your suggested solution."
I don't think "solution" was ever mentioned. I said the ponzi scheme would last a lot longer if we printed the funny money ourselves instead of allowing private bankers to "create" money out of thin air as debt.
Newsacross: "Actually, its banks who create money."
Yes. Thanks for confirming what three people have stated. And the crime is that our money is created out of thin air as debt, and paid back to private bankers,(Federal Reserve) that really have no skin in the game.
The "Federal Reserve" is neither Federal nor are there any reserves. The ponzi scheme is a hundred years old this year and we seem to be in the end game of final plunder and collapse.
The bankers create debt, wars, starvation and enslavement. Capitalism or Communism, the bankers are still in control. We are dumbed down and lied to. I feel sorry for the younger generations that are born into our idiocracy. We are stupid pawns in an old game that we can't understand.
DO,
I can not agree with your suggested solution. You are going to replace a corrupt capitalist system with a different capitalist system that could be easily corrupted.
I understood your posts to be that of an open-minded conspiracy theorist taking on the man who is trying create a one world government; however, at the same time you speak solutions that are similar to Hitler's.
"We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency [backed by] gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done or goods produced. . . .we laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank."
- Adolf Hitler, quoted in "Hitler's Monetary System," www.rense.com, citing C. C. Veith, Citadels of Chaos (Meador, 1949)
What you speak is also not possible because of the world wide economy. Our system has enslaved every country in the world that has resources American corporations desire.
They do this by forcing other countries to borrow money from American banks; forcing them to give that money to American corporations to rebuild their country into a "Great FREE" nation like the United States.
That works too, until a nationalist comes along defending the people. Then we send in the tanks and rebuild the government ourselves.
That is why Iraq is such a great tourist attraction after we murdered Saddam for breaking laws we created after the crimes he allegedly committed.
Before anyone gets offended at that comment you have to look at all points of view. Saddam's regime had an internal religious conflict. Two opposing religious groups killing each other over primitive beliefs. No different than a Judeo-Christian U.S. and Isreal killing off Muslims in record numbers while actually convincing most of you it's their fault.
Most American's seem to be of the opinion that only American life matters, you don't care about the hundreds of thousands of innocent children being murdered world wide by OUR MILITARY!! because of a greed pursuit of resources.
How could we allow this country's morals to degrade to the point someone walks into a school and shoots 20 children?
Maybe it's because you didn't value human life enough that you allowed your government to force it's military, which is comprised of our brothers and sisters, to murder innocent people all over the world.
No matter how you twist an argument, these are disagreeing people murdering each other for unnecessary reasons, period.
This is happening in Venezuela right now, as that country sits on the currently known largest oil reserve in the world. That's why our media hated Hugo Chavez so much, he wouldn't let us steal their oil for our benefit.
When that country is led by someone who cares about the well being of his people over unnecessary profits, we have conflict and need a reason to send in the military.
Do we have reason to think Venezuela has WMDs?
No, the American people wouldn't fall for that trick again; but now that Hugo Chavez is dead, America is supporting a capitalist political party to control their country. When Chavez death was announced to the public, Henrique Capriles, the American backed candidate, wasn't in his country dealing with the tragedy of the people's dead leader, he was having business meetings in New York. That's where he stayed.
Now we are sending America jobs to Brazil, in the middle of an ALLEGED economic crisis.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/...
Why is the government spending more money to outsource a contract to Brazil when we need to fix America so bad?
By boosting Brazil's economy with a hefty American contract, the capitalist candidate can tell the people "look what the US is doing for our neighbor, we could have those jobs and all that money too!"
Capitalism was a necessary step. It produced tremendous progress through the industrial revolution; but this type of system will always create desire under any form of government, from fascism to anarchy. Desire causes a quest for power and material possessions. This is what led to a society of brain washed to think the purpose of life is: get a job, make as much money as you can, buy a house and fill it full of expensive crap.
I'll repost: http://youtu.be/Bgr7uFmncpI
Final thought of that video:
"I have no notions of a perfect society. I don't know what that means. I know we can do much better than what we've got. I'm no Utopian. I'm not a humanist that would like to see everybody living in warmth and harmony. I know that if we don't live that way, we'll kill each other and destroy the Earth." -Jacque Fresco
There is nothing that stops any possibility in that video except the coveting of money. I am speaking of the next step in the evolution of humanity.
"You don't need a formal conspiracy when interests converge. The owners of this country went to the same universities and fraternities, there on the same boards of directors, they belong to the same country clubs, they have like interests, they don't need to call a meeting because they know what is good for them...and they are getting it. There used to be seven oil companies, there are now three...it will soon be two. The things that matter in this country have been reduced in choice, there are two political parties, there are a handful insurance companies, there are six or seven information centers...but if you want a bagel there are 23 flavors because you have the illusion of choice. You don't get the real important choices, you have no freedom of choice."
- George Carlin.
Of course our means of exchange could just as well be sea shells with a hole drilled in 'em. Its really what ever we say it is. But the laws of Economics apply no matter what the currency is.
Our current economic problems tie directly to the changes made under Reagan and imperialism.
There has been no increase in real wages in America in over 30 years. Under Reaganism, (utilizing Neoclassical Economic hypothesis as his guide) we stopped taxing the rich, for all intents and purposes, and then borrowed the money from the rich instead.
In addition to all that, America is busy bullying other countries, committing genocide, and in the process wasting trillions of the tax payers' hard earned tax dollars on their pointless imperialism.
In the end America shot its economy, its reputation, and its principles.
Now the chickens have come home to roost.
"Socialist Hippie Executed"
http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3luqp...
DO
Actually, its banks who create money.
Printed money, or as we know it in Economics, Money 1, makes up a very small percentage of money in the system.
The rest is on paper, mate (Money 2, Money 3) and its created by banking.
"Whether a bank invents fictional money or the government does it, it's still fictional money."
I believe Nana is correct: IE: If we printed our own money, commodity backed or not, we would not be in this private banker fueled inflationary disaster that we now suffer. Our own fiat currency would be infinitely better than the private globalist bankers printing money out of thin air and charging us interest on something that they have no skin in..
If money was printed by us, for us, we could either charge interest, or not. If there was interest, we would be paying it to ourselves and the ponzi scheme could last a whole lot longer..
All money systems are based on faith, and headline news.. the world is losing faith. The engineered collapse continues. Smart money is getting out.
Since we live in a society obsessed with worship, here's a list of famous people telling you that bankers suck. I believe there are quotes from the bankers saying they are screwing you and don't care.
http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money...
NA,
This is the kind of article I start with. A conspiracy as large as global domination over the course of centuries is not going to have all the evidence summed up in one article. This one does a good job and cites many sources for further reading. This is information I've already read in other places and understood to be legitimate, the timeline helped place it all in order.
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2010/07/19/...
NanaDot,
I didn't explain what I meant by "lower the bar". I refer to programs like OSHA. If everyone was equally educated there is no need to waste time and resources creating who agencies to govern laws and rules that tell people "if you put your hand in that gear, it's going to hurt your hand."
I've worked in many factories, companies like OSHA and USDA are unnecessary in a moral, intelligent society. I understand we don't have that now and I'm not saying shut them down today. I'm saying we need to focus on fixing the underlying problems, the lack of morals and proper education so we don't have to make government programs to compensate for stupidity.
If our education system wasn't bad enough, we have groups of people trying to introduce ideas like "Intelligent Design" to replace accepted theories. These people are so uneducated they don't understand evolution; so they just assume it's not true and blame it on their misinterpretations of the bible. They also don't understand the difference between a theory and a hypothesis. Due to their own insecurities they believe this is an attack on their faith and want everyone's children to be indoctrinated into their ignorance.
This is plainly religious intrusion on government. If you can't tax the church, the church does not get an opinion. Whether it's coming from the church or you are doing it for them.
So WHY are these people even getting attention?
I would almost believe there is a conspiracy to keep the American people uneducated, maybe simple minded people do what their told and don't ask questions about anything?
I don't think you understand what fiat currency is. As long as we don't have resources backing the currency it is a fiat currency. The gold standard was abolished during the Nixon administration after FDR's administration stole it all from the people 30 years earlier. The federal government robbed the American people on threat of prison, put their property in a vault, then 30 years later pretended it doesn't exist.
Whether a bank invents fictional money or the government does it, it's still fictional money.
Simple explanation with equation. For everyone $1 the federal reserve creates at the governments request, the government agrees to pay back $1 plus interest. That interest doesn't exist yet; so for the government to pay back the loan the Fed must create more money to do it. 1=1+x? It is a system designed to funnel money upward and it was done intentional over time. Bankers are can be linked to the Revolutionary War, War of 1812, Civil war, the JFK assassination, the list can go on.
I was impressed with how Iceland handled their revolution. The people stood in front of parliament and banged pots and pans with wooden spoons until the government agreed to meet their demands. That is a felony in the United States, up to 10 years in prison http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/11..., and if you read my earlier post you already know they can then strip your citizenship for protesting the government now you're a terrorist that can be detained indefinitely.
You think they won't do it just because they can?
What I proposed was transitioning society from the greed and corruption causing capitalist economy to a system where everything is readily provided. We have the technology to do that, and not over night. The resources and skills needed to build these self-sustained city's would create jobs and stimulate the end of our capitalist economy. So quality of life will begin to improve as we transition.
http://youtu.be/Bgr7uFmncpI
This isn't 'communist' Russia where socialism was projected as an intro communism, but government never stepped down. What I am offering is a republic, under the current Constitution. A peaceful revolution into a better world.
http://venusproject.org/mission.html
I think you have misread what I said about the second amendment.
"no public outcry when the government stripped the rest of the Constitution"
I was trying to make the same point you are, the other amendments are gone and no one cared. They did not think any of it mattered until "DEY TUK ERR GERNS?!!?!" http://youtu.be/768h3Tz4Qik?t=20s
:D
I haven't read any of those people, but I will make note to do it now. :)
NA,
I believe you are educated on lies about the history of America. Not something I can cite one or two articles to validate my claims. You know what you've been told and I know what I've found from researching beyond mainstream history while keeping an open mind. History was written by conquerors and has been and is being manipulated now. http://www.americanprogressaction.org/is...
This article claims the price of gas in 2001 averaged $1.46. I started driving in 2001 and I remember paying $.99 a gallon before September 11, I can't cite my memory for you.
You appear, to me, to be somewhat of a conformist, but an educated, strong minded person, nonetheless; I don't foresee us agreeing on what truly happened during the last 250 years of American history.
Posted by NanaDot Mar 28, 2013: "First, the legislatures don't make laws to 'lower the bar'"
Well actually that isn't technically true and Schism, really didn't make that assertion anyway.
There are many ways the "bar" is lowered to dumb the citizenry down. In nomenclature popular here, empirical evidence points largely to the Federal Department of Education, dumbing our children down.
"Our fiat currency has about sunk us... the only way out is for the government to print their own money,"
Now you are just stepping on Bugs Bunny's toes. Next you will be saying that Keynesian economics may have something to do with our (engineered) economy. Keep it up and 'News' may quit the blogs again. Everybody (?) knows that to get out of the latest/greatest recession we have to print more money and throw it to the winds.(bankers)
It looks to me that you just uncovered the veiled truth that the central banks are privately owned by globalist whose intent is to systematically bankrupt the country (the world) while they convert, printed out of thin air, fiat money into real assets in order to control and enslave the world.
"strictly regulate the banks, put the thieves in prison,"
Crazy talk..
Oh btw, my last comment was in response to Schism.
You said,
"What I propose is not 'giving up' on current society. The United States Constitution defines a republic. Small local governments, states making their own rules, and the federal government having very limited power."
Actually, the Constitution you refer to, the Articles of Confederation, was scraped and replace with our current Constitution which establishes much stronger centrally controlled government.
You will find our new Constitution here:
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
In addition, the issue of decentalized vs centralized government was further dealt with and resolved by the Civil War.
In fact the entire reason our Founding Fathers tossed out the old constitution and replaced it with a much stronger centrally controlled construct is because decentralized government was unworkable.
DO,
The empty opinions of other conservatives regarding Marxism posted on conservative conspiracy theory websites, Marxism being one of the many things conservatives are often unable to even define, does not lend any credibility to your argument.
schism,I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but in my opinion, you do have an out look on things that makes a lot of sense, if you think about it! I'm not one too think any of us can go against the establishment in any significant way,regardless how much we would like! The establishment is here and is not going to give up power of the way things are done! We are NO different than any of the Middle East Countries,because that kind of action is whats going to change things here, if we could begin the process of not being so Intellectual & Civil we can rid ourselves of all the crazies running thing! This Country set a trend of thing too come when they didn't do Bush & Company the same as Husseini & Gaddafi for killing our Brave Men & Women!!! Fair, & just is what this Country is suppose to be,but think again! None of whats happening makes any sense,too me! This is a statment not for debate! Right and Wrong,simple as that!
Another thing ...
Why don't we quit "thinking outside of the box" - or coloring outside the lines - and just get rid of the boxes and lines all together? We don't need lines and boxes just because "The Man" says we do. (At least the boxes they use.) The boxes and lines established in the Constituion will suffice.
gb
DO and Schism -
Great stuff ... I've been saying all along just what Schism added today. And there's more of that stuff happening every day. Too many people just trying to get by or to keep up with their lifestyles to take notice, or even care.
Thanks for posting - and welcome to the fray.
gb
Welcome Schism! A breath of fresh air! I am blown away. Thank you for jumping in.
You undoubtedly know this but be prepared to be attacked for thoughts outside the box. I tip my hat to you sir, for the cogent discussion you bring.
Mass awareness to what is really happening is the first step to surviving the engineered situation we find ourselves.
CM,
What I propose is not 'giving up' on current society. The United States Constitution defines a republic. Small local governments, states making their own rules, and the federal government having very limited power.
If you desire to rule over other people it's just another example of the failure in the current system. If we had a society that solved the root problems; poverty, food and fresh water, housing for all, education, and healthcare there'd be little reason left for crime, or unnecessary rules. Intelligent people do not need companies like OSHA to violate laws of nature. In nature stupid people would eliminate themselves. In society, we intentional lower the bar on education so we become more ignorant with each generation. Then make up rules because we have conditioned people not to think about what they are doing. They we tell these people they are equal and should vote about things they don't understand because we allow them to continue in life with no education.
Intelligent healthy people who are not conditioned to compete for money and power would evolve beyond the primitive social behaviors like jealousy, greed, and intolerance. That's not theory, there are many peaceful cultures. Plastic America has caused our moral collapse.
Conditioning and conformity teaches our children not to think for themselves. That life is about going to school, getting a job, buying as much **** as we can to max out our debt so we can spend our lives making a small group of people rich before we die. Do you not understand how that's slavery? Instead of having to cloth and feed you they figured out how to make you do it yourself and still not have any control over your life. No choice in any important decision that effects you. You have the illusion of choice in an illusion of reality.
Elimination of capitalism would not be done instantly. The process or building this ideal city would generate revenue and jobs. After everything is completed only a small portion of the population would be needed on an engineering level.
The government is a reflection of the people. People hold the true power in numbers. The government manipulates the ignorance of the masses to turn the public against one another over trivial matters to distract us from important issues.
People are arguing about the right to own a gun? That's a Constitutional right, period. No fine print or interpretation. 2nd amendment allow people the strength to protect themselves from government; but there was no public outcry when the government stripped the rest of the Constitution after murdering innocent American so the confused people would allow them to start an unprovoked war which murder's thousands of innocent people world wide.
I shouldn't have to cite information on 9/11. If you don't believe it was a false flag operation, the only evidence you could have seen was whatever the government controlled media told you.
Capitalism is destroying our planet. As long as the economy is completely depending on oil there is no hope of a bright future. Cancer rates will continue to increase from the continuous consumption of oil based products added to food. There is nothing about this world that is driving in a positive direction.
There truly is only two options. Mass enlightenment, or we will extinguish the human race and destroy this planet in the next 50 years.
Editor:
"Debate over what qualifies as legitimate subject of debate in these forums is an occasional subject. So far, no one participant's ruling on what qualifies has been enforced, and the prevailing consensus suggests atheism is a worthy topic."
The debate, on my part, was a response to unsupported accusations that comments I had posted were against posting guidelines. This accusation was not true at all and no evidence was presented to back up the accusations.
My comments were to point out the hypocrisy of the unfounded accusation. Posts were made by others, of a sexual content, in the Religious blog. These inappropriate posts would have embarrassed my Grandmother.
Again, my comments were to point out the hypocrisy, and not involve the Editor in some kind of 'turf war'. Thank you Mr. Crump, for your attention and response.
'News' wrote:"Yeah rich capitalists around the World would like to control the World. So you oppose global capitalism. Great. So do I. So did Vladimir Lenin. What is your point"
The start of Communism was funded by robber Barron bankers. http://www.thehiddenevil.com/communists....
http://www.xat.org/xat/worldbank.html
Author Gary Allen gives his explanation:
"If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth programme, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs.
Communism or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite." Gary Allen, Author
http://www.savethemales.ca/000843.html
The purpose of the New World Order is the same as Communism. The Illuminati created Communism as a means to flout God's will and enslave mankind. Karl Marx was hired to sell totalitarian rule ("the dictatorship of the proletariat") by pretending to espouse equality. He was a Satanist as were Trotsky, Lenin and Stalin.
In his book, Marx and Satan (1986) Richard Wurmbrand illustrates Marx`s true hatred of God and humanity. As early as 1848, Marx wrote about a "coming world war" that will eliminate "riffraff" like Russians, Czechs and Croats.
"The coming world war will cause not only reactionary classes and dynasties, but also entire reactionary peoples, to disappear from the face of the earth. And that will be progress...the revolution...cares as little about the human lives it destroys...as an earthquake cares about the houses it ravages. Classes and races that are too weak to dominate the new conditions...will be defeated...their very name will vanish." (42)
In his poem Human Pride Marx writes that he will "wander Godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world... I will feel equal to the Creator."(31)
Far from champion of the working class, Marx was a police spy. In 1960, the Austrian Chancellor Raabe gave Khrushchev an original letter by Marx proving the "founder of Communism" informed on other revolutionaries. (33)
The reason only 13 of the 100 Volumes of Marx's writings have been published is to hide the true character of Communism. (32)
THEY HATE THE GOD IN YOU
Wurmbrand, a pastor who was imprisoned in Romania, says Communism is in essence Satanism empowered. Christians weren't just brutally persecuted and murdered, they were made to blaspheme. Communism's goal, the goal of the New World Order, is to mock God and to praise Lucifer. A Communist newspaper confessed,"We fight against God: To snatch believers from him."(77)
- See more at: http://www.savethemales.ca/000305.html#s...
"Kentucky Democrats may overturn governor's veto of 'religious freedom' bill (UPDATED)"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/26/ke...
Kentucky, where the Democrats are almost as crazy as the Republicans.
CM,
As always, great analysis mate. Well done indeed my friend, well done indeed.
Schism369, that is one impressive manfesto. Nicely done from the standpoint of letting us know how you feel.
Not saying I agree with everything, as I am not quite ready to give up on the society we are currently wrestling with, but I share your sentiments to a certain degree.
I definitely don't trust large media corporations today. Seems they all have an agenda other than providing content or entertainment. Combine that with our "Department of Homeland Security" and right-wing zeal run amok, and it makes me shiver like a Jewish person in 1940 Germany.
Sadly, the "Occupy Wall Street" movement was right, corporate greed and influence, combined with massive concentration of wealth at the top of the capitalist pyramid scheme, are ruining the American dream for most folks. However, Corporate America, with help from the media and many of our democratically elected politicians, managed to turn public opinion of Occupy Wall Street into a joke.
God Bless America when we brand ideas like a desire for economic fairness, equality, and opportunity as foolish and unrealistic.
Additionally, on another subject, I am ready to join up with the utopian citadel clan.
I just have one request, that I am in charge. I mean, from my perspective, it won't be utopia unless I get to be king. And as long as everyone thinks the same way I do, life will be great.
What? You say that your clan should be in charge? Well, them's fightin' words right there.
(Thus endeth my lesson in what's wrong with utopian thinking and where the idea of strong centralized representative government was born.)
Hey OKR,
Did you ever know Tom Butterfield before you left Marshall?
I knew him when I was a kid. My Grandmother always liked Tom, and I had friends that lived out at the Boys Ranch. So I would go out there and visit with my pals and I got to know Tom a little bit more each time I went out there. He was a very good person. He really cared about those fellas out there and every one of them called him "Dad." He was always kind to me and he always treated me like a member of his very big family every time I was visiting. I think of him every now and then. Though not originally a native of Marshall, he still was definitely one of Marshall's best citizens and a man to be admired.
It's going to take time for me to read all that's been discussed so I may enter the conversation properly; in the mean time I wish share something that weighs heavy on my mind.
During summer of 2012 my residence used Windjammer Cable for our ISP. To my knowledge, my only options at my address for high speed internet is the local cable and AT&T, but AT&T only offers me DSL.
Sometime in the fall of 2012, I have a horrible sense of time, without any notice of explanation, Windjammer became Zito Media. One month we received a bill from Windjammer, a couple months later we received a bill from Zito Media saying we owed them money since they now own Windjammer.
Due to mistrust of politicians and corporations, I felt the need to investigate this company. Earlier on, all I could find was a billing address for a corporate office in Pennsylvania. Google Earth shows, what appears to be, a few small buildings in the middle of nowhere.
Does that seem logical for a company that claims to service 16+ states? I don't know I've never ran a corporation before.
Zito Media was founded by the Rigas family, at least the ones who are not in prison. This is the same family who founded Adelphia media. You may not remember, or ever heard of, the scandal that surrounds that corporation that was the 5th largest communication companies before filing bankruptcy in 2002, that's what independent research is for, wikipedia lacks citations about this topic.
I have read that some believe this family's act of fraud, that some of them were tried and convicted for, created the ripple effect that led to the 2008 economic collapse. You didn't hear much about it in the mainstream media, because their trial was happening the same time the world focused on Enron.
On the afternoon of March 23, 2013, many residents around the Marshall and Slater area, that I know of, lost their connection to the internet...or so they thought. I had already been complaining about my internet connection since the 21st, but Zito would give no explanation for the interruptions. When I contacted technical support on March 24, at 5:40am per my phone log, at least 12 hours after the internet connection had been lost, they still had no explanation for the issue and said it would be fixed when they fixed it.
I demanded an explanation! if I'm paying for a service, I have a right to receive the service I am promised; or a reasonable explanation as to why I can't be provided said service. Zito Media contacted me at 1:08pm to notify me the problem was a result of a cut cable and would be fixed as soon as possible.
What bothers me about this explanation is the inconsistency with the other companies. I know not if MMU lost service for any customers, but I know AT&T had the same problems at the same time; and they were telling their customers it was a result of the storm, that had yet to hit the state of Missouri when service was lost Saturday. Other's were told their hardware was the issue.
AT&T uses proprietary hardware, to use their service you must pay to own their equipment. My company allows the use of generic modem and router that anyone can buy at Walmart.
When this cable was allegedly cut, my generic equipment did not disconnect from the internet. I could not transfer data using a game console, cell phone, or traditional web browsers connected through my modem.
I could use a program developed by the United States Navy, used by undercover operatives, citizens who value privacy, and the hacker organization known as Anonymous, to access the web around an ISPs surveillance. This is a similar scenario as described in Syria: http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/30/tech/web/s... and Egypt: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast...
This is the type of activity one would expect if the company was responsible for DNS hijacking. By the time I returned home to test this theory early Monday morning the issue was resolved... until hours later when I lost connection again for a few hours. This time they blamed my equipment. After I power cycled my system, which had already been done before calling, everything worked...until later that night, then the next morning, then the next night, but that was routine maintenance. Here it is Thursday 28th, I still experience the same problem they say doesn't exist.
People think that to believe a conspiracy you must be crazy, that's exactly what everyone has been told to believe so why wouldn't you?
If you were attending a daycare and a 3 year old child was trying to explain something you didn't think was possible, you would most likely disregard their elucidation, what does a 3 year old know? But if an 5 - 3 year old children begin telling you the same story you now have reason to believe there is credibility.
It may not seem important to worry about what one telecommunications corporation in central Missouri is doing, but what about 2 or 3?
What about the money trails that link this corporation to the same people who can be linked to Monsanto, ExxonMobile, the Fed, the World bank?
What about FM 3-39.40? http://info.publicintelligence.net/USArm...
Why is the federal government creating documents for the event of a disaster that say YOU and YOUR FAMILY, MY FAMILY will be put into a camp for our own protection against our will with the authorization to use deadly force if you resist? If you want to choose you own fate and take you life in your own hands, isn't that what freedom is? It is the government's responsibility to protect the people they are intended to represent.
Not make escape plans to protect themselves and enslave the survivors of a disaster, man-made or natural. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuity_...
and the NDAA? and the Patriot Act?
The monetary links between the campaign contributions from select Corporations and the politicians who voted to pass these legislations?
Or congress trying to pass a bill that gives the President the authority to strip your citizenship so the NDAA can now be applied to YOU who "use" to be a UNITED STATES CITIZEN?! http://www.aclu.org/national-security/me...
Why don't all of you realize this?
Why are people worried about losing the 2nd amendment when the rest of the Constitution has already been violated?
Why are more people not discussing this?
Now that freedom of speech is a felony, http://reason.com/blog/2012/03/01/bill-p... & http://rt.com/usa/348-act-tresspass-buil... how much longer before I'll be silenced? Terrorist is a losely defined word the government uses to describe anyone who works against THEIR interest. All someone has to do is make a call and I'm no longer a US citizen. I'll can be arrested without warrant or explanation, imprisoned forever, or executed without a trial; and that is legal under this government. I can lose my citizenship and be labeled a terrorist because I wrote this post. I don't believe the Federal government has any power outside the Constitution, and that excludes tampering they added through amendments and executive orders.
This isn't one administration. These are steps that took decades to put in place. It doesn't have to happen next week, but it could.
Do I sound like a terrorist? Does it appear that I want anything negative for anyone? Except for the wealthy capitalist bankers who enslaved you, but I don't feel it's negative that they learn you deserve to be as equally happy as they are.
I love and value ALL life. It is time the American people understand the role they are given in the republic, not democracy, that was defined in the Constitution.
We can fix poverty, homelessness, corruption, greed, crime, disease. All gone by eliminating the desire for evil: authority and capitalism. Government is a public service position. The founding father's were volunteer's who truly understand freedom.
We now have the technology to apply their intent and truly free humanity. We have the knowledge to develop unlimited renewable energy everywhere on the planet. Check out LENR, tidal energy, geothermal energy, solar, wind, "free" energy.
That would allow oceans to be desalinated, filtered, and irrigated anywhere on land so that water is a nearly unlimited resource. Automated machinery is already integrated into a large, and increasing, portion of the work force. Machines can repair other machines and fully automated mass public transit systems can be fully deployed eliminating traffic fatalities and pollution.
Few workers, engineers to monitor systems, and everything provided because of unlimited energy and resources.
Now humanity can do what nature intended. LEARN. About anything and everything, EXPLORE. Everything and everywhere.
This is not an impossible dream, the only person stopping it is each one of you. We organize one town. We combine our talents, skills and resources to create a self-sufficient city, Utopia. The success would spreads to another, and another. We educate and show people that the world can and will be better for all of us.
We know the problems, we have a strategy, we only need to implement and only YOU can prevent, why would you want to?
DO,
I had a look at the website you linked to.
Yeah rich capitalists around the World would like to control the World.
I hope you don't think that is a new problem.
After all, capitalism is not much more than semi-evolved feudalism.
So you oppose global capitalism. Great. So do I. So did Vladimir Lenin. It looks like you are in good company.
So what's your point mate?
Oklahoma Reader, you've asked my opinion for an answer to something other than global communism.
A basic answer can easily be found at this link. The web site is easy to navigate, it's short, sweet and to the point. The best part is that you don't have to hear it from me and I don't have to engage in endless typing. Ask questions or voice disagreements if you like.
http://globalistagenda.org/index.htm
Evenin' News, evenin' Slater if you are still around. Wonder if Nana is gonna join us on the old porch this evenin', or any of them other good folks like SD, RT, IT, GB, rr, Jason, and the rest of 'em.
Reckon they might not considerin' that smell comin' from down around the bridge, think I heared some weird sound down that way a bit ago too. Don't think it amounted to much at all.
Pleasant evenin' all 'n' all. ;)
Tromp, tromp, tromp, ahhh how nice it is to cross this bridge impervious to any toothless troll that may be lurking 'neath at its dank, and dark base.
Oklahoma Reader, Mar 27, 2013: "You have over, and over asserted that there is something hallowed about the religion blog as is exemplified by the above quote. Rubbish! It is not a church, nor The Christian blog, It is not a Christian Church. It is a blog with far more general intent."
It's a blog intended for religious issues. Things you posted were rude, crude and something that would have embarrassed my Grandmother. .
OKR:"If that is what you want then take a hike somewhere else, and find it."
It's not "what I want". Please read the posting guidelines and then explain how your postings apply. Atheism is not a religion.
Hey DO,
FYI, I have been friends with OKR as well as many other commenters on this blog -- including reasonable, sincere conservatives from the other side of the aisle -- for quite a few years now.
OKR and I have had differences of opinion in the past, as have ND and me, as have Slater and me, as have RR and me, as have Jason and me, and as have many commenters and me, but that does not make me their enemy and they know that. It just means we disagree on a particular issue and as usual, we tend to just agree to disagree in the end.
But I think in your case you are a little bit like an electron -- nowhere and everywhere all at the same time.
Troll to your heart's content mate. Its as pointless as it is meaningless.
One last salvo DO; I don't treat everyone as I do you DO...wow I just noticed that's a lot of DO in one sentence. It is my practice to return serve with the same heat that the serve has. You might want to start duckin'.:)
Naw, not really, I'm done for the night. In fact I may just not ever say anything to you again. See how fast I learn your little tricks? ROTFLMAO (figuratively)
Don't bite Slater. LOL
"You wouldn't just blurt those out in church, would you? In addition, you wouldn't go into a Christian church, declare yourself an atheist/communist/gun grabber, and start proselytizing Buddhism, would ya? But you did that here, in the Religious blog."-DO
My, my tro...I mean DO aren't we the sanctimonius one tonight? Could it be...SATAN?
You have over, and over asserted that there is something hallowed about the religion blog as is exemplified by the above quote.
Rubbish! It is not a church, nor The Christian blog, It is not a Christian Church. It is a blog with far more general intent.
If that is what you want then take a hike somewhere else, and find it. You have no friends here for you have offended every one that has offered friendship. You are pegged DO, and thus done here beyond being temporarily toyed with when posters are seeking simple amusement to relieve boredom.
GET THE BEHIND ME!
ROTFLMAO x 2, before you ask, figuratively, I wouldn't lift a finger on your account, let alone roll on the floor.
Good night DO, you have now completed your mission, appearing, only to confirm what we have been saying. Oh yes, and thanks for the simple amusement.
My Grandmother would be ashamed of a lot of things I've read here, but not anything I have written.
Slater, you are as clear as mud on specifics. What exactly are you having a problem with in my postings?
Well, I see DO is here. DO, while I'm around, let me offer an explanation for my post from the other day.
Every last person in is subject to being ignorant of the rules, since the stated rules are not all inclusive. As the newest posting member, you were victimized, and my PSA (think of it as one, in a manner of speaking) did little to further your edification. I see that News provided an overview of Editor Crump's changes, so I'll thank News for lending a hand.
All of us do try to obey, but fail from time to time. Eric is a fair-minded person and lets us slide, as long as we don't take advantage of his good nature, both in what we talk about and how we talk to each other. Denigrating fellow posters is a sure road to ruin, because Eric monitors these forums. He's a busy man, but sooner or later he gets around to checking up on us, and anyone who can't or won't conform will be tossed. It's that simple.
News and I have had our skirmishes, but we now co-exist, and that's a relief to Eric. He really doesn't like having to be a bad guy, but he's very capable.
So, now you've been properly apprised and should be able to keep out of harm's way.
Hey! Any cartoon characters in here? :)
Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Tue, Mar 26, 2013, "Well, the evidence is accumulating that DO is in fact an internet troll,"
Reader, You are making an unsupported assertion. Bugs Bunny doesn't like that.
But it was a bold move on your part to bring up the definition of troll. Funny... bold is often unaccompanied by wisdom and you might have left yours at home..
Explain how a self declared atheist isn't being a troll when he posts 'nasty old man' stuff on a religious blog? Save the sexual exploits for the beer joint.. You wouldn't just blurt those out in church, would you? In addition, you wouldn't go into a Christian church, declare yourself an atheist/communist/gun grabber, and start proselytizing Buddhism, would ya? But you did that here, in the Religious blog.
Looks like trolling like that has essentially rendered the blog useless for those in the community that would enjoy it, for what it was designed. Shame on you and your "team".
Please explain how my postings are trolling and yours are not.
"Welfare Caddies?"
They're back?
Wow! I want to get one of those and given the low, low, low prices in America right now I should be able to get one for peanuts.
OKR,
Oh yeah Jason is good people.
So is rr.
I have no problem with legitimate conservatives. I may disagree with them on the issues but I respect the fact that they are true believers who sincerely love our Nation.
But trolls have no such commitment to America or to any principles beyond that of disruption for their own, personal amusement.
The thought occurs to me that the "Welfare Cadillacs" were consigned to the junk yard of history a long time ago, but have been retrieved by a million desperate souls who have lost their economic security, and are in panicky need of any available ride, no matter that it can take them nowhere. ;)
It is true that rr3 is forthcoming with his own opinions. Thus he has brought more to the blogs than someone whose only contribution (if one may even call it contribution) is to disparage the content of others comments without providing any alternative opinion.
Jason also speaks his own opinions, and is getting better at doing it.
The thought occurs to me that Jason, and rr3 have been sitting back hoping that DO would be their champion, and would rout their adversaries. They may be even more disappointed than me.
It is becoming obvious that no one's champion is DO. He is just another, albeit unusual, advocate of NO! ;)
Well, the evidence is accumulating that DO is in fact an internet troll, which is, as I previously posted, "In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."
Thus DO has become a huge disappointment. I was looking forward to fresh perspectives, and dialogue concerning them. It is becoming apparent that ain't gonna happen.
I figure that there will be a few more extraneous attacks, and then he will leave his niche neath the bridge, and run away from the three Billy Goats Gruff. He didn't have the fortitude to even butt heads, let alone the wherewithal to devour them.
May he rest in peas where he can nibble at, chew, and digest small things. ;)
Ya know its a darn shame we seem to have run rr off.
I sure do like that fella.
He may be conservative, but at least he would shoot straight with ya and he was never afraid to assert his argument.
Instead nowadays it seems all we get are the temporary commenters who try to speak out of both sides of their mouths.
I sure do miss rr.
Exactly ND,
and that is why I asked him to be more specific.
The low-IQ crowd is smart enough to know the devil is in the details and consequently avoid any specifics.
DO I responded to your question with a counterpoint. Will you now please respond to mine?
If communism is not the answer, considering the context of the conversation up to this point, what is the answer? Libertarianism? If so in what ways? Something else? Surely you hold an opinion that counters your negative response that Communism is not the answer.
Wow Nana the paranoid among us are going to believe we have been conspiring on the telephone as we prepared in collusion each of our last posts. ;)
You asked, "Opposition to communist propaganda is subjective?" DO, DO, DO, of course it may be, but then you know that don't you?
Case in point: A citizen hear's fire brand Joe McCarthy rant about the communist evil that pervades our nation, the citizen has little prior knowlege of communism, but is captured by McCarthy's magnetism. The citizen, without examining pros and cons of the issue, forthwith expresses his subjectively grounded opposition to what he believes is communist propaganda.
Obviously a large portion of our nation was caught up in a subjective frenzy of McCarthyism, and yes a subjective frenzy against what ever they were told was communist propaganda.
OKR,
or Mr. Reader, if I may be so bold, perhaps DO speaks only in generalities because he is skeeeeeeered of the facts and details that make his specific assertions appear unfounded and without merit?
Again DO, "I am especially curious in regard to the sentence, "There is no left and right and communism is not the answer.". You rule out communism, but say nothing in the affirmative as to what is the answer. In your opinion what may that answer be?"
Cut the extraneous DO. I am asking for discourse. Did you not come on this blog for discourse?
About that propaganda thing, could you be more specific please.
Please give us some examples of just specifically what you are referring to.
Otherwise you are just talking in vague generalities that are as meaningless as they are shallow.
"Oklahoma Reader on Sun, Mar 24, "DO I hope you stick around for a while though I haven't yet determined whether you are allied with, or opposed to much of anything other than a few folks whom you emphatically oppose based on your subjective opinion of them."
Opposition to communist propaganda is subjective?
"NanaDot Mar 25, 2013: "So - specifically what DID you mean? And how do you define "good people" that excludes OKR and NA and, presumably, myself? Does your exclusion of 'the team' not thereby imply "bad" by YOUR standards?"
Nana, My musing was 'that good people avoid these blogs' because of several things, not the least, a radical, tag team effort that pushes radical atheistic/communist propaganda.
I never said you were bad.. a bad actor maybe..
The comment was about why others aren't posting. I didn't feel like posting this reply. See?
"Jim Carrey's anti-gun music video: Charlton Heston had an 'itty-bitty gland"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/25/ji...
Jim Carrey at his best!!!
Get that empty jail cell right next to Jesse Jackson Jr. ready to go -- Michell Bachmann is on her way to jail!!
"Report: Federal investigators target Bachmann in ethics probe"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/25/re...
Posted by NanaDot on Sat, Mar 23, 2013,
"Good"??? so whoever agrees with you is 'good' and others are 'bad'??? Because there are not two more disparate thinkers here than OKR and news... and they are both 'bad'??? And don't tell me you 'didn't say that' - your terminology gives the lie. lmao. seriously."
Nana, are you seriously laughing your as off? Butt you're not rolling on the floor??? I didn't say that!
DO you said "Clinton couldn't go after Bush I, Bush II, couldn't go after Clinton, and Obama can't go after Bush II. Both sides are corrupt. Two wings to the same bird. There is no left and right and communism is not the answer. How can one become so old and yet remain so naive?"
I am especially curious in regard to the sentence, "There is no left and right and communism is not the answer.". You rule out communism, but say nothing in the affirmative as to what is the answer. In your opinion what may that answer be?
DO I hope you stick around for a while though I haven't yet determined whether you are allied with, or opposed to much of anything other than a few folks whom you emphatically oppose based on your subjective opinion of them.
You do provoke curiosity, and that is something, at least for a moment.
Wow!!!!
China beats America again!!
Take lessons folks. This is what a First Lady should look like.
Talent, brains, beauty, Wow!!!!!
http://goodguy.hubpages.com/hub/Chinas-N...
http://www.hugchina.com/photos/gallery/5...
"Return of the Dummies"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoIGyoJ5B...
OK, well just one more thing I want to mention then I have things to do.
I noticed DO is referring to OKR as "Reader."
ROTHFLMAO!!!
I take exception to this veiled disrespect directed at Dr. Reader, Mr. Reader, Colonel Reader, or what ever his correct title is.
Calling someone by their last name without including their proper title is just plain ol' bad manners.
Now DO, I know you are probably used to commenting on one of those loose, crazy conservative blogs but we try to have a little more class in this Forum (lol).
I hope to see improvement in the future.
DO,
Did you say I am bad? lol...cool!!!!!!
"Bad like Jessie James"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_ZVrR6lD...
For anyone interested in learning more about the Tea Party, please feel free to click on any of these informative links. I recommend you visit all of them.
"Why Dummies Can't Build a Tea Party Future"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKohsoxqk...
"Tea Party Express II: Rise Of The Tea Bags (Part 1 of 2)"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=end...
"Tea Party Express II: Rise Of The Tea Bags (Part 2 of 2)"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFtvw4pFs...
They were political zombies, among the walking dead.
They inspired a sense of pity more than a sense of dread.
They uttered nothing, for there was nothing to be said.
Yeh, I remember. ;)
Hey OKR,
remember the looks on the faces of the TPs right after the election? You know that dumbfounded look on their faces?
Priceless!!
SOME GOOD ADVICE FOR THE TEA PARTY
Listen mates, I hear it isn't easy going through life when you come from the dumb side of town, or as I like to call it, the "Brian Kilmeade" side of town.
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/210298/thumbs/...
But TPs isn't it time you reconsider your approach?
I mean, look, Fox News is all you have mates. Without them where would you get "news" you actually like?
Anyway, my advice to you TPs is that you click your heels together 3 times and chant,
"BENgHAZI! BENgHAZI! BENgHAZI!
and you will be magically transported to the Con Bubble where its the 1950s again, Jim Crow is alive and well, and Joe McCarthy is rootin' out those evil commies.
At least there you can be happy there.
Yup News, the Tea Party is just a lynch mob searching for a rope. The irony is that the Corporatocracy is furnishing them a rope, but won't turn loose of one end of it until they have been given enough to hang themselves. ;)
DO I wrote a long response to your accusation about atheists stealing the religion blog. I deleted it because I thought you would delight in stirring me up.
Instead I ask that you do your homework by going back, and reading the religion blog since its inception. Note how many times I have brought up, for instance, Taoism, and Buddhism in an attempt to broaden the conversation.
There was little interest in those forms of religion, especially there was a lack of interest by the members of the fundamentalist Christian posting community who see the religion blog solely as an opportunity to proselytize, and condemn to Hell all those who are not like them. That behavior I find repugnant, and have often attacked via reason the simplistic hypocrisy that they espouse, all of which I do in the defense of reason.
"Tea Party group boycotting Fox News for becoming 'too liberal"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/23/te...
I almost died laughing when I read this article.
Seriously, I have learned over the years that the Tea Party is the party of low IQ, but they really have outdone themselves this time 'round.
I wonder if Tea Partiers realize the whole World is laughing at them?
Thanks News :)
By the way DO I do appreciate your sense of humor from time to time. Your remark about owning ten Kuchinich dark blue T-shirts was absolutely hilarious. :)
DO,
Listen mate, imagine you just moved to a small town where everyone has known each other for many years.
You decide to enter the nightly debates that are held in our imaginary town. No body knows you. They all know each other but they have no idea who you are.
You are, in that scenario, an unknown quantity.
While the folks in our imaginary town may be the nicest people in the World, until they know where you stand on issues they may come across as a bit stand-offish.
That is the situation we have here.
So clear up the unknown quantity thing mate. How do you vote? What is your political ideology?
Introduce yourself mate and you may find us all a lot friendlier.
OH and DO,
OKR was referring to a RR wannabe who made a nonsensical, ignorant redneck statements in another forum.
You can read his comment here:
http://www.marshallnews.com/story/195240...
"Christian" hypocrites, and internet trolls are two categories that come immediately to mind DO. By "Christian" hypocrites I mean those who scorn the poor, ignoring the primary instructions of Jesus. By internet trolls I mean, "In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion." But then you already knew that, and just really enjoy baiting me, and others, right? LOL
I may have further reply to your recent statements if I determine it isn't a waste of my time, or if I feel like playing the game you have brought with you to the blogs.
Oh yes, one other thing as you apparently suffer from hard of reading, which is akin to hard of hearing. Once again, thank you for your benevolent response to the issues facing my son.
DO,
It sounds like you are making a mountain out of a molehill to me mate.
"By the way I saw your response to the rr replica. That probably isn't fair to rr3 to call this guy a replica. This jerk oozes hatred, and its companion ignorance. Anyway, I think we at times make a darn good tag team in response to the haters.-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Sat, Mar 23, 2013, at 11:05 AM
Reader, you have such a way with words but how many can read your code? Please explain the comments you make, above. What and who are you talking about? Why and who, are you calling "haters"?
"I have been meaning to ask you, what is your connection to Marshall, and/or Saline County? Have you some connection, or have you just been roaming the low lands, and swamps of the internet, deciding to stop here for spite, or respite?"-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Mar 21, 2013, at 1:32 PM
We are all in a state of respite on this earth, Reader. If there is need to declare a purpose here, mine would be to gauge the level of geo-political awareness in this place I grew up. So far, it's not so encouraging. It might be that people of good sense, and lives to live, avoid public comment on these blogs because of the thugery here. Just this morning, you seem to brag about your "tag team" efforts against others. (Religious blog)
Things your "team" write turn good people off. It's no wonder that just a few people are conversing here. Many threads really are quite cartoonish if not downright disturbing.
I tried to speak to you as a fellow human being the other night. So much for that. I may leave here too.
"Texas takes step toward secession with Rick Perry's plan to hoard gold"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/22/te...
Sow the wind - reap the whirlwind ...
Well news -
As far as I know I am of European lineage.
However, there may be a little Cherokee on my mother's side of the family tree.
That said - I agree whole-heartedly about the government needing to apologize to the First Americans for all of the crimes brought against them - now and in the past.
gb
He is one of my heroes OKR.
He has my vote anytime he wants it mate.
"Icelandic bankers jailed for reckless loans made before crash"
http://www.independent.ie/business/world...
Recently DO indirectly asked me to comment on the situation in Cyprus.
My answer is this: Cyprus, Spain, Greece, and Italy should tell the IMF to stick their austerity measures, cancel the debt, withdraw from the EU, issue their own currency, and increase the taxes on the rich significantly making all earnings by their citizens -- inside or outside of their country -- taxable.
That is what Iceland did and now their Economy is one of the fastest growing economies in the World.
And now they have put the bankers in prison where they belong.
Cyprus should follow Iceland's lead.
There was a man who asked to be our President, he was not allowed to tell us why.I doubt that citizens would have listened, had he been allowed to inform us. Perhaps he is just too good for us.
Just for a moment, imagine that he, by some miracle had been elected President in 2008, then imagine his words, at the following link, had been his inaugaral address. Then come back to reality and agonize at what we have received instead. Here is my all time favorite presidential candidate. http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/15193-...
On the vet situation,
the VA is suffering from years of cut-backs which are directly or indirectly related to the continuing American austerity measures. There is nothing new about the ongoing budget cuts and nothing new about cutting programs such as the VA Benefits -- and in fact, they plan to do a lot more cutting in the future.
I think what surprises folks -- especially the folks who support such austerity measures -- is that yeah, it means you will be cut off from a benefit you may be qualified for now.
Just take a look at Congressional deficit-cutting plans on the table right now. Paul Ryan's plan proposes to eliminate Medicare as it is now for anyone under age 56 and replace it with a voucher which is predicted to fall far short of the actual cost of insurance premiums.
Look at what they have suggested for Social Security, eliminating Social Security for anyone under age 55 and replacing it with a 401K-type of market account.
And there will be a lot more cuts too.
As long as the President continues caving in to the Tea Party Crazies' demands that we cut government to the bone, more and more people will find themselves doing with far less government benefit programs.
And after all, that is exactly what the Tea Party wants. However, I am not sure how long those folks will be around after all the cuts begin to become reality for most Americans.
OKR,
There is a solution to that problem -- mass immigration.
The USA could increase the annual immigration rate substantially and even gear it specifically for well-trained, certified tradies and professionals who are under a specific age. There are plenty of young folks out there in Asia, Africa, South America and Europe who would just love to emigrate to the USA. We could have significantly more young people than boomers anytime we want. All we have to do is increase our annual immigration limits and promote programs designed to encourage easy immigration to the USA.
The only thing stopping us is us.
"Nearly a million vets wait for benefits"
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-new...
The wait period from filing until completion is two years in some high population areas.
All this, and the graying of the baby boomers together. How will we deal with it?
Will the generation that includes today's teenagers out of necessity become known as the Caretaker Generation?
I hear the vets are a bit upset about some of the deficit reduction cuts Congress has passed over the last few years.
Don't the vets understand that cutting the deficit is the most important thing we can do?
Don't the vets understand that we all have to tighten our belts in order to cut the deficit?
If we don't reduce the deficit, the rich folks might not loan the government more money and they might not create any jobs.
I sure wish some of our conservatives could explain it to these vets, 'cause they don't seem to "get it."
"Judge: Louisiana law banning felons from owning guns is unconstitutional"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/21/ju...
http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2...
ROTFLMA!!!!
gentle ben
Well mate, they did it. I guess I could have left that fact out of there but why should I?
The funny part is that even though its the conservatives who do that bad deed, its always the left-wing that has to apologize for what the conservatives did.
Anyway, be sure and tell Obama the next time you see him that we First Americans wouldn't mind hearing an apology from the US government for European-Americans stealing our land, murdering our people, and waging a war of genocide against us. It would also be nice if the descendants of the Europeans would leave our country as soon as possible.
Thanks mate!
That's what I like about you news - no matter what the crime or indiscretion, you always have the conservatives - American, Australian, or "long ago"ians ...to blame. It's as if left leaning folks were always on the right side, etc.
gb
gentle ben
Yep they sure did!!
Australia was a mighty conservative place back then and yeah, along with the USA, they have done some real nasty things.
Heck you should read about what they did to the First Australians (massacres, genocide just to name a couple of things.)
Of course that doesn't make me proud of them nor does America make me proud when she does evil things.
I am sure that you and me would sure like to see both these nations start behaving like civilized countries, eh mate?
But of course, unlike the USA, at least the Australian government has apologized for what the conservatives did back then. That's a lot more than we Americans have ever gotten from the USA, eh mate?
Hey Y'all ...
What's this I hear about the Aussie government taking babies away from single moms following World War II and all the way up till the early 70s? Surely that can't be true ... (note: this is a serious question and not meant to start an argument)
gb
South Carolina Senator Tom Davis has sponsored the Liberty Preservation Act to nullify the National Defense Authorization Act.
The bill addresses the fact that "Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 purports to assert the President's authority to not only arrest suspected terrorists, but also to determine whether a trial, including the type of trial, will be held for those arrested;" and that "Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 requires detention without trial by the military for a certain class of terrorist and authorizes, but does not require, the same for citizens of the United States."
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/sc-int...
Las Vegas to Introduce Anti-NDAA Resolution
The fight against indefinite military detention continues. Yesterday, the Las Vegas City Council and the Clark County Commission drafted anti-NDAA legislation to protect the Constitutional rights of their constituents.
http://pandaunite.org/ndaa-las-vegas-to-...
New Hampshire House Passes Bill to Block NDAA Indefinite Detention
http://spreadlibertynews.com/new-hampshi...
Oh and that reminds me of an interesting question:
Where in the 2nd Amendment does it say we can't prohibit the manufacture or import of firearms?
Folks can certainly keep the firearms they have or sell them. Other folks can buy them. And the 2nd Amendment remains unbruised.
Perhaps we have simply been going at this all wrong.
We should leave the gun owner alone, but prohibit the manufacture or importation of any more guns.
"Universal Background Checks Threaten Gun Industry Profits, So They Have to Go"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/20/un...
The way I see it, if we wanted to reduce the number of widgets in our society then we would reduce or eliminate widget production entirely. It works the same way with firearms. Get rid of the production of firearms and we won't have so many little angels being butchered by maniacs with easily obtained firearms because there won't be any firearms.
Of course logical solutions have no bearing on the American argument. After all, when have we ever let a thing like logic get in our National way? Instead, the NRA and the Republican Party/Tea Party fascists prefer to go the opposite direction, insisting on wild-west type laws that result in more and more mass murders.
I guess in the end its a matter of what is more important...more rednecks clinging to their Bibles and guns or less babies being slaughtered in the classroom?
From here it seems to appears that America prefers the Bibles and guns option.
Thanks all, no time to write more now. :)
That sounds like good stuff ND.
However, if one is having a difficult time getting to sleep, I recommend the BBQ ribs.
Ya know good BBQ ribs over an open fire can be a great natural medicine too.
OKR, Remember that wood burning grill I purchased awhile back? I made ribs this afternoon, yeah slabs of pork ribs over an open wood fire with my own special recipe BBQ sauce.
I was eating my first slab when I saw this bright light at the end of a tunnel and I heard a voice say "come on in, rest a spell," and I asked where I am? The voice replied, "you are in BBQ Heaven."
and believe me, I was definitely there!!
News belly full o' BBQ.
News growing sleepy....
(lol)
I also donated to Kuchinich, no one else.
By the way, I do not personally take any prescription medications, and never have, excepting short course antibiotics about five, or six times in my life. I did take marijuana for chronic pain long ago, and have used it for a couple of other things. I consider it a miracle herb, and would use it again if my long resolved chronic pain returned.
So, we are far from a family of pill heads, I despise all pain pills, and don't even take ibuprofen, nor aspirin.
I say all this so you will better understand where I come from regarding pharmaceuticals, another head of that hydra that you spoke of. ;)
I donated a little to Dennis Kucinich for 2008 and a little bit more for Ron Paul. The dirty system chewed them both up but they both left their marks.
Today, a few pols are attempting to make their marks in the footsteps of Ron Paul, but there doesn't seem to be much in the following of Dennis K.... I'm wearing a DK* T-shirt right now and I'm tardy off to bed.
*I've got ten, in navy blue
Our problem DO is that he is in another state where he has two kids, he is non-custodial, but will not leave them.
I will check out the Ca Bentonite clay, etc.
I don't want to say much more on this blog as it is an invasion of his privacy, and believe it or not there are more than a few who read here who know exactly who I am. :)
Democrat is not a synonym for liberal, any more than Republican is a synonym for conservative. True practicing conservatives, and liberals are distinct minorities these days.
In the 2008 Democratic primary election campaign the only true liberal on the stage was Dennis Kuchinich. He was ignored.
In the 2012 Republican Primary Ron Paul was the only person approximating any old style conservative values. He was ignored.
The rest, from both parties were corporatist to the core.
Just be very careful and very very slow in weaning off of psych medications. A stupid pill pusher family quack set me up on some of that crap about 10 years ago and it took me a couple years to slowly wean off and I was only on one. Coming off these things is very dangerous.
Some of the best detox, and the cheapest, would be calcium bentonite clay and activated charcoal.
http://www.naturalnews.com/025854_clay_b...
http://naturalsociety.com/food-grade-act...
Good clean greens, cruciferous vegetables and a lot of sunshine is a good prescription. Lots of clean non-toxic water to flush the system. I'm just tossing out a good base to start from. It tears me up to see what the puppeteers do to our children.
http://www.naturalnews.com/cruciferous_v...
DO my son is NOT taking the regimen of drugs as prescribed. I, and his mother have counter-counseled him. As to his contamination there is nothing we can do except continue to love him, and be there for him. Obviously I have a very angry heavy heart.
Thank you for your benevolent response.
Bread and circus for the masses. We are so dumbed down. Recruiters is sharp uniforms troll the public indoctrination centers for kids that can't find a decent job. War propaganda, video games, toxins for the body and mind. Fodder for the machine.
We are paying for our own destruction and the neocons are just one head of the hydra. There is no left or right to the machine. It's the top and the bottom and we are the bottom. Hillary Clinton and Obama are war demons. Where are the "loyal" lefties protesting this? Obama says he can kill whomever he wants and the character named "News" defends it.
People need to wake up. Globalist bankers have mounted a takeover of the world and our expert economist hasn't said a word. Most everything crazy is a distraction for their criminal takeover. Wars are to wind us up and run us down.
Banks are taking peoples' savings in Cyprus as a beta test to see if they can get away with it. Does the economist defend this, also?
I'm sorry to hear that, OKR. Bad drugs are all the VA is going to do for him. Once on them, you can't get off. They will layer one brand on top of another. Your step-son will be denied his Second Amendment rights and cops will 'alert' on him in a negative fashion.
As his health deteriorates from all the toxin exposure and he develops a multitude of ailments, the VA will label him crazy and give him more drugs.
I'm no expert but the biggest thing you can do for him is detox his system and get real/clean nutrition/superfoods in him. The crazy meds are really hard to get off of. They have to be carefully weaned. Going cold turkey is very dangerous. Don't do it.
DO we can't expect people to give a darn about all the suicides, they don't even care anymore about the more dramatic deaths in Afghanistan (twelve more of those forgotten ones listed on the PBS evening news tonight).
Most folks haven't thought about it, or spoken about it since the main stream news stopped regular mention of it, and then the yellow ribbons stuck on cars faded, fell apart, and fell off. That was the end of the wars as far as most people are concerned.
If you mention it a standard come back is "well they volunteered for it". I'll give the neocons one thing, they are shrewd connivers.
First they make sure that there aren't enough decent jobs for young undereducated folks, and then they lure them into the service promising to educate them, and pay a "living" (macabre use of that word) wage. Artful Recruiters seem to some of them to be the only ones that have cared about them for a long time. Volunteers? More like a last chance to make it for many. What a racket by the neocons, all the IED fodder they need, and no one cares about them.
Disgusting, Neocons, and blissful neighbors.
"Psychiatrists are witch doctors with a prescription pad. They treat everything with drugs that make you crazy/suicidal/homicidal. More soldiers are committing suicide than getting killed in our scores of wars. I've met people whose soldier sons have killed themselves."-DO
My step son was "blown up" in Iraq, just got on disability, and of course V. A. treatment. You point about over-prescription is well founded in my opinion. My wife, and I are worried sick about all the meds he is prescribed.
"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOsHLA1CM...
Haven't watched this yet. Don't know if I can stand to watch it. Looks like old news to me. Years too late. The BBC was a tool for war and now they act like they are just finding this stuff out..
-- Posted by DO on Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 11:07 PM"
DO it's just some more of the knowing arrogance exhibited regularly by the puppets of the Corporate Masters. They know well that the masses can't remember their transgressions for more than a few years, if they ever knew. This latest B. S. may be just a trial run to see if the guppies are ready yet for even more revisionism. :)
"There aren't enough psychiatrists around to treat all those people you mentioned; because of their numbers, and because they are treating so many of our mis-used troops for PTSD."-Oklahoma Reader
Psychiatrists are witch doctors with a prescription pad. They treat everything with drugs that make you crazy/suicidal/homicidal. More soldiers are committing suicide than getting killed in our scores of wars. I've met people whose soldier sons have killed themselves. I had a returned soldier renting from me that killed himself.
Big pharma and their fascist partners in the government want ALL the kids on this crap. A big percentage are.. unqualified teachers are now able to designate children to be drugged in THAT prison system..
Add in all the other toxins being forced on us and no wonder people can't even react to the President going dictator drone/murderer.. everyone is living in LALA land. Everyone is their own cartoon character. Liberals/socialist good.. conservatives/fascist bad.
2+2=5
I suppose you were referring to ScaredyCat's comment DO, because you knew exactly what I was talking about in my comment you just quoted.
I didn't understand ScaredyCat's comment either.
"I like the little comments like that one you made DO. We obviously don't need to check to see if you stole them from someone else."
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 11:05 PM
Can some of you attackers please be a little more succinct in your comments so others might attempt to understand what all the jabbering is about?
"The Spies Who Fooled the World"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOsHLA1CM...
Haven't watched this yet. Don't know if I can stand to watch it. Looks like old news to me. Years too late. The BBC was a tool for war and now they act like they are just finding this stuff out..
"I'm being attacked by cartoon characters in the funny papers..
OKR said DO was an acronym for "down under."
What is it now?"
I like the little comments like that one you made DO. We obviously don't need to check to see if you stole them from someone else.
It is nice to see even a few of them come over Countryman, some is better than none.
Those were the angriest days of my life News, even more so than the Gulf of Tonkin/falling dominoes days. Partially because of my chagrin that Viet Nam lessons had been lost even before the participants were a dead generation.
There aren't enough psychiatrists around to treat all those people you mentioned; because of their numbers, and because they are treating so many of our mis-used troops for PTSD.
I'm being attacked by cartoon characters in the funny papers..
"I find it disgusting that you would make use of such an accomplished individual's initials. Especially while portraying to follow such far left ideologies." -- Posted by ScaredyCat on Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 3:24 PM
OKR said DO was an acronym for "down under."
What is it now?
Great video OKR, and it looks like Senator Byrd was correct, again.
I often wonder why the average, mainstream American seems to absolutely love war and violence, but most of all I wonder why they flat-out hate peace.
When one's thinking becomes "War wonderful, Peace bad," then one should not run out and solicit a patriotic ribbon for their car but rather run out and solicit the services of a good psychiatrist.
Here is a five minute speech from the Senate floor by one of the few clear minded ones during the lead up to our effort to invade, and occupy Iraq. It was a breath of fresh air buffering against the stench of ill winds blowing the people of our country right out of their ever lovin' minds.
Some of us had it right from the get go regarding the material folly of the endeavor, to say nothing of the moral folly.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=harr...
"Texas tea party leader promotes Fascist Party as 'pro-Constitution, pro-America"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/19/te...
No surprises there.
DO
I was saying that BEFORE any of these wars were forced upon us by conservatives.
I have always opposed the wars and their "reasons" for the wars.
I have always been critical of the media as well, but I can't analyze what their saying if I don't at least listen to what they have to say before I make my analysis. Otherwise, I would just be walking around blind and trying to describe that elephant without benefit of sight.
When I hear folks who came late to the party, sort-to-speak, warning me to not listen to the media, I always wonder well where were you back in '01,'02,and 03? when we, the loyal left wing opposition -- who staunchly and publicly opposed both the Bush Wars -- could have really used your voice?
And worse yet, the answer, whether they freely admit it or not, is that they were too busy supporting Bush, voting Republican, and cheering on the war at that time.
Hey, y'all. Since I enjoy bashing American Corporate managers, I am including a link to an editorial I read recently that adds some fuel to the fire.
This fellow, Leland Teschler, is normally a heavily right-wing guy. In the past he bashed Occupy Wall Street pretty good. However, it appears he is changing his tune.
http://machinedesign.com/article/living-...
I have had this same point of view regarding big corporations who make the biggest part of their income in America, but do everything they can to not pay taxes and not follow US Government regulations.
I agree with Old Leland (who many of my peers refer to as "the grouchy old man who edits Machine Design magazine) on this one. Companies who wish to sell their goods in the United States better figure out how to manufacture them here. Otherwise I say tax the crap out of them.
Do: i hope your not calling me naive about the Government? I haven't been fooled about the Government since Eisenhower! I've been expressing my distrust in this System for Years! they have it so complicated it's hard for me too keep up! but i have never had the illusion of anyone being Prosecuted for any of the Crimes they have been committing( and there has been many! But hell Bush and Cheney have admitted too their Treasonous acts! This is why i've thought nothing can be changed till the System and conduct in Washington is changed! In my opinion,we need a Socialist Democratic Society of some sort! We need too work together with the World ,not always trying too change a Countries Culture! Keep our nose out of it. We keep sending Money to these Countries and we shouldn't!! When we get our problems workout ,then maybe we can have the respect for what we do for Humanity,other than financing their Rebel takeovers! None of these Politicians care about anything (We the People have too say),and we're their **** Boss,i thought? I've did my duty too this Countries for what i thought was right at that time! That was the time i was naive! And i also think it's a Government Workers Duty too report any wrong doing if they can prove it? And deal with a possible of them taking your life! If you can save a life or stop some sort of tragic thing from happening (YES) iT'S THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN FIGHT BACK! S.O.Bs !!
Darn you! :)
Evenin' ND.
I don't know why I always manage to get myself stirred up at bed time. I guess it must be practice for some last point instruction "do not go gentle into that good night". ;)
And don't forget LBJ's lies about the Gulf of Tonkin as a reason to start the Viet Nam War. While we are at it "Remember the Maine". We have long been a very sick nation.
I will never forget Wolf "The War Pimp" Blitzer during the months leading up to the Iraq invasion.
Every day he had a strange gleam in his eye, and a tense pre-orgasmic tension in his face, that finally disappeared with the release of "Shock and Awe". I think he had been so enraptured by his previous opportunity to roll with "Desert Storm" that he could think of nothing else excepting a possibly greater opportunity to amplify his sick version of Arabian Nights.
To this day I change the channel when his repulsive face pops up anywhere. I reckon you could say I don't care much for him. ;)
Yes, and don't forget Scott Ritter, former U. N. weapons inspector, being shouted down, talked over, and cut off on every darn one of the networks as they beat the drums of war. I will never forget the performance of Wolf "The War Pimp" Blitzer.
They would not listen then, they will not listen now. It is only a matter of time until the smell of blood once again causes America to salivate, and slobber out the words war, war, war where have you been my eternal friend. :(
"I sure am anxious to view the BBC program and find out what the new evidence that confirms the old evidence is."
As you watch it just remember how the BBC helped lie us into a trumped up war. Yellow cake, anyone?
DO,
I realize its easy to miss, but the article does say,
"A special BBC Panorama programme tonight will reveal how British and US intelligence agencies were informed by top sources months before the invasion that Iraq had no active WMD programme, and that the information was not passed to subsequent inquiries."
So I don't know about you, but I sure am anxious to view the BBC program and find out what the new evidence that confirms the old evidence is.
DO
Yes as a matter of fact I do remember that, why?
"New evidence: CIA and MI6 were told before invasion that Iraq had no active WMD"
This would have been new evidence about 7 years ago.
News, are you saying you never heard of this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_St...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Em6pY3Df...
Ray McGovern: "It's there in black and white - The intelligence and facts are being fixed around the policy"
"Selling the Iraq war: Experts knew the intel was faulty. Why didn't they blow the whistle?"
http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/03/18/selling-t...
In fact, maybe we should be putting a number of criminals on trial.
And it presents an interesting question:
Do government employees have a legal obligation to be a whistle-blower when they become aware of unlawful or immoral, secret government action/inaction?
"New evidence: CIA and MI6 were told before invasion that Iraq had no active WMD"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/18/ne...
And remember, its not too late to put Bush on trial for his many crimes.
I may be mistaken but I think I just heard the bark of a dissatisfied dog. ;)
And of course, more false equivalency from DO.
Why am I not surprised?
DO you should work for Fox News where you would fit right in.
Yeah so say you Do...whatever that is worth.
I mean its not like you offer any credible sources to support your claim.
Fortunately, we know its just your empty opinion.
"Good stuff guys!"
Signed, Pavlov.
Jo, the latest puppet can never point fingers at an earlier puppet. You aren't paying attention to who is pulling the strings.
Clinton couldn't go after Bush I, Bush II, couldn't go after Clinton, and Obama can't go after Bush II. Both sides are corrupt. Two wings to the same bird. There is no left and right and communism is not the answer. How can one become so old and yet remain so naive?
Is there anyone on this Blog think ,if Obama & Company had Prosecuted the Bush Regime,would it have changed the way this is all working out??
Good stuff guys!
Smart Dog,
"Tonight on Celebrity Death Match, Karl Rove vs. Sara Palin"
Ummm, which one is the celebrity?
On the GOP,
They have a fairly popular Governor nationally, who is also garnering 70% approval in his home state in Chris Christie, who they did not even invite to their CPAC convention. I don't particularly care for Christie, but he does at least seem to be working for his constituents; and for the CPAC to pick Rand Paul and Sarah Palin over him seems totally suicidal.
Christie was even given an award by the state's teacher's association when a year earlier he was their public enemy.
Come on GOP, at least give lip service to your willingness to change.
You are truly laughingstocks to many many people.
I am not overly proud of the Dems either, but at least they roll out their party favorites. Example; Bill Clinton went to bat for Obama at the convention and during the campaign, and those 2 will never be hanging out together once Obama's term is finished.
Jason,
"You all rag on the 1 percenters but did you know out of every 5 dollars the government 4 dollars come from then.."
If that's the case, they are getting $4.50 out of every $5.00 I spend.
More evidence of the GOP death spiral.
"Tonight on Celebrity Death Match, Karl Rove vs. Sara Palin"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/17...
Hey, at least the cons are entertaining.
On the topic of right-wingers and racism, it certainly appears that the poor old GOP has almost nothing going for it other than the lemmings who will vote GOP even if Ted Nugent is the candidate.
The modern GOP has become a political party with no ideology and reminds me of a little kid who can't seem to focus on anything.
30 years ago they decided to hook up with the fundamentalist Christians in order to win elections. Then they decided to hook up with the NRA to get the redneck vote. Then came pandering to the 1%'ers. Then came adopting the Tea Party. Now they tolerate absolute overt racism in fear of upsetting "the base."
This should give you a clue that the Republican party only cares about two things; winning elections and rewarding donors.
They will adopt any stance they think will win votes and are not ashamed to promote racism, lie, cheat, torture, conduct war for donor profit,and incite disrespect of the president to get it done.
Read up on how many death threats Obama gets daily, and how many plots to assisinate him have been uncovered. You would think there would be a conservative politician somewhere that would denounce these threats and attempts, but nary a word. Wouldn't want to upset 'the base,' eh?
Also, check out what we know about the 2000 election 13 years later, specifically the Florida butterfly ballot, where if you punched out the hole next to Al Gore's name your vote got counted for Pat Buchannan. No kidding. It's fairly obvious what went on when exit polls in specific precints showed a large margin of victory for Gore, yet the final results show Pat Buchannan was apparently very popular among inner city voters. End result, George Bush wins.
The way I was raised, that's election fraud by a corrupt state government in Florida, specifically good old Kathleen Harris, who created the fishy ballot in the first place and then declared George Bush the winner in spite of the recount totals.
It startles me that the GOP has not cleaned it's own house in light of what appears to be a long death spiral of embarassments and mis-steps in the last decade plus three, but when all the folks out there like Jason and RR3 are apparently blind to that stuff, then why should they?
Good links Nana.
So data from the great recession will prove once again that Trickle Down does absolutely nothing for anyone but the rich folks.
The growth in income disparity from 1980 to 2010, during which there were 20 years of neo-con's in the White House, seems to me to prove that the super wealthy drizzling on everyone else is not leading us to a very healthy society or economy.
From one of Nana's links: "The growth in wealth we did see got funneled to the top and it didn't spur faster growth in the middle," Shierholz said.
So to any Tea Partier out there who would like to educate me I have some questions. If we continue down the neo-con path and give even more breaks to the wealthy, how is that sustainable?
Do we keep helping the capitalist system funnel all the wealth to the top elites? How far are you willing to let the middle and lower classes decline? Until everyone is starving or just hungry a lot? Until people are dying in the street, or just until they are really ill? Until most of America can't afford to live indoors, or just until those deemed "undeserving" are out on the street?
It will be a wonderful society when the top 1% have 99.99999% of the wealth (actually, I don't think they are all that far from that right now, then they can just trade their trinkets among themselves and ignore the great unwashed masses.
To learn what history teaches us about what happens next, just study up on the French Revolution, or the Russian October Revolution, or the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Personally, I have no desire to live through one of those.
So once again, cons, I ask. What's your plan to restore moderate wealth to the middle class and restore the American Dream?
If you say "Supply Side Trickle-down Reaganomics" then I would ask "How many years worth of data do you need before you get that it doesn't work, 100?" and we are right back to "here comes the revolution."
That is because they have all the money mate.
Let's just take all their money and put it into health care and direct-hire, government jobs programs.
Frankly, I think we have been way too easy on the rich. Its time for some serious redistribution of wealth in America.
After all, it could be worse for the rich. They could be sitting in a prison cell awaiting their turn on the Guillotine.
You all rag on the 1 percenters but did you know out of every 5 dollars the government 4 dollars come from then..
"Sen. Rand Paul introduces 'fetal personhood' bill to outlaw abortion"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/17/se...
ND,
This whole CPAC thing has been extremely entertaining and enlightening.
Here is another great commentary on the recent big Tea-Party Klan Rally.
"CPAC 2013: Angry and beaten right wingers offer wacky ideas in search for electoral victory"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/16/cp...
ROTFLMAO!!!
That was a great link ND.
It illustrates some of the core beliefs of the Tea Party/Klan, which holds that slavery was good and so was segregation.
Conservatism is a mental illness -- always was, always will be.
SD,
You hit the nail right on the head mate.
Neocons and Tea Partiers want to keep doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Perhaps Paul Krugman said it best when he said there are 2 economic models both of which made predictions ( the Neoclassical, aka "trickle down" and the Keynesian model). One model's predictions never happened (Neoclassical) and the other model's predictions all occurred (Keynesian). Yet despite this fact, the Republicans and Dixiecons keep telling us to try the failed model again and again.
Its time folks like Jason wake up and take a good look at the facts.
Jason
Well maybe it would do those things. Maybe not.
The historical evidence indicates deficit reduction would not have any of those effects you list.
So basically, you can't show us any direct job creation from decreasing the budget or the national debt.
I can easily show you that what your suggesting will cost billions in government jobs -- lost jobs -- lost jobs from the biggest employer in the United States. I can also show you that such massive layoffs can force the economy into a deflationary spiral that will result in even more lost jobs. Further, we know the end result of such fool hardiness -- massive unemployment, massive poverty.
I am afraid you will have to come up with a better plan than that if you want the voters to agree with it.
Everyone does remember that in 2000 George Bush and the neo-cons inherited a budget surplus, and the national debt was going down, right?
Those folks who Jason choses to believe and support managed to turn that into a record level of deficit spending which contributed to the financial collapse of 2007 while they were still in charge of the federal government. What did George and Dick and those loveable neo-cons do in response? Absolutely nothing.
Since Jason is a fan of conspiracy theory, have you considered the possibility that the GOP and it's 1%'er supporters crashed Wall Street purposely as they knew they were going to lose the election?
They hate that little gem of historic data that shows the economy does better during Democratic Administrations than Republican Administrations, but rather than learn from that, they seem hell bent on proving that "Trickle Down" economics works, in spite of the many failures.
I get this mental image of David Koch urinating from his Park Avenue balcony whenever I type "Trickle Down" ever since I saw the documentary 'Park Avenue: Wealth, Power, and the American Dream.'
News, let's not forget Grand Wizard Ted Nugent. Or perhaps a better title would be Tea Party Clown. I'm a gun supporter, but Ted is a dangerous, seditious, (as a former child molester, he may be sadistic as well), egomaniacal, dumb a$$. Ted is a fine example of what's wrong with todays media as they continue to give him a platform to rave from.
Now, on to what I really wanted to say.
Jason, I admire your ability to conjure up correlations from thin air. So you really think that poverty among black urban folks is intentionally orchestrated by liberals who want to keep them poor for political gain?
Whew, that's a good one.
And of course, the reciprocal would be that the GOP is all for reducing poverty and creating opportunity for poor folks. Yeah, that's it.
Sadly historical voting records in the House and Senate pretty much annhilate that possibility.
What color is the sky in that Tea Party Neo-con world?
I would agree with you that there are waaaay too many people on the public dole, but the solution is to create a healthy economy where there is a job available for everyone who is able and to improve the quality of public education so they are worth hiring.
Sociology tells us that there will always be dregs in any society. Even those high performing Norwegians have a derelict portion of their citizenry. Addicts seem to be a permanent part of modern life, and there is a portion who are not mentally or physically able to contribute. So what are we to do, just go ahead and off them if they are not "contributors?"
As men like Lyndon Johnson and Franklin Roosevelt told us, the true measure of a great society is not how well off those at the top are, but how we treat those at the bottom.
Additionally, we have to stop rewarding American companies who take their jobs overseas for cheap labor and move their headquarters overseas to not pay taxes. Jason, wouldn't it make those corporations who have moved off shore to avoid paying taxes part of Mitt Romney's 47% of deadbeats who are not contributing?
I have to admit, that right there was what made Mitt such a hypocrite. I believe he was heavily involved in such tax avoidance and job killing activities throughout his Wall Street career yet he chose to demonize folks who are not contributing. What a putz.
You know those formerly American corporations who moved off shore to avoid paying taxes but still do business in the USA are using our public infrastructure to peddle their wares to folks who are eking out a living here in the US. An interesting facet of this trend comes from Henry Ford, who taught mass production industries that the very folks who make your product need to be able to afford that product or you won't sell enough to be profitable.
How is off-shoring and lowering the income and standard of living of Americans going to be sustainable for those former American companies when no one can afford their products? I think there is another lesson here in why business must be regulated, otherwise it destroys it's self.
Wait, their logic must be something like, "to heck with America, the country that made us the rich fat cats that we are in the first place, we'll just sell our stuff to whoever comes along with the money."
Everyone does realize that corporate tax rates are the lowest they have been in about 90 years,yet these greedy d-bags still don't want to pay their fair share to help support America's Federal Government.
Let's not forget, our Supreme Court says they have the same rights as individuals, but I guess they don't have to follow the same rules as the rest of us.
Less money spent on the interest of debt could be spent on other things.. It would free up 250 billion every year of no interest payments in 4 years that would be 1 trillion. We could invest that money in proven economic programs. If we had less debt we as a nation would have a better chance of having foreign investment in the USA.
From the "ya think?" category: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...
and Jason,
yeah there is a lot of blame to go around for past evils, but my tentative project is only focusing on the Tea Party, aka the Dixiecons, aka the Dixiecrats, aka the confederacy, aka primarily Southern, conservative, Christian red-neck racists, and their Tea Party Grand Wizards.
I will let you worry about those long-dead, ancient Democrats.
Jason,
Please explain to us how reducing debt increases employment.
Evenin' ND. :)
I would say a racist democrat that has some influence or power is more of a threat than David Duke. Recent example, Brown, Bill Clinton's former drug czar and Democrat mayor of Houston, engaged in racist campaigning designed to suppress Hispanic voter turnout during his 2001 reelection bid. Brown faced challenger Orlando Sanchez, a Hispanic Republican who drew heavy support from the Hispanic community during the general election.
The liberals don't think we have a debt crisis our President is on record with that he is also on record for saying W was irresponisible for increasing the debt by 4 trillion but he is not for adding 6 trillion, Obama said we don't have to worry about that for 10 years our debt..
The Dems in the senate are about to propose a budget that increase spending by 61 percent this is projected to add another 10 trillion indebt. Increase taxes by 1.6 trillion that means they can't get all that from the upper class so they will be going after the middle class. I say that soon we will have spent ourselves.
A person who would want to destroy our country would make sure there was big division in our country and weaken our Military I say Obama is doing that.
The late Senator Byrd was a KKK member where is your outrage for that and as far as David Duke he is not a leader of the Tea Party. Tea party are not racists I say that progressive liberals are. And here is why the love the fact the urban core is poor that is most of their voting black and they love the fact that un employement is at all time high with African Americans because that feeds into their insane logic if you keep people down and out and feel like they need the government then they will vote for you...
Thanks ND,
so what do you think of my potential new project?
OKR,
Just to give you an idea of that kind of Tea Party leadership I am referring to, the following would be a good example of what you might find in the "D" section of the book:
"David Duke: Tea Party leader, former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard,...."
Then of course followed by links such as this:
http://www.davidduke.com/?p=17873
I hope that gives you an idea of what I have in mind. Now imagine all the Tea Party Grand Wizards listed in alphabetical order and links to their personal and public histories/biographies.
Hey OKR,
I have been considering a new project -- identifying the Grand Wizard of every county Tea Party in the USA.
It may prove to be an interesting list.
There are a lot of counties in the USA, so it would take awhile to compile, but I think it would help folks in their local area identify with their neighbors in their own local Tea Party, and what better way to start than knowing who the local Tea Party Grand Wizard is?
What ya think?
"Let The Good Times Roll"
Louis Jordan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdQJ3Q0uh...
and stating facts is not a meltdown. Its a statement of facts.
but heck, call it whatever you want mate lol.
Lol...oh don't worry DO,
been there done that.
I've been posting in this forum for a long, long time mate.
Every now and again its good to get away for a few days and then come back revitalized, refreshed, and ready!
And yeah I am anxiously looking forward to reading and responding to your future comments mate.
Feel free to quote me on that.
And hey, here is a song you might like.
"Everyday I Have The Blues"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy_H-1J4x...
Memphis Slim
filmed in July, 1962
Yeah, the best thing you can do after that mindful meltdown is to ignore the obvious and get right along with all the 'uppity' you can muster.
"Yeah I am back and yep, I am uppity!!!"
-- Posted by news across on Sat, Mar 16, 2013, at 4:57 PM
Just think what a change it would be to have an Honest voting System? Plenty of time too Vote, One Man one woman Vote,a 51% Majority? That's just one simple step! And cut in half ,our Representatives,Senators,Congress,and their staff,And another J.EDGER HOOVER TO WATCH THEM!There many things like this? We just need the will too do it! I also want to say this.Maybe i'm taking this a little to far (so my wife says)but Friday I ask my wife's therapist to leave my house,because my Grand-Daughter asked why he didn't vote for Obama, he said he didn't like his Politic like a 4 Year old would do.I was in the other Room and heard it! It ****** me off, so i told him too get the hell out!I didn't like the way he said it.He was shocked, and my Wife was Embarrassed! So we have too get a new Therapist!
Yeah I am back and yep,
I am uppity!!!
News Across, Glad to see you back my friend! Yes we have Elections (BUT) Its a long time before you can get rid of them! The average Person can't or won't research their ethic! Recalls take too long.That's why we need an independent, imparcial Organisation to take this on for the People! And then another group to watch them ,ha POOR POOR SYSTEM!
WELCOME, WELCOME, WELCOME! :)
Oh and Jason,
Exactly how does a Senator of a state know what the People of the state want when he himself is the product of gerrymandering?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Jason
We already have term limits -- its called "elections".
Question:
Who is the current Grand Wizard of the Tea Party?
Is it Sarah Palin?
I am betting its her.
I am going to say this in order to get the desire effect of what you want we should back to where the states appointed the Senators. That way hopefully they would be advocating his/her own state's needs. Another way is term limits if its good enough for the President should be good enough for congress.
And I like commenters who can take a thought, and run with it. Thus, I enjoyed your comment SD. :)
OKR has made a comment that I had not considered before. Thanks, I like it when somebody triggers a new thought.
The future of American politics will indeed most likely become a battle of the big shots to see who gets to control the federal government.
In the 19th century Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, et al battled and backstabbed each other to be the richest man in America. (A side note: psychology tells us that these types of personality are actually to be considered psychopaths as they suffer from extreme narcissism and remorselessness, so let's not admire these fellows too much.)
The 21st century version of this appears to be a battle among the 1%'ers to see who gets to control the government, and therefore skew legislation and regulation in their favor.
I believe the only solution is to level the playing field somewhat. Campaign finance regulation would be nice, but that's asking the very people who profit from the existing system to change it. Unlikely at best.
The big drawback in attempting to level the playing field is that the 1%'ers start screaming "Socialism" at any attempt to limit the power and control of the robber barrons of today.
Oh, and back to the original point. Won't it be fun to see the titans of industry and finance vainly throw obscene amounts of money at attempts to control the government which is supposed to be "by the people, for the people." The kind of money that might cure cancer or discover entirely unknown energy sources or, I don't know, maybe help education?
Here's a gem for you on a slightly different track. How is it that all of the countries we have bailed out in the past are now kicking our ***** in education and economy? We protected the Chinese from the Japanese in WW2, we saved South Korea from Chinese communism 10 years later, Germany we rebuilt after WW2, most other European countries would be speaking German, including Great Brittan, if not for us.
We have to be the biggest dupes in the world if we can fund wars to protect the world from the modern versions of "evil," but we can't seem to fund decent education or get 40% of our citizens out of poverty.
Most of us rant about our U. S. Congressional Representatives, and our Senators. A few of us rant to them. Either way, the way things are they are wasted rants.
Maybe we should help them out. I believe that many of them would prefer to utilize their time in office doing congressional business. As of now they spend more time each day on direct, and indirect fund raising than they do on what their job description directs them to do. We must have tax payer funded elections.
Countryman good recent posts.
The Koch brothers are scary as hell. When I consider them, and then consider the top people at the mortgage banking firms, like the White House favorite Jamie Diamon, I wonder if in some ways the Koch brothers aren't on the outside looking in for the moment, their monumental egos in a jealous rage at the success of the mortgage banking inside plutocrats.
Thus the Koch brothers throw mad millions to get the banker's government out and their government in.
Has it come to the tragic point that our federal elections are now just a fight for control by differing factions of plutocrats? Is the will of the people a forgotten concept relegated to history?
One thing for sure, if we ever want to rule out the concept I have presented we must get all corporate citizen money out of elections, and finance them entirely with tax payers' dollars. In the end we only get what we pay for.
"Eric HolderEnables Dishonesty Fraudand Likely Criminal Activityon Wall Street", by Mark Carlin, Editor BuzzFlash/TruthOut.
If there remains any doubt in anyone's mind that the Corporatocracy rules this country this piece should remove that doubt.
In the relatively short time we have been a nation we grew up quickly, and have grown into a rotten plutocracy even more quickly. We have a puppet government that bows to every whim of the plutocrats. It does not matter whether Republicans are in charge, or Democrats are in charge. It remains the same.
How do we fix it?
Here is a link to Mr. Karlin's remarks. http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/comme...
LOL Nana.
These forums are for the original words of those who post here. For some reason those on the Right, perhaps because of a sense of personal inadequacy, have a penchant for plagiarism. Those who have been reading here for a while know that, for over, and over they have been caught red-handed in their thievery. Shame on you DO for stealing someone else's work, and presenting it as your own. Copying, and pasting what someone else used their talent to write, and presenting it as your own work is an affront to the writer, and a deception to those who choose to read your work.
Here is a link to the authentic product that DO claimed as his own in his last post. http://beforeitsnews.com/libertarian/201...
DO you owe an apology to your audience, to the author, and to the venue that presented the work.
http://beforeitsnews.com/libertarian/201...
Was Adam Lanza, on Psychiatric Drugs? Medical Examiner Snubs Official Request for Toxicology Report
March 15, 2013
While state and federal lawmakers frantically push for massive mental health reform and sweeping gun control laws, two Connecticut mothers recently took to the streets of Newtown, connecting with local residents and gathering signatures on a petition that asks a simple but essential question--did prescription psychiatric drugs play a role in the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting?
Seems like an easy and obvious question that, remarkably, has escaped the consideration of legislators who seem hell-bent on legislating increased mental health services without first having all the necessary information to make thoughtful, fact-based decisions.
Sheila Matthews, co-founder of AbleChild, a national parents' rights organization, and Newtown resident, Patricia Sabato, went one-on-one with local residents to collect hundreds of signatures requesting the release of the complete autopsy/toxicology results and medical/psychiatric records of alleged shooter, Adam Lanza.
To back up the need for full disclosure of Lanza's records, the petition points out certain undisputed facts, such as, at least 31 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs resulting in 162 wounded and 72 killed.
Sheila Matthews has appeared on TV numerous times, including on CNN, NBC and Fox. She has been interviewed on many talk radio programs and has been featured in major newspapers and magazines.
The Petition further points out that 22 international drug regulatory warnings have been issued on psychiatric drugs causing violent behavior, including mania, psychosis and homicidal ideation. Additionally, between 2004-2011, there were nearly 13,000 reports to the FDA's MedWatch system of psychiatric drugs causing violent side effects, including homicide, mania and aggressive behavior.
Both Matthews and Sabato were gratified by the community's support. "The vast majority of the people were really supportive of our efforts," says Matthews. "They were really engaged," continued Matthews, "and they wanted, and felt like, they had a right to know if Lanza was on drugs."
Sabato mimics Matthews' sentiments. "A lot of people," says Sabato, "actually congratulated us for doing the petition." "The people of Newtown," explains Sabato, "know there is more to this story and, though they are tired of hearing Lanza's name, they still want to know everything that may have played a part in his actions."
I may have erred in recall when I mentioned a former poster "Third World" who hung with the Alex Jones crowd. On reflection I believe that he used the sobriquet "Third Child". Perhaps someone else will confirm that.
I concede nothing to you DO except the last word, in a fruitless conversation. The floor is yours, excepting occasional toxicity warnings to other posters.
Oklahoma Reader:"I read the information presented at the link you provided."
Most people would have taken a few days to digest a small portion of the documentation. You must be a very, very fast reader or you must have skipped over a few things and John Gatto, altogether..
OKR:"To put neocons, communists, socialists and corporate plutocrats in the same vessel plotting together against true education is insane."
It IS insane! It's downright unpalatable to some people. Neocons, communists, socialists and corporate plutocrats working against the best interest of the American people? Who would have thought that people like that could have a negative impact on anything? The rest of your diatribe is what I would have expected and is why I will not try to have a dialog with you.
Your interest is to control a monologue and it is tiresome to say the least. There are pages and pages of yourself and 'News' bantering nonsense, where good people avoid speaking. This is being proven again. If you get your way it will only be yourself, and no disagreements. The ultimate communist utopia?
By the way DO don't bother addressing the other points in my comment from which you again cherry picked. I do not care to engage in a dialogue with you. I have been down that road before with a fella who called himself Third World. You won't find his comments on these blogs; they were all expunged when he lost it. Are you Third World returned with a new moniker? Never mind don't answer that either.
DO I read the information presented at the link you provided. In my opinion is an unsavory mix of fact, paranoia, nonsense, and avoidance of fact; to the point that it is unpalatable to rational people. To put neocons, communists, socialists and corporate plutocrats in the same vessel plotting together against true education is insane.
To even consider that socialism, and communism is in anyway responsible for the low, and getting lower ranking of U. S. education is ridiculous as most of the countries rising, and at the top of the education rankings are socialistic. Hell man, the country at the top is China, a communist nation. ROTFLMAO.
The twisted vision of the perpetrators of this fraud that you endorse do not even consider such factors as increasing poverty and failing infrastructure in urban ghettos, nor a rapidly expanding English as second language student population, as well as other things that for the sake of brevity I won't mention here.
Alex Jones like, they mix in enough of the true nastiness of the corporatocracy, and the neocons to achieve some semblance of veracity, but harm the necessary fight against those perils by diverting attention to Socialism, and Communism that have about us much influence in our Center Right government as do the peons in the fields, and the traumatized citizens of cities such as Detroit.
If you are all about going all Alex Jones, or even wackier in all you post, I don't care what you do. I won't read you, I won't comment beyond what I see as a necessary warning to others of the toxicity of such malarkey.
I wondered where all the Goldwater Republicans went. It appears the more deranged members of that crowd have settled in the rats nest of the weird, and paranoid right to whom you have introduced us. I am sure the more settled members are nowhere near these folk.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27...
"You also said that federal control of our schools has ruined them, and is the cause of American decline in the ratings of countries in regard to education. That is a bold statement."
The more government involvement, the lower the academic achievement. You have heard of empirical evidence, right?
"I think that the reason so many of us are having a problem with understanding you, and what you believe is because you really don't tell us anything. Please be more forthcoming."
I gave you links to John Gatto and "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America" to understand why Johnny can't read. It's all documented here: http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/pag...
There is your water.. now all you have to do is drink. Also, please don't mistake my growing propensity to ignore your taunts and baiting as spiteful arrogance.
DO, here is an example of what I meant by "fuzzy thinking that trails off without conclusion".
You said that local control of schools should be established. Uh-huh, so far so good. Do you mind me asking, in what ways, and to what degree. Just what does "local" mean to you?
You also said that federal control of our schools has ruined them, and is the cause of American decline in the ratings of countries in regard to education.
That is a bold statement. From you we have heard hardly a whimper as to why. So, why? Do you believe DO, that there is any proper role for the federal government in education?
I think that the reason so many of us are having a problem with understanding you, and what you believe is because you really don't tell us anything. Please be more forthcoming.
When the Law got involved in how you Parent your kids,what was it back in the late 70s,the kids went too hell and started leaving home with the threat of putting their Parents in jail with a lot of false accusations about them! They ,the law took away the respect the kids were taught too have for their Parents,Teachers,Law Enforcement,or anything, or anyone! I had some of that, until i and then took them too the Law to tell their story. And swatted their a#^ walking out the door! No more problems until the late teens! The END! Ha
I just heard the report of the(Scoot Proust)the Guy that made the tape of the Romney speech about the 47% of the American People are on the take! It lost him the Election!It gave me back some respect for the American People! There should be more People too speck out like he has! It took a lot of guts! Most are called Whistleblower! This man spoke up when he felt safe.There is NO doubt in my mind he could have been done away with,and still could! Not unlike the madam with the black book on Washington Politicians that patronized her Business! When she was Arrested she conveniently Hanged Her self, so did one of her Girls! The black Book was confiscated by the F.B.I.! NO ONE HAS SEEN IT SINCE! Poor Girls but a big breath was taken, for the Politicians!This Scoot Proust is a Hero to the Country! We need more from everyone from either side!! I have a little faith back!
I think the American health care system is doing a fine job of destroying it's self and really doesn't need any help from Ryan or his party.
But if Ryan wants to take the credit.....
And speaking of loveable conservatives; yes Virginia, Paul Ryan really said this:
"This to us is something that we're not going to give up on, because we're not going to give up on destroying the health care system for the American people."
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/12/re...
You know, sometimes those slippery politicians do accidentally tell us what they really are thinking. Freud would have a field day with this one.
Who doesn't love 'em some Koch brothers?
http://thecontributor.com/media/brothers...
And I thought I was the only one who refrred to them as "those lovable right-wing billionaire brothers."
Who says you can't buy off enough politicians to control the United States Government if you have enough money? I believe these gentlemen will make Murdock's Fox News empire look like a bunch of bleeding heart liberals.
This should be an interesting turn in American politics.
I read New across comments for while now.He's always backed up his comments, with links!You i haven't figured out yet? But the way it stands now ,you don't have a lot of common sense!It's obvious your knowledgeable! You asked how someone could be an extreme Liberal? It's a common sense thing with me,its the right thing for the People! In my opinion! The Government sucks at whats good for the People,and have turned into a lying bunch fools,(both Parties)! Like News Across, has always said it has to change! You would be a good spokes Person for the lying fools! News Across, hang in there! Your credibility is alive and well everyone on this Blog!I don't write well,but i'm just folk!
I, personally, feel there are two main problems causing the low educational rankings of Americans.
1) Bad parenting.
It's not at all hard to find bona fide, peer reviewed studies that show how important parenting is to the outcome of the child, and how badly the average American parent sucks at it. Duh, eh?
Apparently, generally speaking and according to my reading, Americans have become really crappy parents.
2) Special Ed.
A rather large portion of education money is consumed by "special services." Stop worrying about the football team soaking up all the cash, because in America we spend twice as much educating the lowest performer than we do on the average or top performer. This, of course, is done in the name of "fairness and equality in education."
It's an ugly thing to say, but if we want high performance kids, shouldn't we be spending the biggest portion of the money on the students at the top? In our capitalist economy, we certainly believe that those at the top deserve much more than everyone else, so why doesn't this philosophy hold true in education?
It seems like nobody wants to take on these two problems. Folks would rather sit around and blame the "guberment" and say how public schools don't work. Funny thing is that the majority of highly successful people in the 20th century were products of public education from an era when the goal was to graduate intelligent, educated, hard working people. Most came from one room schoolhouses.
But here in the 21st century, the conventional wisdom is that shiny new buildings, massive special education programs, and a winning football team are the desired outcome of our education dollars.
School should be seen as a wonderful opportunity we can provide for our children. Instead, it is viewed as free babysitting by many parents.
Of course there are those things like teacher tenure, teacher qualifications for given subject matter, and the teachers union. Let's just say that from my reading, after parenting, the quality of the teacher is the next most important thing that affects educational outcome.
Now take that knowledge and look at what qualifications a middle or high school teacher actually has to have to teach a given subject. Let's just say that you are not required to know all that much about the subject being taught and leave it at that.
I need to add here that, in my experience, Marshall Public Schools has several outstanding teachers. In some areas, I don't think you could find a better teacher anywhere, so my comments are no way intended to take pot-shots at Marshall schools. I think our local district, in spite of the perpetual "As the School Board and Administration Turns" drama, did an excellent job educating my children. But then again, I was paying attention along the way as well.
My apologies to those who have waded through my comment. It seems I can not keep these things from turning into dissertations. It's probably due to that excellent education I recieved way back there in the 20th century when teachers could smack you upside the head if you weren't paying attention. ;)
From the same article detailing Americas decline in education:
"Citing concerns over the country's education performance compared to other nations, and the long-term impact of the shortcomings on the future economic viability of the country, the Obama Administration has pushed for comprehensive reforms during the president's time in office."
According to the AP,
"This is an absolute wake-up call for America," U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in an interview with The Associated Press. "The results are extraordinarily challenging to us and we have to deal with the brutal truth. We have to get much more serious about investing in education."
The more money they get, the dumber the kids get.
Problem.. reaction.. solution
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07...
The United States has fallen to "average" in international education rankings released by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, according to the AFP.
America has received scores around 500 on a scale that goes up to 1,000: 487 in math, 500 in reading and 502 in science.
The AFP reports,
The three-yearly OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) report, which compares the knowledge and skills of 15-year-olds in 70 countries around the world, ranked the United States 14th out of 34 OECD countries for reading skills, 17th for science and a below-average 25th for mathematics.
GB: "Now-where was I"
Still in the same sinking ship as the rest of us, frantically searching for a well hidden life boat, and paddle. Swim for it while you still can, it is each man, woman, and intersexed for themselves. ;)
re: open information ...
We don't have any idea what is going on in Washington these days ... how sad ...
The government gets the blame (and should shoulder a great part of it), but the real culprits are those who control those in control (if that makes any sense?) ...
If the average American had a slight bit of knowledge about what's going on - they'd probably cry.
Sooooooo instead ... we sit in front of the tube and watch basketball tournaments and NASCAR races and sitcoms and non-reality reality shows - and what-have-you ... or we spend so much time on our smart (?) phones that the circumference of our thumbs increases exponentially ... All to block out - or distract us from - what is going on in the shadowlands that surround us.
When the executive branch - no matter which party - wields seemingly unlimited power (legally or not) ... we should all tremble. When casual reading for our Commander in Chief includes a book titled (something like) "The Post-American World" ... we should all tremble. When oil prices and the value of a dollar are controlled by secret (or not so secret) corporations ... we should all tremble.
But not today - It's time for March Madness - or the Bachelorette - or Honey Boo Boo or My Big Fat Redneck Vacation ...
Good grief!!
Get me outta here!!!!
Sorry - I had to get that off my chest.
Now - where was I?
While we fret about "them" collecting our guns "they" are busily collecting our minds and our means. It may take "us" pushing hard for honest to goodness collectivism to right this ship of state.
It will be hard to do when it is likely that three out of four people don't even know what is collectivism. Meanwhile we just keep on paying "the man" for services not rendered. Corporatocracy is worse than the seediest of short term lenders. At least they give us a little something for our buck.
Ok, so from what I see about Ryan's tax plan, it is a huge cut for those making over about $150k disguised as a simplification of tax brackets.
Here is a link to the actual brackets and rates for 2012.
http://taxes.about.com/od/Federal-Income...
And here's a link to Ryan's proposed tax rates.
http://roadmap.republicans.budget.house....
Looks to me like those making around $142,000 and above are getting a nice fat tax cut. Who do you reckon is going to makeup that difference? Where's that money coming from, Paul?
If you make over $217,000, your rate goes from 33% to 25%. That's a 24% reduction in your income tax bill on everything above that amount. Nice perk, Paul. Thanks.
Once you make over $388,350, you rate was 35%. Mr. Ryan wishes to lower that to 25%. A nice fat 28% lower tax bill. It's good to be wealthy in America, eh?
Good old trickle down economics. I love it when our leaders think it's good economic policy for the 1%'ers to relieve themselves on the great unwashed masses as economic stimulus. Makes me feel good about the future and that kind of stuff.
How does Ryan keep a straight face when proposing this stuff? Is there anybody alive who still thinks trickle down Reaganomics is anything but a con game?
Agreed, Nana. Our knowledge of what is really going on in our government is being severly curtailed following 9/11 in the name of "homeland security."
I believe we need a new round of accountability by all government departments, CIA and Homeland Security included. An nice start might be to bring back a strong belief in Habeus Corpus.
This statement from Greenwald in your link is chilling.
"GLENN GREENWALD: Well, the irony of this proceeding is that what led Bradley Manning to do what he did was that virtually everything the U.S. government does is cloaked in secrecy, everything it does of any significance, and that whistleblowing and leaks, unauthorized leaks, is the only way we find out about what our government is doing. And a perfect microcosm illustrating how true that is is the Manning proceeding itself. There is more secrecy at this proceeding than there is even at Guantánamo military proceedings under George Bush. The docket is often classified and kept secret. Court orders are kept secret. There is no transcript available, so Alexa O'Brien had to transcribe his statement, Bradley Manning's statement, using whatever instruments that she could. It really is a mockery of justice, what has taken place, and it really reflects the motivations that led Manning to do this in the first place."
What is it that separates us from the former Soviet Union again? A right to due process in the judicial system? Freedom of information? Habeus Corpus? Open government?
Speaking of Baaaaaad....
Apparently Ayn Rand's boy toy, Congressman Paul Ryan, didn't learn much from his defeat. He's apparently still carrying the water for David Koch.
All hail trickle down (drizzle down?) tax policy! More cuts for the rich folks, yeah, that's the ticket.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013...
C'mon, conservatives out there reading this (both of you). You can't really support this "tax cuts for the filthy rich and tax increases on the middle class" plan, do you?
Maybe more of a teddy bear than a grizly bear these days.
Anyway - like I said - welcome aboard.
Hi Ben, Sorry it sounded like I was speaking of you. I should have said "thinking for OURSELVES when wondering what to do without News. I've followed these threads off and on for some time and frankly have been put off by a know-it-all flavor of the stew that brews here.
I have no doubt that the persona "News" will lick his wounds, declare himself victor and return with a vengeance to this medium. The fascist freedom loving Tea Party,(baggers) pigs will again be the causation of all that is wrong in this world and we will get the empirical evidence straight from the mouth of the great grandson of an unnamed anti-rebel/anti-slavery, Civil War hero.
No slight was intended too anyone that might be a grizzly bear, even if he is gentle.
DO
I realize you are new here (if that's not just a new moniker you're using to replace an old one) ... But - most folks on here can tell you I was never a follower of newsacross - in fact we got sideways of each other from time to time. I don't need anyone thinking for me - be it MSNBC or Fox News. Been around long enough to think for myself.
Be warned - you will find much "tongue in cheek" around here. Hope you can handle it - and decipher it - and recognize it when it comes out.
Some of us (sorry OKR) are pretty good at it.
That said - welcome aboard this slow-movin train of misfits.
"Glenn Greenwald is a LINO - liberal in name only - he's a CATO Institute guy, funded by the Koch Bros."
"There are actually pictures of Greenwald speaking at CATO functions."
A lot of people speak at CATO. CATO isn't even listed as a HATE group organization
with the hate group Southern Poverty Law Center.
Maybe you know something they don't?
"I don't dislike his work... just cautious."
Where was your caution with the hack website you linked to as your proof.
"As noted by others, while I appreciated Rand Paul's filibuster on theoretical grounds I was VERY suspicious of his grandstanding motives... turns out it was a fund-raising stunt..."
I don't believe one man standing alone to speak truth to power and defending your and my rights was a mere fund raising stunt. We disagree.
More confusion?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21...
and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvuhVu0z...
"Holy Crapola!
What are we gonna do without NewAcross???'
Think for yourself?
Glenn Greenwald conspiracy
"Because I saw his bio on the CATO site 2 years ago... don't care what he says, it WAS there. Isn't now -new website design..."
-- Posted by NanaDot on Sun, Mar 10, 2013, at 11:36 PM
Nana, could you be mistaken? Ever?
People that are part of CATO seem to be proud of their work. I don't think it is likely that someone that was ever connected/listed with a bio could ever successfully remove all traces that they had ever been there.
The website you linked was much harder to find than:"Glenn Greenwald Responds to Widespread Lies About Him (on Cato, Iraq War, and more)"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/30..
What about Glenn that you dislike so much?
Holy Crapola!
What are we gonna do without NewAcross???
Another thing - am I gonna have to get Gentle Wife involved in this forum? Seems to be the trend.
Oh well - my advice to everyone is to just keep looking for those insurrectionists behind every hay bale - that'll help justify the use of the drone program - which is a very expensive program and a huge part of the defense budget - against innocent Americans.
In fact - turn your neightbors in if you think they might be civilly (sp) disobedient - even if they are just right-leaning gun owners.
It went well for the snitches in cold war Russia too - until their handlers turned on them.
Have great day! :)
Okie Wife
I like it!
O'Bama sure lays rest to that Kenya thing!
Nana, how did you miss this on your quest to dig up dirt on Glenn Greenwald?
"Glenn Greenwald Responds to Widespread Lies About Him (on Cato, Iraq War, and more)"
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/30...
"Glenn Greenwald is a LINO - liberal in name only - he's a CATO Institute guy, funded by the Koch Bros."
-- Posted by NanaDot on Sun, Mar 10, 2013, at 9:56 PM
I feel a little dirty for just going to that web site, Nana.
Why are people so proud of being "extreme liberal"? Wow.. it is just so destructive and divisive.
How progressive is that?
That guy is not on the level of Glenn Greenwald.
I wish I had that 5 minutes back.
"I think some clarification is needed here. News has left the forum because he got sick of his position being twisted (he never ever stated that the president can murder whom he liked). He is also very, very concerned about Rand Paul's motives as you all should be. I have not contributed to this because except for a few rational people, I have been subjected to the 'you are not an American' taunt many times and that is very disturbing to me and sort of reinforces the belief that it is ok to kill 'aliens' with drones but not Americans. The drone program should be discarded immediately, but the good people of Marshall should also be vigilant about extreme right wingers and their intent to split up your country."
-- Posted by aussie wife on Sun, Mar 10, 2013, at 8:51 PM
It looked to me that 'News' was doing most of the twisting. News lost his argument before he even got started. He seemed to not know that Rand Paul, and Ron Paul, are two different people. Ron Paul, is the father, who is now retired from 11 Congressional terms and a full career as a baby/momma doctor.
Ron Paul, has spoken against drones, extra-judicial murders, never ending wars, and the private Federal Reserve bank that is the cause of our money to be collapsing, for many years.
As much as the 'economist' News spoke Keynesian theory, I find it hard to believe that he didn't know the difference between Ron and Rand.('fascist pig Randi')
Ron Paul, was all about peace, liberty and real money. Austrian economics... I can't believe an economist didn't know this.
If he doesn't know the difference between Ron Paul, and Rand, how did he ascribe such nefarious intent to young Senator, Rand Paul? He was only elected in 2010. Obama was already bombing by then and Rand HAS spoken out against senseless war and civil liberties.
Ron Paul, is an unquestioned champion of civil liberties and Rand Paul, is now proving himself.
Rand Paul's filibuster was speaking truth to power and 'News' attack on that was unbelievable and absurd. Just making stuff up isn't allowed when you tout yourself as an authority.
http://vimeo.com/61306840
Glenn Greenwald at ACLU of Oregon 2013 Liberty Dinner
Glenn Greenwald worked as a constitutional and civil rights litigator before becoming a columnist and blogger to Salon.com and then The Guardian, where he focuses on political and legal topics. He has written three New York Times bestsellers: How Would a Patriot Act? (2006); A Tragic Legacy (2007); and With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful (2011). He also wrote Great American Hypocrites (2008).
http://vimeo.com/61306840
Three Democratic myths used to demean the Paul filibuster
Glenn Greenwald
The progressive 'empathy gap', a strain of liberal authoritarianism, and a distortion of Holder's letter are invoked to defend Obama
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/...
"At best, Holder's letter begs the question: what do you mean when you accuse someone of being "engaged in combat"? And what are the exact limits of your power to target US citizens for execution without due process? That these questions even need to be asked underscores how urgently needed Paul's filibuster was, and how much more serious pushback is still merited. But the primary obstacle to this effort has been, and remains, that the Democrats who spent all that time parading around as champions of these political values are now at the head of the line leading the war against them."
Vapid?
You sir are obviously no friend or even an acquaintance of civil rights. I will take your comment in the vapid text it was written in and respond to you sir in one sentence only. You do not know what you are talking about.
Signed: And another thing
Okie Wife: "It's been proven time & again the US Government executes innocent people. The Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU will back that statement up."
The ACLU has it's moments but the the (wealthy) Southern POVERTY Law Center, is all about helping the US Government target innocent people.
People that believe in the right to protect their families and the Second Amendment, are all racist crazies that hate the President.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, might have you on their 'dangerous hate group' list that the President uses to help form his 'secret kill' list.
I hope you don't send money to the SPLC.
Oh, sorry, that last comment was by me, "And Another Thing", aka Okie Wife.:)
Very astute of you. I am the descendant of a fighting Irish clan out of Kilkenny, Ireland. Some stayed & some went back home but the ones that stayed joined the armed forces during WWI & we have been fighting for one thing or the other ever since. My family has loved the Kennedys for generations now with John's picture in our living room. I do believe my small grand daughter thought he was an uncle or someone. Now we have Mr. O'Bama in the White House who is also of Irish descent. I have a link (below) which should help out in this regard. I hope everyone will celebrate St. Patricks Day with the Irish this next weekend. Erin Go Bragh. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EADUQWKoV...
It's a tough call Okie wife. I don't want an innocent killed either. However, I don't want some chicken*** traitor killing anyone in my famiy with a car bomb or anything else. It would be best if we could arrest all of 'em, but like I said...tough call.
Glad I am not making it.
By the way, was the mispelling of the president's name purposeful? I have to think so, as he's been president for 4+ years now. What is the hidden meaning there? (Not being critical, just wondering)
By the way, welcome!
I have never written on this web site before. I do follow the rules of Mother Jones when she proclaimed "read, educate yourself, and prepare for the war". I am a card carrying member of the NAACP and the ACLU, but all that requires is to send in $$ once or twice a year and get a card or free mailing lables. I get frustrated because I see injustice after injustice and feel as if there is nothing I can personally do. Obviously voting does pretty much nothing as I have been voting since 1971 and what a fat lot of good that has done. Therefore, I will write. I live in a southern state, I highly admire southern writers, not that I would ever be on their hallowed ground but I am gonna write what I think so here goes...
And Another Thing
So Mr. O'Bama's White House wants to kill American's on American soil without a fair trial and without getting their hands dirty. The US government will just use those pesky little drones, those venom filled mesquitos controlled by some computer guy miles and miles away who likes to shot people on the internet. I can drone on and on about drones. It's been proven time & again the US Government executes innocent people. The Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU will back that statement up. That single fact alone should scare the bejeezus out of all US citizens.
The US government admits it acts upon intelligence from agents. Who these agents are gets foggy so we'll neatly wrap them all up in an "intelligence agents" package. Early on in "Operation Enduring Freedom" (words are a wonderful weapon in their own right) the agents advised of (1) Weapons of mass distruction beginning in the time of the longest war in US History (2) Intelligence advised US troops to shoot down a group of terrorists when in actuality they were a Afghan wedding party who were unfortunately mowed down by American airstrikes and (3) Most recently in Afghanistan the US mistook two young brothers 10 & 11 years old who were following their donkey as terrorists & were killed by US drones The US response was there were terrorists in that area (who know right?).
The last time there were so may innocent civilians killed in Afghanistan was when Russia invaded that country. Like O'Bama's White House, Russia's government also kills Russian's on Russian soil. Remember Chechnya the almost complete destruction of Grozny, the Chechen capital. Russian Government is bolder and more open than the US Government about killing, locking up, and torturing it's people but the US and Russia are getting closer and closer to being alike.
The bottom line is justice should be a fair and reasonable solution but can be a blind b*tch holding a lopsided scale and a double edged sword. Be aware be very aware the cossacks are coming.
Signed: And Another Thing...
(Okie Wife)
Well News along with your host of other problems your memory is also failing you. ROTFLMAO!
You said during your diatribe, and I quote; "OKR,
Ya know come to think of it mate, it sure took you a long time to mention it too -- despite the fact that I was commenting about the killings extensively in this forum immediately after the killings.
I was quite surprised then that not one other person, including you, seem to feel there was anything wrong with the targeted killings back then."
The truth is old buddy that I was talking about it before you. Read and weep:
"X-Ray if you have a libertarian bone left in your body you must be against Obama's kill at will policy. What will the next President do to extend it just a bit further, then the next one, and the next one? It is a horrible precedent, and another huge rip in the already tattered fabric of democracy that shelters the people."
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Sat, Oct 8, 2011, at 7:10 PM
THEN you said;
"Obama is a murderer -- pure and simple.
Now what are we, the American People going to do about it?
If we do nothing, then we can kiss our democracy and everything we ever fought for goodbye."
-- Posted by news across on Sun, Oct 9, 2011, at 4:25 AM
Thanks though for supporting my comment about the drone murders...I guess. LOL
Last comment News. So now you are a martyr? I think not, and I point you to MLK as a true example of martyrdom. Not even close.
As to your leaving the blogs in a pout, so be it. However I find it ludicrous that you of all people feel wronged. You more than any other expressed the opinion that these blogs are rough, and tumble, and that if one can't take it they have the option of going away. You certainly have dished it, but obviously can't take it when things don't go your way.
Do as you wish, but I must say that I have enjoyed many of your comments, especially concerning economics, and have learned from them. I don't know who shares my opinions, and who doesn't. I do want to remind you that you also have the option of getting over your hurt feelings, and coming back to post like a big boy should. Of course that would take a good measure of courage to return from such an unusual departure. I am not certain that you are up to that. :)
First of all News Across I do not appreciate your arrogant assumption that I did not know "Exparte Milligan", and your consequential talking down to me. I knew "Ex Parte Milligan' when you were still running around the school yard at St. Peters. Your second arrogant assumption was that I was taking exception to that, and the other points of constitutional law that you were making. Your third was to entirely miss the point I was making, and continue to foolishly argue against me about something that had nothing to do with my declaration. That is three strikes, thus you are out.
My constant theme in my comments was that immoral laws are vulnerable to necessary civil disobedience. In your headstrong attack you did not once address what I was saying. Instead you opted to over, and over regurgitate Milligan, et al; making one hell of a case that the executive, and legislative branches branch can do much as they want to.
At no point did I challenge that because I agree that your point is established by our government, and supported by judicial review. There in lies the danger. There is much temptation in that establishment for certain elements of our government to morph into something dangerously akin to the Russian FSB. Again my singular point was that it is immoral in concept, and practice, thus compelling opposition that includes whatever means of civil disobedience is possible, including Rand Paul's taking of the opportunity to present it to daylight. Of course that set you off on a barrage of bizarre nonsensical statements that I was now a full fledged member of the Tea Party, and other such ridiculous statements. I think that you are familiar enough with rhetoric to realize how foolish that made you look. Sometime in one of your calmer moments take the time to really read what I said on the subject. I do believe you have the ability to comprehend it. You will find the most of my comments adjacent to this comment.
"Bravo to Rand Paul. He is dead on right on this one. I just wish that more of the Republicans, and the Democrats too had a strong libertarian streak.
Our civil rights, the precious entitlements common to us all, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are all endangered by this monstrous decision, and the cavalier attitude of those who promote it.
This is one issue that should unite the left, and right for it literally attacks us all. It grieves me to see the citizenry so unconcerned about this encroachment on the life, and welfare of every one of us. If it is ignored what will the federal government next steal from us?"
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 12:06 AM
"So which is the greater threat News, fascist Republican impeding of congressional procedure in this, or fascist destruction of habeous corpus, et al by the executive branch?
Sometimes great threats require breaching protocol, and laws. The civil rights movement proved that point, and this is once again civil rights."
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 12:47 AM
"You may choose if you wish to ignore the greater moral question in this instance.
To me there are few threats to a civilization and a citizenship as great as an executive proclaiming that he has the right to kill an American citizen on American soil without ever a charge being made in any sort of court, without the victim ever having the chance to refute any charge, without any responsibility for any attendant murder of innocent bystanders. The fellow being resisted by Rand Paul is central to this Freedom to Murder scheme.
Mr. Paul is not stupid; he knows that his resistance will be overcome. Meanwhile he is doing all he can to call attention to this outrage against humanity. It is an excellent example of civil disobedience, and I am flabbergasted that you do not support civil disobedience of lesser laws in the furtherance of moral law; just as you would resist a law forcing you to the back of a bus in whatever way was possible in furtherance of the greater moral law.
Mr. Paul is protesting. He has chosen a forum available especially to him, and yes he is breaking a law to do it. I don't suppose you want to let loose the police dogs on him, or blast him from his sit in with a water hose? ;)"
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 1:43 AM
"News slavery was once Constitutional law, Constitutional law affirmed more than once by the Supreme Court of our land. By your argument those poor slaves legally should have accepted the status quo, and waited passively hoping that court affirmed constitutional law would change. Running away by your logic would have been the criminal act and slavery not so.
You have painted yourself into a corner my friend. ;)"
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 2:17 PM
"So they were supposed to sit there in slavery for one hundred years waiting on Lincoln? Oh no, don't break constitutional law, just be good little slaves until Massa says you are free. LMAO
You are wrong on this one, and you know it, else you were lying in your praise of MLK, and Gandhi.
Moral law takes precedence over constitutional law in every case. You have made that point yourself over, and over. Suddenly you jumped off into a swamp, and refuse to admit you have left the high ground because you won't let go of an argument. LOL"
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 6:28 PM
Ya know mates I don't know why OKR or anyone else is attacking me in this forum.
I simply said the the High Court has ruled that the Constitution gives Congress the authority to suspend habeas corpus in any area that is engaged in armed insurrection or making war on the United States within or outside the USA, and that has no functioning civilian Federal court. Further, that the Congress can authorize the President to conduct military defense in said areas.
That is a fact...nothing more, nothing less.
I don't know what you fellas are discussing but it sure isn't factually based.
I guess OKR is making the point that drones are bad.
I would go much further and say nukes are bad, war is bad, but what does any of that have to do with the constitutionality of the President being authorized to conduct defensive operations in an area of the US that is under armed rebellion and has no functioning Federal court?
War bad...yep. Drones bad..yep Nukes bad...yep. Civil war bad...yep.
Other than that, what is OKR's point?
On another matter. I don't care what you think of me or say about me, but when you begin addressing my wife with insults, that is when I put my foot down.
I won't be back and neither will Aussie Wife.
You boys do whatever you want, but if we want to be insulted for being factually correct...well I am sure we could find folks just as insulting much closer to home.
Its been fun but now its time to go.
Oh and SD,
OKR is factually wrong. See the links I have provided in earlier comments for confirmation.
As to what you and he "believe," such is immaterial to the issue given the historical and constitutional facts.
OKR,
Ya know come to think of it mate, it sure took you a long time to mention it too -- despite the fact that I was commenting about the killings extensively in this forum immediately after the killings.
I was quite surprised then that not one other person, including you, seem to feel there was anything wrong with the targeted killings back then.
I am glad to see a year and a half seems to have opened your eyes...you and Randy both. But you sure didn't condemn it when it happened.
Here is one more thing you might want to think about.
Al Awlaki, senior, concerned that his son was soon going to be assassinated by Obama, sued Obama in an effort to stop Obama from killing his son. There were some rather interesting rulings from that Bush-appointed Federal Judge. He ruled that (1) Al Awlaki,Sr. had no legal standing to bring the case and here comes the best part, (2) that if the President says that something is a matter of national security, the courts have no right to review the matter (that means they can't even listen to the facts of the case -- it means they can't even have a hearing over it).
Now that is something to be worried about.
When we can't even bring a matter to the attention of the court just because the President says its a matter of national security then any President can do anything he wants.
The decision has been appealed but to date no court has struck it down.
Between the 2, I would say the court ruling limiting court review is far more dangerous than any drone. Why didn't Randy rage about that?
Oh by the way OKR, I guess you missed my comments immediately after the first targeted killing of an American citizen. It didn't take me a year and a half to talk about it.
And yes the fact that there was no warrant or grand jury indictment issued for Al Awlaki and the fact that our Government had 0 evidence to tie him to Al Qaeda or to any terrorist attacks does raise some serious constitutional questions regarding the assassination -- questions I was asking the day it was announced.
It sure took Randy a long time to mention it.
I guess Randy had to think about Al Awlaki and his son for a year and a half before he could think of the correct words to express his outrage.
OKR, you've been hoodwinked mate -- whether you know it or not.
Yeah Randy never said a word when Obama was killing Americans for whom no warrant or indictment had been issued in Yeman -- when they were Muslim Americans -- 1 of them an American child (and yes the child was targeted). Not 1 peep out of him then. In fact, I bet Randy fully supported those killings.
Not a single word then.
Not 1 peep from Randy about those folks.
"Unedited Tea Party Protestor in Cleveland, Ohio"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUsBvkfQK...
In fact mate, I bet if tomorrows headline was
AMERICAN-MUSLIM INSURGENTS SEIZE CONTROL OF KENTUCKY -- MUSLIMS DECLARE KENTUCKY AN INDEPENDENT MUSLIM NATION -- MASSES OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT POURING IN FROM CHINESE AND RUSSIAN ALLIES -- INSURGENTS SETTING UP NUCLEAR MISSLE SITES IN NEW MUSLIM NATION OF KENTUCKY FOR DEFENSIVE PURPOSES.
your pal Randy would be screaming for Obama to send in those drones to Kentucky as fast as he can.
Oh OKR,
Randy was not up there dissing war mate. In fact he said he fully supported war.
As to terrible weapons, we have had nukes for a very long time now mate and they make those model planes with a bomb attached to them look like child's play.
Why didn't your hero Randy mention getting rid of the nukes?
Mate, you better have a good look at your hero's political agenda.
But all his grandstanding is meaningless anyway since the Congress has the right to suspend habeas corpus in any region in which there is no functioning civilian US Federal Court. Once duly authorized by Congress, the President can use any weapon in our arsenal -- including drones and nukes -- what ever is necessary to put down the insurrection.
That is the law no matter how many or what types of weapons are in our arsenal.
And as Randy pointed out, he certainly has no problem with war.
He is a bit worried about us making war on him and his Tea Party fascists in the States that he and his Tea Party fascists are pretty sure will be seceeding from the union soon.
Nice try, but no cigar mate.
Show me its not legal/constitutional for the President, under specified conditions noted in Ex parte Milligan, when duly authorized by Congress, to wage war against domestic enemies who are engaged in armed conflict with the US or you have nothing mate.
Frankly mate, you should have read AG Holder's response to Randy a bit more closely, and while you are at it you may want to read Ex parte Milligan very closely as well.
"10 years later, Dixie Chicks right all along"
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/05/opinio...
http://www.politicalgarbagechute.com/yes...
http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/15007-...
CASE STUDY:
"Can Texas Really Secede from the Union?
Not Legally"
http://ideas.time.com/2012/11/19/can-tex...
OKR,
Aussie Wife and I were just discussing your and my recent comments to each other. First off, even though she is not willing to come in here and say it for the record, she does not think you and I arguing is constructive and she thinks we are both becoming angry at each other over a question of law that has already been answered by the courts. I, however, disagree. I think its good this argument should be in this forum.
I always believed this matter ended with the close of the Civil War, but the Tea Partiers have once again throw it up as an alternative to the United States. I know its easy to say, oh well that will never happen -- even though its already happened...twice before.
I know how it is to think something would never happen in modern times -- such as the Supreme Court, along party lines and by just 1 vote, selecting the President of the United States, but it happened mate.
I have learned a lot about the about Tea Party folks over the years.
I have learned that up is down, black is white, the sky is mauve and never blue, and that God is always on America's side.
I have learned that just when you think the Tea Party is making a claim so crazy that nobody would consider their claim for a single moment, half the country embraces the claim.
I don't take them for granted anymore.
When the Tea Party makes veiled threats of violence against the Unite States, its People (including my children, grandchildren, and Parents) then yeah I take it seriously.
When a US Senator begins grandstanding about how Congress cannot give the President the authority conduct defensive military operations in a section of the country that is under armed rebellion and under the control of armed insurgents -- including the Federal courts in that location, then yeah I get a bit concerned.
And you should be a bit concerned about that too mate.
So let's simplify this.
Show me that the High Court overturned itself as regards Ex parte Milligan.
Show me that the Constitution does not give Congress the Constitutional right to suspend habeas corpus in areas where the federal courts can no longer function.
Show me that the Constitution prohibits and does not expressly task the President with the duty to protect the Constitution, the Federal Government, and the People from all enemies both foreign and domestic.
Show me that President Lincoln did not wage war against armed insurgents in the Southern States that had declared themselves no longer part of the USA and where there was no functioning US Federal court system.
Show me that the High Court did not rule in Texas v White that secession is unconstitutional.
Show me these things, and I will gladly cease and desist.
Yeah I must be crazy to believe secession is unconstitutional and that the United States Government has a right to prevent said secession.
Yeah that's right OKR, I must be crazy lol lol lol.
And in case you have not noticed over the years mate, I don't care if you are listening or not.
I think you've lost it News. Keep it up, and you will be talking to yourself, but then again maybe you already are. I'm done.
Exploding Tea Party Protester Threatens Interviewer (Original)"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=bgec...
yeah...OKR, those Tea Party folks are just trying to put forth some good, common sense ideas and protect our civil rights.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
"Why Dummies Want to Forget the Tea Party Ancestry"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiaI63pBm...
"Army suspends popular tuition assistance program because of sequester, in blow to soldiers"
http://nbclatino.com/2013/03/08/army-sus...
Why are the vets complaining?
Don't they realize we have to cut the deficit so job creators will create more jobs?
Well!...they aren't very patriotic are they?!!
Don't they know they have to tighten their belts so the rich folks will create more jobs for them?
Apparently these complainers weren't listening when Randy and his pals in the Tea Party explained the Tea Party job creation plan -- cut America to the bone.
I guess its a good thing that we in Australia decided China is the World's future a few years back. We do a lot of business with those folks. They are darn good customers and they have been very good neighbors to us here in Australia.
One thing is for sure, with the coming collapse of the USA, we can't depend on the USA much longer as customers and the future Confederacy won't have any more money than they do now -- and probably a lot less. That makes them pretty much useless to us here in OZ.
Yes sir, its a changing World and yours is about to change dramatically mates.
Good luck with that "Congress can't authorize the President to put down armed insurrection within the United States" thing mates...you are sure going to need all the luck you can get!
OKR, I bet you will be supporting you new found friend Randy for President of the Confederacy, wont you?
Come on, don't be shy mate, you know you already support him. Why not go all the way after your state joins the Confederacy and support him all the way to the Confederate Presidency?
After all, he is obviously very concerned about civil rights and all.
And listen, don't worry about the "Indians," Hispanics, and black folks. I hear Randy has a Confederate jobs program designed just for them. Sure they won't be citizens, but, utilizing the old South African model, they will be fully employed. What more could a brown-skinned person hope for?
OKR, actually its you Tea Party boys that will do better than a lot of other folks there in the New Confederate State of Oklahoma. You will be dirt poor and probably on the verge of starvation most of the time, but hey you will finally be free to live in the Confederacy.
However my kin up there on the Cherokee and Shawnee reservations may not fair too well under a Confederate Oklahoma.
And I don't see anything in Oklahoma's history to indicate that they won't start lynching foreigners -- you know black Americans. I doubt they will be regarded as citizens after the Confederates refuse to acknowledge them as citizens.
But hey, at least you will have your Tea Party freedom! That is what really matters mate.
OKR, no one is forcing you to say anything mate.
As for me, I have lots and lots and lots more to say about this.
Oh well OKR, you have already done enough for Randy and the Tea Party already mate. You should be proud, you will be able to say in a few years that you helped pave the way for the succession of your state from the USA.
Enjoy, and listen, don't even think about it any further mate. Hey, I know, just go take a nap and pretend it will never happen.
Question:
Will Oklahoma being sending folks their Social Security payments after they follow the other succeeding states and become an independent nation?
And yes I am sure the independent Nation of Oklahoma will do all it can to extend you civil rights similar, kind of, to those you enjoy now...or will they?
Oh wait, I guess it will be new Confederate Federal Government that will pay your pension and assist you with with CSA medicare and other seniors benefits.
Yeah, everything will be just fine mate.
News I don't have anything else to say on this issue. It has grown tiresome to me. Beat a dead horse until the maggots fly if you want, but I want no part of it.
Oh and may I add that the Tea Party agenda Randy is pursuing as hard as he can is likely to succeed.
Its as clear as the nose on your face mate.
And he has folks like you, who have a heck of a lot to lose if he is successful, to thank for giving their agenda much needed support. Frankly, without you they might never be able to pull it off. But that's all water under the bridge now, eh mate?
The fact is mate, we may very well be seeing the beginning of the end of America.
I sure am glad I am also an Australian lol lol lol...
Good luck mate, you are going to need it.
Oh and OKR, he is no nutcase at all. In fact, he is a very shrewd, ultra-right-wing politician with an agenda and a whole lot of power -- and now your full support as well.
Like I said News R. Paul is crazy, so yeh there may be something to your hypothesis. There are also many crazy citizens in the southland who dream every day of the south rising again.
For that matter one can go to redneck bars all over Oklahoma where if they believe there ain't nobody here but us'ns the N word is a part of about every third sentence. White trash is what this ole country boy calls 'em. ;)
Hypocritical Republican Representatives across the nation including Missouri's Vicky Hartzler claim that they voted for the Violence Against Women Act, when in fact they voted against it.
The fact that they did so is a strong indicator that they think they can fool folks likely to vote for them because they think such folks are stupid. That is the first thing Republican legislators have been right about in a long time. ;)
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/...
OKR,
Let me give you a hint at where this entirely new position of Randy's is headed and specifically what it is designed for.
Let me give you a potential, but as yet hypothetical, scenario.
August 1, 2015. Texas Republican Governor signs into law TX HB 34009, the "2015 Texas Independence Act,", and publically announces Texas official secession from the United States of America.
President Obama orders the military arrest of the Governor and all Texas State legislators and senators on charges of conspiracy to commit treason against the United States of America.
Federal Marshals attempt to enter the State Capital where the Governor is believed to be but are turned back at gunpoint and refused entry by the Texas State Police.
The Governor protests that the United States has no authority in Texas.
Day 2, Texas creates the Texas Army and swears in 100,000 volunteers -- many from the State Police, county sheriff's departments, the TBI, and private militias from all over the state.
Day 3, Texas military officials attempt to take control of Fort Bliss, but their requests are denied by the commanding General under direct orders from the President.
Loyal American citizens in Texas ask for an emergency ruling by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on the constitutionality of the "2015 Texas Independence Act."
12 Am, August 6, 2015, on orders from the Texas Governor, the Texas Army seizes all Federal Court Buildings and orders all US Federal Judges in Texas to be taken into Texas military custody.
August 8, the Texas Army surrounds Fort Bliss and demands its immediate surrender.
President Obama asks Congress for a joint resolution authorizing him to act in his capacity as Commander in Chief and use whatever military force he needs to defend the United States Constitution, citizens, and federal government in Texas against the unlawful armed rebellion in Texas.
The House Passes the Resolution quickly and declares Texas a martial law zone.
However in the Senate, Kentucky Tea Party Senator Randy Paul launches a filibuster of the resolution, and states that the President of the United States cannot target American citizens any place in the United States, including Texas and that such would exceed his authority under the Constitution.
End of story.
OKR, I believe Randy Paul, in concert with other Tea Party fascists, is positioning himself politically for exactly the kind of hypothetical scenario I have described. He is attempting to gain political support to somehow ignore all precedent and insist that the President and the Congress have no authority to enforce the Constitution in any State using military force - thus paving the way for the successful secession of the Southern (and other) States of the United States.
And before you start saying, oh that will never happen, well mate it already did happen in South Carolina in 1860. And yep the Southern Senators attempted to thwart any action by the Senate, albeit unsuccessfully.
Am I to believe the "South's Gonna Do It Again" crowd wouldn't try to do it again?
I'm not obtuse News, if you will recall I said during the course of this discussion he was a nut case, and that I rarely agreed with him. I don't give a darn about his motivation, he got a piece of nasty business in the spotlight, as witnessed by this lengthy discussion among other venues.
I don't give a darn if it is the devil himself witnessing against immorality as long as someone is.
OKR, my dear friend, are you beginning to see something odd about Randy and his pals sudden interest in civil rights?
I just want you to know that you will eventually, and I await your realization patiently my friend.
And hey where was Randy the day Bush ordered the Army to go to take Jose Padillia out of the custody of the police and moved him to a military prison where he was denied even 1 hearing on the charges for 3 years, where he was held incommunicado for 3 years, where he was denied access to an attorney even though he had requested one repeatedly, and where even his family was not allow to communicate with him for 3 years -- and if that was not bad enough, he was never even charged with the dirty bomb claim of the Bush administration.
Where was Randy then? Why wasn't Randy screaming about the multiple violations of American citizen Jose Padillia's right to habeas corpus (and all his other civil rights along with it)?
Oh now Randy is upset...lol. I highly suspect that Randy's motives are purely political and have nothing to do with any genuine concern for our civil rights.
And ya know I thought it most interesting that Randy clearly stated he supported our invasion of Afghanistan.
We had no legal or moral reason for doing so.
Randy and Bush claim it was to get Bin Ladin. But he ignores the fact that the Afghan government immedietly placed Bin Ladin under house arrest as soon as the request for his extradition was made by Bush. They surrounded his house with a platoon of infantry and gave them orders to kill him if he attempted to escape. The extradition request went to the Afghan High Court. The court asked for 1 -- just 1 - piece of physical evidence tying Bin Ladin to the 9/11 attack. The USA provided none. So the Afghan High Court ruled that under their extradition laws the USA must provide at least 1 piece of evidence which they failed to do. So, the Afghan court turned down the extradition request. Then the Afghan government offered to turn Bin Ladin over to a neutral 3rd party -- they suggested American's close ally Egypt, and they were fully ready to transfer him to Egypt's custody. Bush refused the offer and began preparing to invade that sovereign nation.
So much for the law, eh mates?
"Atheist cop sues after being demoted to car washer for refusing to pray"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/08/at...
Freedom, American style!
DO
You said, "There is your hope, News, and your (non)change is to proudly defend it."
I am not a Democrat, nor do I vote for Democrat.
I am not a Republican, nor do I vote Republican.
I am an independent voter.
In 2012 I voted for, and supported, Gary Johnson of the Libertarian party for President.
Oh and countryman,
You said, ""Land of the free" is starting to have the same hollow ring as "the American dream."
I used to think I was free in America too.
Then I moved to a free country.
Freedom in America ended the day the U.S. Supreme Court, in direct conflict with previous rulings, overturned the Florida State Court and ordered the vote-counting in Florida to stop, effectively appointing Bush President.
And I gotta tell ya mate, life outside the American Iron Curtain is fantastic!!
Here is an interesting story. Its about some other folks who thought they were free too.
An excerpt from:
"They Thought They Were Free
The Germans, 1933-45"
Milton Mayer
gentle ben
As before, I remain a pacifist. I do not participate in violence of any sort.
How about you mate?
DO
You are wrong regarding the President using force on domestic armed insurrections.
He can be authorized by Congress to conduct martial law in areas that are either fully in the armed rebels' control or has no functioning civilian federal court.
In addition, the President is mandated by the Constitution to defend the Constitution, the federal government, and the People of the United States against domestic enemies and against foreign enemies.
You may think that is wrong. You may think its crazy. You may think anything you wish, but if you think he does not have that mandate then you are wrong.
Please feel free to petition your senators and congressman to begin the process to change the Constitution...cause that is the only way you can change the current law.
countryman
Good point mate. I am with you 100% on that mate.
I have publicly and privately opposed these military actions since before the Republicans even sent 1 soldier to die in a foreign land.
I hope we can say the same for you mate.
I am glad to see that folks are beginning to see that we peace-nicks were right all along.
That sound you hear is all our founding fathers rolling in their graves upon hearing the topics discussed in American politics today.
Torture
"Extraordinary Rendition" (government sponsored kidnapping)
Warrantless wiretaps
Suspension of habeas corpus
Warrantless searches
Government sponsored murder of citizens
War without congressional declaration
I reckon that our "War on Terror" apparently is enough of a war to invoke certain aspects of martial law and suspend habeas corpus, or order the murder of citizens, but not enough of a war to actually require a declaration from congress. How the hell does that work?
I'd say it's time for a new Civil Rights Movement. Except this time it need not be based on racial discrimination, we need a restoration of civil rights for everyone in America.
"Land of the free" is starting to have the same hollow ring as "the American dream."
"Hope" (and change) that President doesn't murder-drone-strike Newsacross?
"Newsacross.. I am relieved to read AG Holder's clarification and I hope it also applies to Americans living overseas.-- Posted by news across on Fri, Mar 8, 2013, at 2:47 AM"
Your hope is wasted on Holders clarification. It doesn't even rule out murder-drone-strikes of Americans on American soil, if they are deemed *enemy combatant. (*see 7 degrees of Kevin Bacon for that because you might know someone that knows someone that once knew someone... or their children, or whatever, that might have spoken to an alleged Al-CIA-Duh member.
Of course the President's prerogative to murder-drone-strike Americans elsewhere (and their children)has never been in question.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-gre...
There is your hope, News, and your (non)change is to proudly defend it.
Whatever happened to peace, love, and rock-n-roll?
"Where have all the flowers gone ... long time passing ..."
That sort of thing ...
Oh and DO, I am relieved to read AG Holder's clarification and I hope it also applies to Americans living overseas.
As an American (dual citizenship) living overseas and who is sometimes regarded as "radical" (well my hair is half way down my back -- an old man with very long hair lol, I guess that might be a little radical for some) has, based on the empirical evidence apparently a bit more to worry about than one living in the USA (see case of "Anwar al-Aulaqi" for more on this).
In fact, every time I call home or email my family back in the good ol' US of A, the US gov gets a copy thanks to the Bush/Obama Eavesdropping program. I am already a victim of Presidential over-reach in that regard my friend.
"Attorney General Eric Holder: President can't kill non-combatant with drone strike"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/07/at...
DO
I don't care what you believe. I know my own family history.
Anyway, believe whatever you wish mate.
On Fighting Rebels and Freeing Slaves..
"His name is none of your business mate." -- Posted by news across on Fri, Mar 8, 2013, at 1:09 AM"
You should be proud of the story of your great-grandfather, mate. Why tell a tiny part of a story without completing it? We have been conditioned to not believe anything without empirical evidence.
How are we to believe this is even a true story?
His name is none of your business mate.
Stop rebel traitors and free the slaves?
"Newsacross.. The institution of slavery was stopped by men like my Great-Grandfather (my Father's Grandfather) who went to the battlefield to settle the matter by force of arms. My Great-Grandfather fought long and hard in the Civil War to stop the rebel traitors and to free the slaves. That is what HE said was his reason for enlisting."
Something to be proud of..
What was your Great-Grandfather's name?
Oh and DO? Just one more thing.
Randy's dance was kinda funny actually.
I mean talk about entertainment lol lol lol....
Its just another case of a con telling us that white is black, up is down, right is wrong.
Randy acts like this is the first time anyone thought about it -- the fact that the President of the United States might, when duly authorized by Congress, use military force to subdue an armed insurrection in an area of the United States that is no longer under a functioning federal court because the area is in the control of the insurgents or under no control at all.
I think he is a bit late mate...153 years too late.
OKR,
I think you are advocating a change in the law. That is certainly possible but it will require at least one, and maybe more, new Amendments to the Constitution nullifying parts of Article 1, Article 2 and Article 4 as well as other parts of the Constitution.
Until then, Ex parte Milligan remains the precedent and the law.
If on the other hand you are merely noting that war is bad...well no argument there mate. War is bad, Civil War is bad, but like it or not, the President can, when authorized by Congress and under the cited conditions, make war on any enemy of the United States be it a foreign enemy or a domestic enemy and that is the fact mate.
DO,
Checked! and its fine mate, as always.
Look mate, I guess you missed the last 2 Presidential elections -- the Tea Party and the Republican Party lost the elections for President and lost seats in both Houses of Congress.
I don't know where the extra votes are coming from to change this trend and especially since its due, at least in part, to the diminishing number of conservatives and especially the diminishing number of white conservatives. Brown skinned folks now make up about half the population and they refuse to vote conservative.
So good luck with that dream mate.
I think the problem is you are viewing the World from within the conservative bubble.
But hey, you can believe whatever you want mate -- but it won't change the reality of the facts.
Rand Paul is a nut case News, and it is only when our differing views of libertarianism merge that I support him. I will always oppose anyone being granted the right to murder. Call it subjective if you wish for one to take that stand. I call it irrational to not take that stand.
I applaud his effort to put this issue before the people.
I suppose that we have proven absolutely nothing to each other. I am as stubborn and have as strong a sense of conviction as do you. So be it. However we of the far left have proven to the far right that the left is not in lock step with established dogma as are they. In all the years I have followed, and participated in these blogs I have not once seen any two members of the far right disagree about anything. ;)
"Newsaccross... Ron Paul and his group of fascist pigs need to stop holding a gun to the head of the American People and get on with our business -- but we know he and the fascists are only interested in their own not-so-secret-as-they-think fascist agenda.
The best long-term solution to the fascist filibuster problem seems to be to simply continue to replace the Congressional Republicans with Democrats in each and every election until such time as there are no Republicans/fascists left in Congress.
-- Posted by news across on Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM"
Might want to check your blood pressure, News
"Rand Paul, was a hero yesterday. Van Jones"
"This was not a stunt, this was Democracy. Van Jones"
"Liberals and progressives should be ashamed. Van Jones"
"Mr. Smith, goes to Washington"
"Although Rand Paul is a villain on civil rights, he was a hero on civil liberties for his 13-hour long filibuster" Van Jones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzBAxHeVR...
"The most important question before the American people"
Oh and Randy's grandstanding doesn't impress me one bit. I may just consider renting a nice place there in Kentucky just legally long enough to register to vote there and vote against this clown the next time he comes up for re-election. I just love Kentucky that time of year and my wife would just love it too. The best part is that it would be 1 more vote against Randy with a great vacation side-effect...(lol).
I am shocked you got taken in by that TP Fascist Republican mate, but you did...hook, line, and sinker!!
As regards Gandhi and King,
Yes I am a pacifist.
I have not discussed my personal, moral perspective on that particular potential Congressional approval, under specific conditions set forth by the Constitution and affirmed by Ex parte Milligan. This is because my subjective view of morality has no place in this particular argument. The issue at hand involves a long standing potential authorization by Congress. Its a matter of law.
Of course I think slavery is immoral. And yes its sad that we had to fight a war in order to end it.
The argument you make was presented to the High Court. If you read the majority opinion you may find that they too struggled with this issue. What they came up with is that only Congress can suspend habeas corpus (declare martial law) and then only under very specific circumstances. Under such conditions the Congress does have the power to authorize the President to conduct martial law within those specific limitations. That was their decision and only they have the Constitutional authority to make that decision (Marbury v Madison, 1803).
If you want to change the law, then follow the steps through the legislative process and I wish you the best of luck in your efforts.
But absolutely none of that justifies a filibuster of a cabinet position. The candidate deserves a fair, straight up or down vote. If you want to encourage your Senators to vote against the appointment then please make your feelings in the matter known to them.
OKr,
An ad-hominem attack from you mate?
That's surprising.
So they were supposed to sit there in slavery for one hundred years waiting on Lincoln? Oh no, don't break constitutional law, just be good little slaves til Massa says you are free. LMAO
You are wrong on this one, and you know it, else you were lying in your praise of MLK, and Gandhi.
Moral law takes precedence over constitutional law in every case. You have made that point yourself over, and over. Suddenly you jumped off into a swamp, and refuse to admit you have left the high ground because you won't let go of an argument. LOL
"Top 5 moments of Rand Paul's filibuster"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/07/to...
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
"Why Dummies Believe Fake Movements Are Real"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJ40o7HBV...
Oklahoma Reader
The slaves in the rebel states were freed by proclamation by President Lincoln and the Civil War.
The 13th Amendment made the slaves citizens.
That is the lawful path that was taken.
The institution of slavery was stopped by men like my Great-Grandfather (my Father's Grandfather) who went to the battlefield to settle the matter by force of arms. My Great-Grandfather fought long and hard in the Civil War to stop the rebel traitors and to free the slaves. That is what HE said was his reason for enlisting.
And it was that war that also settled a few issues besides slavery including the matter of centrally controlled government or state's rights, the unconstitutionality of state secession from the Union of States (Texas v White), and defined boundaries to when and under what conditions Congress may limit habeas corpus.
Congress is the key mate.
Congress can limit the President in a number of ways which begins with a simple "do not authorize the President to do it." All Congress has to do when the President asks for authority to suspend habeas corpus anywhere in the country is to do what they have been doing for years -- nothing.
News slavery was once Constitutional law, Constitutional law affirmed more than once by the Supreme Court of our land. By your argument those poor slaves legally should have accepted the status quo, and waited passively hoping that court affirmed constitutional law would change. Running away by your logic would have been the criminal act, and slavery not so.
You have painted yourself into a corner my friend. ;)
DO,
The filibuster is a Senate rule, Rule #22. It can be changed or eliminated by a simple up or down majority vote. Many in the Senate have felt for some time now that its time for Rule 22 and the filibuster to be removed from the rulebook by the Senate. However, it is the Senate's prerogative and the President has no say in the matter.
Ron Paul and his group of fascist pigs need to stop holding a gun to the head of the American People and get on with our business -- but we know he and the fascists are only interested in their own not-so-secret-as-they-think fascist agenda.
The best long-term solution to the fascist filibuster problem seems to be to simply continue to replace the Congressional Republicans with Democrats in each and every election until such time as there are no Republicans/fascists left in Congress.
Smart Dog
Lol, yeah mate Keynesian Economic Theory is a standard in Economics. Most Economist point to both the theoretical evidence (the math) and the empirical evidence of the Keynesian Model as the reason we should be using the Keynesian approach.
It was application of the Keynesian Model that saved our nation's economy in the 1930's, helped us finance WW2, and built our current infrastructure -- including Ike's use of the Keynesian model to build the interstate system and to finance the rebuilding of Europe (the Marshall Plan).
Reagan-ism re-introduced the use of the Neoclassical model and the result was flat-lined real-wages for the next 30+ years and stunted economic growth, and huge increases in income for the top 1%. Ultimately, the use of Reaganism (neoclassical hypothesis aka supply-side, aka free-market) lead to the 2008 economic crash.
I have never understood why anyone would want to use Neoclassical hypothesis as their model for the American economy but the fact is both the Republicans and the Democrats do. The end result is our current economy.
In the interest of fairness and open-mindedness, following is a link to the article by John Papola that Mr. Livingston takes issue with in my link below.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk...
After reading both, it seems to me that Papola is having trouble getting past his personal failed business adventures. Newsflash, Mr. Papola, not all smart guys are good managers or leaders. Additionally, there is a decent amount of luck involved in developing a successful business.
If two guys start similar businesses, and both do the same things, but one guy stumbles into a great market and the other stumbles down into a morass, was it luck or leadership?
That has long been a pet peeve of mine, successful folks that think they are somehow genetically or intellectually superior, when in reality, it was most likely their employees, or dumb luck, or good timing that resulted in their success where others failed.
Welp, since we seem to be plagarizing PBS, how about the importance of parenting and education in determining success of the individual.
Apparently there is no genetic defect in poor folks, or dumb folks for that matter. Just a giant lack of effective parenting, education, and opportunity.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk...
But wait, how do I feel good about myself if I am a big shot, say ... Paul Ryan, but you are telling me that I am not a superior being? What kind of commie logic is that?
The following is a link to an essay on the topic of austerity, and it's pitfalls. I found it interesting, and a stimulus for more reading on some of the topics presented.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk...
His argument that an economy based on consumption makes more sense than an economy based on savings and investment seems to be a good one.
I do understand his point. That savings in order to drive investment, which will then increase production and in theory result in more wealth, doesn't make any sense in light of empirical evidence and modern society.
I find his argument against the fundamental ideas that the only driver for growth is savings and investment seem very well reasoned. He seems to favor the idea that economic growth created by consumerism drives investment, not the other way around.
Now, how do we teach this to about 200 congressmen who seem hell-bent on making life as miserable as possible for as many as possible.
Perhaps someday we will grow beyond the Puritan influence on American dogma that says we must suffer through austerity and misery in order get anywhere. The more I think about the article, the more I realize that it makes no sense to tell folks, the government included, that the only path to riches is through sacrifice and austerity.
Heck, if no one ever spent any money on anything, then none of us would have a job, and therefore no one would have anything or any money to spend.
Isn't that what the end result of austerity in it's most extreme would be? How does that lead to economic growth or prosperity?
I can identify with anyone leaning toward a more Democratic Social approach to the Government of our Country! The Governmental System we have now is not working,nothing about it works for anyone! Over the years it has been manipulated & twisted too the point, its Paralyzed ! When two groups can manipulate our Voting, make thing so difficult for minorities,and now Middle Class, (Hell everyone)is criminal.When they see a district that's not going their way,on either side , they just change it by Gerrymandering in their interest! This kind of thing has too be changed! There is Things that could be done that would stop a lot of it! Going too the Popular Vote on everything, stop the Filibuster entirely! Cutting our Senate,the Congress, districts Representatives,what there paid & their retirements! They have some pretty sweet deals.And word a very short Week.They should work 40 Hours like the American People? Let the People Vote on some of these things they just automatically put in place?? They are Employees that think we are stupid,and most have NO clue to whats going on.Im one of those to a point,but common Sense can make a person have questions of being husseld and check it out!! My Rant!
Oklahoma Reader, hits the nail on the head with this: (where were Congressional progressives last night?)
"Bravo to Rand Paul. He is dead on right on this one. I just wish that more of the Republicans, and the Democrats too had a strong libertarian streak.
Our civil rights, the precious entitlements common to us all, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are all endangered by this monstrous decision, and the cavalier attitude of those who promote it.
This is one issue that should unite the left, and right for it literally attacks us all. It grieves me to see the citizenry so unconcerned about this encroachment on the life, and welfare of every one of us. If it is ignored what will the federal government next steal from us?
-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 12:06 AM"
Filibusters are not illegal or the murdering President would have had Senator Rand Paul, hauled off to one of the undisclosed gulags for enhanced interrogation.
We as american's are protected by due process and I feel in some cases due process is violated..Drone attacks on American soil should never happen we are a nation of laws and we can operate within them.
"It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us--that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain--that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
An excerpt from "Gettysburg Address" November 19, 1863
President and Commander in Chief Abraham Lincoln, defending our Nation against traitors in the South who would have gladly done our nation in if they could.
As difficult as that job may be, as reprehensible the task -- specifically, that of the Commander in Chief, duly authorized by Congress, having the task of stopping and defending against American citizens who are in armed rebellion against the government, and have attacked the United States and effectively pacified any federal court authority in their area -- as bad as that Presidential duty may be, it is the President's obligation to defend our Nation against all enemies foreign or domestic.
So says the High Court.
So said our Founding Fathers.
So says the Constitution.
Oh and OKR,
Would you not have made the same argument to refute Lincoln as well?
We are a nation of laws.
The High Court has been clear and there are circumstances when the President, not only has the right, but rather, has a full obligation and duty as President and Commander in Chief to the Constitution, the Federal Government, and the People to protect against enemies both foreign and domestic.
That is a Constitutional mandate that cannot be ignored mate.
If that enemy is in an area in which the Federal Courts are unable to hear cases, unable to enforce rulings and orders, and are functionally neutralized, the President can go in with lethal force to put down violent insurrections, ensure the safety of Americans in that area, and protect against invasion, protect both private American property and federally owned property, and enforce federal law -- including martial law (suspension of habeas corpus) if such authority is granted by Congress.
Its been that way since 1866 mate, These are not new powers.
Oklahoma Reader
I have never heard the President claim he has the right to target a domestic enemy in an area where there is a functioning federal court. Please show me where he says that.
You may choose if you wish to ignore the greater moral question in this instance.
To me there are few threats to a civilization and a citizenship as great as an executive proclaiming that he has the right to kill an American citizen on American soil without ever a charge being made in any sort of court, without the victim ever having the chance to refute any charge, without any responsibility for any attendant murder of innocent bystanders. The fellow being resisted by Rand Paul is central to this Freedom to Murder scheme.
Mr. Paul is not stupid, he knows that his resistance will be overcome. Meanwhile he is doing all he can to call attention to this outrage against humanity. It is an excellent example of civil disobedience, and I am flabbergasted that you do not support civil disobedience of lesser laws in the furtherance of moral law, just as you would resist a law forcing you to the back of a bus in whatever way was possible in furtherance of the greater moral law.
Mr.Paul is protesting, he has chosen a forum available especially to him, and yes he is breaking a law to do it. I don't suppose you want to let loose the police dogs on him, or blast him from his sit in with a water hose? ;)
And OKR,
The United States Government is bound by the Constitution to defend the Constitution, our government, and our Nation.
I think President Lincoln and the Federal Government made that abundantly clear to all Americans by the close of the Civil War.
The United States has a duty to protect the United States. In addition, Ex parte Milligan established precedent when the Court ruled that in any area in the United States where there is no functioning civilian court the Congress may (1) declare martial law and (2) authorize the President to conduct martial law in those areas.
If the President feels he must use a particular weapon under conditions where he is meeting his Constitutional obligation to defend the Constitution, secure the border, quell insurrection, and insure domestic tranquility as Commander in Chief then that is his call and his duty. In addition, I doubt Congress would ever attempt to violate Milligan and try to authorize a military act in any area with a functioning United States Federal Court, or at least I know of no such occurrence since the Civil War. However, the President is obligated to use military force against any enemy threat, foreign or domestic.
So which is the greater threat News, fascist Republican impeding of congressional procedure in this, or fascist destruction of habeous corpus, et al by the executive branch?
Sometimes great threats require breaching protocal, and laws. The civil rights movement proved that point, and this is once again civil rights.
R. I. P. Hugo Chavez 1954-2013
http://fair.org/take-action/media-adviso...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/...
Before some of you begin parroting the mainstream media line on Chavez at least take the time to understand that there is another side to the story, and have the common sense to understand it before you begin blowing. The two links above will get you started.
No way OKR.
I may not believe John Brennan is the best choice for the job, but he is fully qualified under our Constitutional requirements for that office and its the President's prerogative. After all, he did win that last election with an electoral mandate from the people.
Its time the Fascist Republicans stop obstructing the People's business and get this confirmation to a straight up or down vote.
Do
Economists teach and Economists advise corporations and organizations in micro-economic design of production operations and on investment strategies both for the short-term and long-term.
As to being a Communist, no, I am a democratic socialist. You really need to move ahead a hundred years or so mate. Times have changed and to most socialists communism is a relic of the past for the most part, China and N. Korea excepted -- and neither form supported by most socialists. Frankly, when you say "Communist" your probably mean "Stalinist" and they are 2 very different approaches -- 1 is Leninist and 1 is Stalinist.
And much like the capitalist/fascist, Adolf Hitler, Stalin's political system was totalitarian and as hostile to the success of socialism as was Hitler's hostile to the success of capitalism. Both of which require a free and open society under a democratic government in order to flourish.
I don't regard myself as radical at all mate. That is your unqualified opinion. I am an Economist, retired, and I know both the empirical evidence and the data as well as the theoretical science (the math) support both the Keyensian Model and the Western, Democratic Socialist model. I will stick with the facts and leave the radicalism to the fascist tea party and their fellow travelers, the Republican Party.
In answer to your question regarding the fascist obstructionism going on in the Senate, I have long supported doing away with Senate Rule 22 making filibusters extremely difficult and reducing the probability of its occurrence and success. Fascist Republican obstructionism must end or We the People will have to kick those pigs to the curb (see 2008 and 2012 Presidential election for more on this). That's my opinion.
Bravo to Rand Paul. He is dead on right on this one. I just wish that more of the Republicans, and the Democrats too had a strong libertarian streak.
Our civil rights, the precious entitlements common to us all, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are all endangered by this monstrous decision, and the cavalier attitude of those who promote it.
This is one issue that should unite the left, and right for it literally attacks us all. It grieves me to see the citizenry so unconcerned about this encroachment on the life, and welfare of every one of us. If it is ignored what will the federal government next steal from us?
Where do all the good Communist stand on an American President being able to murder by remote controll drone, any American on American soil. It's a given that this is being done overseas at this time. Should the President or the next President be able to do that here?
Rand Paul and a few others are trying to get an answer from the President as I write.
12 hrs. and counting..
http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN2...
"Newsacross... I retired early (late 40's). I was able to do so because my wife and I both have defined pensions and because of accumulation of wealth over the years as a result of hard work."
From your radical comments I would have guessed you to be a younger man.
Where does an economist actually work and how did you come to the conclusion that a Communist utopia is really the way to go?
Oh and DO,
One more thing....
During the French Revolution all executions were done according to the law. The accused were promptly tried, promptly convicted, and promptly executed.
And heck, most folks there in the States -- and particularly Texas -- have a pretty solid track record of executions themselves -- and that doesn't even include the lynchings.
If executing criminals for crimes against humanity and other laws of the land bothers you, I recommend you move to Australia where they don't execute anyone...yet.
"NOAA: 2012 saw second largest rise in climate emissions on record"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/06/no...
The Younger-Dryas II, coming to your location real soon!!
And hey DO, while you are digetsting all that, here is some Guillotine music you can listen to.
Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTyv0L8go...
"The French Revolution"
([Documentary] [History Channel])
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUrEJBsWL...
DO
Well mate, I am middle class. Sure relative to most Americans I guess I would be a little bit rich, but I guess you could say that about all Australians given the American economy.
America is where we Australians go for incredibly cheap buys -- in much the same way many Americans used to go to Mexico for incredibly cheap buys. America is our version of Mexico.
As to living in a capitalist economy, I retired early (late 40's). I was able to do so because my wife and I both have defined pensions and because of accumulation of wealth over the years as a result of hard work. However, I would have been just as happy with a national pension that sustains my middle class lifestyle the way my defined pension does, and in a socialist system such a retirement would be possible for you as well as everyone else.
As to the Guillotine and rich folks...well it wouldn't be the first time that has happened would it? After all, the French, Russian, and Chinese revolutions weren't just figments of my imagination, right?
Events occur as a result of causation. Almost all revolutions in modern history were the result of collapsing economies that could no longer sustain the population.
The empirical evidence is clear mate, when the masses reach the point of starvation, revolution occurs and rich folks lose their wealth, their freedom, and often times, their heads.
I find it more than ironic that every other word out of a non-political, communistic, "economic" promoter's mouth is about murdering all business people by chopping off their heads.
News-across, if you are a wealthy economist as you say, wouldn't you also be seen by the lowly proletariat as such an evil capitalist? It sounds like you live much above the standard of the rest of us peons. How did you make so much money? How are you to keep your wealthy head attached when so many others are rolling in the streets of our new non-political world order?
"News-across...
In fact, its a rather ironic situation when the only thing standing in-between a capitalist and the Guillotine is the Food Stamp program."
In fact, its a rather ironic situation when the only thing standing in-between a capitalist and the Guillotine is the Food Stamp program.
One of these days the People will get tired of the capitalist propagandists and the capitalists and off their heads will come...just like France of old.
Ultimately, it is the People -- the masses -- who are the "deciders." When the People get tired of starving while watching the rich get richer, capitalists lose all their wealth and their heads. So says the empirical evidence.
The Bill O'Reilly's of the World may very well find themselves on the Guillotine right next to their capitalist masters.
"Bill O'Reilly screams at Alan Colmes for pointing out Obama's sequester plan"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/05/bi...
The only thing cons hate worse than liberals answering their questions is the answer...lol.
Its a changing World cons, and there is no future in political conservatism. We the People reject your failed model/ideology (see presidential elections 'o8 and '12 for more on this).
"Parody: Mitt Romney says he lost because minorities understood his message"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/05/pa...
Well OKR, I doubt it, lol.
That ought to Do it. ;)
DO,
Marxism is an economic model not a political system.
Capitalism is an economic model not a political system.
Both are capable of functioning in a free and open society under democratic governments (see democratic socialist countries Norway and Sweden for more on this).
However, under capitalism Allocation, Technology, and Equity are all decided by Dollar vote, where as in a Marxist economy -- a socialist economy -- Allocation, Technology, and Equity are decided democratically (1 man, 1 vote). Because these economic decisions are made under capitalism by dollar vote, in capitalist economies the rich make all the decisions -- including Equity (the more dollars you have, the more votes you get). That is why in the United States the rich (the top 1.5%) own and control 98% of the means of production and distribution.
As an economist I believe Marxism is the fairest economic system we can utilize and it is the only economic system that does not have a definite end point -- as capitalism does. Capitalism cannot survive long periods of decreased consumption (consumption is the engine of the economy and is driven by Demand -- which is composed of 2 parts: 1 is the desire to purchase and the other is the ability to purchase -- Demand requires both). As we saw in '29 and '08, (and many other times), in capitalism long periods of decreased consumption or short periods of significantly decreased consumption, result in spiraling deflation -- which can, ceteris paribus, lead to a complete collapse of the economic system. In light of the fact that our World population is now 1.5 times greater than the capacity of the Earth to provide resources, capitalist economic collapse is assured. It has a definite end-point, though the exact date of the collapse remains unknown).
Only a scientifically planned economy can provide the kind of efficiency and effectiveness we need in order to deal with such a large population. Socialism is not affected by long decreases in demand as is capitalism. Its a much easier system to adjust to changing times, and its a much fairer system creating a rich society rather than only enriching a few of the members of that society.
Is this supposed to be a joke?
"Newsacross....Marxism is all about equality. Marxism is centered around economic equality where every person owns an equal share of the Net National Product. In addition, rather than using dollar vote to make economic decisions -- as does capitalism -- Marxist economic decisions are 1 man, 1 vote.
Everyone is equal in a Marxist economy provided it exists under a democratic government in a free and open society."
All you guys should write on some of the more widely read Blogs. You can make more sense then a guy like me,and i write on all i can find. Its a wonder the Secret Service hasn't been Knocking on my door, or Homeland! Ha Their looking for un Americans,they need too look at the inside of our own Government! In my opinion,the take over can come from the inside! More likly i think!!
Due to sequester all tours of the white house have suspended March 9th apparently the White House can't afford volunteers. (volunteers due the tours. On occasion staff help.. This another example of your fellow marxist liberals trying to steal mid term elections... Obama is in campaign mode.
OKR, it only goes to show the shrinking party of old white men has had it. The Republican Party is suffering from Alzheimer's. In fact, it has become the Alzheimer's Party.
The Republicans are nothing but a fading, bad joke.
Speaking of those same Dummies they have included in their latest pseudo-bill the defunding of ACORN. ACORN ceased to be in 2010 when the moronic Right defunded them. Just another case of perpetual "Ground Hog Day" from those irrational fools. ROTFLMAO. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05...
"TSA to allow passengers to carry small knives on planes"
http://www.nbcnews.com/travel/tsa-allow-...
As time goes by and we get a good look back at what the conservative dummies have done to our Nation, time begins to act as a magnifying glass and we see the real goal of the 1% and their conservative dummies.
What we see is that the only goal of Dubba Bush, the conservative dummies, and their 1% owners was to use 9/11 to strip us of our civil rights.
That's all we get from the 1% and their conservative dummies -- less civil rights and more poverty.
ND,
and let's not forget that the 1% and their conservative dummies only call it class warfare when we fight back.
OKR,
No actually I have not enjoyed much in the way of spirits since the Holidays ended. I know I often make it sound as if I consume large amounts of spirits (lol), but the reality is I rarely ever have a drink outside of the holidays.
It was a super-typo.
I blame the internet.
We have all noticed the propensity of those on the right to copy and paste statements they stole from right wing web sites, and presenting them as their own on these blogs.
It appears that their inspiration for such abominable behavior is none other than their beloved Fox News which has been caught doing the same thing. Monkey see, Monkey do. LOL
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05...
News are you sure that it was not another kind of double that caused the double comment? For instance as in double whisky. ;)
OK well that last comment got doubled up...lol.
I know I often have some pretty bad typos, misspellings, rambling sentences, comma errors, redundancy, and other grammatical errors.
But my last comment was a Super-Typo!!
I blame the internet.
"Alleged escort in Daily Caller video: I was paid to make claims against Democratic senator"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/04/al...
Gee I wonder who paid the escort to make that claim?
Obviously it was the Republican Party since they are the only folks with a motive for doing so (to make the Democrats appear as immoral as the Republicans).
Another example of Republican morality (or rather lack thereof).
I don't care for either party, but between the two of them, most of the immorality I have seen comes straight from the Republican Party.
Gee I wonder who paid the escort to make that claim?
Obviously it was the Republican Party since they are the only folks with a motive for doing so (to make the Democrats appear as immoral as the Republicans).
Another example of Republican morality (or rather lack thereof).
I don't care for either party, but between the two of them, most of the immorality I have seen comes straight from the Republican Party.
Jason,
Elitist?
How is it possible to be both Marxist and elitist? After all the 2 concepts are mutually exclusive.
Marxism is all about equality. Marxism is centered around economic equality where every person owns an equal share of the Net National Product. In addition, rather than using dollar vote to make economic decisions -- as does capitalism -- Marxist economic decisions are 1 man, 1 vote.
Everyone is equal in a Marxist economy provided it exists under a democratic government in a free and open society.
Anyway, it appears to me that since you lost your argument and have no points upon which your argument can stand, you have lowered yourself to the point of attacking me personally rather than attacking my argument.
That means that the debate is over and you lost by a long shot.
Your elitist attitude that you share with your fellow marxist socialist comrades is what is ruing our country News your ignorance is clouded with 1 dollar words that have no cents (sense) then again ignorance is bliss for you...
Benghazi? My answer to you on the Right is Iraq! My answer to you on the Right is Afghanistan! When was the last time the Right was right about anything of real importance?
Your opinions are suspect in regard to every ongoing issue today. You have been utterly wrong on every resolved, or resolving issue. It amazes me that you can have any confidence in anything you say. Only fools have such ill founded confidence.
What happened to all you right wingers, and yes some in the middle, who defended our invasion of Afghanistan righteously stating that we were there to save them from themselves, and all the other ridiculous, nonsensical justifications that you made?
HELLO? Hello? Oh that's right you crawled back into another pocket of ignorance that you blather about, and have conveniently forgotten how wrong you were.
Your ignorance is pathetic, and you by association have blood on your hands, not only that of your fellow Americans, but that of countless innocent women, and children of Afghanistan. You are disgusting. Can you now understand why I have no respect for you?
After eleven years nothing there has changed, and the Taliban patiently awaits our departure to again take over the entire country. http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...
Jason,
Marxism is an economic theory -- not a church or a political system.
And speaking of morality, Republicrazies have a lot of nerve commenting on anyone else's morals given their track record of immorality.
It was not Marxism that tortured those prisoners -- it was conservatism that tortured those prisoners.
It was not a Marxist that lied the American People into war. That was a conservative, supported by conservatives.
It was not Marxism that put that tap on your phone and computer. That was conservatism that violated your 4th Amendment right.
Those fellows with the pillow cases on their heads who were lynching all those black folks? Conservatives -- not Marxists.
Those were not Marxists that committed genocide in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those criminals were conservative and conservative only.
Frankly mate, you have a lot of nerve to point your finger at everyone or anyone else and claim some kind of moral high ground, given the facts.
Its a good example of another moral failing of conservatives -- lack of personal responsibility.
Jason your comments are always so enlightening.
Oh how I love how the White House now says the sequester will not destroy us. The have revenue increases and they use 250 million of that to give Egypt.
The night of Benghazi the President was no where to be found. There have been several stories about that night from the White House how interesting I find it that you News take lightly about or fallen americans then again I am not shocked most marxist are immoral.
I agree with the last 2 post's. Our Democracy is gone!
There are 435 Congressmen and women and 100 Senators.
I agree that they should all vote themselves a pay-cut and a corresponding reduction in staff and budgets if for no other reason than appearances. That would be a nice indication that our elected leaders actually cared about something other than themselves.
Once getting yourself elected to a federal post became a path to wealth in of it's self, our system was doomed.
Hi, Lets talk about our very large government, we have about 450 representatives and approximatly 200 senators and 1 President, each one of these government officials draws down just a little under $200,000 a year with a private retirement, and their own insurance, and an office fully staffed and fully supplied. I believe they are totally working together to trick the people of the USA, first of all, where is the middle class people they are talking about, middle class jobs has left the country, the only thing left is the poor and seniors citizens and we are a non-productive citizens, yes we are dead weight around the richs neck, every time a politician talks about cutting cost, the first thing that come out of their mouth, WE HAVE TO REDO SSI AND MEDICARE PLUS MEDICAID AND ALL PROGRAMS THAT RELAT TO THE CITIZENS, well what about our very large government, and all those fat cats working in our government, (or maybe I should refer to them as a non-working government of fat cats. I hope I have kept this little note in the guide line outlined above. Thank you for letting me express my thoughts on the subject.
I wonder what would have happened if, when Obama took office and had the Majority in the House,why they didn't ram everything they wanted through the House & Senate at once? Would it have made a difference? Could it have been done? There is nothing going to happen as long as there is only 2 Parties! The People has too Write them every day and then turn around and do it again the next day! But we as a people just don't care,and we let them have their way! The people have just given up on their own Welfare. Disgusting!! Another Rant from me1
"How to become a drone target"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/02/ho...
WOW!!!!!
However, Jason, to be fair, I have to admit that nothing beat the expression on the faces of Republicrazies immediately after they lost the election.
That was the best!!!!
They actually believed that not only would they win, but that they could not lose.
Then facts burst the bubble...and it all happened so fast -- Wham, Bam, it was over.
I am really looking forward to 2016 when Hillary puts that look back on their faces.
Ya know which crazy Republican "cause" I liked best Jason?
If you guessed!
Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi!
then you guessed right!
I miss that one. It just made Republican folks look completely nuts lol...
Anyway, this latest pathetic attempt to blame the President for years and years of Republicrazy obsession with obstructing the work and will of the People, is just another failed political game of the Republicrazies.
But hey, hang in there buddy, who knows maybe if you repeat
"SEqUESTER! SEqUESTER! SEqUESTER!"
a few times you can get back to the good ol' days of the fabulous 50s! I hear McCarthy is busy rooting out commies and I know you don't want to miss out on that mate!
Jason,
Spare us the bubble version of events. We know about Woodward -- he showed us his neocon-self during the illegal and immoral war in Iraq.
Anyway, We the People have not forgotten where this started -- when the Republicans put an economic bullet to the heads of the American People, Yeah we know where this started.
And We the People will be kicking those House Republithugs to the curb in 2014.
Get used to it mate.
The sequester was proposed by Obama back 2011. As part of the Debt limit compromise.
Btw even though I don't agree with this the Republicans proposed to give Gov. Depts. flexibility in how to handle the cuts in the sequester it was voted down by Dems. Why because they are playing politics they are wanting to make the Republicans look evil because they are still campaigning so when a political party plays politics with policy then we as a whole nation suffer.
The sequester is the product of in adequate after all the sequester was the brain child of President Obama I bet President Clinton would of not have even put us in this situation and by the way the sequester is 2.5 percent of the projected increase in budget this year, I bet individual households which the average house hold makes now only 3,3000 a 10 year low has found away to cut more for their budget and have even increased their budget.
I forgot where I got this but I do remember this Let's rewind a bit to the presidential campaign -- remember Barack Obama vowing to veto any attempt to undo the sequester? Bob Woodward has pointed out the sequester was actually invented at the White House and was imposed during the Budget Control Act negotiations. This is the same reporter that the white house kind of sort of threaten by Saying you will regret this oh by the way Lenny Davis strong supporter of Obama has reported his boss at the Washington Post has been threaten with withdrawing press credentials if they don't stop running Lenny Davis' column.
"Sequester of Fools"
Paul Krugman
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/22/opinio...
Here is an interesting perspective.
Dr. Krugman reminds us of how we reached this foolish point in the first place.
BTW, it's "Sequester Day." Has the sky fallen yet? Has the zombie apocalypse begun? Are the streets littered with dead bodies? Has business come to a screeching halt?
So far all I see as a result is a gigantic amount of finger pointing and political potshots.
From my view, across the board 3% spending cuts at the federal level are a good start. Personally, I don't want to cut education, medicare, or social security a single penny. However, what I also know is that any good manager should be able to find 3% in waste in their organization pretty dang easily, especially a government funded organization.
I am not convinced that our federal bureaucracies are finely tuned, high performance organizations, so a round of learning how to control costs might be just what the doctor ordered.
Defense cuts could be much deeper than 3%. We obviously are down to just one war (how sad for the warmongering crowd, eh), and are closing in on an end to the other, so we ought to be realizing significant reductions in millitary costs to the taxpayers.
I'm all for strong defense, but somebody is going to have to explain to me how ending two rather large and expensive foreign campaigns should not result in a smaller defense budget.
I am also all for ending corporate welfare. Cut those subsidies to some of the worlds richest companies in the oil industry. Close all the ridiculous tax loopholes for specific industries.
I could also get behind new tax revenue. Here's the kicker, the new tax revenues should fall onto the shoulders of anyone moving American jobs overseas.
New taxes on foreign corporations sounds like a great idea. All the American companies racing to incorporate in places like the Caymans, Ireland, etc. should be required to pay a new fee to do business in the good old USA where all the money is. This new fee should exceed what they would have paid in corporate income taxes (which in my understanding are much lower than what individuals pay).
I won't be holding my breath until congress get's any of that done.
And somebody be sure and let me know when the sequester becomes something other than political theater.
$1 says that the first conservative response to my post will be "oh, yeah....well Obama did.... (insert GOP talking point here)."
This should get the Pavlov's Liberals crowd salivating.
In the past, I had developed some measure of respect for Justice Scalia due to his well known stance of opposition to "judicial re-interpretation of what congress, or the framers of our constitution, actually wrote down." It seems Scalia says he believes that laws should be interpreted based on what is actually written down, not what we think the lawmakers really meant, but didn't write down.
I have to agree with him in that respect, that putting words into the mouths of the founders, or the framers of the constitution, or the legislators who wrote laws, is improper. After all, as he has famously said, "if the congress had wanted the law to be interpreted in a certain way, they would have written that into the law in the first place." What counts is what they actually took the time to write down, not what we think they meant.
However, in this latest round of debate of voter rights, it appears that Justice Scalia has contradicted himself.
To make the following statement reeks of second guessing the legislature if you ask me.
Regarding the 2006 renewal of the Voting Rights Act of 1965,'He said the Senate's unanimity simply proved the law had not been given serious consideration. The senators were afraid, he said, to cast a vote against a law with a "wonderful" name. He went on to assert that the reauthorization of the act was merely "a phenomenon that is called perpetuation of racial entitlement."'
Sadly, Scalia, who at times can display impressive logic and reason in his conservative points of view, has again reaffirmed that regardless of how savvy his logic, his politics always take precedence.
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/top...
One thing I can say about today's neo-cons, give them enough time and they will all contradict themselves.
For example - "all life is sacred." Well, except for those lives who were working in those Baghdad buildings during "shock and awe", or those brown skinned folks who want to vote, or those folks on death row regardless of wrongful conviction rates, or the children of the 'terrorists' killed in drone strikes, or those 'suspected terrorists' who we tortured to death, or . . . . you get the point.)
Yeah I remember when they convicted him.
How is it he was prosecuted and convicted while George Bush committed the exact same crime and then walked away a free man with no consequences what-so-ever?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canad...
Ya got that right bro!
Darned if I know OKR.
If he wants to know why folks call Hannity and his pals at Fox News fascists, then he will want to understand the definition of the word.
But the funny thing is that if he did read the 14 defining characteristics of fascism, he would probably wonder to himself, "so what's wrong with fascism?"
I think its both funny and sad that so many folks don't have a clue that the ideology they love and defend is just plain, ol' fascism.
News do you really think that Jason is going to read the fourteen points that define fascism?
"Gun owner fires at Walmart shoplifter to 'mark' him for police"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/28/gu...
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Orange-...
One day a fella gets to carry his pistol in his pocket legally, the next day he is well on his way to prison.
Do we really want ignorant fools like this guy carrying pistols in their pockets?
Perhaps its time to rethink conceal-carry laws?
Oh no Jason,
I was referring to the political ideology that Hannity follows and for which he is a propagandist.
" Fourteen Defining
Characteristics Of Fascism"
http://rense.com/general37/char.htm
My opinion, nothing going too get done Until we can take the control of our Elections out of the Politicians hands! Go too the Popular Vote! All States will abide by Federal Law. A 51% vote on everything,and let the chips fall were they may! The way things are now, the Presidency has NO power at all,so why do we have a favorite?
I am concerned when the intolerant liberals call someone who disagrees with them a facist what this means is they have logical comments or thoughts to answer someone's view point.
"Eyes Wide Shut on the Iraq War" This commentary made me recall the frustration, and exasperation I felt as I saw my country going down the tubes, with megaphoned mainstream media, left, and right bellowing a constant war chant.
http://consortiumnews.com/2013/02/24/eye...
It's all there in black and white. The continuing American tragedy that great heroes, Lincoln, MLK, and others who died trying have not been able to end. http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/comme...
Well Jo, it might help if Republicans could start actually accepting personal responsibility for their wrong-doing.
The Republicans give the phrase "personal responsibility" a lot of lip service, but that is as far as they go.
When it comes time for them to really and truly accept personal responsibility for their bad deeds, they are nowhere to be seen.
And mate its not like the sides are equal. There are far more Democrats than Republicans and frankly the average American seems to dislike the Republicans very much. As I said before, they are loud, they give personal responsibility a lot of big talk, but in the end we see the Bush's, Cheney's, and Rumsfelds of this World go on as if they had done nothing wrong -- and nary a word from the Republican Party while they assisted in committing Bush Administration crimes of state.
All the lies that's been told to the Public from both sides, should be corrected by the Media,if there going to print it ,correct it before hand! If you let them tell the lie, your as guilty as the liar! There has to be a Law that covers this,use it!, If not go after the Liar, and Loosen some teeth, or is that not civilized?I think we need a little less Civility! Being civil is not working! Just a thought!
If you "disagree" with Hanity and the fascism he represents, then you will love this video clip.
"Rep. Keith Ellison hammers Sean Hannity: You're a shill for the Republican Party"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/26/re...
Finally...somebody has said what had to be said.
Finally, Hannity's been properly put in his place.
r, if you see this clip, please be sure to take notes mate.
Well, what will the Democrats give them on this Sequester thing? They will do just like they have in the past,(give them anything they want,and screw us all again)
Obama and the rest of the wimps better gets some guts, learn, and use, the tatic's the Republicans use!
IT,
Yeah but I think she will be busy getting ready be President.
Hey News,
I think Hillary Clinton may be available for a few years for a cabinet post.
She isn't Catholic, but my guess is that she's now celibate.
Dear Future Constituent,
Thank you for your suggestions.
You may rest assured the Honor will be Restored in Rome, I mean the Vatican.
I plan to rule the Italian peninsula, I mean the Vatican and its 2 billion strong Catholic Church with my iron will no matter who is on my Cabinet.
When I go from being Papal Candidate News Across to Pope Duce I, discipline and order will be high on my list of priorities.
Thank you again for your interest in Vatican Cabinet positions, and I hope I can count on your vote.
Too bad all the Marx Brothers aren't alive, I think they would make fine Cabinet officers for you News.
I can almost see it, Groucho, Harpo, Zeppo, Chico, and even Gummo, spilling, stumbling, and tripping out of a large cabinet in the Pope's master bedroom, overflowing with innocent madness the Apolistic Palace replacing the dark madness that has been the custom of the place. ;)
Oh and r,
After I win the Office of Pope, I hope you will consider accepting a place in my Administration, specifically the position of Secretary of Labor.
Your ideas seem to fit well with my vision for a new Rome, uh I mean Vatican.
r,
There are no areas of the United States governed by "liberals."
Nice try, but no cigar mate.
rr3yv0
Are you defending slavery?
Are you defending treason against the United States of America?
I think you are.
OKR,
I try to no longer read rr's posts, but I made an exception when I read your post to him and read his.
Shouldn't have!
I need to listen to myself.
Please post disclaimers to remind me not to read him the next time you post to him.
I'll trust you to ferret out the good stuff.
:)
You are really special rr3, only you would think of ways to celebrate slavery.
This should be celebrated as part of black history month. Shouldn't it?
Father of U.S. slavery was a black man
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/father-of-u-s...
Is that why the most bankrupt areas of the country have been run by liberals for years? Now America will pay the high cost for electing liberals.
Jo,
There seem to be a lot of conservatives but in fact they are a small minority. They are loud, and that may be why it seems like there are quite a few of them.
Jo conservatives have gotten hostile with America before. 4 years later their states lay in ruins, burnt to the ground, most of the conservative traiters who were men were either dead, permanently wounded, or POWs.
Once the richest area of the United States, 4 years after they got hostile with America they were a beaten people. The South still, almost 150 years later, has not fully recovered economically.
The conservatives talk a good story, but when it comes down to it Jo, but I don't think they really want to go that same route again.
News, I hope your right about the Republican Brand becoming obsolete! But with everything i've read ,i get a sense of some kind of take over of the entire Government, from the inside.I do think it can be done! Look whats happening in Michigan.You have probably been reading about it, unbelievable!It could get very Hostial in this Country!!
Early 2016 prediction:
Hillary for the Dems and Christie for the GOP.
No room there for Tea Baggers.
Oh, what will become of them?
Hee hee.
OKR,
Thanks for clarifying that.
I know blaming it on solar panels sounded crazy, but these days the cons blame everyone else and everything else for the failures of their policies.
They talk a good game but when it comes to accepting personal responsibility for their failures, they are nowhere to be seen.
So naturally, I figured they were blaming the safety failures of nuke plants on solar panels.
It used to be that when Republicans made their crazy statements, We the People were shocked.
Now it just seems normal for Republicans to make crazy statements -- par for the course, sort-to-speak. We have to come to expect that. It may also be one of the reasons their party and their "ideology" is dying (literally).
Yeh News solar panels at the nuclear plant are the real cause of the worse than thought radioactive liquid leaks at the Hanford facility...what are you doing just putting something out there that no one to the left of rr3 could possibly believe?
I know you were obliquely making a statement that we would not have these nuclear nightmares if we instead had invested the same amount of capital in the solar industry.
You need to watch that though because there are folks out there barely clinging to the right edge of reality that will actually blame it on solar panels. I am talking about those folks who busily separate the wheat from the chafe, and brag about how much chafe they collected. ;)
"Montana legislator introduces bill to give corporations right to vote"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/23/mo...
Republican are clearly morally bankrupt.
OKR,
I am somewhat confused by the article you linked to.
Is that radiation leak being caused by solar panels at the nuclear plant?
"Glow little glow worm, glimmer, glimmer".
A shot at the good life is getting slimmer.
"Lead us lest too far we wander"
Such sad things we must ponder.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/...
Oops! Typo!
I meant to say "...caved to pressure from the pro-obamacare crowd."
Hey r, check this out:
"Experts: Florida's Medicaid turnaround paves the way for Obamacare"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/22/ex...
I don't get it.
I thought Florida Governor Rick Scott was on our side on this issue. I can't believe he caved to pressure from the pro-obamacare crowd.
r,
Just out of curiosity...
1.) why do conservatives hate women?
Could it be related to the high number of conservative closeted gays (aka Log Cabin Republicans)?
2.) Do you agree Congress should begin adding the single payer provision back into the Obama Care Program?
It certainly seems to me like it would be an improvement relative to the current American medical access system. Any thoughts on this issue mate?
r,
I agree regarding Obama care.
If you may recall, I was opposed to Obama care from the moment they dropped the single-payer plan.
After that it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.
America needs socialized medical care access -- not half-steps designed to make the 1% even richer.
rr3yv0
Those aren't crimes.
His personal-life mistakes do not make the Reverend Jessie Jackson anything but human.
And paleeeeeez my friend, don't try to cast conspersion on his public work. He has been an asset to our Nation in many ways not the least of which is his work in the ongoing Civil Rights movement.
We saw this same kind of attempt to discredit a great man when the FBI attempted to do the same with Dr. Martin Luther King when it was learned he may have had some indiscretions in his personal history.
It didn't work then and it won't work now mate.
Oh now Senate Democrats are complaining about the implementation of Obamacare. Hey we had to pass it to see what was in it. What planet do these people come from? They were all for it 2 years ago.
Oh news are you talking about his dad the Baptist minister that committed adultery and knocked up a girl working for his organization and had a child out of wedlock. It's funny how you people always lift up your failures.
Ending a pregnancy you cannot afford, don't want, or were raped over, and killing the same 50 million later by slow starvation, lack of medical care or as cannon fodder in a resource war just to give Rightists' another 50 million reasons to gripe?
Posted by NanaDot on Thu, Feb 21, 2013, at 8:11 PM
Is that how you justify the murder of over 50 million babies. Really! That is pretty sick. What is the actual percentage of these murders that are rape? The rest of the reasons you cite the women have a choice in. If you can't afford a baby don't have one. If you don't want one don't have one. Should we legalize murder to cover up a moment of indiscretion? Nana you really should do something to get rid of this hatred.
OK, a Congressman can wear a Rolex, but what was he doing with the fur capes?
Selling them?
One last thing, this must be very embarrassing for his family -- especially his Dad who is indeed one of the greatest Americans of the 20th Century -- right up there with Dr. King in terms of his contribution to our society.
But heck, I guess every family tree has at least1 bad apple somewhere along the line.
Thank goodness for his Dad though. He has helped a lot of people in his life.
Now if we could get the Bush Administration criminals to all enter into plea deals at least we could say We the People got our day in court.
And yeah I do see that Jackson entered a plea deal with the prosecutors.
yeah I see your errors, if that is what you mean.
News,
See what I mean?
What the f...
Yeah mate, this is the first I have heard that he has entered a plea in a court hearing.
Anyway, I don't care at all what you do for a living as long as I can continue to live my lavish lifestyle and never have to work.
In terms of physicians, the only one who's medical opinion I am interested in is the treating physician. However, if he had not entered a plea of guilty, the court would be interested in having him examined by state experts in the field of psychiatry and their diagnosis would carry a lot of weight with the court's decision in this regard.
But as you pointed out, he has acknowledged his guilt which would have to mean he has already plead guilty -- either that or he made "admissions" when he was hospitalized, under medication, and suffering from a severe mental illness -- one that could seriously interfere with his decision making process. I doubt the jury would ever hear those "admissions."
Personally, it sounds like a bad decision a client might make in a case like this but its not what his attorney recommended.
And now I guess we just wait for the sentencing.
That's that!
Badda Bing, Badda Boom!
Unless he has not plead guilty in which circumstance he may be listening to his attorney now and preparing for a plea of not guilty (due to insanity maybe?). And frankly, given the description his treating physician has given of his condition, I am not sure he knows if he is guilty of anything or not.
Frankly, as I said in an earlier comment, like any other defendant he is innocent until proven guilty.
My only concern here is that everyone get their day in court. Its a thing we Aussies call a "fair go." He gets his day, the People get their day.
Its a better deal than we got with the Bush criminal gang who all walked away without even nary a hearing or investigation or a single question about it.
As to your personal opinion of me, it means nothing to me mate. Think whatever you want.
News you said;
"If you can get him convicted, then he is guilty. Until then, he remains innocent by virtue of the fact that he has not been convicted of anything."--News
At most he is presumed innocent, which is not the same thing as actual innocence. ;)
News,
The man pled guilty. Also, how do you know I'm not a physician? More importanly I am someone who is Manic-Depressive(diagnosed) and I can still tell you it does not give me or anyone else Carte Blanche to steal $750 grand in campaign funds. Period.
Please spare me any long winded, mind numbing retort.
Quite frankly you stike me as someone who is in love with the sound of his own voice.
Furthermore, you seem to be afflicted with the unfortunate compulsion to always appear to be the smartest guy in the room at any given moment.
For instance, your incessant use of the word "mate" in written form as opposed to just conversational usage comes off as pretentious. It doesn't make you sound any smarter or even Australian for that matter. It just makes you sound like a Yank who's trying too hard. Perhaps you should consider dailing it down a few notches?
Definitions: Black's Law Dictionary
What is NOT GUILTY?
A plea of the general issue In the actious of trespass and case and in criminal prosecutious. The form of the verdict In criminal cases, where the jury acquit the prisoner. 4 Bl. Comm. 301
What is INNOCENT?
Free from guilt; acting in good faith and without knowledge of incriminatory circumstances, or of defects or objections.
Apple and orange. ;)
Yes rr,
To my knowledge, in the case of Congressman Jackson there has been no legally admissible admission of guilt and even if there was there are still some serious legal questions and possibly a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.
In addition, unlike with the Republican criminals Bush, Cheney, and others in the Bush Administration, we actually saw an investigation at full tilt as concerns Congressman Jackson.
With Bush's crimes -- much more serious crimes -- there was no investigation, no grand jury investigation, no police investigation, and no special prosecutor investigation. We just let those who may in fact be guilty of torture and genocide just walk away from their crimes with nary even a peep from the Republican Party or you rr.
In no way have I said that if found guilty these folks should not all be held to the letter of the law, and, while a prosecution based on the evidence we do have against Bush and his fellow criminals would likely be successful (if it ever got that far), the prosecution of a severely mentally ill person may not be possible or may result in dismissal based on the likely insanity plea Congressman Jackson's attorneys have almost certainly been contemplating.
I am saying that apparently if you are a Republican there are no consequences at all for law breaking, while if you are a Democrat there WILL be an extensive investigation for even the most minor crimes -- and a prosecution and probably prison time.
When it comes to Congressman Jackson, We the People will get our day in court.
But with Bush and his criminal gang We the People will never get our day in court.
Oklahoma Reader
You quoted me out of context mate.
As I said, from a legal standpoint there is no substantial difference between not guilty and innocent.
If there is a difference in the legal sense, please explain the difference in terms of its application.
Man that was out of left field!
"then there is no substantial difference between not guilty and innocent."- News
I disagree. There is a huge difference between the two words in every venue. Innocent is a nebulous word. Not guilty is a precise phrase with clear, limiting boundaries to its meaning.
Innocence is most closely the purview of the individual in whom it is questioned, for in most cases the individual is the only possessor of the most relevant facts. The stickler is that in the case of many there is a dearth of the mental acuity necessary to forming a sound judgment. Here we witness the innocence of a fool.
Innocence is so slippery that it can not be quantified with sufficient certainty. Ultimately we determine innocence more by what we feel about an individual, than what we know about the individual's inner being. I can not bring myself to assume the innocence of anyone, including myself, who is over the age of two. ;)
Really news you are standing on that after you said that JJJ was innocent after admitting to his crime. Say it ain't so.
Actually OKR,
This approach is based on the notion of Western Jurisprudence (and in particular English/American Common Law) which holds that one is innocent until proven guilty.
In addition, I think perhaps we are splitting hairs over 2 similar words. If we are viewing it from a legal sense (and we are), then there is no substantial difference between not guilty and innocent.
No where in title 18 does is say that the act must result in the death of the prisoner being tortured in order for it to violate the Title. In addition, it does allow for the death penalty should he be found to have ordered torture that does resulted in death (including the "mysterious deaths" of some of the prisoners held at Gitmo). There are also lessor penalties in Title 18 for non-death related torture, including long prison sentences.
In fact, it prohibits any kind of coercion.
I call Bush guilty because he admitted to the crimes publicly. He admits it, and you never complained one time.
The President is not above the law. He must comply with Title 18 or he is guilty with a criminal act. He violated the law and admitted he had ordered the acts.
and its not the only crime he admitted to (spying on the People without a warrant was another of his famous crimes as was his outing of Valerie Plame, a CIA agent).
Nixon was wrong -- it is a crime if the President does it.
And like Nixon, you are wrong too.
"If you can get him convicted, then he is guilty. Until then, he remains innocent by virtue of the fact that he has not been convicted of anything."--News
He doesn't remain innocent, he remains not guilty. The court only decides whether guilty, or not guilty. Innocence is not their purview. :)
Oh my news you are worried about water boarding that didn't kill anybody. Yet you support a persons choice to kill a baby. Some things our military does should not be revealed because normal people can't handle it and it gets the job done. I agree if Bush was guilty of a crime he should have been prosecuted but you constantly want to call him guilty but you never do this to a liberal no matter what high crime they may commit. Hypocrisy at it's finest.
Rand Paul returned $600,000 to the treasury that his office came in under budget. He returned $500,000 last year. Why doesn't this make the liberal news media? Oh he's not a liberal. Have you ever heard of a liberal giving back anything? This should be headline news to counter all the crazy spending of the other idiots in Washington. We the people should be asking our congressman every year how much did they save. Will the low information voter ever support this kind of action?
Well r,
I know that Bush admitted he has ordered the water boarding -- which is at the very least coercion and is torture by any standard.
It is also a serious violation of US Title 18, part 1, chapter 118, War Crimes. His "methods" were a serious violation of the Geneva Conventions (which prohibits coercion of any kind to either combatants or non-combatants) to which the United States is a signer. Title 18 reflects that commitment.
I know how its a crime.
But how is that a lie mate?
Still... missing the point news.
Then you try to justify liberal actions because you believe all the lies about Bush. Or are you just trying to change the subject because you don't want to see my point of your hypocrisy.
California is threatening to strip the boy scouts of their tax exempt status if they keep their policy of not allowing gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender from serving as scouts or leaders. I say the scouts should just leave California like everyone else. We used to say, 'only in California' but sadly their liberalism is spreading. Can straight people or Christians join gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender organizations? Maybe I should check that out so I could go to the meetings and tell them about their sin. You think they would allow that?
r,
given that Bush and other senior leaders of the Republican party committed the worst crimes on the books (torture, genocide, murder of civilians, ect), and just walked away with not even a grand jury investigating their crimes which they have admitted publicly they committed, it seems ironic that here you are wanting to throw the book at mental patients who haven't been convicted of anything.
Where were you when Bush was busy breaking the law?
Still missing the point news.
WTF,
He was diagnosed by trained, fully qualified doctors.
I will take their diagnosis and prognosis before I would ever take a non-physician's diagnosis and prognosis.
And frankly, there is a real difficulty in convicting someone who has been diagnosed with this debilitating illness.
If you can get him convicted, then he is guilty.
Until then, he remains innocent by virtue of the fact that he has not been convicted of anything.
How come a conservative is always convicted when accused of wrong doing and a liberal is always innocent until proven guilty? That's the blatant hypocrisy of liberalism. Is that why they always think conservatives and Christians are always the criminals. I guess it comes from denial of ever thinking that liberal policies are the REAL problem.
Still missed the point news.
News,
I diagree completely. I am also manic-depressive. Years back I tried to deal with it by crawling into a bottle and it almost killed me. Fortunately I came out the other side stronger and better for it. It's still there but now I can deal with it since I know what I am dealing with. It is NO excuse for stealing. Depressive or not he needs to pay the piper.
Well r, if your point is that he is guilty of anything then you are wrong.
He has not been convicted by any jury or court of law that I am aware of.
That makes him innocent of any wrong doing under our laws.
Missed the point news.
rr3yv0
He has been fully examined and diagnosed by fully qualified psychiatrists -- you know, doctors -- as suffering from Manic-Depression.
A conviction under those circumstances is rather unlikely.
And until such time as he is convicted, he remains innocent under the law.
News JJJ is only sick because he got caught. Liberals are never sorry for what they do they are only sorry that they got caught. I am giving him the same latitude you would give any conservative accused of the same thing. Liberals always think their sin is not as bad as the other guy. For example cm's logic thinks that adultery is worse then stealing. Sin is sin no matter how you justify it.
FoxP2? http://todayhealth.today.com/_news/2013/...
Question: Does this extend to written language? I tend to think otherwise, anecdotally speaking of course. ;)
How many think the crisis and fear mongering by psc and liberals about the sequestration will come true if it actually takes affect? Psc knows exactly how to appeal to the low information voter to blame the Republicans for something he was all for passing 2 years ago. It is all a game and the low information voters are the pawns along with a complicit media. They are like lap dogs as long as you feed them and scratch their heads they will always be faithful.
See what I mean by being dumbed down. Countryman they got you too!
You are right, rr3, there are plenty of corrupt politicians on both sides.
However, I hold a special regard for those who include a giant dose of hypocrisy along with their misdeeds.
Jesse jr. is a crook. Spent campaign funds on himself. Shame on him. He will serve time for his indiscretions.
Do you suppose Sara Palin or Michelle Bachmann have done the same thing? I guarantee it. But, wait, they have all those right-wing US Attorneys George Bush installed and the full power of the GOP machine on their side, so I am sure we won't be seeing them in court any time soon.
Sen. Domenici, however, knocked up one of his buddies daughters, conned her into keeping it quiet, all the while campaigning and winning on the "family values" platform for decades. That makes him a lying liar without a single patch of moral high ground in sight.
So, I guess your logic is that since Jackson is an embezzler, then that makes it ok for Domenici to be a mysogynist, liar, and deadbeat dad?
What happened to that right wing platitude of personal responsibility?
Jackson is now suffering through taking responsibility for his actions.
Domenici, well he was slick enough to lie his way through his indiscretion, so you're right, let's let him off the hook, eh?
Neo-con logic is hillarious.
Jackson bought a Rolex with campaign money.
Domenici seduced his friends daughter and then covered up the resulting pregnancy for decades while claiming the Christian Conservative moral high ground, which is just creepy.
Similar to Newt Gingrich and his many affairs while gathering public sympathy for his wife's battles with cancer, all the while claiming the "family values" title and beating up Bill Clinton for doing the exact same thing that apparently many Republicans were doing as well.
Those are the same thing in the neo-con mind, I guess.
Talk about your low information voter.
rr3yv0
Congressman Jackson is suffering from a major, debilitating illness which was responsible for his poor behavior.
He is sick.
Where is that Christian compassion my friend?
It's funny how the low information voter is always fawning when their media source is slamming conservatives. Now I know all conservatives aren't saints but do you really want to stay so dumbed down that you can't think any other way. I may have missed it but what about JJ Jr now he really screwed up but maybe your sources haven't mentioned that. It is really pitiful that Americans choose not to be informed and will not stand for principal or character unless it is the other guy then all of that is important. I think all of them should say, "WHAT DOES IT MATTER, ANYWAY!" then they could walk away and all the low information voters forget about it because integrity is really not important anyway. That is something that gets in the way and it seems those that lack it are always expecting it from someone else.
Hey Country Man.
I agree 100% with your assessment.
However, may I add that his "apology" to the folks out there in New Mexico, and the rest of us, is pathetic.
Its not enough to admit he is wrong.
I want to see some Jimmy Swaggart-type confessing with a lot of crying before anyone considers forgiveness for any of these jerks (lol).
At least we should get a good show out of it.
Looks like another of those "family values" conservatives has been exposed after 30 years of secrets.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/...
C'mon. Who doesn't love neo-cons? I'll bet this fellow was giving campaign speeches claiming support from God and Country all the while his baby-momma was raising his ******* son for him.
Wouldn't it be a hoot if she was collecting government assistance so he wouldn't be inconvienienced with taking responsibility for his actions via child support?
Another in a long line of lying liars from the "Reagan Republican" ranks.
What happened to integrity, dignity, honesty, compassion, maturity, and stoicism as characteristics of successful leaders.
What a wonderful society we have created.
Ugh.
America, the land of disgraced politicians, mass shooters, and unbridled greed.
"Supreme Court: Search warrants don't give police the power to detain someone away from home"
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/...
"Former Powell chief of staff '**** sure the Bush administration cooked the books' on Iraq"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/19/fo...
"Hubris: Selling the Iraq War - The Rumsfeld memos"
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/0...
Bush and his entire administration belong in prison.
Bush = criminal
Cheney = criminal
Rumsfeld = criminal
Republican Party = criminals
OKR,
As y0u may recall, I am an independent voter and I support neither major party nor do I vote for either of their candidates.
But I gotta tell ya mate, the only thing worse than a Republican or a Democrat is a stupid Republican or stupid Democrat in political office.
When is Marshall going to learn that when we have stupid legislators we are certain to get stupid legislation.
Next election I hope folks do the smart thing and show Doorman the door!!
At least "The Door Man" only got 44.5% of the vote in Saline County. The other district (48) that chops up Saline County also went Democratic with Ron Monnig.
Don'tcha love gerrymandering?
There was a time when I was a Yellow Dog Democrat. Now I consider myself a Dead Skunk Democrat. I would vote for a dead skunk because when it took its seat over half the Representatives that cleared out would be the Republican majority. Better nothing done than what will be done by those Bozos. ;)
By the way good comments under Door Man's blog by you, and ND.
OKR,
Yeah...read it.
See my comment in that section address to that poor excuse for a legislator.
I guess really he should have read those law before he voted for them.
'Cause I sure DID read them...very carefully.
It goes to show the pathetic choice of politicians the conservatives have to offer. No wonder their party is dying off. I say good riddance to their incompetence.
As for the People Gaming the System is nothing compared too the Hospital,s and Doctor's stealing from it! With the over charging everything and everyone! Big Business are the Thief's! If they would leave S.S. alone it would be OK! The Republican has this Idea too do away with it, so the System can Play with our retirement's also! They want to have the opportunity to get their hands on every Dime we have! What a system1
RT: All the evidence needed to put a label on the Government of this Country is follow the Administration of George W. Bush! These criminals that got 1000's of our American Hero's that were killed because of the lie Bush,Cheney,Rice,Rumsfeld perpetrated on the American People! And i say that most of our Government new this to be a lie,and let it happen. So in my book, these Criminal's need to be Hanged for the Death of all these Hero! (What happened) they are walking the streets and Doctor's giving this S.O.B.A new heart,and the Dummie Bush living high on the Hog!The rest going about their business like nothing has happened,it sucks! So yes i'm angry at these Politicians!I would never serve again if i was a young Man! We need to write indite bush.org We should keep the heat on until it too late or they are dead, for the sake of the unnecessary War!
News get a load of Missouri House member (R-51) Dean Dohrman's latest comment on his blog.
He has served up another red herring to the people of his district. When are the people going to get sick of the same old rotten fish being served to them?
Its sad ND that there are folks who walk around intentionally ignoring the facts that are contrary to their beliefs.
By the way, this is a common characteristic of Fascists also. Fascists have no need for facts. Facts just get in the way of their plans. They rely on faith...and WW2 was the price we paid for their intentional ignorance ("death camps? what death camps?").
OKR,
I want to thank you for sharing your Vatican concerns with me.
During the course of this campaign I have had the opportunity to meet many of the regular Joe six-packs all over the World, Joe Six-packs just like you OKR, who also are worried about past Vatican mistakes -- just like you and me.
Clearly, the current administration has put into place failed policies meant to enrich the elite few at the top while the rest of the faith are left to waller away in poverty.
And those are the same exact failed policies that my opponent supports!!
I promise that if elected Pope, I will order an immediate investigation of the matter, and let me assure you OKR those guilty of wrong doing will be brought to justice!
Its another good reason to call your nearest College of Cardinals member and insist he vote News Across for the office of Pope.
Again, thank you for sharing your concerns with me and I hope I can depend upon your support.
Link please concerning Santa's catholicism. Don't bring me that Saint Nikolas junk; that Vatican propaganda is spuriously sourced, they have twisted, expunged, and hidden documentation for so long that they have no source credibility.
"When The Patriots Rise Up"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/14/wh...
On Feb 16 only 1 papal candidate had the guts to sign the "Pledge for a Clean Election."
Why haven't the rest of the candidates signed the PCE?
What are they hiding?
Why are they afraid to sign the Pledge?
Please urge your Cardinal cast his vote for the one and only signer of the Pledge.
Ask him to support Papal Candidate News Across.
(paid for by Citizens to elect News Across Pope)
OKR,
I checked with my legal staff and they assure me there is no conflict between Santaism and the Catholic Church and that in fact good old St. Nick is indeed a practicing Catholic himself.
In addition, my legal staff has advised me that the College of Cardinals is free to elect whoever they want to elect to the Office of Pope.
OKR, are you working for one of my opponents?
Are you being paid to attempt to discredit my campaign?
Yeah I have seen this kind of dirty politicking before.
And folks that is why I signed the Pledge for a Clean Election (the PCE). Why hasn't my opponents signed it? Is it because they are trying to turn this election into a farce?
Thats why we need responsible leadership in the Office of Pope -- we need honest leadership -- not dirty-trick politicians nobody can trust.
I hope I can depend on your support.
Hi Friends, I just wanted to say its been a real pleasure to have the opportunity to run in the Papal race.
I've met a lot of nice folks and its been great to hear the stories of so many little people from all over. I am glad that the little folks out there share many of the same concerns as my staff and me.
Recently, I suggested a Papal debate that would include all the candidates participating.
I have not yet heard back from the Vatican Cardinals yet, however I remain confident we can get in at least 2 debates before the election. This will give the undecided voters a chance to make up their minds on the best choice for the Office of Pope.
At the debate I hope we will be able to discuss the topic of National Defense.
Frankly, the idea of being defended by the Swiss Guard is a bit lame and way out of date -- and generally a national embarrassment.
Its time for a modern, mechanized, trained, and well equipped Vatican Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines. A force that reflects the power and stature of one of the richest, most powerful nations of Earth -- the Vatican.
Now some of my opponents have accused my plan of being an attempt to assemble a large nuclear force capable of enforcing the Pope's will anywhere in the World.
I would like to say that my opponents fail to cite even 1 time I suggested that the Vatican go nuclear -- not once!
My National Defense plan is a reasonable, common-sense approach to ensuring peace through military strength.
Folks, I hope I can count on your support in the upcoming Papal election.
(paid for by Citizens to Elect News Across Pope)
What blasphemy! I posed the question to you earlier, what would Santa Claus do, (WWSCD?); you are so caught up in your greed for power that you didn't even see it. You have spurned your chosen religion. What a hypocrite!
That's not the first time that has happened. History is rife with similar examples. Henry VIII immediately comes to mind. Oh the shame of it all.
Of course in some quarters all that is excusable by merely shouting out, "I saw the light!" I suppose you will next trot out that old canard to conceal your devious purposes.
OKR,
Earlier I laid out some immediate changes I would make upon being sworn in as Pope.
As you may know, the Vatican is its own country. And as you may also know, the Pope rules absolutely by decree.
In addition, you may also be aware that there are nearly 2 billion Catholics in the World.
That alone makes the Office of Pope pretty valuable and add to that the fact that the Catholic Church is the richest non-government organization in the World who's exact wealth is still unknown, and you have the perfect executive office.
Yeah, I think I'm gonna like being Pope.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aogOR8c8...
"you better watch out" "He knows if you've been bad or good."
WWSCD? News you may wish to reconsider your Papal positioning.
Hi friends and neighbors.
I just wanted to leave you good folks this reminder that the Papal election is just around the corner, but its not too late to get that email letter out to your local Catholic Cardinal and urge him to support me for the office of Pope.
Its time for Papal change.
Its time for News Across.
(paid for by citizens to elect News Across Pope)
Jo, granted most politicians have to pander to their base often, and certainly chasing money donations make many of them corrupt, but there are degrees of "bad" politicians. And, in general, and often very specifically, the Dems represent a compassionate party that pretty much stands up for the down trodden and unfortunate, and certainly those near and below the poverty line, as well as the middle class. Yes, we have to be careful not to support lazy people "gaming" the system, and there are a lot. One must simply recognize that and continually put checks and balances in place to reduce it, even though we must recognize it will be an unending challenge. The GOP's solution is to make everyone fend for themselves, promote deregulation on just about everything (there wouldn't be a tree left on the planet if they had their way), and unfortunately legislate to keep women and minorities second rate citizens. I can't imagine what it would be like without Social Security and Medicare. Yes, it is easy to say they are all bad, but the degree of difference is immense. In the long run, compassion for our fellow man is what counts, and the GOP has shown just the opposite.
"Nugent conspiracy theory: 'No so-called assault weapon used' in Newtown"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/15/nu...
What an idiot.
This is what we have come to expect from the low IQ crowd.
Okla: Hope everyone's well!
Dead on Jo! Good to see you.
I want to say if we the People don't start trying to getting rid of these Politicians! Like the Wimp Reid,the Weasels,John McCain,and Lindsey Graham ,Mitch McConnell,& all the other nazi trying to do away with the Democracy in this Country. The rest of the out of touch Morons,to many to Name,that we the people put in charge of our well being in this Country! I say were NUTS,and had better get out of our funk,or we're done for!! For the sake of this Place,The U.S.A. Quit trying to fix the Economy & world in your living room's and put someone in office that will stay out of our bedrooms or Doctors Offices,in other words stay the hell out of our Domestic Problems for now and take care of the big issues!! This is Insane the way these people are out of touch! Democrats and Republicans start thinking about the People that make this Country?????? My rant for the Month!
Great link ND,
However, I must say that Nobel Laureate (Economics, 2008), Dr. Krugman is unfairly using facts to confuse the issue. And what the heck would he know about it anyway? He probably had his head stuck in a book, writing another book on Economics when Bush was in office anyway.
Besides what difference does it make that Republican deregulation policies and rich Republicans on Wall Street -- good honorable Republican businessmen (job-creators) -- crashed our economy in 2008? We survived. It wasn't the end of the World.
Dr. Krugman should keep all his "theories" in the classroom where they belong and not on panels criticizingly Republican jobs programs.
I was almost personally offended by the obviously correct conclusion summarized in his concluding paragraph where he says,
"This strikes me as a bigger deal than whether Rubio slurped his water; he and his party are now committed to the belief that their pre-crisis doctrine was perfect, that there are no lessons from the worst financial crisis in three generations except that we should have even less regulation. And given another shot at power, they'll test that thesis by giving the bankers a chance to do it all over again."
Frankly, ND, Krugman may be scarring my grandchildren with his fact-based, professional opinion in that paragraph.
Clearly, the problem is his ability to both understand and recognize facts.
I would be willing to go as far to even bet that Dr. Krugman believes the Earth is more than 6000 years old.
'nough said!!
Hi Friends,
As you may have heard the Pope will be retiring soon and his job will be up for grabs.
I recently announced my candidacy for Pope and as I promised, I will be speaking directly to my plan for a better Vatican.
My top priority will be getting the out-of-control spending of the previous administration under control.
I promise to stop the runaway deficit created by the reckless spending of the Ratzinger Administration.
I will work towards the privatization of many of the various holy sites located in the Vatican, the proceeds of which will go to fight the current deficit and support national security interests.
And that is just a taste of what you can expect under a Pope News Across.
(paid for by the Committee to Elect News Across Pope)
Ya gotta point Nana. I apologize to all those good recycling dumpster divers. Come to think of it there are hardly any groups today that won't be legitimately offended when compared in any fashion to right wing Regressives. ;)
Has any one other than me felt like they were dumpster diving when browsing right wing web sites? ;)
OKR,
As r pointed out, you are missing the bigger picture.
Clearly, the 22 scumbags that voted against the bill were merely reaching out to women in an effort to explain their alternative plan which is taken from Leviticus. It involves male-centered family relationships and for the ladies it means more time at home, pregnant, in the kitchen, no need for shoes.
As an independent, I am well aware that the Republican Party would like to educate me as to how we can succeed with their plan.
Their problem is that I am already well aware of their positions on the issues...all too aware to join them, vote for them, or even take them seriously.
Link associated with my prior comment. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/12...
The Senators representing Stepford have struck again. Twenty two of them, all Republicans of course, again reinforced their opinion that violence against women is just fine, and dandy, voting to continue the legality of same.
No doubt they all have Stepford wives excepting one or two of the fellas who instead may have Stepford boy friends.
Yes Roy Blunt was one of them along with those two crazies from Oklahoma James Inhofe, and Tom Coburn.
I have never seen more classic cases of projection than those put forth by rr3yvo.
OKR,
I read your comments with great interest.
However, I was disappointed to find you skipped the Republicans secret weapon for the 2014 election -- the Zombie turnout.
Apparently Lil' John Boehner has confirmed that the Republican Party does plan to employ certain Haitian ritual practices designed to re-animate long since dead Republicans...aka Zombies.
It is also rumored that due to an obvious affinity that she would have with remaining Republican voters Nancy Reagan will toss her designer hat in the ring 2016.
It is also said that Harold Stassen may return from the grave to make a lucky thirteenth run for the Republican nomination for President. Political savants think that if he may some how present himself he will have his best chance ever. One thing for sure, he wouldn't be any stiffer than the candidate that they ran in 2012. ;)
There is one other thing that the Republican Party plans to do in 2016; that is to buy the customer lists from fly by night operators of robo call companies that have managed to get certain geriatrics to pay for one service three, or four times. That is their plan to match the Democrats small donor base. ;)
It is rumored that the Republican Party's entire 2014 get out the vote strategy will be confined to three things; setting up voter registration tables in the game rooms of nursing homes; borrowing hearses, and family cars from rich old Republicans who control the Retail Death Market to line up in front of the Rest Homes on election day, giving free rides to the polls; and paying nursing home secretaries under the table to "handle" the absentee ballots of the residents.
It looks like they are set up to get the votes they have a shot at getting.
Of course an always looking ahead party like the Republican one is setting up for 2016. For that they intend to send campaign workers to the nation's cemeteries. As always they will remain in hot pursuit of likely Republican voters wherever they can dig them up. ;)
Well r,
It sounds to me like the Republicans haven't changed 1 little bit.
I guess all that talk about trying to save their party by reaching out to independents, women, and minorities -- and specifically, Hispanic Americans -- was all just more Republican rubbish.
I don't mind that the Republicans will cease to exist as a party. After all, those old, rich, fat, white men can buy a lot of things -- but they can't live forever, and since they are old they are also dying off.
And it gets worse r.
The young people, independents, women and minorities -- especially Hispanic Americans -- don't want a single thing to do with the Republican party.
I think you see the problem they are facing in the Republican Party. Its a change or die scenario, and apparently they have chosen the die option.
I wish them good luck with that.
Oh my they didn't reach out to me the independent voter. Victim mentality, what should they promise to give you? Your vote went for psc although in an indirect way. But really news are you independent when you rely on the lies and deception of the left? There is no common sense or independent thinking there, is it the liberal education making you dependent to a point you can't accept anything else?
News you need to read something besides rs to get the truth. That is if you care about the truth.
r,
I know why Rubio and the other 21 men voted against it -- they are chauvinist pigs.
I don't see that as reaching out to me, the independent voter -- you know, like they claimed they would?
Regarding Obama:
I agree r, Obama is bad medicine mate.
That is why I voted for Governor Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party.
You see news you conveniently leave out the real reason there were votes against it. I have told before about your worship of anything rs publishes. You eat it up don't ya mate. I really feel sorry that you fall for all this. How do you beat lies and deception and of course Santa Claus? You are just like them falling for the attack on character instead of manning up and discussing real issues.
How many of you fell for the lies in the misstatement of the union speech tonight. No I didn't listen to psc because it would make me ill. He is going to do all these things and not add one dime to our deficit. Really are people that gullible? How many of you believed that after the fifth straight trillion dollar + deficit psc has handed us, without a budget. Well who believed it okr did you, news did you, wtf did you and I don't want to forget about nana, did you believe it. If is no wonder people can't believe the truth if they believe this guy. But hey, WHAT DOES IT MATTER, ANYWAY! Right!
"Rubio one of 22 male GOP senators to vote against Violence Against Women Act"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/12/ru...
See what I mean r?
Its crazies like Rubio that are allienating the voters away from the crazy Republican Party.
Well r, I can tell ya this buddy.
The Republican Party is heading downhill fast.
Its kinda sad really, it being the Party of Lincoln and all, but what the heck I guess it was just the Republican Party's "time" if ya know what I mean.
So here is the thing mate, the Republican leadership has indicated that they want to reach out to more independents to the party as well as minorities.
That is probably a good first step.
I am an independent.
Where's the Republican reach out to me?
All I hear from Republicans are conspiracy theories and crazy rants about "libruls" and Obama.
Where's the "reaching out" in that?
I have to tell ya mate, as an independent I am not impressed with all the empty Republican rhetoric.
rr3yvo.
Said this about others:
"They can tell them anything and they will fall for it"
You mean like "religion", rr3yvo? I would love to hear a direct answer but I won't hold my breath.
OKR,
Wow!!
In light of today's headlines, this recording is certainly interesting. Could we have inadvertently slipped into the Republican Bubble? 'Cause surely this can't really be happening lol.
"It's ok okr you don't have to answer. It's really ok. I'm alright with that. Liberalism is bankrupt in the arena of ideas."-rr3
And rr3 obviously you don't have to answer, as you have recently proven six times over. To refresh your memory, there are six questions that I have asked you that remain unanswered.
To generalize, as did you, Conservatism is bankrupt in the arena of providing answers.
ROTFLMAO x a trillion!
Hey guys an interesting story is in the MDN today. Check out the first link below to read it. Then read the second link which is an NPR feature by the beloved truth speaker to America, Uncle Walter Cronkite. That is about all I am going to say right now. I am going to do some research later on tonight. ;)
http://www.marshallnews.com/story/194059...
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story...
Jo,
Excellent comment mate, and I agree 150%.
rr What else do the Politicians have too say, for you to believe they are lying to us? Not everything they say is a lie.But most of it! Do you think everyone else is as gullible as you?Its Obvious the G.O.P.IS trying too privatize everything! And it wouldn't surprise me if a few of the Democrats aren't in on it also! We have lost control of our Democracy,and everyone can feel it! It don't seem too register with you??
and r,
My personal opinion on the fugitive, former officer Dorner:
First off,
I am hard core liberal...you already know that.
I hope you will please keep that in mind as you read my opinion.
Secondly,
Dorner should surrender to the authorities immediately and without violence or incident.
Dorner should face the charges.
If convicted, Dorner should be sentenced by a competent, duly authorized judge as prescribed under California law.
When it comes to dangerous, alleged murderers on the lose, its not a question of politics, but rather, its a question of public security.
r,
You are correct in part, the Sun does effect the Earth's weather but not to the degree that you suggest.
The hypothesis you suggest has been throughly tested and results have always been the same no matter how many times it has been tested -- null hypothesis.
Granted there are 2 or 3 "scientists" who work for the Koch brothers who are paid to try and resurrect the null hypothesis from the dead -- much like Jesus (PBUTH) did with Lazarus -- but their credibility, much like their ethics, is just as empty as their claims.
As to cycles of Glaciation, yes there have been other periods of of glaciation (ice ages) (one time most of the World was covered in ice and its a period sometimes referred to as "Snowball Earth") and yes they have given way to non-glaciation (warm periods), after extremely long periods of time and all these were the reaction to a natural causation. We know what caused them and it was nature -- not God -- that was the culprit.
However, the cause this time around is, without question, the introduction of additional carbon into the air -- and yeah its because of human activity.
Too much carbon in the atmosphere is a real bad thing (for more on that see the "Planet Venus"). In fact, the most conservative estimate so far is that we are adding a minimum of 3% more carbon into the atmosphere each and every year (in 3.3 years that comes to about 10% more carbon in the atmosphere that is not cleaned out by the natural cycle of carbon through the environment). Over 33 years of that and we have effectively increased the amount of carbon in the air by 1/3. Thats not good because that carbon tends to cause a greenhouse effect and that means serious climate change effects -- unpredictable and radically changing weather patterns.
And Global Warming has another nasty effect on the Earth mate, it can, and has in the past, Shut down the Atlantic Conveyor in the North Atlantic and that can bring on an ice age -- as it did with the Younger-Dryas a mere 10 - 12,000 years ago (that would be 6000 years in Bible-speak).
And those are the facts mate.
Science with a political agenda will want you to believe that. That is why liberals depend on the low information voter. They can tell them anything and they will fall for it. That is why in the arena of ideas liberalism is bankrupt because everything they believe has to be tied to an agenda because it is not true. Plenty of scientific date says we have always had cycles of global warming way before industry and oil. It is caused by the sun, imagine that I guess some people would never think of that logic.
rr3yvo
evolution, green energy, global warming and climate change.
What do all those things have in common?
Scientific data.
The bible has zero credible data regarding any of it's supernatural claims.
You believe in a magic man in the sky while telling others they are the failures.
I hope there is a Jesus and I hope that one day you get to meet him but,don't get too excited.
If he's everything we're told he is he probably won't like you.
Who is going to watch the lying state of the union speech? I guess more impotantly who is going to believe it?
It's ok okr you don't have to answer. It's really ok. I'm alright with that. Liberalism is bankrupt in the arena of ideas.
Gee r, you sure are repeating yourself a lot mate.
I think we covered all those topics.
I concur with OKR.
Yawn...zzzzzzzzzzz...
You really need to get some new material mate.
...yawn
WHAT DOES IT MATTER, ANYWAY!
They say this Dorner guy has a fan base now because he is black and he is addressing racism in the LA police department. It won't be long before they will make the LA police apologize to him and give him his job back.
We used to have to make up absurdities like this but liberalism brings them to real life.
Are Pelosi and Reid the dumbest politicians in America? We don't have a spending problem we have a paying for problem! Yeh I have that all the time. What about the people that vote for them and believe them? They probably believe in evolution, green energy, global warming and climate change. Another great example of the failure of liberalism.
rr3yvo,
What would Jesus do?
Nana,
Forget that argument...Google is part of the liberal media.
You'll have to find another souce for the 'truth'.
r,
I see you are still upset at Mrs. Clinton's response to ridiculous questions posed to her by morons in the Senate (yep we even find the low IQ folks in lofty places like the US Senate or even the White House when Bush was President).
She definitely hit the nail on the head with her answer.
But r, frankly, I am a little concerned about how long you have been in the bubble mate.
I mean look mate, you are only human. We all are. We have limits to physical and mental endurance. Sometimes some folks (Republicans) just have to escape to a place where the Sun is shining on clean white streets lined with neatly trimmed, healthy, green lawns and big roomy houses, McCarthy is flushing commies out of our society, and being dumb,...I mean "low IQ," is cool.
But mate, eventually you have to come out of the bubble and face reality -- nobody even cares about that stupid conspiracy theory.
Its all over mate.
Mrs. Clinton made the Republicans look like clowns.
End of story.
"Neil DeGrasse Tyson Destroys Bill O'Reilly"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5dSyT50C...
r,
The Earth is 4.54 Billion years old.
I hope the next time you are discussing this with the Pasture of your Church, you will be able to proudly announce the correct answer that alluded Rubio -- the Earth is 4.54 Billion years old.
Oh I almost forgot.
WHAT DOES IT MATTER, ANYWAY!
Well news how old is the earth exactly? oh thee of credibility. You don't know either, you only claim you know along with your other lies and deception. But you are at high risk conversing with someone of ZERO credibility.
Rubio?
The teaparty fool who has no idea of what the age of the Earth is?
That Rubio?
I guess the low IQ crowd finds him interesting, but then again, they are pretty easy to con.
Oh I better add a disclaimer to my post. Okr says, that my credibility is ZERO. So read at your own peril.
Hey r,
If Drew Zahn says it then it must be true, eh mate?
I guess folks like Drew -- who apparently has no credentials of interest -- are helpful to the low IQ crowd.
Anyway, its sounds like Drew is venting.
I am sure he will get over it when he gets it out of his system.
You know for psc to come out on top of this amnesty deal he now has to destroy Rubio. He is in the cross hairs now. Psc success depends on not defeating his opponent but destroying them because he cannot succeed amid opposition. Why do you think he wants drone strikes on American citizens? Some will be ok with this though until they are in the cross hairs.
Today the producers are the villians of this country and the takers are lifted up as victims. You all really hate the truth don't you? HeHeHe! I love it. Scrambling to discredit me because you can't address a single issue with truth in it. I think it is really the blatant hypocrisy of the left that I point out is the reason you don't like me. I post on here as a no name because no body knows who I am am and you try to discredit me? Now that is hilarious!
You know poor old Lance he must be a Republican because they are going to make an example out of him on this doping deal. I think it was because he confessed on Oprah now they have to prosecute because everyone knows now. I wonder if any other cyclers will be prosecuted because of this. He should have told Oprah, "WHAT DOES IT MATTER, ANYWAY!". He could have kept his millions and never had to answer for it again.
Sorry Eric,
My post reappeared, so I apologize if I misread the situation.
SIX QUESTIONS r, six of my recent questions unanswered by you that are now a part of the years of questions you have avoided from me and others. Your credibility with me, and I suspect many others....ZERO.
Eric,
I don't think my comment to rr should be deleted.
He's said worse about other's opinions.
Oh well.... my grandmother would not have been upset.
rr,
You are now on my 'do not read' list.
I like reasoned rhetoric, but that was just hogwash.
Where is Gal66 when we need him?
You liberals let our government especially psc get away with violating the law and the constitution. You justify it by acting like 3rd graders saying, "Bush did it too!" Wah! Wah! Crybabies! Now okr you're comment about no dialogue is really funny. You have never had a dialogue with me except to spread the lies and deception of the left, besides any answer you disagree with is a non-answer in your mind.(3rd grade)That's ok with me I like our one sided dialogue because I am always right then. Liberalism is ruining America and you are willing to let it happen. Truth always hurts buddy.
I talked to a 19 year old boy the other day. Yes a boy because he has chosen not to become a man yet. You know doesn't want that responsibility. He don't work but seems to always have money. I told him that what he was doing was illegal and he will get caught some day. He stated that, "In my eyes I am not doing anything wrong". The birth of a liberal right before my eyes. I told him if he ever needed help I would help him but only if he decided that he wanted to be a man and take responsibility, but he don't want to do that yet and may never do it. Oh I know we will help him one day through welfare or in prison but why are people growing up with stinking thinking.
Why must liberalism destroy everything it touches?
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/why-must-libe...
ROTFLMAO ND.
r,
What gives any individual or group of individuals the right to decide when another individual has forfeit his life?
What makes one human more human than another?
As to the criminal in California who took 3 lives -- one a police officer just doing his job, the criminal should surrender immediately and face justice for his crimes.
I don't care what his politics are.
Violence is wrong.
'nough said.
Regarding abortion, its not a "liberal thing" its a secular thing. We don't base our laws on your religious beliefs. There is no place for religion in secular law.
There are six unaswered questions rr3 that you have back logged. When you answer those questions that I posed I may resume our dialogue. Until then, talk to the hand.
Okr you are right about countryman's post being dead on. It describes liberalism to a T. I know liberalist cannot see the description of themselves, just like they can't see God. Pride creates this bubble around you where everyone can see you but you can't see out. It's really very dangerous. I particularly likes the question, "Capital punishment is good, but abortion is bad?"-- Posted by countryman on Thu, Feb 7, 2013, at 1:00 PM
Well let's address that, shall we? I believe one deals with an innocent person and the other deals with a guilty one! Which one would that be class? I know there are cases of an innocent person being put to death by capital punishment. I knew you would bring that up. Abortion, over 50 million and counting, innocent babies, all dead. They never did anything wrong and didn't even get to face a jury. If liberalism can't see what's wrong with that, what can they see?
Seems like California are wasting a lot of resources trying to find this rogue cop. Heck he has only killed 3 people. Heck he even likes liberal talk and liberal tv. He can't be bad he's a liberal, right! They could just promise that he could set in front of the California congress and say, "WHAT DOES IT MATTER, ANYWAY?" Then we could go back to life as normal.
Since 1960 more people have died from gun incidents-suicides, accidents and homicides-than died in every war in U.S. history. http://www.upworthy.com/its-one-of-the-c...
Maybe Arkansas needs to restore workhouses a la Dickensian England. Then those ungrateful humans could stay there on bread and water, cleaning trash from streets, and highways, etc. until their back rent was paid, and of course the cost of room and board for their families while they were all in the work house was paid. It would be a charitable kindness to pay them at a one half minimum wage rate.
Humbug! No account forty percenters all!
(satire)
"Arkansas law jails tenants who don't pay their rent"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/09/ar...
http://www.hrw.org/node/113160
OK well you know how the Tea Party slings around the word "freedom" a lot?
Well this is an example of their idea of freedom.
What ya think?
Freedom -- con style!!
"Why Dummies Can't Build a Tea Party Future"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKohsoxqk...
Actually OKR,
The Republican Party emerged from several parties circa 1854.
The modern Democrat Party is much older and has truly weathered the years (circa 1830s).
In addition, the Republican Party was founded primarily on their preference for Big Government -- aka strong central government. Mostly it was their support for strong central government and weak state government that defined the Republican Party's founding.
How interesting that the Republican Party abandoned its central organizing principle -- its ideals -- a long time ago.
But perhaps their situation is more delicate than they might want to believe. When a party is losing 100 members everyday to natural causes (old age) -- and the rate of loss is increasing -- and the young folk are avoiding their party like the plague, the future of that party is clearly limited.
But even worse than that, it may not be just the Republican Party that is shrinking. It seems to be that the con ideology is dying because it just about destroyed our nation and is founded on assumptions rather than empirical evidence and reason. In short, the young folks reject conservative ideology.
I guess you can fill a pale that is losing more water than is going in, but I don't know how.
Returning the compliment countryman, I enjoyed your piece on shabby America, it was dead on.
Speaking of compliments there are several of you who post frequently whose product I nearly always enjoy (you know who you are). I struggle between remiss, and redundant regarding reaction each time you write something. :)
Next to last paragraph lose, not loose, sorry about that.
News I do not understand why the Republican Party still caters to the far right section of their party. They should just ignore them, and not support the far right representatives. The far right will still vote for any Republican candidate as they have no other viable place to go with their votes.
The fear factor that is so prevalent in those of the far right will compel them to vote for any Republican candidate because they are paranoically afraid of what every Democratic candidate will do to our nation. It is amazing that the Republican Party has been so obtuse in regard to this problem.
The Democratic Party learned long ago that they could ignore the far left of their party, then even the moderate left, and still succeed. Fear was also the key component of the success of that strategy. The left has been afraid that if they did not vote for a center right Democrat that a bogey man Republican would win, and all hell would break loose.
Maybe the time is approaching for all of the far left, and moderate left persuasion to dig in their heels, and say "hell no, we ain't supporting that center right junk any longer, get right with us, or loose control to the Republicans."
It would be interesting to see what comes of both major parties when each are fragmented at the same time. Hopefully at long last a third party candidate, the likes of which we haven't seen since Teddy Roosevelt's Bull Moose charge, would sweep away the stagnancy of American politics.
David Sirota on our president the confessed murderer. http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/who_cant...
Karl Rove explains to the Tea Party what their new role in the Republican Party is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7K3YDAXC...
"GOP infighting turns ugly over 'hater' comment"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/07/go...
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/02/06...
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/be...
Its also time for the Tea Party to find new friends, 'cause the old pals have lost interest in them.
Face it Tea Party, you're Dixicons and you always have been. You are a small minority that, without the big North Eastern Republicans, you have nothing -- no money, no power, no ideas, and not a clue to reality.
And OKR,
Its about time the American Empire fell.
The rest of the World rejects imperialism while the American Reaganites love imperialism.
So while the Reaganites may be crying, the rest of the World is rejoicing that the American Empire is ending.
We don't want or need empires nor nations that believe they are the exception.
What we do want and need are responsible nations working together to eliminate poverty, hunger, disease, and war.
Nice analogy with the "red" thing.
Tragically folks, what you have all said is true. What we are a part of, what we are observing, is the disintegration of the New World version of the Roman Empire.
Like the Roman Senate our federal government is corrupt. Like, but worse than the Roman infrastructure's lead water pipes, we have unleashed a myriad of brain damaging toxins that march hand in hand with a failing education system, exponentially making us dumber.
As the well to do fled Rome for outlying areas, escaping her crumbling, and burning, our capitalists have taken their treasures to other countries, and are following with their corporeal selves. The parallels are there in every facet of our society.
We the people are a giant lobster, and though the pot that is America is past a simmer, and beginning to boil we bask in the boil. Though feeling a nagging sense in most of us that something is wrong we can not as a whole focus on the cause. Meanwhile we get redder, and redder. ;)
For a glimpse of the future in America, I suggest the movie "Idiocracy," a minor cult classic comedy from 2004.
It pretty much paints the picture that nanadot has outlined.
It would be hilarious if not for the fact that it seems entirely too familiar.
Of course, I also thought that "The Campaign" did a fine job of capturing politics in America in the 21st century. Very sadly accurate.
Much as "Gone with the Wind" captured, and preserved on film, the lifestyle and culture of 19th century southern America, I am sure these two film classics will be heralded as grand examples of life in early 21st century America by future generations.
Sadly, the political class has nothing to gain by a smarter populace. It's much easier to lead the not-so-clever. Those pesky intellectuals ask way too many hard questions and always seem to find all the potential pitfalls in our grand schemes. Much easier to make policy for folks who can't see anything but what you tell them to see.
Oh, yeah, and as the old saying "a fool and his money are soon parted" seems true, what better reason to hope folks get dumber. Much easier to sell swampland, or Glen Beck, or fossil fuels, or Honey Booboo for that matter, to boneheads than geniuses.
Heck, it's still legal to buy and sell cigarettes even though the court system in every state and at the federal level have found that they are a deadly product and have a significantly high cost to society.
Then there is those numbers rackets and gambling, which were considered unfair, immoral, and a drain on society right up and until the state governments decided to get in on the action. Now we have state run gambling to drain the pockets of the poor. Brilliant.
The 6000 year old earth?
War to achieve peace?
The collateral damage of "shock-and-awe" half-way around the world in the name of 'freedom for Uhhh-mericans.' Made for good tv though, didn't it?
"Mission Accomplished"
Capital punishment is good, but abortion is bad?
"Freedom, liberty, and justice for all" unless you want to be free to control the products of your own body or marry who you want.
Spending 4 to 10 times as much educating the lowest performers in the system as is spent on the top performers. I thought the point of fairness in public education was equality for every student?
Wait, never mind about the dumbed-down future, I think we are already there.
ND,
Yep the World does regard Americans as the dumbest suckers on Earth, and yeah the World laughs at America a lot.
They aren't laughing to be mean.
They genuinely believe we are morons -- lowdown, immoral, war-mongering, torturing, NAZI morons.
I do wish the conservatives and folks who tend to vote Republican would take off their blinders and have a good look at what they have done to our once great nation.
If we as a nation want to be successful then we had best get our head out of our rears, stuff Reaganism into the garbage where it belongs, and wake up -- or things can and will get much, much, much worse -- for them.
Cons need to realize they will suffer just as much as the next guy. The Koch Brothers have no intention of giving any of their money to help out and they don't care 1 bit if conservatives starve to death.
Oh and a little follow up.
I don't know what Americans are doing wrong that would cause the budding solar industry there to collapse, although if the government requires a thing called "Smart" metering then I recommend just going off grid and storing the excess in one of several possible methods (battery system, kinetic system, hybrid system, ect) rather than making it available for use by the electric company.
Anyway, Fox claims it takes 14 years to pay for a solar system.
I say, where? In Bizarro World?
Our system has already paid for itself and its warranted for 10 years. It paid for itself in 2 years.
And the same system I purchased is now selling for less than $5000.00 thanks to economies of scale in our massive solar power industry -- making it even more affordable.
I might also point out to the folks at Fox that even our electric companies can read the writing on the wall and have gotten in on the solar power industry, big time!
I don't pay 1 penny for electricity. Even though I have to pay the line costs for remaining hooked up to the grid -- which everyone pays to maintain the system (its a flat fee), and despite the fact that the Conservative Government of NSW reduced the price we receive for our excess electricity from 28 cents kw to 8 cents kw, I still make a nice tidy profit in addition to the free electricity.
And one last thing.
Fox and the conservatives want you to believe something that is the opposite of truth -- they want you to think that the lower the demand for electricity, the higher the price of the electricity. That is not true at all. That would violate one of the most important laws of economics -- law of demand. Demand always has a direct relationship to price -- not the other way around. As demand for any product or service decreases, so does price. Anything additional they are charging is nothing more than intentional gauging designed to take advantage of the fact that energy is not price elastic over the short-run. Reduced demand means reduced price, ceteras paribus.
Anyway, Fox can keep their propaganda, and I will stick with my free electricity, thank you very much!!
"Solar power's future looks dim, as plug is pulled on incentives"
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/...
Yeah, I guess the conservatives and Fox News are right again.
Solar power is dead.
ROTFLMAO!!!!
I don't know about you folks, but I am an electricity pig.
Yeah, I burn electricity with no concern what-so-ever for conservation.
I admit it, I leave my office air-conditioner running full tilt every day and night, whether I am in there or not, and often with the doors and windows open in the Summer. I keep that electric heat at a comfy 80 degrees in the Winter.
Yeah, when it comes to electricity my wife is just as bad as me. She does the same thing. In addition, she leaves our Panasonic big screen plasma TV on most of the time. Those babies really suck up the electricity!! We have 3 refrigerators and 2 freezer chests that are always in operation, several computer systems that are on all the time. We cook in our convection/microwave oven which sucks down about 5kw an hour.
Yep, the little lady and I are definitely electrical energy pigs -- and darn proud of it!!
But the funny thing is, despite all the electricity we use, we haven't paid 1 single penny for electricity since we installed our solar panels a couple of years ago -- and our carbon footprint from electricity is 0.
But Fox News and the conservative think tank, the Washington Policy Center, say its unsustainable.
Funny that...it sure is sustainable for Aussie Wife and me.
Lol....
"Venture Capitalist"
Isn't that a neat word?
It means a guy or a gal that goes around buying up healthy manufacturing companies and then dismembers the companys and sells off the assets at a profit -- with no concern what-so-ever for the workers of the plant who will no longer have a job.
That is what Mitt Romney does for living.
I am shocked he even had the nerve to run for President given his previous career choice.
Only a backward, minority party like the Republican cons would have the nerve to insult the American People by nominating a crook like Romney for the White House.
What a bunch of losers!
Nana, you shouldn't pick on the Romneys like that.
OKR,
Doe you remember the last time our Prime Minister addressed the US Congress when she visited?
Yeah, our PMs really know how to suck up to the boss.
We aren't stupid.
We have 20 million people...and China isn't very far away.
We love America because we know who will protect us.
Consequently, when the President says jump, the PM asks "how high?"
In fact, because of my Missouri dialect, a lot of folks here ask me what I think of OZ and this is my answer.
Well its not much different than the other 50 states.
We all usually have a good laugh after that. They know what I mean....
Well OKR,
Australia IS on that list lol...
Not slamming Australia NA, I wish we were more like her. The fact remains that E. R. mushroomed after WE started it.
At the least ND we should be able to impose a tax on their overseas assets, including the human assets. I propose a minimum tax for every overseas worker that each corporation employs. So they took our jobs away, darned if they shouldn't have to pay the tax that they took away.
Uh OKR,
To be fair, Australia is on that list, BUT the Australian Government under conservative Prime Minister John Howard did deny any involvement in any American renditions when said accusations were made years ago.
They were accused of being involved with Bush renditions, but steadfastly deny that any rendition ever took place in Australia and further that the Government of Australia would never knowingly allow a kidnapping of any person in their nation.
In addition, neither the Australian government nor anyone else can find evidence that any planes left Australian air space that met the description given by witnesses.
Just to be fair mate, there is no evidence that I know of to support the accusations. And after all, hasty accusations are easy to make as long as one does not have to produce evidence to support them.
I would also like to add that, frankly, the Australians really frown on that kind of thing. I believe the Australian Federal Government regards its primary duty as protecting the citizens and residents of Australia. I don't think they would have been involved in anything like that at any time in their history. Its just not the Australian way mate.
I want to jump back to the thread preceding ND's interesting comment for just a moment.
We are the big monkey in this world, as for the rest of the countries, well...monkey see, monkey do. For instance there have been fifty countries involved in the dark practice of extraordinary rendition that we initiated.
How long is it going to be before all the other monkeys emulate us. Will they not also decide that they can assassinate whomever they want whereever they want? For instance will Britain decide to kill one of their citizens when he is in Chicago? Supposing such an individual is walking down Madison Street, a British agent jumps out, shoots him, and disappears. Is that not a murder punishable by law within the United States? Would we demand extradition of the murderer?
More monkey see, monkey do; Drones! Everybody gotta have 'em. Suppose that the Chinese launch a drone here because they think that a dissident Chinese citizen is plotting destruction in China? What do we do? Suppose it is Iran in the same scenario? What do we do?
Folks the outrageous breach of the civil rights of U.S. citizens is just the beginning of this monsterous problem. We have flung open the lid on Pandora's box again.
NanaDot
Wait a minute, what if the immigrant is financially independent and hates work? Why should he have to work?
(lol)
"A new government report is predicting the budget deficit will drop below $1 trillion for the first time in President Obama's tenure in office."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/...
Yes OKR, when a leader of a Nation declares martial law (suspension of habeas corpus) in any region he wants then we all lose our freedom in its entirety.
I reckon about the only thing that can unite us all is outrage at our government assuming the right to kill an American citizen because they choose to do so. That is the scariest breech of freedom of my life time.
If they can take our lives without established cause what can they not take.
There is a partial list copied and pasted in the Religion forum from that link if anyone wants a quick look at it.
It is American law.
It is not UN law.
It is not someone else's law.
It is our law.
And the available evidence of multiple violations, by no less than George W. Bush's own public admissions, is massive. Yet no Grand Jury has been commissioned to investigate the matter and give its recommendation. No special prosecutor was ever empowered to investigate, and we know what Obama failed to do (keep his campaign promise of justice for the American People). Nothing happened and the criminals walk free today.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1...
And folks, its not too late.
We can still legally prosecute the criminals involved in the torture campaign of the Bush Administration for multiple violations of Title 18.
There is no statute of limitations on acts of torture.
What shocks me is the we even have to discuss torture in the United States of America.
Surely our nation is above such NAZI type behavior?
Or maybe the problem is that the conservatives follow NAZI policies and ideals?
Sure they won't admit they are indeed fascists, but the fact is they support NAZI principles, such as regarding torture as a legitimate means of discovery.
So even if they call a rose something besides a rose, isn't it still a rose? Doesn't it still look the same, and doesn't it still smell like a rose?
The problem with America is that some folks -- the conservatives -- are highly opposed to freedom and democracy and are highly opposed to doing the right thing.
Maybe its time we start calling a rose, a rose and a NAZI, a NAZI ...after all, no matter what you call either of them, be they a rose or a conservative, they are what they are and that is the way it is.
News,
Don't confuse the issue with FACTS!
rr3yv0
One last thing mate, everyone who was water-boarded (tortured) was injured. Torture, by its very nature, is an injury all by itself and highly unlawful under Title 18 as well as the 8th Amendment.
r,
Actually the Republicans have an issue here that, if they were smart, they would grab it and run with it.
Seriously mate, Obama screwed up on this one and this may be Obama's achilles heel.
You might be surprised where an wave of support for action to stifle this power Obama is claiming might come from.
This is the moment mate. Its now or never. Its time to pick up that ball and run.
Nobody was injured or killed from water boarding.
I will make a couple of predictions news.
No liberal will take a stand against this like they did against water boarding?
If the Republicans can stop this they will be blamed for not wanting to keep our country secure?
This coming from a man that denounced water boarding and thinks terrorist should get due process, but now we can just kill American citizens
"'Judge, jury and executioner': Legal experts fear implications of White House drone memo"
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/...
I was warning about this the day they murdered natural born and raised, American citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi.
Now the legal experts have decided it is "dangerous."
Oh its dangerous alright, its also the kind of power that allows for dictatorship.
"Texas man guns down couple over dog poop on his porch"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/05/te...
Yeah IT,
I read about Rove the other day. No doubt the Republicans have discovered something new about the Dixiecrats-turned-Dixiecon -- they are crazy and will drive our country right into the ground.
It will be interesting to see the Dixiecons mount election campaigns without the big money Traditional Republicans.
News,
You called this months ago. Now that Karl Rove has come out of the tea bag, he shows that the corporate, war-mongering, elitist GOP members want their party back, and they will no longer back fringe losers. The Tea Party may break the Koch brothers while they try to keep up funding for their candidates AGAINST those in their own party!
This is going to be fun.
After all of the weeds have been burnt off; the GOP remnants may still have some strong stems and roots.
Let's hope so, as we all need balance, and I don't want the pendulum swinging far left anymore than I want it swinging far right.
He's the poster child OK.
Well said News.
Akin to Akin huh IT? ;)
Maybe the violence isn't "legitimate".
Republican Senators -- their values are not Americas' values.
"Eight Senate Republicans vote against the Violence Against Women Act"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/04/ei...
Scary stuff OKR,
I am reading their Justification PDF very carefully. I want to analyze their legal argument.
One has to bear Ex parte Milligan in mind whenever suspension of habeas corpus occurs -- a suspension of habeas corpus occurred each time the President ordered the deaths of 3 Americans in the Middle East.
Its important for 2 reasons. 1.) It defines when a President is authorized to declare martial law (defined as the suspension of habeas corpus) in a region (only Congress can authorize the declaration of martial law) and 2.) and it limits where application of martial law can take place (only in places where there is no functioning civilian court).
The Department of Justice attorneys are well aware of the importance of Ex parte Milligan as regards these military activities by the President. They know they have to satisfy Milligan or they are in serious trouble.
That is exactly what they have claimed so far -- that they have acted Constitutionally and in accordance with Ex parte Milligan. They claim Congress gave them authorization to declare martial law anyplace in the World where they decree they are fighting Al Qaeda or its affiliates when Congress issued the Joint Resolution for Authorization of Military Force in Afghanistan -- satisfying part 1. In addition, they claim that there is no functioning civilian court in which they could indite and bring to trial the Americans they killed.
The last part is incorrect, however, as they never issued, nor sought, any warrant of any kind for their arrests nor did they ever seek a grand jury indictment and have admitted they had no evidence at all against any of these folks they killed. That means that no civilian court anywhere in the World would have authorized their arrests, much lest put them on trial. No evidence = no warrant, no indictment, no trial, no conviction.
I believe what the President has done violates Milligan and violates our Constitution and laws.
Well News pour yourself a stiff one before you read this. My pet title for the article is "Drone Baby, Drone" http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/201...
Gal66
I like a good bourbon as well. Aged, single malt Scotch ain't half bad either lol.
Here's some 'shocking' news. After bombing out in the last election, Karl Rove is starting a new PAC to raise money for Republicans that can win the General election...not just primaries.
The Tea Party has already written some derogatory missives on Rove and his new PAC, saying that he's just in it for the money!
Let the unravelling begin!
http://prospect.org/article/establishmen...
Now, I realise this is slanted, so just Google it and read whatever source you like.
I agree; Gal is cool and cool headed as well. It also looks like he forms his own opinions based on his own life experiences.
rr and Jason do what Faux News tells them to do, as far as I can tell.
rr3yvo,
Thanks, that's all I need to know. Although I would love to hear your reasoning and fact based premise as to how one is real (god) and one is not real (Santa). Please enlighten me.
"I reckon that is because he enjoys his guns, cars, and beer more than he does this stuff. Nothin' wrong with that. :)"
You almost hit that right on the head, I would much rather have a good Bourbon :)
If you think santa claus is God then for your benefit I guess so.
I don't think they are one and the same myself but if you do then ok. I will tell you a little secret though one is real and one is not. Take a guess!
I see psc is still campaigning. This time for stricter gun laws. I wonder how much this is costing us? So we are paying psc to campaign against our guns? Only in America. Maybe those sales of F-16's and tanks to terrorist will pay for it. You think?
rr3yvo,
Earlier you mentioned Santa Clause? Did you mean "God"?
OKR, Yeah X-ray was OK in an extremist-conservative kind of way.
Gal is one of my favorite conservatives also. In fact, I find Gal's intelligent conservative approach both challenging and refreshing. He often makes strong points and offers a different perspective.
However, OKR, I must disagree with you when it comes to our friends, the Tea Party folks.
Without them we would think real Republicans were true conservatives. We have the Tea Party folks to thank for providing contrast -- and you know it mate (lol).
Psc did say that the state of the economy is because of some bad decisions. He also said that 2013 will be a year of solid growth, more jobs and higher wages. Why will this year be different from the last 4? What has changed?
My wife and I decided that we can't wait for the recovery so we started our own business. We are still working our regular jobs but with wages stagnant and prices rising then it will take more money to maintain our lifestyle. Of course many will just whine about how bad it is and blame Bush and the Republicans. Well the Democrats nor the Republicans care about your lifestyle. So we are working in the evenings when our daughter is not playing basketball or something so we can maintain. Also since it is a home business there are plenty of tax deductions that we will not pay any extra tax like we would if we worked a second job. So are you going to whine about an economy caused by Bush and psc can't fix, or are you going to do something about stimulating the economy. I do have to look at the bright side if it wasn't for psc's bad economy, I mean Bush's bad economy we might not have started a business. I wonder if psc will ever run a business besides in the ground. Just doing my part.
X-ray's last post was 10-29-12. Do you suppose he may have been a troll trying to gin up the Republican vote in the election. Maybe he left for another country when Obama won?
Is there an effective voice of liberalism on this blog? Define effective.
You are right news it isn't patriotic. I guess I should say, 'is it wrong to sell F-16's and tanks to terrorist(Muslim brotherhood) and at the same time talk about taking away or restricting our rights to own guns.
News you are getting hung up on things just like okr. Just look at what is happening in Egypt and tell me if psc is not supporting terrorism. They are just waiting for pull out deadline in Afghanistan then Al Quida will be bigger and stronger then before 9/11. But now that might be patriotic.
The first 8 of the last 12 years that's what psc is left with. Are you serious? You can't be serious. Really! Wow!
This is what conservatives are up against. It is hard to beat lies and santa claus.
On reflection I suppose Gal66 comes the closest to filling the need, but he doesn't go in for detailed extended discussion of all things conservative. I reckon that is because he enjoys his guns, cars, and beer more than he does this stuff. Nothin' wrong with that. :)
News you said, "Yep, the Republican Party doesn't want the Tea Party crazies either"
That prompts the question why do we give them recognition, and response on this blog? If they are not wanted in the conservative Republican party, what pragmatic purpose can there be for them here?
It is equally demeaning for all when the rest of us play the cat, and toy with them (the mouse).
It is my considered opinion that there has not been an effective voice of conservatism here since Mr. X-ray left this blog.
"Karl Rove launches initiative to keep tea party candidates out of elections"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/03/ka...
Yep, the Republican Party doesn't want the Tea Party crazies either.
Excellent point there Jo!
R the first eight of the last 12 Years, YES!,THEY ARE AT FAULT, FOR WHAT OBAMA IS LEFT WITH!
r,
I thought I would help you out mate.
Terrorism as defined by The Department of Justice/FBI is:
"the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives" (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85).
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/public...
rr3yvo,
I'll ask you once again. Define terrorist.
r,
Please show us specifically how the deficit is hurting our economy.
r,
How is selling weapons to other countries patriotic in the first place?
I think perhaps you are confusing patriotism with psuedo-patriotism.
"Krugman: NRA thinks 'we're living in a Mad Max movie"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/03/kr...
Exactly!
Why do the Republican cons keep leaving the police out of the mix when it comes to guns?
Republican cons are again completely out of touch with reality.
I was wondering if it is patriotic to sell F-16's and tanks to terrorist while at the same time proposing to take guns away from Americans?
Why are liberals so worried about an answer from a conservative, when they wouldn't like the answer and I thought they already had them all?
With all those feelings okr don't you feel sorry for psc for what he inherited?
How come liberals always hate it when conservatives act like them?
Whatever r. I think that at least for the time being I am done with you, your smug direct line to God, your misquotes, and shoddy research, your refusal to respond when inconvenient, or when you have painted yourself into a corner, and all the rest.
Of course all that criticism is just my opinion. I don't claim certification by any God, nor even a certitude akin to that which you can somehow develop from the thinnest of evidence, while ignoring the bulk of same.
As always wtf, lol,lol.
You know I really feel sorry for psc don't you? He inherited over a $1 trillion dollar deficit, 7.8% unemployment, and a contracting economy. But hey it wasn't me it was because of hurricane sandy and the uncertainty of the fiscal cliff by the Republicans. Do low information voters really believe that a hurricane and Republicans are the cause of the disaster of the last 4 years. We are into psc's 5th year and has he been held responsible for anything?
Did any economist predict this downturn? Then they want to say it is because Republicans are cutting spending. Really! Even if the huge cuts because of the sequester goes through government spending will increase by over 500 billion dollars.
Oh I know we need more stimulus. More of the magic that takes 1 dollar from us and turns it into 3. Has that ever worked? Now the liberal are spinning this saying that last quarters contraction was the best looking contraction ever. This is the new normal with the growth choking policies of the psc.
With more regulations, higher taxes and a 5th straight trillion dollar deficit will anyone be surprised if we have an under performing economy for 2013?
rr3yvo,
Until now I never thought I could feel sorry for you. I was wrong.
By the way okr don't patronize me because you don't feel sorry for me or really give a ****. The feeling is mutual although it makes for exciting conversation. Liberals don't care about anyone but themselves because their policies always end in failure and hurt a lot of innocent people but that wasn't the intent. It is the intent that matters not the outcome. Right!
Without God what is truth?
I don't really expect an answer because without God you don't have an answer. It would be like asking 'is evolution true'? Is climate change true? Is abortion murder? Is being gay an acceptable lifestyle?
The truth is elusive to the low information voter.
Lol OKR,
The cons can be a bit frustrating. The problem is ignorance mate and the solution is education. However, education requires a receptive mind. That is the catch 22 mate.
Don't let them frustrate you.
They were mine News, and they should have been deleted. I reckon I got a little heavy handed, or maybe derisively punitive is more descriptive.
Were they your comments OKR? Or were they a response from the loyal opposition?
lol...
Evenin' ND. Feelin' good an' on a roll...ya shoulda seen the ones that our beloved, but belabored Editor had to make go away. ;) (Not griping Eric, I'd a done the same in your shoes...mea culpa.)
News you have a point. I'll see what I can do to get you appointed to the Board's awards meeting for next year. C.R.A.P. is already moving toward next year by the release of a special award for an all categories considered super winner.
It is to be called "The Honor Roll", crafted of copper in the shape of a double roll of toilet paper. The winner of that one will truly wipe away the competition.
Actually rr3 Mr. Cosby did respond to what you posted as his words. Obviously you thought it was great stuff as you posted it.
Bill Cosby said about it; "There's an email floating around-entitled"I'm 76 and tired-purportedly sent by me. I did not send the email, I'm not 76, and don't suscribe to the ugly views expressed in the email. We are coming up to an important anniversary on Sunday [the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks] which is a day we should all come together. Whoever wrote this email is not thinking about our country, or what is important. If you get the email, it's time to hit DELETE."
Now that is the response of the true American that most folks believe Mr. Cosby to be.
What do you think r of the real Mr. Cosby's response? Oh one other question, why is it that you don't fact check yourself before posting? It would probably save you from embarassment now, and then.
Well by my count that is six questions that you have yet to answer. I'll stop now, and I'll be waiting for you to catch up with your answers. Hey I may even remind you once in a while that you haven't answered them. As I am 72 I know some folks our age that have a bit of a memory problem so I hope that you will appreciate the occasional nudge; just to help you out of course old buddy.
OKR,
While all the candidates for the coveted C.R.A.P. Award were certainly all deserving, I think the most deserving is Sarah Palin.
She has always been dumb as a sack of hammers.
We all know that.
But now she has lost what little good looks she may have had in ancient times and has devolved into the hedious old hag of the Alaskan wilderness.
http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2012/...
As if that wasn't bad enough, the Republican cons at Fox News have fired her for excessive redneckism.
So at least she now has the C.R.A.P. Award she can add to the list of things she clings to including her guns and bible.
This probably a good time to present the Creative Revisionism Academy of Propaganda awards for 2012.
C.R.A.P. is unique in that it gives its awards to those who are seldom honored outside of such organizations as the KKK, Aryan Brotherhood, the American Nazi Party, and in recent times the New Republican Party.
So here it is C.R.A.P. 2012:
Musician of the year; Ted Nugent. Mr. Nugent is a consistent winner of this award, though in the past he has been challenged by the Pendergraft Sisters. He has been able to distance himself from the competition by constant repetition of C.R.A.P. ideas, and ideals.
Radio Broadcaster of the year; Rush Limbaugh. Though Rush is slipping, his competition has slipped more. He may remain the favorite of C.R.A.P. primarily because he has personally proven that drug addicts can, and thus should, hold a full time job.
Television network of the year: There has never been a true competition for this award. The Fox Network has won it every year. Some grumble that it is not fair because the C.R.A.P. judges, who are all the members, have never watched anything on any other network.
Posthumous political award: Mitt Romney for obvious reasons.
Politician of The Year: Michelle Bachmann. This was the most hotly contested category of all with a drove of qualified candidates. Ms. Bachmann may have squeezed out her agonizing C.R.A.P. win because of the spaced out, slightly crazed look that appears so natural to her when she delivers the goods. There was strong competition from newcomers such as Akin, though Palin has faded, and remains a likely candidate for only a lifetime achievement award. There is a long line nervously waiting to get in for that one. ;)
ROTFLMAO r, I truly believe that you, and Jason have more doh! moments than Homer Simpson*. ROTFLMAO x 2.
* Homer Simpson is a long running cartoon character much beloved by all but the extreme right who either despise all he stands for, or are ignorant of his existence. Some of the worst cases also suffer a tragic psychological deficiency of not being able to see, hear, speak, or think about anything that they have not heard from Rush Limbaugh, or Fox News.
I truly feel sorry for you rr3, you thrive on lies, and hide from the truth.
I am happy to once again burst you bubble, though you will just fill another with hot air.
Bill Cosby didn't utter one word of what you just attributed to him. Read and weep o misled one.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/i...
I do not admit to naivety rr3, but even if that is the case I much prefer it to self imposed ignorance, and delusion.
Answer the questions r!
Here is a link that will inform 99.999% of people though I hold only faint hope for you. Still I offer it to you even though I don't believe in miracles, and know that due to its politically neutral approach you will have the opportunity to cherry pick. No, I should have said exercise your compulsion to cherry pick. ;)
By the way there is some interesting stuff here for all of us. It is a sort of amalgamation of contrasts between Rep, and Dem on many points of our economy. http://tlrii.typepad.com/theliscioreport...
I really didn't think you were that naive okr or is it just old age.
Bill always has a way a speaking the truth.
Bill Cosby "I'm 75 and Tired"
I'm 75. Except for brief period in the 50's when I was doing my National Service, I've worked hard since I was 17. Except for some some serious health challenges, I put in 50-hour weeks, and didn't call in sick in nearly 40 years. I made a reasonable salary, but I didn't inherit my job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. Given the economy, it looks as though retirement was a bad idea, and I'm tired. Very tired.
I'm tired of being told that I have to "spread the wealth" to people who don't have my work ethic. I'm tired of being told the government will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to people too lazy to earn it.
I'm tired of being told that Islam is a "Religion of Peace," when every day I can read dozens of stories of Muslim men killing their sisters, wives and daughters for their family "honor"; of Muslims rioting over some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews because they aren't "believers"; of Muslims burning schools for girls; of Muslims stoning teenage rape victims to death for "adultery"; of Muslims mutilating the genitals of little girls; all in the name of Allah, because the Qur'an and Shari'a law tells them to.
I'm tired of being told that out of "tolerance for other cultures" we must let Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries use our oil money to fund mosques and Madrasa Islamic schools to preach hate in Australia , New Zealand , UK, America and Canada , while no one from these countries are allowed to fund a church, synagogue or religious school in Saudi Arabia or any other Arab country to teach love and tolerance..
I'm tired of being told I must lower my living standard to fight global warming, which no one is allowed to debate.
I'm tired of being told that drug addicts have a disease, and I must help support and treat them, and pay for the damage they do. Did a giant germ rush out of a dark alley, grab them, and stuff white powder up their noses or stick a needle in their arm while they tried to fight it off?
I'm tired of hearing wealthy athletes, entertainers and politicians of all parties talking about innocent mistakes, stupid mistakes or youthful mistakes, when we all know they think their only mistake was getting caught. I'm tired of people with a sense of entitlement, rich or poor.
I'm really tired of people who don't take responsibility for their lives and actions. I'm tired of hearing them blame the government, or discrimination or big-whatever for their problems.
I'm also tired and fed up with seeing young men and women in their teens and early 20's be-deck them selves in tattoos and face studs, thereby making themselves unemployable and claiming money from the Government.
Yes, I'm **** tired. But I'm also glad to be 75.. Because, mostly, I'm not going to have to see the world these people are making. I'm just sorry for my granddaughter and their children. Thank God I'm on the way out and not on the way in.
" I'm 75 and I'm tired. If you don't agree you are part of the problem!
Still waiting for your answer to the question you continue to dodge rr3. Once more why do you think that the stock market has done better under Dem Prezs than Repub Prezs?
When you get to it here is a related question for you to dodge. Real GDP growth between 1949 and 2011 was 4.43% under Dem Prezs, while the average growth rate has been 2.43% under Repubs. Why do you think that is?
So now you have the stock market does better under Dems, and the gross domestic product does better under Dems, and I suspect that to your utter horror you have done better under Dems?
Answers please.
rr3yvo,
Perhaps you could define what a terrorist looks like. Is it only a dark skinned Muslim, or could it be a spoiled white suburban school shooter upper?
I want to know who is in favor of women in combat? If you are do you agree in the name of equality that all young women should register with the selective service?
So does the low information voter think that because the DOW is at 14,000 that America back on track to prosperity and influence? I think we need to look at why it is where it is at. Obamanomics will not allow success, we are supposed to punish it right?
Let's look at some numbers. The economy reportedly added 157,000 jobs in January, the unemployment rate was up to 7.9 percent. Wait we added jobs and the unemployment rate went up? For the low information voter 169,000 dropped off the roles. Can that be good news?
Some 8.5 million Americans have dropped completely out of the work force since Obama took office. That is about 6,000 for every day psc has been in office. Can that be good news?
We now have about 89 million either retired, they have take early retirement or have just given up looking for work. So we have less people working, an ever expanding government, so how is the government ever going to balance the budget without a serious tax increase on those left working?
So we have a government that is projected to spend 4.5 trillion a year within the next 5 years. Right now we take in about 2.5 trillion and spend 3.6 trillion. So where is the money going to come from?
Does anyone think that government spending will decrease with sequestration cuts? Is anyone that naive?
Gas is headed toward $4 a gallon again. Who does that hurt the most? Hint:not the rich.
With Obamacare tax increases the least expensive family health plan may cost $20,000 a year. What does that do for those that are working?
Ahhh but the stock market is booming so why isn't the economy? We actually saw a contraction in an economy that the media keeps telling us is recovering and the low information voter says it must be true because they say so.
The stock market is being artificially inflated by $85 billion the fed is printing and putting into it. You might remember the fed forcing the banks to make it easier to buy a home and a whole bunch of people got a home loan that could never pay it back and do you remember what that did to the housing market? What do you think it will do to the stock market and our economy? We are bankrupt but the low information voter will not hear or if they do they will deny it.
Debt is crushing this country and psc doesn't care, in fact it is his plan and he kept enough people dumb enough to vote for him, having the worst first term record in the history of this country.
A high stock market is good if you have money in it but an artificially high stock market is not good for the future of this economy. So you can tout the stock market as a sign of a good economy just like the liberals touted the housing market was good at it's peak because they had got it done despite the warnings from the conservatives. Then when the poopoo hit the fan it was all the conservatives fault and the liberals that orchestrated the whole scheme were running for the hills. Low information voters don't get this stuff from their liberal information press.
Then we have the low information voter that thinks that every dollar the government spend turns into 3. Shazzaam! And they think believing in God is magic. That's so silly! If government spending were what causes economic growth, then the economy today should be booming, and the unemployment rate in American should be plummeting.
The Dow Jones Average just had its best January since the last Democratic President was in office 1994 to be exact. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/31...
Something tells me rr3 that you spend a lot of time biting the hand that feeds you. ANSWER THE QUESTION!
Hey r, why won't you address OKR's question?
Hey rr3 for the fourth time, what do you make of the fact that the stock market does better during Democrat Administrations, than Republican Administrations.
You can hide, but you can't run from the truth, it is always there, inconvenient, or not.
Watch out countryman with flattery like that you will also bow at news feet. I don't have to worry about that.
How come the liberal information voter never wants to address any real issues or the truth?
I was wondering if it is patriotic to sell F-16's and tanks to terrorist while at the same time proposing to take guns away from Americans? I really want to know what the low information voter thinks.
countryman
Excellent comment mate!!!!!!
I hope you will stick around and keep commenting.
One of many of my favorites by JM, a great poet musician. Thanks for sharing GB. :)
And I dreamed I saw bomber jet planes ...
Riding shotgun in the sky ...
Turning into butterflies above our nation.
We are stardust ...
We are golden ...
We are caught in the devil's bargain ...
And we've got to get ourselves back to the garden.
by joni mitchell
All Creatures Not So Great, Not So Small
The red herring prolificates, swims in sewers of many minds.
The hen house fox salivates, thirsty chickens run toward the drip from its grin.
The disingenuous duck walks as always, secure in its devious disguise.
The fly in the ointment is taken for the cure.
Sadly none will ever be endangered species.
Well said countryman!
News, you are missing something in Geraldo's actions.
He can get in on the ground floor of the new, "kinder and gentler" GOP. The one with the Gen X'ers like Bobby Jindal up front doing all the talking.
I'm starting to read the 'up-and-comers' in the conservative ranks say things like "we have to stop coining stupid phrases like 'legitimate rape'."
This should be fun to watch as the baby-boomer neo-con generation fades into obscurity. (Who can tell me where Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld are right now? .....and, yes, I know where they should be.)
A new generation of egomaniacs are recognizing an opportunity to jump into the vacuum created in the Republican Party leadership due to the ineptitude of the old guard. There's still plenty of rich cat political contribution money floating around out there looking for a home, and plenty of starched shirt wearin', bible thumpin', holier-than-thou types out there looking for a ride on the Koch Brothers gravy train.
"Psssst.....Geraldo........just tell 'em you love Jesus, hate gays, think war is good, and that there shouldn't be any taxes on rich folk, and they'll start throwing cash at you."
Personally, I can't wait to watch the parade of political prostitutes lining up at the trough of fat cat money.
Then, it should be fun to watch Hillary, who will seem like the wise, old, nostalgia candidate, trounce some rookie 40-something Paul Ryan look-alike front man, who believes the earth is 10,000 years old and Atlas Shrugged is an economics textbook, in the 2016 campaign.
"Geraldo Rivera says he may run for New Jersey Senate"
http://nbclatino.com/2013/01/31/geraldo-...
Well, well, well, so little Jerry Rivera is going to run as a Republican for the Senate...at the very time the Republican Party is disapearing from the face of the political map.
Yeah, real smooth move slick.
ROTFLMAO!!!!
NanaDot
My advice to to all teachers -- go into private enterprise and let folks teach their own kids at home.
At least until the public decides to pay them what they are worth and that is at least triple what they make now.
You might be amazed at how fast the public would move to pay teachers if all the teachers quit teaching all at once -- permanently.
Nana -
You mean like the DHS trades some of their guns and ammo to the Dapartment of Education? ... Or State? ... or ??????
"South African billionaire announces he'll give half his fortune to charity"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/30/so...
Wow!!
"Caught Attacking Rape Victims, [New Mexico] Rep. Cathrynn Brown Claims She Only Meant to Punish Those Who Help Rape Victims"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/29/ca...
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/25/ne...
http://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/13%20Reg...
Hey Jason,
Just out of curiosity, what is it cons have against peace?
GB
Simply..no.
Jason,
To me, at least, you have become irrelevant. Not you, as a person, but your posts, as they really have no fathomable content.
I'm not one to get too highly involved (or is that highly evolved?) in these political conversations, but I think I would like to chime in (think "Tubular Bells") on this matter of the FEDs emassing large stockpiles of fully automatic weapons and such a large hoard of ammunition.
What do you guys think?
Are they preparing to defend the country against an uprising by its own citizenry? ... or are they preparing to mount a pre-emptive strike against what they see as a threat from that citizenry?
All redneck and hillbilly joking aside - what do y'all think?
GB
It's ok Jason, it's not like we take you seriously anyway.....
Jason...I'm sorry...Polly Parrot, you also stole the content of "your" unparagraphed diatribe about 7,000 assault weapons directly, word for word from the internet. Your unattributed copy, and paste maneuvers are the actions of a pick pocket. Have you no shame? Here is a link to the many sites where it is published. http://www.bing.com/search?q=In+yet+anot...
Wow Jason you are incorrigible. Why didn't you attribute "your" Obama meal joke to Conan O'Brien who authored it? Here it is, and a whole bunch more Obama jokes that you can enjoy, and adopt as your own work. http://www.you-can-be-funny.com/ObamaJok...
I am going to be on you like white on rice until you stop stealing!
Up until now now you have only shown these blogs an empty mind without an original thought in it. Maybe I will start referring to you as Polly Parrot.
Jason,
If you were given an assault weapon for personal defense, would you be willing to strap it on and carry it on you 24/7? If not then what's the point?
I've noticed an interesting and alarming irony lately in that those among us who seem to be the most well armed also seem to be the most frightened.
DHS buys 7000 full-auto assault rifles, calls them 'personal defense weapons' In yet another huge blow to the rhetoric and narrative of the Obama administration and its desire to disarm the American public, a DHS bid has been uncovered (see documents below) showing that the Department of Homeland Security recently put out an offer to purchase 7,000 full-auto "assault weapons" to be used domestically, inside the USA. Keep in mind that President Obama is on the record saying, "AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals; that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities." But it seems he really means they don't belong on the streets of our cities unless they are in the hands of homeland security enforcers, in which case they can be FULL-AUTO assault weapons. In the hands of the government, they're called "Personal Defense Weapons" The juiciest part of this bid is the use of the phrase "Personal Defense Weapons" to describe the full-auto AR-15s being purchased by DHS. Apparently, when YOU hold an AR-15, it's an "assault rifle." But magically, if you hand that same rifle to an armed government homeland security enforcer, it instantly transforms itself into a "personal defense weapon." The request for bid actually says: DHS and its components have a requirement for a 5.56x45mm NATO, select-fire firearm suitable for personal defense use in close quarters and / or when maximum concealment is required. So there it is, right in black and white: DHS enforcers need full-auto AR-15s which are "suitable for personal defense in close quarters" and for "maximum concealment." But if you or I make the same claim, suddenly we are branded lunatics by the fringe left and all the gun grabbers across America who apparently have no clue that their own government is arming up like never before. Senator Feinstein, the gun-grabbing Senator from California, says she wants to take all the guns from all Americans. "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in," she says on the record. But while Mr. and Mrs. America are turning in their guns, 'roid-head DHS goons are arming to the teeth with full-auto assault rifles. This is all on top of the 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition the U.S. government has already stockpiled, as was discovered last year. What kind of government wants to domestically stockpile ammo and full-auto weapons, putting them in the hands of domestic agents who have nothing whatsoever to do with overseas wars? Well, the kind of government that plans to NEED 1.6 billion rounds of ammo and full-auto assault weapons, of course
Mcdonalds will be offering a new Value meal its Obama Value meal order anything you want and the person behind you pays for it.
State department was allocated money for security they just used it for different things also. To your point of security we knew that Al Queada was getting stronger why did we not have at the min. A drone base somewhere near. Clinton even said that we have known about the instability there were other ways to protect. But the Dems are full of excuses.. Be honest you would be feeling different about this if W was in charge wait this would of never had happen. Why do I say that because he cared enough to protect us. On to a different note.
Our economy did not grow in the last quarter of 2012 in fact it was down. .1 now if this happen on W was in charge you would blame him oh but the Dems still blame him because they don't want to be accountable for their incompetence.
Jason,
What is a terrorist? What is a terrorist attack? Benghazi - 4 dead - Newtown - 26 dead - with now probably more that 1000 Americans dead, on home soil, from gun violence just since Newtown. These tragedies are more political that you know.
I wonder whay we can't get FOX news to manufacture any outrage about that? So, does it matter that much what we call it? Terrorism or criminal? Apparently it means everything.
An Afterthought: Jason the worst thing about this is that you do a disservice to yourself. These blogs are a wonderful opportunity to all of us to grow our minds, to learn to better arrange our thoughts, and to place them on the page with an increasing degree of clarity.
It is also an opportunity to learn to strategize before presenting your argument, by envisioning the points against your argument, and countering them within the body of what you say. It will make your words have more power to understand the issue completely by arguing it with yourself, before putting them to the page.
The mind is a terrible thing to waste.
I know that I have laid into you like an old grandpa. However I assure you that if I didn't care about you I wouldn't have bothered. Sometimes you young fellers need to be taken to the woodshed! :)
Hey "Clinton", -- now there is another word those cons like to throw around.
Trust me, she will be stomping the snot out of the Republican Candidate for the White House in the 2016 election.
My wife and I are reserving front row seats for that election.
Of course, frankly there may not be a Republican Party anymore by then -- or at the least it will likely be a minor 3rd Party by then.
In that case the cons can be spared the embarrassment of seeing their candidate figuratively, politically dismembered in front of their eyes by the single most powerful force in Washington second only to our President -- yeah, Thats "MRS." Hillary Clinton, to the con losers.
Jason if you are doing this because of ignorance, and don't know how to add a link to your comment here is how you do it.
Suppose that you are reading an article at a web site, and decide that you want to make a comment about it on the blog. Move the cursor (use your mouse) up to the top of your screen where the location on the web of the article is located. Left click your mouse and run the cursor along itilluminating it. Right click on that. The little box will appear that has cut, paste, copy, and other functions are listed. Right click copy. Then left click.
Go to the blog comment place. Say what you want to say, your thoughts, your words, not some one elses. When you are finished leave one space after your comment. Then right click your mouse. The little task box will come up again. This time right click paste. Hit your space button once. That is it. Your link will appear below your comment. If something is not clear please reply, and I will try to clarify.
Ignorance is not a crime, excepting a moral one, when one fosters it instead of expelling it. I hope this solves your problem, I would much prefer to believe that you just did not know how to link something than that you were engaging in that other repugnant possibility. :)
Jason please quit copying other peoples words, and presenting them here as your own. Several have asked you to stop but you won't. Here is your latest act of plagiarism, which in case you don't understand it, is a form of stealing. Evidence of the crime: http://m.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-...
And Finally,
Jason,
Did I just hear another conservative throwing around that word "Gore"... again?
You folks sure do like that word.
Anyway, I don't think anyone but you folks stuck in the fox news bubble care much one way or the other about Gore anymore.
But hey whatever gets you through the day, eh mate?
Jaason,
Answer: Fox News is the propaganda wing of the Republican Party.
Mate you really are stuck deep in that bubble.
Jason,
Socialism is an Economic Theory.
It is simply one of several approaches to satisfy the 3 columns of Economics -- Allocation, Technology, and Equity.
That is all it is.
Perhaps you mean most, if not all, democratic governments have some level of corruption -- no matter what economic system is dominant at any given moment.
Any and all democratic governments will have some level of corruption as long as we elect corrupt men to Congress/Parliament.
In fact, you live in the nation with the most corrupt government in the World.
But none of that has anything to do with the Economic Theory we refer to as "Socialism."
Hey everyone!
Jason just informed us all that "redneck" is a race!
Seriously mate, a race?
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Al Gore the sellout looked like an idiot with Matt Laurier.
Democrat Senator from Louisanna says the spending problem in Washington only exists with Fox News. I guess 16 trillion debt is a made up number... Obama mention Fox news when talking about immigration...How the hell does Fox News have anything to do with the way politicians run the country.....
Chris Matthews: "People That Believe In Border Protection" Are "Right-Wingers Or Idiots"... People who say that are left wing extremist who wear a cheerleaders outfit with the word Obama on front and use pom poms. Chris Mathews the most idiotic person on tv today.
With any economic system you can corrupt to being political.
Red necks to me seems kind of racist. Now onto a different subject. Hilliary Clinton was being whinny about the partisianship in the hearings. Poor Mrs. Clinton ask Billy for a spare intern seems you need all the help you can get. Courtesy of red flag news btw she kind of sounded a bit partisian herself: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, while lamenting the partisanship of congressional Republicans who grilled her about the Benghazi attack, encouraged Republicans not to imitate the unwillingness to compromise evinced by terrorists in North Africa.
"It has been increasingly partisan," Clinton said today at theNewseum when asked to comment on the questioning she faced from Republicans last week. "You can be partisan, you can have a strong sense of the rightness of your position, but democracy and certainly legislative bodies require compromise. And you can't let compromise become a dirty word because then you veer toward fanaticism."
"I mean, we were just talking about extremists who think it's only their way, they are the ones who have the truth, none of the rest of us have any kind of claim on what is real in their views," she continued. "And so it's important in our democracies -- like Australia, like the United States -- that yes, be passionate, be intense about your feelings, but at the end of the day you've got to serve the people who sent you there, and that requires compromise."
The "extremists" Clinton had just been discussing included those that carried out the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, resulting in the deaths of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans. Read more via The Washington Examiner...
I guess rr3 I'll just have to keep wacking you with the same question every time you pop up, until you answer. For the third time, what do you make of the stock market historically doing better under Democrat Administrations than under Republican Administrations.
You can hide, but you can't run. ;)
'Our parents pay tax so we're entitled to benefits'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...
Is this what we really want in America?
"Georgia man guns down immigrant after GPS sends him to wrong driveway"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/29/ge...
What an idiot!!!!!!!
He took a young man's life for absolutely no good rhyme or reason.
This illustrates the biggest part of red-neck gun ownership -- the owner.
Well I really didn't care if it was Jason's idea or Alex Jones. Either way I knew it was hogwash.
However, it would be nice if Jason could comment without the plagiarism.
Thanks ND. Actually I thought when I read it "That sounds like Alex Jones". That thought was immediately followed by the self query "why do I always think of 'Third World' when I think of Alex Jones".
Sorry Jason but that doesn't really qualify as a credible source. However I do read stuff produced by him from time to time just to keep myself alerted to things on the outside fringe of possibility.
jason
Socialism is an economic system not a political system.
Gee whiz man, pick up a book sometime.
Interesting stuff about the framing our "enemy" by blaming him for a chemical weapon attack that was perpetrated by our minions.
Jason would you mind providing a link to your source? I don't rule it out, but I want to know more about it. If I determine that it is likely true I will be one of the loudest ones spreading the alarm.
Thank you.
I feel like the usa should be renamed The United Socialist States of America.
Alleged hacked emails from defense contractor Britam reveal a plan "approved by Washington" and funded by Qatar to stage a chemical weapons attack in Syria and blame it on the Assad regime, fulfilling what the Obama administration has made clear is a "red line" that would mandate US military intervention.
The fact that the plan involves delivering a CW (chemical weapon) that is "similar to those Assad should have," clearly suggests that the idea is to stage a false flag chemical weapons attack that could be blamed on Assad by Gulf states like Qatar and NATO powers. Red flag news if this is true that means Obama is a war mongrel.
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
But then again r,
After reading this, its pretty easy to see why the Republican Party is on its way out the door permanently.
"Father of Newtown victim heckled by gun advocates at legislative hearing"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/28/fa...
Regarding your 8:42 comment r; I think you're in your own bubble within the opaque Republican bubble. That is two layers away from reality, but who is counting. LOL
r you guys should have put McCain on the ticket in 2012. Then you would have had a shot at winning.
News: i would love to see that sign R.I.P.in the History Books,(BUT) I think they will get out of this funk,with their lying and their ability to all of a sudden change their Policies, and make it all look good again! Seems the Bible Belt will forgive and forget.If they committed an on screen sacrifice,for every one to see,they could still talk their way out of it,with People like that! So i don't think we will ever see this happen,(Most American People of Faith, are gullible)! My wife is 1, and has some strange Ideas but a good Woman! Ha
liv='low information voter' or 'liberal information voter'
They never address issues and believe all the lies and corruption of the lib media. Of course some don't care at all they maybe hear a sound bite and go vote based on that. Then some are prodded to get on a bus and told they are going to go vote and they need to vote Democrat. It is hard to beat lies and santa clause in the voting booth.
Right-on Nanadot right again!
I was never that sharp in English,so thanks! Always willing (too) or (to)learn. Thanks!
...and just to show no hard feelings.. I called 'you're' a hyphenated word, when it is clearly a compound word. Anyone can goof up, but it did change the meaning of my post, and almost made it more irrelevant than it already was.
I know that I will get slammed for being a spellchecker on this, but, I just have to do it.
Call this English 101:
3 common typos that, when fixed, will make it easier for some of us to read, and digest some posts on this site.
'You're' means you are. It is a hyphenated word which actually combines 2 separate words.
'Your' is actually used as a possessive, meaning something along the lines of 'This is 'YOUR' bike."
Lose vs. loose. Lose means to actually have something missing where loose means 'not tight', or not corralled, such as "The dog is loose".
To vs. too.
To indicates a direction or a movement. "I am moving 'TO' this place."
'Too' means also. It's as simple as that!
(We'll get to it's vs its some other time.)
These are common typos, and I make my share of typos as well. I actually accept with grace when I am corrected, as I know that my meaning will be clearer and cleaner for it. I used to make the 'it's vs. its' mistake a lot.
(We'll get to 'use vs. used' later!
For those who want to do a bit better job on their (we'll get to their vs. there later) posts, this is intended as concerned advice. For those who do not consider this in good humor; please feel free to disregard my missive. I mean no harm, and am only trying to make it easier to decipher your posts.
I am with News on this one; we all make typos, but these examples aren't typos, these are unintentionally misleading words that can change the entire meaning of a sentence or phrase (we'll get to sentence vs. sentance later).
Have a great day y'all!
:)
rr3yvo,
When you post a comment that is attributed to a specific person and your typo completely changes that person's name for reference, then yes,it does make a difference. BTW I think you meant "lib" instead of "liv" right?
What the heck does 'liv' mean anyway? I know it must mean 'lib', but the 'v' makes no sense. Please explain.
Typical liv response, it is sad that a large part of the voting block has been dumbed to the point of not caring what the truth is.
rr,
I see you didn't like Secretary of State Clinton's direct method of answering -- or maybe its because nobody but the handful of crazy conservatives are interested in their crazy conspiracy theories.
Its a new World mate and there is no place in it for conservative crazies.
Get used to it mate!
You said r; "I have come to realize that psc is not our problem. The problem is when half the population watches a lying president rip apart America for 4 years and then see fit to reelect him."
Wow r that is the first time you have ever owned up to the utter failure of the George W. Bush presidency, and the stupidity of those who voted for him. Now that you have owned up that Obama is not the problem why not quit calling him president santa claus?
You read my comment very selectively rr3. Do you remember this part of it? "Seems like the stock market historically does its best during Democratic Administrations."
Care to comment on that?
Lol rr,
Do you seriously think Republicans amount to half the population and/or half the voters?
I mean, you were just joking right?
Oh wait...yeah, inside the Con Bubble up is down, stop means go, and right is wrong. Its 1984, Reagan just won re-election and "Liberal" is a dirty word.
Yeah that's right rr, if you believe it then it must be true!
ROTFLMAO!!!!
I have come to realize that psc is not our problem. The problem is when half the population watches a lying president rip apart America for 4 years and then see fit to reelect him. Millions think it is ok to rip apart babies before they are born, steal from those that work hard to redistribute to those that don't, think that gay marriage is ok and embrace the most absurd, preposterous and destructive lies as though they are enlightened truths. Millions are in love with lies, deception and selfishness which is our problem, psc is only the symptom.
2007 highs? this 2013 why did we fall?
I figure a big dog like you r probably has a lot of interest in the stock market. Did you see that it is rocketing upward approaching 2007 highs? Now thats the kind of change that puts extra change in the pocket of guys like you. Say what you will you gotta hand it to those Democrats. Seems like the stock market historically does its best during Democratic Administrations.
Griping all the way to the bank are you? ;)
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
Funny how the liv's never want to talk about issues but will jump all over a spelling error. Hilarious!!
Folks I think that perhaps the only honorable thing for Republicans to do at this juncture in their Party lifespan is to humbly resign from the American Politic.
REPUBLICAN PARTY
1854-2012
RIP
"Berlusconi praises Fascist dictator Mussolini on Holocaust Remembrance Day"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/27/be...
No surprises there.
ND,
Did you ever hear somebody who is insured under a employer-provided medical insurance plan complain that they would rather have no insurance benefits from their employer?
I haven't heard anybody complain because they HAD employer benefits.
Its pretty easy for those working folks who have managed to hang on to their jobs (because they usually work for the Government -- ie, Prison/Industrial system) to complain about other folks wanting adequate medical access.
I guess some of the working folks feel better when they see someone who has even less than they do. It makes them feel rich I guess, even though they are really dirt poor and on the short-list for the next round of job layoffs.
Its time we stop worrying about those who would deny the People their due. Those few cons couldn't get one of their own elected to dog-catcher anymore. Frankly, the cons are meaningless nowdays. They are loud but have no power. Rather, its time we use our huge National majority to bypass the cons and create those policies that will return our nation to prosperity and economic equality.
Oh heck Jason1969,
We can recover that by slashing that outrageously large military budget and raising Mitt Romney and his buddies taxes to 75%.
Obama made it easier to get ssdi and did nothing to shore up the fund because millions of people were added more than what was projected the ssdi fund will run out by early 2016. Well Obama made it easier to get it but also made it easier to bankrupt it. Thank you King O for screwing the real disable citizens.
It might just have been a typo.
heck look at anything I write -- you'll find at least a couple of typos, comma errors, misspellings, ect.
It happens to us all.
What about that r? Have you got a thing against Jewish folk?
Thanks WTF, I had never heard of Ben Shein. I didn't want to go lookin' for it because I figured I would find myself at some dreary right wing web site where between the gurgles always present on a sinking ship I would find more asinine aphorisms. ;)
rr3yvo,
FYI, It was BEN "STEIN".
How dare the Republicans waste our hard-earned tax dollars on phony hearings like the Benghazi matter.
First the Republicans spent and borrowed us into the worst economic depression we have had since 1929, and now the Republicans want to keep us there.
The Republican Party, out of touch, out of ideas, and on their way out of our Government.
All Hands On Deck!
Hello to you all, I am The Right Wing Dream. Though I have never been real it has been your desire to believe in me, so you have. Many of you have long believed in one myth or another, often basing everything on it. Thus I do not feel any responsibility for your fate.
I am telling you now that this ship has been circling to the right for the entire cruise. I know it will be a surprise to most of you that we have gone nowhere. I am also telling you now that this ship is sinking...fast.
One other thing; there are no life boats aboard. Swim for it maties. If you are lucky you may be saved by one of the many other ships that thankfully do not go in a circle. ;)
rr,
Lots of questions but you have no provable answers to those questions.
OK, so you choose to go down with the sinking Republican ship.
That's great mate.
"Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured...,but not everyone must prove they are a citizen."
"and now, any of those who refuse, or are unable, to prove they are citizens will receive free insurance paid for by those who are forced to buy insurance because they are citizens."
BEN SHEIN
Was Benghazi caused by a protest or was it terrorism?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
Are Americans freer or more dependent on government than ever before?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
Have we cut the national debt in half or increased it to over $16 trillion?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
Do we have hope and change or record high poverty rates, unemployment and economic stagnation?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
I think we ought to adopt the new liberal slogan.
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!
My take would not be the same as a liv.
25,562 people die from falling each year. Let's demand that Congress OUTLAW gravity. Sounds logical doesn't it?
Welcome back r,
I hope you had a great time on that cruise. The Caribbean sounds like the place to go when its Winter in Missouri.
So, r, what's your take on the Tea Party surrender to the moderate Republicans?
Wow got back about a week ago from a Carribean cruise. Wonderful vacation for the middle of January. I guess you could say I went to where the globe was warmer for sure. The boat for a 5 day cruise averaged 32,000 gal of fuel per day. That is awesome I felt just like Algore. The only difference is I wasn't trying to convince anybody of the climate change hoax while enjoying a jet set lifestyle.
"Newtown residents to join gun control march in Washington"
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/...
Well i seen were the States that were trying too Redistrict there State to give the Rep.a NO fail Election!(gerrymandering)are backing off from it, for now. The only way to keep the Elections fare is to change the System.Obama is wasting a lot of his time buy not pursuing Indictments of Wall Street Bankers,changing the Voting system,seeing that the 60% majority is changed. To me these kinds of changes would do a lot to correct a number of things!
GB,
The Moral Majority?
"How Obama is unraveling Reagan Republicanism"
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/how_obam...
And just maybe this is a hint as to why there is a purge going on in the Republican Party:
"Christian radio hosts: Feminists are 'selfish, narcissistic, family-destroying [women-of-ill-repute]"
(mild language warning on this one)
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/25/ch...
Ya know if I didn't know better, I would say there is an internal party purge going on in the Republican Party.
"Sarah Palin's contract with Fox News not renewed'
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/25/sa...
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/20...
Hey Tea Partiers...guess who is getting dumped (and it ain't just Palin)?
If you guess "the Tea Party," then you guessed correctly.
Well GB, if the Republican Party is to continue upon its same path on the issues (and apparently they do), then the Republican Party will continue to shrink.
Putting lip-stick on that pig won't change anything.
Stay the hell out of our Social Life,were not a bunch of adolescents,the politicians are not our Parents, we can handle our own choices! This is what causes a lot of the Nations Problems! I mean, Rage ,from a lot of our Citizens!Some, will not stand for it anymore! They can't see this could cause some of this carnage happening?
Nope - I am sure they will keep fighting on the social issues - but only after they have strategized and formulated a new approach.
They will either move way to the left (and call it moderate) or way to the right to appease the Moral Majority in hopes the MM will help them in 2014.
But again - news - it's not even about the social issues ... It's about power - ultimate power - and those who wield it.
Just think about it - I saw apicture the other day of four men sitting on lawn chairs in front of an old dilapidated log cabin. One was reading a newspaper while the other three were apparently in some deep discussion.
One of them was a president- I can't remember which one ... The other three were Thomas Edison, Harvey Firestone, and Henry Ford.
Wow!, I thought .... Look at brain trust and power assembled in the yard of that cabin. Then I realized that even these four were second level "operatives" in the grand scheme of things - second level puppet masters at the least.
Its either that or the Republican Party is really just trying to put lipstick on a pig and trying to convince us its something else.
Surely the Republican Party is smarter than that?
I know the American People are smarter than that.
GB
Yeah, so no more fighting us on the social issues?
Now we are getting somewhere.
Well, I guess that settles a few things lol.
It sure sounds like the Tea Party is surrendering.
I mean either they are going to fight for social issues or they aren't. It sounds like they have chosen "aren't."
So call it surrender or just giving up or whatever we may want to call it, it seems to work out the same.
Maybe not "surrendered" - maybe retreating and regrouping ... I doubt they will surrender.
2nd amendment rights ... abortion ... gay marriage... all good topics ... But not even on the radar as far as the puppeteers are concerned. Again - just distraction.
Much like the elections, the Tea Party, the fight over abortion, that guy from Kansas and his church full of lunatics ... just things to distract us while they make their plans - and their fortunes - at the expense of the rest of us.
Maybe we'd be better off to be like PollyAnna and just play the "Glad Game" until we turn back to dust and become part of a beautiful sunset.
Lol...the Republican Party now wants to take a new "softer gentler" approach.
Oh where or where is the Tea Party?
Are the Tea Party folks going to take this lying down?
What about their concerns regarding social issues?
I just can't believe good, Christian, Tea Party folks will just stand by, do nothing, and allow moderates to take over the Republican Party.
What will this mean for 2nd Amendment rights?
What will this mean in terms of preserving traditional marriage?
How about that battle against abortion?
Has the Tea Party officially surrendered?
I've worn my fingers out Writing to every Politician available too get an answer,no answer yet! I am beginning to think we are no different then any of these Countries fighting for Democracy! What do you do Riot? And have our own Military kill us? This Government has learned a lot from this kind of behavior,so they are more subtle in their approach of taking our Democracy away!
I'm with you news - not that only repubs look at things that way - but that all (or most) pols are out for themselves. Just look at how the Republican Party is backing up and blowing smoke and saying they need a complete makeover. Just another try at compromising to maintain their positions prior to the election in a couple of years.
Believe me - if I could crawl in a cave somewhere and get off the grid I would do it.
GB
What worries me most are politicians, parties, and individuals who think Americas' only solution to an economic depression is to force Americans' to accept a much lower living standard -- and then threaten to commit terrorism if the American People don't submit to it.
I think that is fundamentally wrong.
I think that is the wrong direction.
Jo
You're right ...
As I've said numerous times - It ain't the dems or the repubs we need to be concerned with - it's the puppeteers.
The parties are just a smoke screen - a mere distraction.
Maybe someday we'll learn.
GB
I would love to see how long Ted and his band of pseudo patriots would last after the US Air Force began their carpet bombing -- if he and his pals ever did go ahead and actually carry out their threats of treason/terrorism.
These cons seem to think its the 1700's and that somehow they will achieve glory in some kind of twisted, Bizzaro World version of a "Bunker Hill" stand against the People (and military might) of the United states of America.
What a bunch of idiots.
The United States will make short work of them.
BRING IT ON TED!!!
Dead on Jo. :)
Saw that News about that narcissistic nut Nugent. He has never given a darn about anything except self indulgence. He says why would he waste his time going to Viet Nam when he could instead stay home and live life exactly as he chose. It had nothing to do with any principle other than self gratification.
He also suffers from the earliest onset of arrested development that I have ever witnessed. It appears to have hit the poor soul around age two, or three.
Jo I agree 100% -- Reid is a wimp.
He has been selling out to the conservatives for years now.
Well i was in a good mood until i just seen the wimp Reid make a deal with MCconnell on the 60 Vote Majority with a hand shake,do you believe it? The Man with no Honor at all! That little wimp needs too go.So now we're stuck another 2 Year with this Crap! What the hell's wrong with the Democrat? He has said for Years it was going to happen this time! What happens, they said they didn't have the Votes. I think both Parties has taken over things ! We don't have anyone doing our bidding,We think we do but i think they have us all fooled,we're already living in a dictator-ship! They could careless what we the People want!11
Just when we thought we knew all there was to knowing about Ted "Redneck" Nugent, we learn something new.
Oh Teddy boy...oh my, my, my....
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/24/tw...
Well Jo, they call the conservatives crazy for a good reason.
But ya know Joe, the Democrats have their own history of doing the same thing.
That is why we can rest assured most these Republican redistricting "plans" will be struck down in much the same way the courts struck down similar Democrat "plans." Eventually the districts will be objectively drawn utilizing one of several objective methods for re-districting.
Its nothing new mate. Its just the Republicans doing it this time instead of the Democrats.
The dishonesty of the People involved in this, has to have another back-up plan or some twisting of the Law too succeed! People in place,like Bush did. Federal Law should be able to handle this.but it won't,i don't think.Holder is gone again! Has Obama commented on this? News these fools think were NUTS,and they might be right!
Jo,
Its likely the gerrymandering will be challenged in court.
The standard the court usually uses is to ask the question, "does the redistricting plan benefit the State majority party" -- in these cases that would be the Republican party. Normally if the court finds it does benefit the majority party, they strike down the redistricting and order that an objective method (there are several) be used in drawing up new districts.
This is something i can't imagine the American People not being out-ragged about, this Gerrymandering going on! What we just let it happen? If we don't get the Electoral Collage put out of Business,and go too the Popular Vote,what kind of Country will we have? The Rep. Party cannot win an Election Honestly, we let them do this! Whats wrong with us as a Country? Whats wrong with us as a People? The entire Party Brand Should be put out of Business! This isn't Politic,this is Fraud!!
"Listeners and employees quit Georgia public broadcasting as mind-control conspiracy theorist takes over"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/24/li...
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/15/ge...
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/state-regio...
And the Tea Party wonders why everyone thinks they are crazy...lol.
I am pleased to see America is finally waking up to the fact that women are 100% equal to men, and will no longer prevent women from serving in combat.
The Russians had women on the front-lines in WW2.
Maybe that is how they defeated the Germans.
http://englishrussia.com/2012/03/08/outs...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyudmila_Pa...
"Miss Pavlichenko"
Woody Guthrie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHKjOl9oc...
Yep...and the way of the NAZIs.
NanaDot,
Well, the cons never believed in democracy in the first place. They believe in minority rule -- their and only their minority (their minority being rich, fat-cat white males) -- see election 2000 for more on this.
I hope the courts will review this soon...before its too late to do anything about it.
OKR,
I love discussing Bush and Cheney. Its one of my favorite pastimes.
The problem seems to be that when confronted with facts the average con suffers acute can't-remember-bush-itis.
Its often the result of long-term selective memory loss experienced while in the conservative bubble.
There is no known cure.
What I want know is, are you right wing Regressives now going to shut your mouths about Obama's first term?
All we have ever heard from all of you when we brought up the administration preceding the one now ending was "that is in the past, let's talk about now!"
Well the last administration is now in the past. Talk all you want about what Obama does from this point forward, but keep your mouths shut about the past four years, there is a new administration with a new cabinet, and a new beginning. All I'll have to say in response if you don't is HYPOCRITE! HYPOCRITE! HYPOCRITE!
I don't think my admonition will have even the slightest effect on any of you because you are so used to being called hypocrites. However, just as this past administration didn't charge Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld with treason when they were gone, you guys need to let H. Clinton off the hook on Benghazi. No more about that O. K. ?
If you keep it going we will continue to hammer you about the blatant lies your boys told to get us into two disastrous wars, that have put America on its back economically, on credibility, and made us one of the most despised countries in the world.
One thing for sure you won't see Dubby Bush nor co-president Creepy Cheney traveling the world, as have most of our former Presidents (often on special assignment). Neither of them could make it halfway around the world before they were arrested, and hauled before the World Court for their war crimes. If it should happen it would be Nuremburg all over again.
So shut the hell up about what happened in the last administration. If you don't this is just a taste of what you will get in reply. Nuff said, get it?
Regressive Couples: Realigned folks who should dance together at every Tea Party Event.
1. Ted Nugent and Orly Taitz
2. Paul Ryan and Sarah Palin
3. Michelle Bachman and Rick Santorum
4. Jan Brewer and Scott Walker
I can see them dancing through the night, twirling always to the right, turning into rotten pumpkins at the stroke of midnight.
OKR,
Check this out:
"Ted Nugent claims his 'buddies' are willing to start an armed revolt"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/22/te...
That bloke is seriously disturbed but he does provide good comic relief.
Someone please send this link to Paul Ryan. ;)
http://paulbibeau.blogspot.com/2012/01/i...
I did see him grit his teeth once.But i'm not convinced yet! We'll see! Hope he's woke up!
I checked Fox News, they fail to mention that he was home schooled.
You just can't trust Fox News to give ALL the facts.
"Homeschooled teen who killed family with AR-15 plotted Walmart mass shooting"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/22/ho...
http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/crime/compl...
"Cops: Woman kills husband, mistaking him for intruder"
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/...
"Husband accidentally shoots wife while lying in bed"
http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Hus...
"Husband accidentally shoots himself and wife during gun safety class"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...
Well, I think you see the point.
ND the study you pointed out is why a lot of us gun owners don't have a problem with the back ground checks Obama wants in place, at risk people should not be able to buy a gun and if a person becomes a risk then they should have to turn over their guns.
All of my guns are locked up except one it is loaded but there is not one in the chamber.
As far as suicide I think that if someone wants to kill themself they will do it any way they can.
GAL,
This link might help explain the answer a little better than I can.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtqDB2spy...
Darned if I know, Gal.
Its a good thing such violent, intrusive break-ins make up a very small percentage of gun deaths.
But I know what We the Majority are going to do.
We are going to make Congress co-operate with our President or they will face the consequences and the wrath of the American People -- and that includes voting in favor of common sense gun regulation.
The majority rules, its what democracy is all about mate.
Its best conservative folks get used to a few changes they may not like -- 'cause real change is here mate and there is no stopping it.
News GB asked a very good question, so I will ask it again.
How can a firearm in a home be used for personal protection if it is not loaded and not handy (secured) and the ammunition is secured separately?
Come on news man up answer the question.
news -
you did not answer my question ...
and - again - you assume you know my stand on issues.
gb
Oh, hey GB,
I just watched O'Reilly's comments regarding our President's speech.
I was hoping O'Reilly would go ballistic -- complete with on-screen meltdown...but nope he just made some stupid comments that only make sense in the con bubble reality.
Fortunately, we can still watch re-runs of his classic meltdown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy-Y3HJNU...
Typo Alert!
In my previous comment responding to GB, I meant to say "1980's" not "1980"
Jo,
I sure am glad to see our President finally come out swinging for a change.
And I can almost hear the crowd chanting for him to deliver the knock out blow to the cons.
Its a new day mate and it looks like the American People are winning for a change.
GB,
I just had a look at the Fox News website.
I couldn't believe it mate. They are clicking their heels together 3 times and repeating the magic words.
BEnGHAZI! BEnGHAZI! BEnGHAZI!
They are heading back into the con bubble where its 1980 and Reagan has just been sworn in to his 2nd term of office. You know, where a conservative can feel all warm and comfy and where "liberal" is a dirty word.
"Okie From Muskogee"
Merle Haggard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iYY2FQHF...
I agree News.Ever since the Leadership G.O.P. has been standing in front of the Camera to tell us what we want, they do look like, & reminds me of the News Reels of Hitlers group. Cantor,kyl,and the rest looks like a bunch of Naiz! You hit the nail on the head like always!
gentle ben
Its one of the ideas We the Majority plan to put into place.
If the cons are still debating the gun issue, that is their thing.
As for the rest of us, we plan to put some common sense rules into place -- with or without the cons.
Get used to it mate 'cause its a new day and a new America.
Or as our President said,
"Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time, but it does require us to act in our time,"
"OBAMA: NO MORE MR. NICE GUY"
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...
Get used to it!
Hey News -
How can a firearm in a home be used for personal protection if it is not loaded and not handy (secured) and the ammunition is secured separately?
"Excuse me Mr. Intruder - give me just a few minutes to assess the situation, unlock my gun safe, find the proper weapon, and then go to another location, unlock yet another vault, and load my weapon - and I'll be right back!"
I know it's important to make sure the firearms are secure - but what does that really mean?
GB
"Mayans actually predicted rise of 'pale obese gun monsters"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/21/ma...
I for one am getting darn sick and tired of all the Ryan Bashing in this forum!!
But seriously, if you dressed Ryan in a NAZI uniform he could look and play the part perfectly!
Poor Paul Ryan in his world turned upside down since losing the election still sees every thing upside down. He thinks makers are takers and takers are makers.
I wonder if he is sleeping with an Ayn Rand book as a pillow; closed mind, and closed book written by a closed mind, ever perfect bed fellows.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/21...
Jo,
I think having a reliable, reasonable firearm in the home for protection is a good idea provided there are safety criteria mandated by law.
The weapon should be well secured with well secured ammunition kept separately from the weapon.
It would also be a good idea to require some form of firearms training and for the owner to become accustomed to their weapon and learn to shoot it.
Such training should include a general course on gun-owner legal obligations and the limits to the weapon's lawful use.
But frankly mate, I think if we wanted real safety we would be teaching Gandhi/King style pacifism to every child and adult in the World. Then maybe we would not have to any think about needing weapons anywhere at all.
Personally i don't think there will ever be a Gun Law to satisfy everyone! Ive carried most of my Adult life to make a living.I was never one to hunt as a youngster, unless we were Hungry,didn't like killing even then. obviously all guns will Kill you, like a lot of other thing! Hell a 22 rifle will do the same thing,maybe more Damage, the way it bounces around inside you.So that's why i have this Opinion. AK 47, Shotgun, 22 Rifle, Dead is Dead! Too deep for me!
OKR,
That is a great article. It inspired me to do some research.
So now to the crazies who are opposing Chuck Hagel's nomination I must ask....
The surge worked? When?
Maybe what worked for us was the withdrawal -- but that surge thing doesn't seem to have had much effect on the violence in Iraq or damping their defacto civil war.
"Wave of Iraq car bombs targets Shia Muslim pilgrims"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan...
"43 killed in sectarian attacks across Iraq"
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/secta...
"Al-Qaeda making comeback in Iraq, officials say"
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world...
"Police: 26 killed in blasts across Iraq"
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world...
OKR
Yeah I can pull the link up now mate, but not before. I tried it several times because I always enjoy reading the links you post and I didn't want to miss it. However, no matter how many times I tried it kept pulling up a blank scree.
Anyway, now that I can pull the link up now, I will go give it a read.
I clicked on it this morning News, and it came right up. I don't know what's going on unless the good ole USA has opted for a Chinese approach to the internet. ;)
It is at "TruthOut" and has to do with revisionist attempts regarding the Iraq surge. You could probably get it by just going to "TruthOut" and perusing their articles.
OKR,
I was unable to pull up the link. Maybe its me, I don't know, but I was unable to get that link up.
...just thought you should know mate.
Regurge the surge. http://truth-out.org/news/item/14020-the...
"$240 billion amassed by 100 richest people enough to end extreme poverty four times over: Oxfam"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/19/24...
ND I believe that it is at least partially a consequence of our drift to a center right base. That new focal center has among other things brought a very trend sensitive media to increasingly ape the national feel.
All that of course is counter to what the paranoid right sees, and believes.
The pendulum can never swing fast enough, nor far enough for radicals of any stripe.
That is a good point ND.
They indeed do have a double standard as regards home-grown terrorists, aka, conservative terrorists and any other terrorist.
Its the media's conservative bias at play.
The media's conservative bias has also been shoving false equivalence down our throats for years. But this time someone called them on it.
"Plouffe chides CNN's Candy Crowley: 'This false equivalence needs to stop"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/20/pl...
Good evening UpseDaisy. We were on the same wave length at the same time. Great minds think alike. :)
It's the Three Stooges, no it's Laurel and Hardy, no it's just folks enjoying themselves on National Gun Appreciation Day. Five people shot at three gun shows across the nation.
At one of the gun shows after the accidental shooting they decided to not let private sellers bring guns on site. Another of the three sites had previously banned customer carry and private sellers, allowing sales only by commercial vendors. Could it be that they won't allow on their premises what they propose is fine for nearly every other place, public, or private?
Am I the only one who finds humorous the hypocrisy, and the lunacy of these crazy antics?
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/...
Today's, gun show at NC State Fairgrounds was closed after a loaded shot gun fired three rounds through the gun case. Three people are in hospital. Gun show will reopen tomorrow, but no more "private sales" will be allowed.
In another county, a loaded shot gun in a single wide trailer began firing when flames reached 300 degrees. County fire truck was damaged to the tune of $3,000-4,000.
Adding security officers to all elementary schools for the remainder of the school year will cost $800,000.
Money well spent Tea Party?
And while you cons are at it, you may want to have a read of this.
"Anger, violent thoughts: Are you too sick to own a gun?"
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/...
Glad you enjoyed it News. I am waiting for responses from J69, and r, it will probably be a while. It is likely they are already in seclusion. On the other hand they may have already read my post, and have started acting on all my great suggestions. Guess we'll hear from them when they get back. ;)
OKR,
ROTHFLMAO!!!!!
My top ten things for Tea Party Members to do to get through the double whammy of President Obama's inauguration, and Martin Luther King's birthday.
10. Take a three day mini-vacation to Alabama, Mississippi, or Oklahoma.
9. Lock the parental guide on all channels except Fox News, and "The 700 Club" provider on every television in your house.
8. Read the "Cliff Notes" version of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged".
7. If you some how finish "Atlas Shrugged" in under three days read a Scrooge McDuck comic to the kids. Scrooge is a wonderful role model.
6. Alternate watching Ted Nugent concerts, and Pendergraft Sisters concerts on your DVD. (http://www.realcourage.org/2009/12/white-supremacist-pendergraft-sisters-efforts-to-promote-hate-via-music/)
5. Triple your meds.
4. Watch a lot of "Father Knows Best", and "Leave It To Beaver" on NetFlix. If you are the modern sort mix in "The Brady Bunch".
3. Eat all you meals at a "Cracker Barrel" restaurant, and recall the good old days when you could get a good breakfast at "Sambo's".
2. Spend several days at "Creation Museum".
1. Go to the shooting range every day. Insist on black silhoutte targets, and be sure to lean them to the left.
"West Point study on 'violent far right' shows 'dramatic rise' in attacks"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/19/we...
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/wp-content/uploa...
"Worker's outsourcing scam discovered"
http://www.crn.com.au/News/329133,worker...
As soon as his employer learned what he had been doing he should have been promoted right away.
"Mom arrested after 7-year-old son brought loaded gun to school"
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/...
Yeah, just what we need -- the access to dangerous weapons is so easy a 7 year old can get a gun -- oh yeah, just what we need.
"Firearms instructor' hired as school guard leaves handgun in student bathroom"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/18/ne...
http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ss...
"Texas bank welcomes concealed handguns to stop 'Yankee' robbers"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/18/te...
countryman
In short -- neither my American citizenship, my Missouri birth, or my American civil rights are up for debate. They are absolute.
countryman
You have no idea what taxes I pay (I am required to pay American Federal taxes on any income I earn in Australia above $82,000 a year -- and yeah, I make way more than that mate).
You have no idea how often I travel to my condo in Independence, Missouri (or how much I pay in property taxes for that condo).
You have no idea how often I pay Missouri State sales tax or how much I pay.
You know nothing of my parents in Independence, my grown-up children living in various states, or my grandchildren living in the various states, my brothers, my sisters -- all in America, and yet here you are foolishly trying to somehow designate any American who leaves America for any period of time as "less American and less deserving" than you. That's pure-D nonsense and is as meaningless as the motivation behind it.
And you sure don't know much about me if you think you can dissuade me from posting in these forums.
I am equal to you in terms of my American citizenship in every way mate, I vote in every Missouri/National election, and there is not 1 thing you can do about it.
Watch as I enjoy exercising my 1st Amendment rights.
Drop the virtual xenophobia countryman.
I say that in self defense as much as in defense of News Across, for next you will be complaining that OKR no longer lives in Missouri thus should not be entitled to an opinion on Missouriania.
How wrong you are. I suppose that you have never read Dickens, after all what could a Limey have had to say that was at all relative to America?
countryman news does pay taxes here he is still an American citizen.
By law he has every right to be involved in this country he even gets a vote.
Now just so you know how I stand in my opinion no one should be allowed to have citizenship in more than one country.
But until the constitution is changed he has every right any other American citizen has.
Is it possible for a fellow who does not pay taxes in our local community, participate in any way in any local organizations or activities, pay taxes in America, or actually experience daily life in Central Missouri in the 21st Century to have any credibility when bloviating on solutions to rather complex societal woes?
Internet philosopy is a great exercise, but there is this pesky real world out here that most of us live in.
"Christie: NRA is 'reprehensible' for targeting Obama's daughters"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/17/ch...
Good Points all, OKR.
My preceding post prompted my closing thought for the night.
I don't mind if you have a full automatic AK-47 in your dream as I may have one in mine.
Sleep tight. ;)
There are never enough guns for the American people.
There are too many people in this country with a subconscious phobia that our country is falling apart, and/or going to hell. Thus a subconscious restlessness, and insecurity causes a conscious reaction, get more guns now.
It is totally understandable given the context of the overwhelming fiction media primary message for at least the last sixty years. Guns solve problems, end problems, and are the only real security when things go wrong.
An endless stream of cops and guns shows are perennial hits on television, shoot 'em up movies in every genre from crime to cowboys, and shoot your way to victory video games seal the deal. It couldn't be any other way. Life imitates art, as often as art imitates life, and in this case it has become a circular affair that grows exponentially.
How much firepower is enough? Where do we draw the line? Should there be a line?
countryman
1.) "Our" refers to the political majority.
Being loud does not change the fact that the cons are a small minority.
We will be changing the law, and I believe the Supreme Court will uphold the law as fully Constitutional.
2.) I am an American citizen, and that is not up for debate. In addition, where my boots happen to be standing has no bearing on my American citizenship.
"...our National reaction...."?
Liberal use of the word "our" there don't you think? Which nation would that be? The one you do not reside in?
To determine what folks think, would one not need to actually communicate with them personally, not with judgment and negativity, but with a desire to understand a variety of points of view?
Or I reckon one could just determine what is going on in the actual real world we live in here in the USA by reading facebook pages, internet blogs, and the Huffington Post.
Did I forget to mention cluelessness and one-upmanship, defined as a burning desire to always be right about everything, never leaving any room for other possibilities? The stench of arrogance abounds.
Or perhaps defined as pseudo-intellectual ramblings from one who really has no dog in the hunt in the first place?
Good plan, mate, let's punish the innocent and law abiding masses for the egregious acts of individuals. Now that is enlightened governance.
"Recreational assault weapons fire riddles Ohio home, narrowly misses officer"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/17/re...
BTW mate,
Do you think perhaps our National reaction to 27 victims -- most young children -- being murdered by a crazed gunman who had easy access to his weapons -- is a bit overly dramatic?
Isn't that special....
And hey how about that Colorado theater shooter? Would you describe our National reaction to that as a bit over the top mate?
And hey, what will you say about the next mass-murder? Will you say, "oh its just a few folks getting killed. Nothing to see here, just move along (lol).
"Every thing's OK in Mayberry!"
Floyd the Barber
Yeah mate, thats life.
Another fine example of a common charachteristic found in the baby boom generation: excessive drama, or perhaps better stated as a propensity toward dramatic over-reaction and riteous indignation.
Alas, poor maturity and dignity, we knew ye well.
Gal,
As regards the President's common-sense, assault weapons initiative, that small minority that is standing in the way of these much needed reforms are getting folks killed. That may not be their intent, but it does seem to be the end-result. Such is not just another, hum-drum political discussion between the major parties -- its a matter of life and death.
Gal66
I doubt defined pensions are offered as a benefit anywhere these days.
They were replaced by the 401K.
When 401Ks were first offered, most employers offered to match contributions of the worker which made the 401K viable. Those matching contributions by the employers then began to decline slowly, and today most companies offer no matching contributions.
The 401K was originally touted to be far superior to defined pensions (which had been the pensions companies offered prior to the 401K).
Defined pensions enabled many of the WW2 Generation to retire and not have to worry about future income because their pensions paid them an amount close to their former salary (and usually included annual cost of living increases).
These defined pension wained during the Reagan years (phased out by the 1%). Ultimately, the 401K turned out to be just another lame-brained, conservative idea that made the rich richer and the middle-class/poor poorer.
The 1% sold us the 401K idea and then they sold us down the river.
Thank you NanaDot.
I should have looked it up myself I guess, don't know why I thought a economist might help..........
News and OKR I was asking about the 401k because I really was looking for an answer from someone I thought would be able to tell me the truth.
But because of my conservative views I get a smart mouth answer from news.
OKR the 401k is the only program offered where I work.
As for a problem with personal responsibility I really think I was admitting that don't you think?
So news you think everyone that does not agree with the President should be swinging from the end of a rope, sounds like you have some real problems!
You know I really thought the active people on this section of the news papers web site could have a disagreement about political issues and still be decent and respectful to each other but I see I was wrong.
I respect both of your views and some of them I even agree with from time to time.
Have a great day both of you.
Gal66
It sounds like you are having a problem with personal responsibility.
Anyway I would put my and my wife's defined pensions against your 401k any day.
Just because you got sucked into a con-job by the cons does not mean the rest of America should suffer.
Jason1969
Hey I got a great idea mate.
Lets vote the Republicans who are placing our babies at risk out of office.
I say we vote those scumbags out of office and replace them with responsible members of Congress.
'cause frankly mate, I think we who value our children can way out vote the scumbags who are putting our children in danger.
Let's start convicting the cons who would do our children in and just go ahead and start hanging the lawbreakers who are resisting our President and our placing our children in danger,
I challenged anybody that is anti guns to post a sign on their property that says gun free zone.
I am going to say this gun control only works with law abiding citizens there is no honest criminal. I think nothing is going to happen with gun control the president did what he could do and that is it. There will be no bans on semi automatics or limits on magazine....
Trick to 401 ks is to leave it alone don't draw on it early. Otherwise your subject to taxes, fees. I would actually suggest investing in mutual funds that have performed well and have a proven track record...The returns are much better but use a investment broker research everything.
Why would that not be drawn out before you saw it with a standard pension plan?
You didn't address why a 401K is better. They both have the advantage that you find necessary.
News can you explane this please
"401K was a terrible idea to begin with.
Defined pensions make a lot more sense."
I have a 401K it seems that is the only way I can save money and that is only because it comes out before I can get my hands on it......
I know part of the problem is that it will be taxed at the rates in effect when it is drawn out correct?
I have to say that the NRA could not possibly be responding any more poorly to the current situation.
For example:
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...
I think those $1,000,000 annual salaries that Keene and LaPierre are raking in are making them soft in the head. Which, by the way, seems to be a charachteristic of the 'privledged' class.
Which just goes to show you, you don't have to be smart to be rich. Cunning, guile, remorselessness, and luck are much more important. Heavy emphasis on the last one. Here's a lesson for you young folks, it's much easier to marry wealth than it is to earn it. Even better if you can get yourself born to the right parents.
Don't get me wrong here though. I support gun ownership rights and have no problem with folks who like to target shoot or even hunt with black rifles. It seems that the anti-gun folk are most concerned about magazine capacity, and they deserve to be heard.
My personal take, bring back permits to own certain weapons. I have no problem having to apply and recieve a permit from my local sherrif to purchase a hand gun or high capacity magazine. In some ways, it would be easier to recieve the permit, and then go shopping. Also, require a permit for the buyer in a private sale. No selling your handgun to somebody unless he has a permit. I guess I never had a problem back when that was the law.
The instant background check system seems to be filled with flaws and obviously isn't stopping guns from getting into the wrong hands.
Of course, responsible gun ownership should be mentioned in this discourse as well. Trigger locks, cable locks, and lockable gun cabinets are all good ideas. My position is that it is the gun owners responsibility to assure their weapons are properly secure and their nut job friends and relatives, or neighbors, or burglars can't do bad things with them.
"More Americans raiding 401(k)s to pay the bills"
http://www.nbcnews.com/business/more-ame...
401K was a terrible idea to begin with.
Defined pensions make a lot more sense.
OKR no problem at all with the time it took to reply no way is this the most important place for any of us I hope.
I may have missed some of what you posted.
The only problem I have with the old AWB is that it put the ban on a type of gun that I like to shoot.
I do not have a problem with a limit on clip size really with the exception that I do not want to see it go below 10 rounds.
Sorry I am late getting back to you G66. I thought I had stated some of the specifics I believe on gun contol here, and there on the blogs, but maybe not. I have written so prolifically on this topic that the specifics probably got lost in the verbiage. ;)
I believe most strongly that there should be a limit on the size of magazines, or clips. That would not hinder hunting, nor recreational shooting. I believe that the Clinton era gun control laws should be restored. I believe that one size fits all gun control is impractical, and unfair. I think that federal mandates beyond what I have mentioned should be confined to assuring that a mandatory gun control program is in place, and enforced on a local and state basis. The same program obviously would not be effective, nor necessary in for instance, Chicago, and Marshall.
I have a personal prejudice against the BushMasters, and such, just because of what they stand for. I recognize that is a prejudice, therefore if the BushMaster lovers can get along with the same bullet capacity as a standard deer rifle, I have no legitimate objection to them.
There you have it, you will of course make up your own mind as to whether my wish list is conservative, radical, or moderate, so it makes no sense for me to make a case as to which I believe it is. :)
"Poll: Majorities favor assault weapons ban, background checks"
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...
http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/14/i...
Racist "Coulter: 'Not a gun problem,' U.S. has 'demographic problem' with non-whites"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/15/co...
Right-wing racism rears its ugly head again.
Fox News needs to start doing the right thing and not give airtime to racist pigs.
OKR yes I know what it is, I have tried to do it but never got very far with it hell I can not walk and chew gum at the same time.
I make it to many ranges in a years time and just do not see it being done much any more that could be a product of the fact that the cost of ammo has gone up drastically.
I do not get any joy out of just blasting away the vast majority of the shooting I do is done at paper targets I have shot at a few matches but that is just not my thing really, I still do some informal matches most of those are email matches.
I get great joy at being able to hit what I am aiming at no matter the range.
Being able to hit a 4" target at 1000 yards is amazing.
OKR from everything I have seen you post on the subject of gun control it appeared to me you were in lock step with most of the gun control advocates if that is not true I am sorry.
What the f......
In the case of the Newtown school shooter, he was a 1%er.
His mothers alimony alone was over a quarter of a million dollars a year and his Dad is very wealthy. Suburb? Probably. Conservative Parents? probably.
The killer at Virginia Tech, Seung-Hui Cho, was a Korean citizen, born in South Korea, raised in the USA since the age of 8. Not White. I don't know if he lived in a suburb but lots of folks do.
Am I right or wrong? Have a lot of the mass school shootings been done my suburban white kids or not?
"New York poised to pass nation's toughest gun law'
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/...
Good news!!!
"Coddling, awards for everyone, no discerenable discipline etc,etc, etc. This is the extreme left I am referring to."
WTF I think that you are myopic if you truly believe that is applicable to our whole society. Reading between the lines which for some reason is necessary with these most recent of your posts I think you are talking about kids today. If that is your observation about all the kids in Marshall and beyond, and the way they are treated at home, and school you are entitled to that opinion. However I am also entitled to my opinion that it is cynical, and over-reaching.
How you can ascribe the source of that, even if it existed, to the left is beyond over-reaching. I think it is balderdash. It is as if an ill wind had torn some misbegotten paper banner, slogan intact, from a Tea Party gathering, and blown it across your eyes, your ears, temporarily blinding, deafening you to what is. To ascribe such conditions to the extreme left is indeed short sighted.
If only it were so that the extreme left held such influence on society as a whole, we would not have had any of the wars that have morally, and financially bankrupted our country.
If such massive decline as you describe it even exists it is caused by a buy in of society as a whole. Such shattering of structure is never, ever caused by a sliver of a minority, neither left, nor right. That is just my opinion, take it, or leave it.
Those yuppies went neo-con a long time ago mate.
Today we call them "The Tea Party."
Nana-Dot,
Name calling? I guess my point in the most basic terms is that in regards to the "mass" shootings, seems to be mostly suburban white kids. Not black or latino gang bangers, but spoiled little white yuppie offspring.
Actually, on the last snow that amounted to anything; Jan. 31, I had 2 sets of kids come up to shovel my driveway. I turned them down, as I try not to do anything twice if I don't have to, and I waited until it stopped snowing before I did the job myself.
WTF,
Have you ever had a Henry Hill moment?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A90bVruQr...
(language advisory on this one)
WTF: "The extreme left has given us a generation who don't know how to handle disappointment or any other of life's little unpleasantries"
Tell that to the folks in our overflowing ghettos, or on the "rez". They just might think that you have no understanding of the depths of their disappointment, nor that the unpleasantries of their lives are far from little. They just might blow your head off with one of the always at hand guns that the right insists be available. ;)
Actually it may be that the only people who give a darn about their plight are the folks on the far left.
By the way WTF speaking only from personal observation I see no difference between the over-indulging of today's children by politically right parents, and politically left parents. I also see no political distinction concerning the fascination with accumulating material goods that make life easier, and softer, that effects the most of us.
If that is a machination by the political left it is a true wonder, because it is the only left wing plot that the right wing has bought part, and parcel.
If you were speaking of coddling criminals it goes on no where as flagrantly as it does with the rich right wingers who are seldom charged, and even less frequently convicted of anything. We have accepted a culture in which they are above the law.
Even on personal crimes it is the same. Rich white guys can blow coke all day long, and nothing happens. Some poor Mexican can smoke pot, or black guy can do crack, or white red neck do meth with the same frequency, and they are in the slammer for years. Yeh it's that way in Marshall, and in the cities.
I think maybe that if you expanded, and detailed what you were talking about there is less chance that you will be misunderstood. I hope you do, because more often than not I agree with your comments, and I may not be getting your point.
By the way G66, I forgot you hadn't replied about that bump firing thing, are you familar with it, and have you done it?
WTF you have a point on coddling. I was obviously excersing my right as an irascible old man to indulge myself with a back in my day moment, circa 1952.
OMG here I go again. When I was a kid, and it snowed I grabbed the scoop shovel (none of them fancy "snow shovels" back then), and was gone all day. I earned on average about a dollar per sidewalk, and steps, and maybe two dollars if it included a good size driveway. I went straight home afterward, and the money went in the family pot. Yeh, it was a hard life, but we liked it that way. ;)
What the f......
And that is the fault of the left? Specifically, detail that process for me so I can understand it.
News, OK Reader,
I never said anything remotely close to that. That is your projection. If you don't think we are raising a generation that expects certain things then you are wrong. For example I went to shovel the snow on my Father's driveway. There was a time several groups of kids would have been by to do it for extra money. Not so anymore. Just one very small example.
LOL...
ND, every now and again some militia or right wing nut case goes nuts, commits terrorist acts, and either kills himself, is killed by the police, or is caught, convicted, and put in super-max forever and a day.
What many of the seditionists are threatening, they have done many times before (committing terrorist acts against Americans) and probably will do many times again. They aren't scaring American's into surrendering their freedom to the seditionists with that nonsense -- the seditionists are just making Americans angry and when they get angry enough they will put a stop to that nonsense and it won't be pretty.
Just like the last time the traitors tried to defeat the United States of America (and gee, we weren't even the most powerful country in the World back then -- and we also have nukes and drones this time around).
G66 you have just exhibited one of the traits of the far right. You need to discern that there are differences in position between various folks on the left. Because one calls for something, does not mean all do.
You have never read that I favor doing away with all semi-automatic weapons. I do not. Hell, as a young feller I hunted squirrels, and rabbits to put meat on our empty table. It sure went easier when I was able to scrape together a few bucks to replace my single shot twenty two with a used semi-automatic twenty two.
How about doing me a favor, and not automatically, nor semiautomatically, assume my every view is some rote thing common to every one on the left. After all, I have never suggested you were in lock step with Jason 69, or rr3, or a universal right wing stance on every thing. You might take offense at that. ;)
Gal66
Your assumption that the seditionists have a majority of people willing to commit treason against the United States is completely unfounded.
At best, the nut case cons amount to a small minority, have no army, no navy, no air-force.
In addition,...
...every law enforcement officer, soldier, sailor, and airman is subject to a structured disciplinary process that can include criminal charges, Prison, or even the death penalty, depending on the severity of the violation of the law.
I don't think you will find a lot of them willing to commit treason.
I recommend you take a good look at what happened the last time the rebel scum attacked the United States. It didn't fair well for the traitors and set the South back a hundred years -- and they DID have an army and a navy. Perhaps the best difference is that this time around Lincoln won't be there to pardon the traitors and this time around they will swing by their necks on the gallows.
Gee WTF I some how missed out on all of that coddling, and some folks would consider me a part of the extreme left political segment...go figure. ;)
What the f......
You mean the rich folks?
Every working classer I know came up hard and poor.
"Blackburn promises to 'be very thoughtful' while shutting down government"
with video
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/14/bl...
news,
Coddling, awards for everyone, no discerenable discipline etc,etc, etc. This is the extreme left I am referring to.
News like it our not when Obama made that decision he was coming of the 2008 election and if I remember correctly you voted for him in that election so at that time he was you choice
News no where in my post did I say any thing about a violent criminal rebellion period.
Yes I did say I would have to decide if I wanted to become a criminal and News like it or not that is my choice.
You know News you may just be surprised just how many of those police, including the state police, US Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines just might not be willing to take action against American citizens when it comes to taking guns if it came to that.
What the f......
You said, "The extreme left has given us a generation who don't know how to handle disappointment or any other of life's little unpleasantries"
How did they do that?
I regards to these mass shootings of late, I think we are seeing the results of pure extremism from both sides.
The extreme left has given us a generation who don't know how to handle disappointment or any other of life's little unpleasantries while the extreme right has made sure that those same little darlings have insanely easy access to miltiary/law enforcement type weaponry.
We have all seen the results.
We all need to get back to the middle but fast. Let's keep score at T-Ball and paddle their butts when needed. At he same time let's take the 2nd ammendment, any gun available to anyone at anytime rhetoric down a few notches and we maybe we'll all be better off. If anyone is looking for me I'll be over here....back in the middle.
gal,
My boy Obama?
I voted for Gary Johnson, thank you very much.
As to veiled threats of violent criminal rebellion, we have the police, including the state police, we have the US Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines.
We are a nation of laws and we will enforce those laws with the full might of the United States of America.
The veiled threats of attempted civil war by many cons are nonsense.
The South isn't going to do anything like that again, despite what a lot of morons in the South think.
They won't because they can't, and because we won't let them.
OKR I know you can see the part of the quote that says "Semi-automatic weapons" News started out wanting to ban just the assault rifles now it has changed to "Semi-automatic weapons".
I am not confused in any way I can read exactly what News posted if you choose to not see it thats up to you!
News as far as Bush goes your boy Obama could have done something about every thing you have brought up time and time again.
News and OKR if or when a ban is put in place depending on if it includes a confiscation (yes I think that A confiscation is going to happen sooner or later) there are a bunch of people going to have to decide if they want to remain law abiding citizens or not.
In my opinion that is a decision I really do not think I should have to make.
I wonder where all that con fear was when they were busy violating our constitution under their boy Bush?
My, my the cons are so loud now...all of a sudden...and only regarding 1 constitutional issue.
Yet when con leader Bush was busy torturing folks (in violation of the 8th Amendment) and spying on Americans without warrants (violation of the 4th Amendment), denying folks access to legal council (Amendment 6) and holding prisoners incommunicado and without charge (habeas corpus violations), et al, the cons were completely silent.
Cons only care about the Constitution when they think it suits their agenda.
Gal66
We the People have not yet defined what your and my 2nd Amendment rights are yet mate
However, rest assured that We the Majority, who are We the People, will make those decisions through the legislative and constitutional processes.
We will find those lines, and I believe we will have a High Court willing to draw those lines.
As to your fears, they are irrational and irrelevant to the concerns of the majority.
Its our fear, the Majority's fear (babies/angels being massacred by crazies with assault weapons), that are our concern...and you better believe we are going to do something about that...despite your fear.
G66 you said, "News this comment is exactly why us pro gun people fight so hard for our gun rights.
You have gone from banning assault rifles to banning all semi-automatic weapons.
Thank you so much for proving my point give the anti gun crowd an inch and they will take it all!"
I think you are confused G66. What I have seen is a current movement to ban extended magazines, assault rifles, and if you insist on a tenuous distinction defacto assault weapons; just the guns capable of rapidly spraying a hail of bullets. Can you not get by without those? If not why not?
By the way, are you familar with the bump firing technique, and have you practiced it?
I just did this post because I want 4 in a row!
:)
You know News,
I really believe the Supreme Court issue is the biggest issue in Obama's second term.
It will, in itself, bring moderation to guns, healthcare, immigration rights and duties, and possibly not affect the outcome of a presidential election.
I don't want left wingers on the court any more than I want right wingers, but if moderates are there, then perhaps they can mostly agree on issues that affect the majority of the people.
If that sort of group makes a decision I disagree with; I'll still have hopes that it was well thought out, reasonable and essentially moral.
Yes news;
I am so looking forward to the day when we have a good Supreme Court again.
Finally, some relief for the common people.
I am for taking most of it.
I think we should have hunting rifles, shot guns and revolvers.
Anything else is superfluous.
I am not anti-gun, I own several, but within those limits only.
So, anti-gun may also be pro common sense.
"Semi-automatic weapons are extremely dangerous because of that factor, and should be banned for use by civilians.
Semi-automatic weapons belong in the hands of soldiers -- not in the hands of civilians"
News this comment is exactly why us pro gun people fight so hard for our gun rights.
You have gone from banning assault rifles to banning all semi-automatic weapons.
Thank you so much for proving my point give the anti gun crowd an inch and they will take it all!
OKR,
I think this issue is but one of many to come that will be difficult for conservatives to swallow.
The fact is, Obama is likely to be appointing as many as 4 replacement Justices to the Supreme Court. Guys like Scalia my be able to put off retirement, but they can't put off their health and they can't live forever.
Even just appointing 2 Justices, Obama can set our Nation in a whole new direction for the next 30 to 40 years.
This will mean some changes.
In addition, brown skinned Americans now account for about half the population -- and they saw those Tea Party signs, interviews, et al, just like we did. They know full well what the Republicans are all about and it isn't brown skinned people.
This will mean some changes.
Frankly, the best our fellow Baby-Boomers who are conservatives can do is hope for a quick, painless, and early, natural death to avoid the changes.
News don'tcha reckon that a whole lot of these self proclaimed conservative gun lovers who delight in their BushMasters, and such may be just a little hypocritical?
One of the first points that they hasten to make is, oh no these guns aren't assault rifles they are semi-automatic, assault rifles are fully automatic.
Don'tcha figure that a whole lot of those folks know all about bump firing, have used the technique, and know darn well that the technique approachs the rapid fire rate of full automatics? C'mon when the instuctions on the technique warn them to be careful because the barrel gets very hot from spewing rapid fire bullets, even suggests that they put a handle on the front of the barrel if they are going to do it? They have known all along that the slow fire BushMaster is a myth.
Yet not a one of them has said anything but that they are semi-automatic, and entirely different rifles.
Which leads me to the thought that if Diogenes could not find an honest man, it was because his world way back then was populated solely by pseudo- conservative right wing radicals. ;)
"Official: White House firm on changing gun policy"
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/nightly-news/...
Gal66
Yes and under the 2 defining cases ruled on by the Supreme Court, that would be arms regulation.
So finally we agree the People do have the right to some regulation of arms use.
You may note that most the Supreme Court Justices, including the Majority Author of the 2 precedent setting decisions, Justice Scalia, agree with you and me that there are limits to the 2nd Amendment and that the People do have the right at some point to regulate arms and arms use.
Now that we agree that their are limits to what type of arms one can own and that the Majority has the right to regulate arms, we need only to agree on where that line is.
Oh by the way, I am a Vietnam Era Vet. I spent my term of service as a permanent tourist in Germany making America safer by drinking and eating as much German beer and food as best I could.
However, in boot camp I was trained to shoot an M16 and a few other weapons. Under our training, and based on our trainers' experience -- the Vietnam Vets' with multiple-terms in Vietnam, and having just recently returned from there -- our Drill Sgts insisted that we understand that our automatic setting on the M16 would rarely be used.
They said under fire the semi-automatic was our best bet.
In addition, during our training in combat simulation we were taught to use the semi-automatic setting unless ordered to do otherwise -- and that was not often. There were a number of reasons for that including the fact that the M16 barrel would get red hot if we tried to fire off an entire clip and it would jam up.
But I gotta tell ya, I could fire off a standard clip of 20 in nothing flat on semi-automatic, and accurately so.
Semi-automatic weapons are extremely dangerous because of that factor, and should be banned for use by civilians.
Semi-automatic weapons belong in the hands of soldiers -- not in the hands of civilians.
And I think we have a Majority willing to ban them and we will have a Supreme Court willing to define the limits of the 2nd Amendment when those bans are challenged.
News asked
Does the 2nd Amendment protect my right to possess nuclear arms? No
If not, why not? Where is the line? Why that line?
If I am not wrong I think that would be controled under the gun control act of 1934 under explosive devices.
I would say it has a lot to do with this.
Thornwell Simons said "Nuclear weapons are not allowed to be used for self defense by private citizens because they are not sufficiently discriminating."
The line is where ever the law says in is in the gun control acts of 1934 & 1968.
Seriously News I am in very good company with the other winners of your Hammer award. :)
Well frankly mate, your argument was so convincing that it put the whole con argument to rest.
That's pretty good mate.
Thank you Wizard of Oz. I humbly accept your award, and aspire to meet the criteria for such consideration in the future. ;)
OKR,
Your comment in the main Speak Out is excellent mate.
You flat out hammered the con argument to pieces.
It was so good, I didn't want to push it down from top with a comment...hence, my response is in this Speak Out.
I am pleased to once again to present you with the coveted, "Hammer-Time Award" for best hammering since RT hammered r...the last time...in the religious section.
Congratulations!!
You earned it buddy!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4...
ND,
The Powell interview...WOW!!
Personally, I only disagree with 1 issue with Powell in this matter. I believe the Republicans have already gone off that cliff and are on their way to a split and becoming 2 separate parties -- the Tea Party which will have most of its support in the South and a smaller Republican Party composed of moderate, big money, North-Eastern Republicans.
Guess which party will have money and which one will be Po'?
Lol...
OKR,
You hit the nail right on the head mate.
Jason could not support his arguments and thus fled in fear.
I have seen cons do that before. Its not a new phenomena.
At this point the cons have lost all their arguments and now have only obstructionism to rely on.
But its OK, because We the People can/will fire those cons in the House in 2014.
Con opinions and arguments are no longer relevant in the modern World.
Cons no longer matter.
Jason you said in response to me, "If your able to get a job find a way to get one I have no further input on this." The only thing that I can logically gather from that is that it is a confirmation that you walked away from the discussion because you had painted yourself into a corner, and your only out was to disappear. It doesn't get much weaker than that.
You guys on the extreme right just can't admit even once, that you are wrong. I suppose that is because if you did your entire house of cards would fall, and you are all missing the will, and where with all to rebuild it from legitimate materials.
"Krugman: Recession 'gratuitous' because if Congress created jobs program it 'would all be over"
with video
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/11/kr...
This is a must see interview for anyone who wants to understand the way out of the economic mess.
Oh its coming ND, and comin' right soon.
It won't be the end of the World, but there won't be many of us left when its through. Getting there will be a long series of wars, wars to control resources...shrinking resources in a rapidly expanding population on a planet that cannot meet the resource needs of its current population.
Think Easter Island on a World-wide scale.
...yep, and comin' right soon.
Gal,
Does the 2nd Amendment protect my right to possess nuclear arms?
If not, why not? Where is the line? Why that line?
If so, why so?
Nana my point about the question was that the only difference is the looks period!
I live out side Marshall on "O" road.
Now as far as the hand gun problem in big cities the problem is that by far most of that handgun violence has been committed by criminals that are going to have guns new gun control or not.
Do you really think more gun control is going to stop that
Feinstein is going for a US gun band.
Like parkuser said its not gong to matter in a few years anyway and yes I really think that's going to be what happens.
Ok Nana a few points for you the reason the people racing in the NHRA did not complain about going to a 1000' track is it saved them a lot of money in reduced expense.
The guns used in that bank robbery are not the guns being banned, look at the video they had full automatic weapons there is already a law that keeps those guns out of the hand of the public unless you have the means to get a class 3 firearm that cost's $3000 plus the cost of a transferable automatic weapon and an AR16 runs about $25,000
How do you know what guns they are coming after, Dianne Feinstein will not even produce a list of the guns she wants banned.
If they restrict them to an appropriately equipped range then that means I can not shot on the property I live on how is that fair?
I do not have a problem with new gun owners having to have gun safety training.
Maybe you missed this question in my last post.
Here is a question for you what is the difference between any other semi-auto rifle and one of the so called assault rifles?
Jason1969
Yes, Texas...the minimum wage State!
And yes mate, the lower the cost of labor, the higher the demand for labor.
The problem is trying to feed your family on poverty-level wages.
We aren't interested in making our Nation poorer mate. We are interested in making our Nation (and thus its People), prosperous.
Lowering our Standard of living is not an acceptable solution.
Raising our Standard of living is the solution.
We need a New Deal -- not minimum wage jobs.
"State suspends gun permit for CEO who said he would 'start killing people' over gun control"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/11/st...
Now that is a step in the right direction!!!
Jason,
you said, "If your able to get a job find a way to get one..."
I don't know to whom that is directed, however please indulge me while I weigh in on that idea.
The last thing I want is a job.
First off, I haven't worked in many years.
Secondly, I don't like the idea of working for somebody else. Frankly, I have worked for other people before. Trust me, it sucks.
In addition, I don't like working -- short of piddling around my workshop in the backyard or doing some yard work.
Finally, I live in the South Pacific in one of the most unique places in the World, and I am having way too much fun to even consider seeking employment.
Thanks, but no thanks.
The unemployment rate in Texas is 6.2 percent would be lower if the feds got their act together... The lower welfare benefits means that there is not an opportunity to live off the government and they have to use there hands and feet to live.
Texas has a surplus because they had previously cut welfare, reduced retirement plans and cut back on (you guessed it) mental health. Now, they have a surplus due mostly to less stringent regulations for oil and gas (under the Obama administration, mind you), and an increase in sales tax. (The dreaded TAX word).
Missouri does not have oil and not much natural gas. I guess that just leaves decreasing mental health programs and raising sales tax, right Jason?
Oh yes, and let's get those welfare bums some guns and let them guard the schools; there's a job opening for you.
maid was suppose to be made btw..
If your able to get a job find a way to get one I have no further input on this. Problem is there is no will because you can get more out of the government than you can get out of a job so its natural for people to look for the easiest way out. We have no self pride.. Cut down on the benefits for able body america. Give them an incentive to go look for work wherever that may lead.... I think there is no further reason to discuss this with you I have made my point and you have maid your point.
Now how come it seems the more progressive of a state the more in debt the state and how come Republican controlled states are the ones that have surpluses? Mike Huckabee summed it up. he media may have a lot of voters convinced that huge deficits and sluggish job growth are the "new normal." But on the state level, it's obvious that what's normal depends on who's in charge. The Washington Examiner reports that the federal government just racked up another quarterly deficit of $293 billion, and states controlled by Democratic governors are facing similar problems. Illinois is looking at a deficit of nearly $6 billion. And surprise: the revenues from California's huge new tax increases are running 10.8 percent below expectations, so they're now anticipating a $1.9 billion deficit. Meanwhile, states controlled by Republican governors are rolling in money. Tennessee and Florida have seen deficits turn to surpluses. Iowa, Michigan and Indiana have surpluses in the hundreds of millions. And business-friendly, energy-producing, income tax-free Texas is trying to decide what to do with a projected two-year budget surplus of $8.8 billion.
I'm not discussing anything with you Jason until you come back, and finish the discussions you ran away from.
We were talking welfare bums remember? You said they all should be forced to get a job remember? I asked you what percent of welfare folks in Marshall were bums, you allowed about 20%, I said thats more bums than jobs in Marshall, you said they could go to Colombia, or Kansas City for jobs, I said there are also more forced to work bums there than jobs. Then you ran away.
Oh and Jason,
you said,
"Didn't see any facts btw."
Well mate that is the whole point, you never do see facts...and especially when those facts turn your argument on its head.
Jason1969
So how do you go from calling for reasonable, rational safety regulation of firearm use and the banning of assault weapons and large clips to all of a sudden calling for all guns to be banned?
You sure have taken the argument to a whole new level -- one that no-one on the left is making.
We on the left are only interested in banning assault weapons and large clips.
We did it in the '90s and there is no reason we can't do it now.
Didn't see any facts btw.
Thank god this mother had a weapon. http://myfox8.com/2013/01/10/armed-georg...
The recent school shooting was not cause by a semi automatic weapon. Jonesboro school massacre rifles were used by 11 and 12 year old who stole them which by they way I think there is a law for it...Gun control laws keep law abiding citizens from having but not the criminals.
I read that Obama thinks that Chicago's gun control laws should be a blue print for national laws. I hope not they are No.1 in Gun violence in the USA.
Nana,
As I have said I and lot of other gun owners have no problem on a limit to how many bullets go in a clip we do have a problem with a ban on "assult rifles" (by the way if it is like the AWB from before it will also include handgun clips)
as soon as there is another mass killing the gun control folks will go after another type of gun.
I enjoy shooting my so called assult rifle I have no 30 round mags, I am working on another for long range shooting out to 1000 yards.
Here is a question for you what is the difference between any other semi-auto rifle and one of the so called assult rifles?
In my opinion in this last mass shooting the owner of the guns used was not a responsable gun owner he should never of had access to guns period.
But you want to punish me for what she did wrong!
J69 you said "Sorry have a bad habit of ignoring ignorance one of my hidden talents, Since you all seem to want to intrude on the 2nd amendment maybe you all should go after the first amendment with violent Hollywood."
Gotta say you should be less concerned about your imagined habit of ignoring ignorance, and more concerned about your very real habit of ignoring facts.
You left a series of facts that were presented to you unattended, and ran away with no response. Now you come back changing the subject. You don't deal well with inconvenient truths. It is an affront to those with whom you are engaged in discussion to walk away from their presentations when things get sticky for you. Worse than that though is the harm you do yourself by refusing to even entertain facts, and follow them through to a logical conclusion. It is a (for you) tragic weakness. For the rest of us it is rudeness.
That of course is just my opinion, no response necessary. However it would be proper for you to attend to those pesky unattended facts. ;)
But before I go,
They should have entitled this
"Dorks With Guns"
"Portland residents panic as men armed with assault weapons 'educate' the city"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/11/po...
Yeah GAL, I'm real predictable.
Well I gotta go. I heard they are having a wine tasting down there in Manly by the beach. That means great music, great Aussie wine (I am definitely a Merlot bloke), the South Pacific Ocean, and its Summertime!!
Surfs Up!
Have a great day!
News you are so predictable and easy it's almost funny.............
Every news outlet has an agenda period your smart enough to know that right?
For that matter everyone has an agenda.
Have a great weekend news, I will thats for sure the oldest son and Iare going to work on his race car.
May even go out and do a little target shooting!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCqEOboRc...
"Bring Me My Shotgun"
Lightnin' Hopkins
This is what a real guitarist/singer/composer sounds like.
Ted Nugent Goes Off In CBS Interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-QXN4xVQ...
My favorite Ted "cry baby" Nugent interview. Its hilarious!!
That guy is definitely a few bricks shy of a load.
The Washington times...lol.
Ted Nudgent...lol.
Gee...no conservative bias there (LOL).
No sir!
ROTFLMAO!!
Open letter to Joe Biden on guns
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/d...
Sorry have a bad habit of ignoring ignorance one of my hidden talents, Since you all seem to want to intrude on the 2nd amendment maybe you all should go after the first amendment with violent Hollywood.
ROTFLMAO ND. All that algebra stuff is the Devil's work. Jus looky at it, all us hard workin' God fearin' good folks cain't make heads, or tails out of it no way. Them schools need to git back to teachin' readin' writin' rithmetic, an the scriptures, elseways are Nation's goin' to hell! ;)
Find out how much God has given you and from it take what you need; the remainder is needed by others.
-- Saint Augustine
Jason,
I am proud of you for walking 5 miles each way for a job.
Now, try walking 10 miles each way to stand in line for a loaf of bread for your family.
Hello Jason? Jason? Gone again, I wonder why? ;)
Ya know there was another fella that only cared about his culture too.
His name was Hitler.
Not a good role model to choose unless one is into that whole "racial cleansing" thing.
"In the attitude of silence the soul finds the path in a clearer light, and what is elusive and deceptive resolves itself into crystal clearness. Our life is a long and arduous quest after Truth."
Gahndi
Jason the hard fact is that some in our society, and every society, though absent observable physical disability, obvious dementia, or retardation will never be productive citizens. Some for instance suffer incapicitating depression, which they attempt to self medicate with beer, pot, cigarettes, meth, et al. For that they are scorned. If we didn't have such a lousy medical system some of those, but not all, could be helped, but that is another story. Again that problem is not going away in its entirety no matter what we do to address it.
My suggestion to you is to quit obsessing about the pennies that are in your opinion "stolen" by those unfortunates (they are unfortunates, for how many of us would want to live their bleak lives) and focus your anger on the millions of dollars stolen by the rich who hire brilliant conniving fiscal geniuses to milk the system in every way. If one wants to stop fraud the rational method is to stop it at the level where the most dollars are stolen.
Though it is seldom exhibited by the hard right (who pretend conservatism) there is such a thing as rational anger.
Jason,
After viewing the facts at the link provided by OKR, I have to ask you, what is it about facts vs lies that you find confusing?
Facts are reality.
Lies are not the reality.
Or is it your conservative bias again?
Jason, Jason, Jason, does it never end? You said, "If you can't get a job you need to move where there are more jobs like KC or Columbia.."
What about that same 20% (or more) already in Columbia, and Kansas City that are in the same unrowed boat as those in Marshall? Would they not as they are already in residence, and under the same requirement as Marshallites not suck up the jobs there before the twenty percent in Marshall could even finda way there?
Think big picture Jason. :)
Oh and Jason,
Ganhdi wiped the biggest empire your culture could create off the face of the map -- and he did it without firing a shot.
Top that mate.
For clarities sake J69 I was referring to your regurgitation of the Huckabee Report. ;)
"Gandhi does not matter to me he was not apart of our cultural..."
Jason
Now there is a statement from a guy firmly rooted in the con Bubble.
Once again J69 your ignorance is exposed, because you chose to ape an asinine acolyte of the absurd.
You sir, are in the uncomfortable position of repeating lies, which makes you appear a liar, when in fact you are a lesser example of undesirable behavior, a gossip. ;)
For your own sake please read the following at Fact Check.Org, and quit repeating mendacities.
http://factcheck.org/2011/04/planned-par...
Jason1969
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you had to walk 5 miles uphill in the snow and then 5 miles uphill in the snow to get back.
Spare me your self-indulgent tears.
No matter how hard you think you had it, no matter how tough you think you are, there are lots of folks who have had it harder and who are a lot tougher than you.
Your party -- the Republican Party -- and your President -- George W. Bush -- crashed our economy, embroiled us in not 1 but 2 "Vietnams," made torture the norm, broke our laws, spied on our People without a warrant, and drove unemployment to levels not seen since the Great Depression.
And now you want to blame the poor for being poor.
Paaaaleeeeeeze spare me your insensitivity and lack of compassion and lack of common sense.
The USA treasury owes 2 trillion to social security. But Social Security will never see for if they treasury where to give it to SS our economy wouldn't be the same. Here is why S.S would not be able to hold it so they have to put it in bonds and other things and that would trigger interest rate problems. In other words we screwed ourselves.
Gandhi does not matter to me he was not apart of our cultural and btw if there are gun control laws then in fact in my opinion the government has infringe on my rights.
If you can't get a job you need to move where there are more jobs like KC or Columbia.. I was on disability before thought I could work when found a job walked 5 miles to it. I ended up having to go back on it because of heart problems now I am reeducating myself and plan on being off it again soon. And btw I am paying for my education. My question if you know Marshall is a low job market why not move before you get hard up so you have a better opportunity. I hate people who mess with the system and are fat middle age guys.
Jason my questions were, "How many folks do you think there are in Marshall right now that could work, should work, but don't work? I have another question for you. How many jobs are available in Marshall right now?"
Your answer was, "First of all there are means for transportation working the dfs just got to look for it second of all I would say about 10 percent to 20 percent could work".
My follow up question is what the hell does your answer mean?
Jason 1969 said:
"Btw the 2nd amendment was not for protecting hunter's right. It was for protecting us from criminals and a tyrannical government"
Here's what the 2nd ammendment actually says.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Jason1969
You really should refrain from commenting on history.
Its clearly something you don't know much about, judging by your consistent errors on same.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world's problem."
Mahatma Gandhi
Gal66
You should try "living off the government" (whatever that is) for a couple of months.
You may just come away with a whole new perception of what that means.
I am on a roll now here is commentary by my favorite former Governor of Arkansas and I am not talking father of the year Bill Clinton but Mike Huckalbee.
Whenever Republicans try to cut funding to Planned Parenthood, it always raises howls of outrage from the left that they're waging a war on women's health services. Nobody ever wants to talk about what Planned Parenthood actually does with our tax money. But with the new year, the required annual reports have been filed, and the Susan B. Anthony List analyzed the numbers. If you think Planned Parenthood is just a benign source of health care for women, the numbers may shock you. In fact, their clinics don't even perform mammograms; they send women somewhere else for those. Increasingly, Planned Parenthood is becoming the one-stop-shop for abortions. According to the latest numbers, the organization got a record $542 million in taxpayer funds last year. That's 45 percent of its annual revenue. Yet since 2009, Planned Parenthood's contraceptive services have dropped by 12 percent, and its cancer screening and prevention services have dropped by 29 percent. But one aspect of their business is booming. In fiscal 2011, they performed a record 333,964 abortions. In the three years from 2009 to 2011, they performed a total of 995,687 abortions.
Granted, you may have no problem with that. It's your right to think that way. But could we at least stop insulting the intelligence of pro-life Americans by claiming that giving their tax money to Planned Parenthood does nothing but provide women with health services? For nearly one million unborn children just since 2009, what Planned Parenthood supplied was death services.
This commentary is from Wednesday's Huckabee Report
Btw the 2nd amendment was not for protecting hunter's right. It was for protecting us from criminals and a tyrannical government Japan in ww2 had no plans to invade our pacific coast why because they knew the people of the usa was well armed Germany didn't invade because of the people of the USA being well armed in fact they had no battle plans drawn up.
First of all there are means for transportation working the dfs just got to look for it second of all I would say about 10 percent to 20 percent could work.. When there is a will there is a way and right now there is no will.
I have a question for you J69. How many folks do you think there are in Marshall right now that could work, should work, but don't work? I have another question for you. How many jobs are available in Marshall right now?
The government has a program where subsidizes Dairy farmers if they didn't do that a gallon of milk would cost well over $10.00 a gallon.
I think that with the increase of citizens on food stamps/housing/ social security who are able to work but have found a way to get around the system has put these programs in real jeopardy of not being able to help the truly helpless and to me this is a disservice to the truly helpless.
Seagarr I don't have a problem with the government helping needy children and single parents at all, but people living off the system forever does bother me. Able bodied people should work not live off the government.
Before someone jumps all over me, if someone living off the government gets a job but still needs help then by all means give them some help.
Now about subsidies for farmers I for a long time have call that farmer welfare.
The problem with all subsidies for businesses is yes they could be done away with but I think there would be a great cost to consumers.
What I find interesting is when money is going to needy children and single Mothers it's "welfare". When it's going to farmers it's a "subsidy". Generations of fat cat farmers in Saline County have gotten rich from government $$$$
"America First"
Woody Guthrie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k83WArW5...
Gal66
Personal?
No.
I was referring to your support of cuts. Under a similar climate during WW2, WW2 would likely have been a losing proposition for us.
And as a matter of fact, it was the conservatives who forestalled our entry into the war. Maybe conservatives like Prescott Bush, Charles Lindberg and the America First crowd had too much riding on the Germans' success.
Or news is that just the chip on your shoulder coming to the top?
Real easy News what is the data you used for this statement?
"Gee, if we all had your defeatist attitude we never would have fought -- much less won -- WW2."
Your all the time talking about people on the right stooping to personal attacks so is this not the same thing from you?
Yep Jason,
Those wars can really cost ya.
But it was worth it, right mate?
Maybe ol' Bin Laden knew there was more than one way to skin an orange, eh mate?
Not sure that's true Jason, but toward any end that this is correct, it is due to wars, Grover Norquist and people in government who would rather see Detroit go bankrupt than get the city back on track.
Please quote your source.
Another Obama accomplishment! United States no longer one of the world's ten most prosperous countries for the first time
GAL?
Uh what specific claim do you want me to qualify?
The WW2 cost and debt?
No prob:
The following table is really all you need.
Note in particular the National Debt, as a % of GDP, skyrockets in the 1940's -- almost quadrupling.
You may also want to note that you will see frequent periods of lower National Debt that almost always correspond to a major economic downturn.
Higher spending almost always coincides with recovery and prosperous periods.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stat...
News I like the new deal as you lay it out, but the idiots in DC could never make it happen and that goes for all of them.
News posted "I am correct in my statement in that comment no matter how much you may not like it"
Lets see the data to back that up please.
Gal66
The New Deal is all about putting folks back to work. Its pay that is earned.
Oh and by the way, a New Deal would put most folks who are currently utilizing their unemployment insurance benefits back to work in good paying jobs (that's the idea).
In addition, all able-bodied folks who are on welfare would either work in the program or lose their entitlement benefits -- at least that is how FDR did it. Watch how fast they go back to work, lol. And why not? They don't want to be poor.
The tax revenue saved from paying out unemployment benefits and the significant reduction of the welfare roles will go a long way in reducing our debt and would create new consumers to help drive the engine of the economy (consumption).
As to snide comments or whatever that means, I am correct in my statement in that comment no matter how much you may not like it.
We the People are tired of using the failed Reaganism/neo-classical economic policies of the conservatives over and over again and expecting different results. We the People are tired of the poverty Reaganism has brought our nation.
We want a New Deal!!
Aussie Wife found this in the Sydney Morning Herald.
This cartoon/drawing is both funny and too the point. It really says it all regarding science deniers.
Enjoy
http://images.smh.com.au/2013/01/09/3940...
News thanks for your answer also the snide remark.
Nana I was born in 1959, I agree with cutting out the subsidies but I also know what will happen when they are gone.
Most of my family is around here with-in an hr except for my (2 little brothers long story)one of them is a chemistry professor at an SEC school not MU either the other is in New York city workin in journalism, my 2 older kids are right here in town one just sold her business and the other has a good paying job and has started a business this past year.
This country has become what can I get my government to give me and yes that goes for business too.
You never did tell me what percentage of income should people and business be able to keep you either OKR.
Also do you think the people and business's in the health care industrie should make a profit?
Well said Nana,you mad my day!!
Jason1969
Regarding your veiled threats against the United States of America...
If you plan to commit a crime in the United States -- such as committing mass murder or at least attempting to committ mass murder -- or any other violent attack -- you will be either killed or arrested, prosecuted, and placed in prison -- probably for the rest of your life.
We are a nation of laws. Law breakers will be prosecuted and imprisoned. Its that simple.
Also, you may want to remember that calling for war or violence against the United States in this forum or any other public forum is a serious crime called "Sedition."
Sedition is not protected free speech and we have prosecuted and imprisoned criminals who have called for violence against our Government before. Its all nice and legal and its Constitutional.
Your political views represent that of a political minority. That is because the majority of Americans do not agree with your views. In America, the political majority rules -- not the political minority, and all your threats against the United States of America and its People won't change that 1 bit.
Good luck with that sedition thing mate, you will need all the luck you can get if you keep going down that road.
Gal66
How to pay for the WPA and the CCC?
That is the easy part.
The programs would be paid for by (1) issuing bonds and (2) significant cuts to military spending, eliminating corporate welfare, ect.
We could even pay for it entirely with borrowed funds (like we did with WW2) and pay down the debt with the new tax revenues during the prosperity these programs would bring.
and yes, a government should operate at a slight deficit but even a large deficit can be paid down by new tax revenues -- the result of significantly increased employment and new business starts.
As I said, we cannot cut our way into prosperity and lowering our standard of living, as the cons suggest we do, is not the solution We the Majority are looking for.
Gee, if we all had your defeatist attitude we never would have fought -- much less won -- WW2.
As my parents used to say, "I can't never could do nothing."
Its time we get a New Deal.
The FBI just released their annual crime stats. They show that over the last few years, the number of murders committed in the US with hammers and clubs far outnumbers murders committed with rifles. Our politicians are in a frenzy about banning so-called "assault rifles," but the FBI found that since 2005, nearly half-again as many people were murdered with blunt instruments than with rifles. For instance, in 2011, 323 people were murdered with rifles, and 496 with hammers or clubs. Maybe we should start imposing hammer control laws, and force carpenters to get a license to wear a tool belt. And of course, as Hollywood keeps reminding us over and over, never let a Texan have a chainsaw. Mike Huckabee I have to say this. Lets ban any blunt objects and make carpenters take hammer control lessons. After all it is the hammer that kills.
Following controversy over its purchase of around 1.2 billion bullets in the last six months alone, the Department of Homeland Security has put out a new solicitation for over 200 million more rounds of ammunition, some of which are designated to be used by snipers. This happen recently.
The 1938 Gun control laws of Nazi Germany lowered the age to have one but effectively banned German Jews for having them.
My question why is the DHS arming themselves with so much?
I am telling you right now if you try to take guns from law abiding citizens in the USA you are going to start something that nobody will want. Maybe if we stop ignoring the mentally ill and give them help mass shootings would not help. The recent school shooter was on meds at an early age in in life and there were several red flags to say he needed to get in inpatient help on a long term basis but because of our attitude towards mental health it was next to impossible to do this. The mother was trying to get him hospitalized at the time of the shooting and he found out and killed her in cold blood btw she should have not had guns in the house where there was an unstable person living there. Laws were broken he possessed guns that were illegally obtained transported them illegally and went to a gun free zone. 11,000 people died from gunshots. 86% of homicides in Hawai where committed by knives, fists and other methods so why not ban knives and cut of hands. By the way the WTC 9-11 not one gun was used to take over the passenger jets...So why not ban Jetliners?
News how do we pay for the ccc and wpa wages of these new employees of the goverment?
We already spend more than we take in.
Nana very few of the poor have property to tax, everyone pays sales tax, they pay very little in personial property tax, if having to pay to license a car in a burden don't own a car.
Nana I understand that $50 to a "poor" person is a lot of money but here is my thought on that.
I was born into a single parent family along with 2 older brothers, and 2 older sisters we had very little I never went to bed hungry but I sure could have eaten more my mother worked 2 jobs one full time and 1 part time and took in laundry for other people on the side.
I have a high school education raised 2 kids on my own, have a son that lives with his mother after our divorce, I pay my child support payment every month.
I worked 2 jobs for almost 20 years not because I needed it to live on but because I like to do extra things in life.
I make a good living, have been at the same job right here in Marshall for almost 30 years
I chose not to be poor it was hard work but I chose to do it!
I had a very wise man tell me one time after I complaned to him that he sure had a lot of nice stuff I was about 20 years old.
He said you know I am almost 50 years old I worked for everything I have if you want nice stuff you have to work for it!
NanaDot
Don't worry, big business would never want the flat tax. The flat tax would mean them paying taxes on total revenue -- not a net tax. Without being able to itemize their expenses, such as labor, business as we know it would cease to exist lol.
If they get their deductions then we must give those same deductions to individuals. Or we could have 2 different systems, 1 for corporations with itemization and pre-tax adjustment of income to reduce the overall tax, and a straight flat tax on the total revenue, with no deductions or itemization, for individuals ...oh wait, we have a 2 tax systems now too? Hmmmm....
Anyway, businesses now pay a small tax on net income on average of about 5% to 11% of their total revenues, so an average corporation might earn $5 million in total revenues but may only pay 35% of $500,000 (= $175,000) in taxes. As a result, the corporation in my example, is actually only paying 2.92% of its gross earnings.
I don't think you will see many 1%ers seriously talking about a flat tax these days.
What she said. :)
May I suggest, Jason, that if its a revolution you want, try peaceful resistance along the lines of Dr. Martin Luther King or Gandhi.
Jason,
this is what a civil war would look like to a traitor in a trench observing his surroundings:
The traitor is lined up ready to fire! Dedicated to his cause, he has no fear. He awaits to bravely do battle against the United States Combined Armed Forces, and then....
Everything starts blowing up including the trench, the traitor, and his "gun." Any surviving casualties are soon crushed under the treads of the tanks.
End of Civil war.
Gal66
1.) Yeah I am with ya on that flat tax. All income (gross income) taxed 25%, no deductions or itemizations and 1 simple tax form be it a corporation, an investor, or a single payer.
All tax payers would be taxed on gross revenues, with no deductions or itemization -- it's as simple as paying 25 cents on every dollar that comes through the door -- right off the top.
2.) The empirical evidence is that the tax rate has little effect on production within specific parameters. For example, most of the tax breaks given to the 1% by Reagan ended up being invested in the European Bond market.
In addition, given that the current economy is still deflationary, attempting to use the Tax Multiplier to pull the economy out of a deflationary period, through recovery, and on to prosperity has never worked. Its been tried many times but its too small to accomplish the needed increase in consumption of durable goods and new housing starts.
3.) Cutting government jobs in the midst of a deflationary period would be like committing economic suicide. Such cuts cause consumption of durable goods and new housing starts to shrink considerably. The result can be nothing but a return to spiraling deflation as we saw under the Bush Administration.
We can't cut our way into prosperity.
Our emphasis should be on increasing consumption by increasing public sector employment in the form utilized by FDR, the CCC and WPA, with direct hire of the unemployed rebuilding American infrastructure and building new industries such as green energy. Paid good wages, such employment programs would significantly increase private sector jobs as well and the overall effect would be a huge jump in consumption of durable goods and new housing starts, deficit reduction in the form of new tax revenues, vast new profits for the private sector in the form of new consumption, and a 21st Century infrastructure. The work programs would eventually be privatized guaranteeing long-term work opportunities during the resulting period of prosperity.
4.) see my answer #3.
It will not be the United States military or local police that come after you guns jason it will be nato peacekeeping forces but I don't think it will come to that.
There are only 2 manufacturing companies of centerfire primers in the world and both owned by the same company and neither is in the United States all our government has to do is say no imports from said company and come 2014 it will happen!
Sooner or later all guns will be banned in the United States because there is just no need period!
Wow Jason!
Just....WOW!
You never cease to amaze me.
Some questions for everyone.
What percentage of a persons or business's income should they be able to keep?
If the tax rate for companys and corporations are raised what do you expect them to do?
What departments of the government are you willing to cut spending in and or decrease their budget?
Do you think the deficit can be zeroed out with just a tax increase?
I will go first
#1 I think there should be a flat tax on all income with no deductions lets say 25% flat tax so we all keep 75%
#2 They will raise their prices.
#3 I think all departments need to cut their spending either by cutting waste or fraud or by cutting the budget.
#4 No
jason,
First of all there is no practical way at this point for the government to even entertain the idea of coming to get your gun,there are over 300 million of them and as to sparking a civil war, something tells me you can't wait for a chance to take a shot at somebody.
Hey Jason,
While we are on the subject of Hitler and Germany, why did G.W. Bush's Grand pappy finance the building of the German War Machine -- especially when they were hammering our closest Allie, Great Britain?
Could it be that he was putting profit before country?
Typical Republican.
You just can't trust them to be loyal to America.
Oh and Jason,
the folks who committed the Holocaust were the German Christian majority.
Hitler had their full support.
The German Christians way, way outnumbered the small Jewish minority. They didn't need to take the Jews guns. The Jews' piddly little rifles were no match for the German Military machine no matter how you look at it, and your piddly little firearms are nothing compared to the police swat teams, the state police, the US Army/Navy/Air force, tanks, or loaded drones.
If you think a rifle will save you from the police or the army, you have another thing coming mate.
Jason1969
Civil War, you mean a war against the United States of America?
Do you have an army in your pocket mate?
How about an air force, navy or marines?
Go ahead, see how long your civil war lasts -- and this time we will put the traitors on trial for treason.
So apparently you have not read about Poland's Jewish Ghetto how the resisted. I guess that is pacifist. The fact is Hitler made sure the Jews were disarmed and preceded to kill them.. Study history so you don't speak so ignorant.
Now onto a different subject why do we support planned parenthood with money when all they do is refer women to other health services when it comes to mamograms. They do kill babes effectively. And they advocate kids having sexual pleasure. http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/planned-paren...
The former Speaker of the House hypocrite Nancy Pelosi are going to go for another trillion of new taxes to offset any new cuts in spending, and the Repubs will cave in as usual. Btw try to take our firearms and you will spark a Civil War.
Another example of a liberal hypocrite: http://redflagnews.com/headlines/anti-gu...
The took guns out of jews and when it was done they preceded to kill them. Plain and simple. The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow
the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all
conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms
have prepared their own downfall by so doing.
Adolph Hitler
Recently, I have been hearing some of the conservative talking heads down at Fox have been claiming that the Nazis "took folks guns away from them," which is in fact, false.
In fact, the Nazis expanded gun ownership by the Christian majority.
Have a read:
Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. Writes Prof. Bernard Harcourt of the University of Chicago, "The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition."[4]
The groups of people who were exempt from the acquisition permit requirement expanded. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP party members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.[5]
The age at which persons could own guns was lowered from 20 to 18.[5]
The firearms carry permit was valid for three years instead of one year.[5]
Jews were forbidden from the manufacturing or dealing of firearms and ammunition.[6]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politic...
r,
Spare us your crazy conspiracy theories please.
Another thing the liv don't know about is all the middle class tax increases that are kicking in. You mean it is not being reported by the liberal media! Ya don't say!
A liberal legislator says that conservative rights should be restricted and I bet most of the liv's didn't hear about it. Do you think the liv would know if a conservative would have said that we should restrict a liberals rights?
Hey I hear that Hillary might be back to work now I wonder if she will be well enough to testify or will something else happen?
Yeah, so what?
We the People have had a gut-full of Republican obstructionism. Or did you somehow miss the last Presidential election?
Jason1969
Wrong.
1.) By the end of 1934, our economy was well into recovery. 1939 was a bit sluggish but the economy returned to full recovery by mid 1940.
2.) WW2 (December 1941) was paid for with IOUs.
Our debt, in terms of todays dollars, was far greater than the debt we have now by the end of 1946. Oh and speaking of that, while George W. Bush's Grandpa was busy financing the German war machine (until the day Germany declared war on the USA), FDR used the Federal Spending Multiplier (WW2 military production) to finance a huge labor force capable of producing all those durable military goods. You bet, that expanded our economy tremendously...and it was all deficit spending.
3.) Mathematically and empirically the Tax Multiplier is far too weak to pull an economy from a deflationary period into recovery and on to prosperity. That is a mathematical and empirical fact mate.
What you suggest, massive government layoffs/cuts accompanied by lower tax rates (for the rich) has been tried before and has never, ever worked.
Now you want our Nation to try the Tax Multiplier again?????
That sounds like a real bad idea mate.
Chuck Hagel has even anger the gay far left with some ant gay remarks in the past. So it is not just Republicans who are against him liberal News.
"Senators signal tough fight for Hagel"
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...
More Republican/con obstructionism?????
Oh you Republicans REALLY DO want to disappear into the history books lol lol lol...before the 2014 election even gets here lol lol lol....
Real good idea cons!!
I will refute your argument about the great depression being ended by liberal/Progressive policies by saying WW2 helped our economy other countries needed supplies and we provided that hence our economy improved. The first question about tax cuts is, exactly how do they stimulate the economy? This is not a stupid question! Remember, if the government gives us a tax cut they'll still have to make up the budget shortfall somehow, chiefly by selling more bonds to American citizens (who happen to be the same people getting the tax cut) or foreigners (who will raise the money by selling us more of their goods and services, or buying less of ours). In other words, government spending will keep sucking money out of the private sector, only the payment method will be different.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013... More taxes to come if you continue to take from the people then the economy will suffer. And at this point it will tank. You get what you voted for so stop crying you liberal idiots.
Jason1969
Name 1 time when the Tax Multiplier was strong enough to pull an economy out of a major recession/depression.
I bet you can't.
The Tax Multiplier has never pulled a deflationary economy into recovery and on to prosperity. it has been tried. Many times. It does not work, and often only makes matters worse. It is not strong enough and has never been successful.
Mathematically, and empirically the ONLY approach we KNOW can actually do that is the Keynesian Federal Spending Multiplier.
So says the math.
So says the historical (empirical) evidence.
As regards the Treasury, they burn old money and print the new. None of that means much though from an economic standpoint. Money 1 (cash) is rarely used in big transactions and accounts for only a small amount of the money in our system.
Banks create money mate.
If your arguing raising our standard of living then less taxes would do that providing friendly ecnomic plan for business would do that competition would do that. 50 percent of people getting something from the government will not do that. The treasury printing money when we don't have the gold to back it up. Giving the government an unlimited credit card will not do it...
"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban (on guns), picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it." -Diane Feinstein Senator if you believe this why do you have 5 armed guards went thru loopholes in your own state to get a ccw? Hypocrite.
r,
So you can't name even 1 time?
Yeah, that is because the Neo-Classical and Classical ("free market economics," circa 1750) economic policies, aka, Republican/con economic policies, cannot pull an economy out of a major recession/depression.
But the Keynesian approach works. We KNOW it works and we KNOW the conservative approach doesn't work.
See Great Depression, 1930's, WW2, and the early 50's for more on Keynesian successes.
When has increased tax rates on over 70% of the taxpayers spurned economic growth? The thing the liv don't understand is psc doesn't care about the economy that's why he is giving it all away.
Then according to your theory and the money that has been spent the last 4 years we should be in utopia by now.
r,
Name 1 time when cutting the budget pulled the economy out of a major economic recession/depression in our history.
The tax multiplier does not have the strength to do it. Only the Federal Spending Multiplier has enough strength to do that.
So says all the empirical evidence and so says the math.
I don't anyone can agree with another 100% at least not all the time. I could agree with news post also but he accidentally inserts Republican where it should read Democrat. Other than that small detail I agree with him. Liv!
There was also much I agreed with in SD's post. I am wondering rr3 what is the one percent of his post that you did not agree with? It seems you, and I may have more in common than either of us has admitted.
SD very well put I agree with 99% of what you said. Spoken like a true conservative.
Jason now you see what we are up against with the liv. It's hard for them to vote against psc.
Jason we can't cut our way into prosperity, and we won't create jobs by laying off government workers.
The majority rejected that approach in the 2012 election and gave Obama a mandate.
Naturally, he has a good record already of cutting the fat and fraud in spending which has helped a lot. In addition, he saved billions from Medicare when he passed Obama care.
But he knows the key to a healthy economy is through job creation -- not job destruction as the Republicans prefer. He knows cuts alone won't and can't get us where we want to be.
The President is well aware that increasing tax revenue is the best and fastest way to reduce the deficit, and the only way to do that is to create jobs.
Jason, may I suggest that the Republican plan -- lower our National standard of living -- is the wrong way to go.
Instead, we need to be raising our National standard of living. We need to increase jobs and the additional tax revenue will bring the defict down.
In addition, Jason, let's not forget that was how the Democrats balanced the budget under Clinton and we ended up with the best economy in our history and a budget surplus -- a surplus the Republicans spent under Bush.
So the Dems want more tax increases in the upcoming fiscal talks i.e debt ceiling. No mention of spending cuts.
I do so wish the Republican minority will remember that the People re-elected Obama -- not the Republican challenger.
The Republican lost and lost big.
My candidate (Gary Johnson) also lost and lost big.
Its time for the Republicans to accept that the American People reject Republican policies.
But either way, we have no intention of allowing the Republicans to force political minority policies on the political majority.
We the People are in charge now and the majority rules!!!
Get used to it cons!!
Smart Dog
Ayn Rand was also an admirer of Hitler's political philosophy (fascism).
That speaks volumes about Ayn Rand and those who follow her "teachings."
It appears to me that Congress has turned into nothing more than a bunch of spoiled, hard-headed, over-privledged, egomaniacs who do nothing but take political pot-shots at each other continuously, never caring about the effect of their battles on the American public.
Congress has done nothing for the last four years exept propose bills which are designed as political hammers to further drive in the wedge which currently divides our population in order to win elections.
I reckon this is the manifestation of that politcal theory that states that democracies throughout history have all eventually devolved into corrupt, ineffective, eliteist governments not operating in the best interest of the governed, interested only in self preservation.
That certainly seems familiar.
Sadly, we already have the NFL so our feds can't just build some stadiums and fill them with gladiators to appease the masses and distract voters from the real issues as the Romans did.
At least the Romans realized that you had to initiate job creation programs during hard times to appease the masses by putting a little money in the pockets of working folks. Our inept bozo's in congress can't even seem to pull that off effectively.
Of course they are doing a really nice job of distracting voters with the fog of religion sprayed all over everything in order to make our problems all seem like they are because we are not "living right." They excel at placing the blame on the citizens for all of the ineptitude of the federal government.
By the way, this rant is intended to be bi-partisan. I believe there is plenty of blame for Democrats as well as Republicans here. Both are fools to think there is a bright future to be had if they get everything they want.
For example, we don't need to eliminate social security as the neo-cons would have it, we need to clean up the fraud. There are way too many able bodied folks who have won the "social security disability lottery" in my opinion. Choking off the money won't fix that, kicking the deadbeats out of the system would.
Same applies to the Farm Bill and food stamps. To tie up farm subsidy and food safety programs because you wish to clean up food stamp abuse by choking off the money is equally foolish. I admit, when one has money for cigarettes and beer, but pays for groceries with food stamps, something is wrong with the system and needs to be addressed. However, killing the patient to cure the disease seems a little stupid.
Then there is that defense budget. How in the wild, wild world of sports do you justify unwillingness to cut defense spending when we have ended one war (the unjustified one that should never have occurred) and are ending involvement in another?
The message I get from that one is that we have many politicians who wish to be involved in perpetual war from now on. Anybody read any of that dystopian literature from the last century. "Perpetual war" was a common theme. How about we throw a few trillion dollars toward "Perpetual Peace?"
Speaking of dystopians. I still laugh to myself ever time I think about how we had a candidate for vice-president who clings to and admires the philosophies of Ayn Rand. It would make a good joke if it wasn't true. "I get my personal belief system from a work of dystopian fiction written by a Russian woman after she came to America and became filthy rich." Funny or scary? I'm not sure which to think.
What I do know is that it is a perfect metaphor for the state of our United States Congress today.
I believe I'll finish up with one of my favorite quotes from Clarence Darrow. "When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President. Now I'm beginning to believe it."
Same holds for congressmen and senators, I reckon.
"Ex-officer is first in CIA to face prison for a leak"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50374994/ns/...
And why has George W. Bush not also been charged?
He admitted it was he that ordered the leak of CIA agent, Valerie Plame's undercover status to the press.
I don't see the difference in these cases. I think we all agree the President is just as obligated to obey the law as is any other citizen, and both Bush and John C. Kiriakou committed exactly the same crime.
How is it fair this man should go to prison for 2.5 years and George Bush goes free with no charges?
... NASCAR...lol.
Now there's a worthy recipient.
This fiscal deal was so full pork congress and the Pres opened up a swine farm.
Sounds like rr3 is launching his own small scale economic stimulus program for the oil industry. Way to pitch in in these austere economic times.
And speaking of environmental destruction, it appears that a leading opponent of genetically modified ag products has had a 180 degree reversal of his opinion of GMO crops.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/...
It appears there are still folks on the planet who can learn from their mistakes, or in spite of their mistakes, I reckon.
The same article has a bit about the "vaccination causes autism" fallicy as well. Of course those who swallowed up this misinformation now have children who can't attend public school and are succeptible to preventable disease. Worse than that is the risk of their children contracting rubella during pregnancy as an adult that will result in birth defects or worse.
http://www.babycenter.com/0_rubella-germ...
I wonder if any of those folks are able to learn anything as they go as well.
It always amazes me how long it seems to take us humans to learn things that are not all that hard to understand.
Sadly, the fundamentalists who by default must espouse a disbelief of science in order to further the creationist agenda prey on the blind faith and intuition of the flock in order to promote themselves and their institutions. This has created a situation where all science is questioned by the faithful. I mean, if you can't trust those geologists who say the earth is millions of years old, how can you trust the geneticists at Monsanto or the researchers at Merck.
A healthy dose of disregard for logic and reason, seems to create a giant stubling block for many in society today, on both sides of the political chasm.
Is this post religion or politics, you say?
What difference is there between the two in todays American culture, or in the culture of almost all of the world these days?
After all, half of our politicians essentially rely on the fundamentalist belief system to get themselves elected. I think most everyone knows which half.
Hey r,
While you are out in the woods, in the cold, splittin' wood, you might want to take a few minutes for personal introspection regarding your many disproved conservative notions.
Give a shot mate. Be objective and weigh it all out with reason.
You will see how you have been politically mistaken all this time and how Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and Hitler have all has mislead you into a dark and evil realm.
Have a good time out there and hey, if ya get the chance, maybe its a good time to re-examine your many completely debunked, nonsensical, deeply-held beliefs.
This is way too much fun but I think I will get ready to go cut wood while it is frozen. You know doing my part for global warming i.e. climate change. Take my 4-wheel gas guzzling truck with my 2-stroke chainsaw and my diesel powered wood splitter to the woods and emit some CO>2. Life is good doing what good decent people do.
Sounds like Algore sold out to big oil. Interesting!!
-- Posted by rr3yv0 on Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 6:57 AM
Read this slowly news. I thought is was interesting that Gore being the green weenie that he is could morally accept big oil money for the sale of his company. Instead of commenting on why this is interesting you say I have always hated Gore and spare you the conservative bias. Is that real dialogue news, how can I know what the other side thinks if they don't tell me. You are right I have a conservative bias and you have a liberal one and we have probably known that for as long as I have hated Gore so what is your point?
This post is kind of like Congress. Liberals take offense to some of my comments but have no problem with making a comment about me that might be offensive. The difference is that I don't whine about it. In Congress when the conservatives make a stand on something that is right all the liberals and psc can do is whine about and make accusations. Sound familiar.
OKR,
Its sad that rr has not learned to adjust to reality outside the fox-news' conservative "reality bubble."
If only he would have clicked his con heels together 3 times and repeated the magic words,
BeNghazi! BeNghazi! BeNghazi!
then he would know the truth -- cons make up a small political minority in America and while they are very loud, they don't have the votes to even get elected to the office of dog-catcher.
Hey jason,
You hated Vice President Gore long before he sold Current TV to a news publication.
Gee, why all the hubbub now all of a sudden?
Spare us your conservative bias please. It serves no useful purpose.
Regarding Al Jazeera, J69, and rr3; they were usually a better source of honest reporting during the early years of the Iraq war than our own mainstream media who mostly caught a bad case of flag waving fever, or were as one might say, Foxified.
I know that you guys did not know that because your faces were, and still are glued to the Fox News screen, and you had no idea what the rest of our mainstream media were doing back then.
Rr3, pshaw!
News:
PSC is President Santa Claus to rr3.
Funny to him, but not to you or me.
He try to seal the deal on the sell of Current tv before Dec. 31 but couldn't get it done to avoid higher capital gaines taxes he was trying to get a 15 percent rate but since deal was sealed after the New years it was taxed at 23 percent....LOL taxes are good for everybody else but me mentality.
Al Gore Global warming fanatic sales Current tv to Al Jazerrra who is funded by an oil producing country Qatar. Hyprocrite.
PSC?
What's that r?
Do you think a decent person would be ok with our psc telling us that the top 2% are the only one's to see a tax increase when all of us are going to see one? Would a decent person say that he lied? Does any decent person think that Buffet will pay a larger percentage then his secretary in taxes? Only the liv!
You make huge assumptions news without any proof, evidence or peer review. Now that's funny!
r,
Since you really only have 1 source for news, Fox, I will presume you got that nonsense from them.
'nough said!
Sounds like Algore sold out to big oil. Interesting!!
What do you think of the paper releasing the names and address's of legal gun owner in New York? You call the Post Office for an address they are not supposed to give it to you because of the privacy act. Just wondering why this is different?
OKR,
I checked out the link.
Watching them made me go insane.
Thanks a lot!!
(lol)
WARNING! You who watch Fox News should not click, and watch this link. You will come away with even more misconceptions if you of the seeing is believing crowd dare to watch it. http://www.mandatory.com/2013/01/02/mind...
Amen News.
Mate if I believed in a God, I would have to say it...God help us!!
OK,
Perhaps this would be a good time to point out that I voted for Governor Gary Johnson, Libertarian Candidate for President in the 2012 race.
I could not, under any circumstances, bring myself to vote for President Obama.
This is one of the reasons why that was so.
Obama slides further to the right , and takes a giant step toward fascism, breaking his word in the process. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/03...
ND,
In the Republican/con bubble one has only to click his or her heels together 3 times and repeat the magic words, Benghazi! Benghazi! Benghazi! and wallah, its the 1950's, socialism is evil, and Joe McCarthy is all the rage!
When a fella is living in that bubble, reality does not exist.
Oh and in case you didn't notice, Venezuela IS a constitutional democracy.
And he beat the capitalist opposition by a landslide.
Much as your boys lost our election by an electoral landslide.
Nobody in their right mind is interested in more Reaganism.
Great, show us the source of your "truth."
Your opinion is not an acceptable substitute for truth.
My source wouldn't matter to an liv because they don't have to ability to separate liberalism from actual facts. Liberalism is an agenda where facts don't matter. Proved my point. It doesn't matter whether the subject is global warming, climate change, green energy, etc. it is an agenda but when you suppress the knowledge of the truth the liv will believe it. That's how psc go reelected.
Hey lookee, here is one source of info...good and bad alike (such as the fact that he cut poverty in half).
This is why they re-elect him over his capitalist opponent.
"Chavez Wins Fourth Term in Venezuela"
http://www.theworld.org/2012/10/chavez-w...
rr3yv0
So say you, but I notice that democratic nation continues to re-elect him.
Also, I doubt any of your claims are accurate based on my experience with your previous, unqualifiable, often baseless, claims in the past.
Show me your source mate.
Really news you really need to expand your horizons and break out of the liv mindset.
Venezuela economy:
Latin America's highest inflation rate
chronic electricity crisis
food shortages
high crime rate
the lowest economic growth rate in the America's
I guess that's why the liv reelected psc. You really think that is better than what we have in America. Well don't worry they keep the voters dumbed down that is the direction we are heading. Just like the Jews in Nazi Germany they marched into the death camps willingly hoping for something better so goes the plight of the liv.
Oklahoma Reader
Yes President Chavez has done a spectacular job at reorganizing the Venezuelan economy.
However, its the benefits that he brought to the poor and middle class that have really made the difference in the lives of the folks in Venezuela.
Maybe that is why he was re-elected, eh mate?
Compare that to continued attempt to repair damage caused to the American economy by 30+ years of Reaganism with Reaganism. That does not work, as we can tell by the current state of our economy -- the result of trying to do the same thing over and over again but expecting different results.
We need a whole New Deal if we ever expect to be a successful Nation again. Otherwise, we will just continue on the path to National poverty.
And bring in Hugo Chavez to oversee the operation. He's been there done that, and lived to tell about it. ;)
ND, I would go much further than that.
1.)Nationalize the medical industry.
Do away with medicare and medicaid and create a socialized medical system using the French system as the basic structure.
2.) Nationalize the Rebuilding of America's infrastructure.
Do away with unemployment by direct hire of all able bodied people to be employed in rebuilding our infrastructure. This would also make food stamps and welfare mostly a thing of the past with only the disabled on the programs -- a significant reduction.
3.) Nationalize the Energy industry.
Utilize profits from oil, gas, and other energy production to help pay down costs of Infrastructure rebuilding and socialized medical system.
4.) Significantly increase the basic, lowest minimum tax to 70% of top 1%ers' income.
5.) End all wars and bring all troops home from overseas. They could be employed in the civilian corp responsible for infrastructure rebuilding.
6.) End GATT
7.) End NAFTA
8.) Strengthen workers rights.
Those would be good for a first step in the right direction.
Jason,
You said, "You can't expect the debt to improve without cutting spending. I am telling you right now."
Why can't the economy improve without cutting debt?
Why do you think the only answer is for America to lower its standard of living?
Why do you think doing the same things that caused the Great Recession will somehow end the Great Recession?
A better approach would be to utilize the CCC and WPA programs of Roosevelt's New Deal Recovery plan.
His plan would increase tax revenues by increasing the number of tax-payers in the system.
Its a much better approach than the con "throw the baby out with the bath water" approach and it won't lower our standard of living.
Happy New Year J69. Would you mind providing a link to your source in regard to your last statement?
President Obama has its my way or the highway attitude when it comes to Congress. This not a good way to be a leader. This country just lost 1.2% of its G.D.P thanks to new taxes this will have a strong effect on the economy. You can't expect the debt to improve without cutting spending. I am telling you right now. We are on a fiscal cliff and we are loosing our finger tip grip and reality is going to hit us hard when we land.
Talk about living in a bubble!!!! This is funny stuff but sad even for liv's.
R,
The Republicans are the majority in the House...for now (that all changes come 2014).
The approval rating of Congress = approval rating of the majority in charge of Congress = Republicans.
That should give you a good idea of what is going to happen in 2014.
rr3yv0
Why is it the only solution you cons have to any problem is to tell Americans they have to lower their standard of living?
The key to eliminating the deficit (like the Dems did back in the '90s) is to increase the revenue side without raising taxes on the poor and middle class.
That requires increasing jobs and that requires a Keynesian approach.
The solution is NOT for us to simply have to lower our standard of living.
The solutions IS increasing jobs and you won't get there by laying off government workers.
(is, not are)
I think r that the 5% who think Congress are doing a good job is an over sampling of One Percenters.
All right rr3! Comin' out swingin'! You da man!
Maybe those 5% are in a lib imaginary-reality bubble.
A survey showed that 69% of the people think congress is doing a terrible job. 5% thought they were doing a good to excellent job. Who the heck are those 5%? But what the heck the boss give them all a pay raise, life is good.
These are all manufactured liberal crisis. Who said that we can't let a good crisis go to waste. We own the media, we are playing sc, so how can we lose. As long as we continue to pretend to care by giving things away we will have the power. We dumb down the education system, get liv's to hate the rich, promote the war on women and lay all the blame on someone else we have it made. What more could you ask for the taxes are going up on the 2%, there will be no more deficit and free health care for everyone now that's UTOPIA!!
Expected response of liv's.
rr3, it's good to see you back. I am sure that you are happy that Romney won the presidential election, that the Republicans took back control of the Senate, and enlarged their margin in the House. I expect that you are also enjoying watching pigs fly.
rr3yv0
LOL...I had been wondering where you have been.
Now I know.
You've stuck in the con imaginary-reality bubble.
Don't you see psc and the liberals got exactly what they wanted. One crisis after another that they can continue to blame on the Republicans. And the L.I.V. will fall for it every time. Chicago thug politics at its finest.
For all the libs:
L.I.V.=low information voter
They are actually a 'high liberal' information voter and the brain can only absorb so much. When it is chocked full of liberal pop culture stuff there is no room left for reason, or rational thought. Some even think that we have not had liberal policies for 30 years when liberalism is the the failed policy.
ND,
I have been saying for a long time that there are no Liberal policies in Washington and there haven't been any for over 30 years.
The chickens coming home to roost in America are the spawn of conservative policy.
We need a New Deal but I think all we are getting is the shaft.
"Christie: Boehner ignored multiple phone calls on Sandy relief funds"
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/02/ch...
And so it goes with a center right government that is firmly grasped in the greedy talons of the plutocrats.
You are right ND insinuating stupid was far too kind to Obama. ;)
I meant delusional.
Have to get the 'l' out of here.
Anyone who even quickly imagined that our 'leaders' would help the middle class was dillusional.
It's not going to happen folks.
Now, the Republicans are surely schizoid, but the Democrats are invertebrates, and the two together equal a squid on a fishing hook.
It is all well and good to state that the Tea Party is dying and that the Republicans will lose seats in the House next election. However, even if that happens, the Democrats have 20 Senate seats up for re-election and the Republicans only have 10 in 2014.
Add in the lame duck status of Obama in 2014; plus realizing that the economy should only be slightly better in 2014....well, there isn't much hope for anything except for more partisan squabbling and a barely different looking Congress.
I am not very positive, but reality has sunk in and it's going to take a true leader to pull us out of this mess, and 2016 is the earliest that this could happen...if then.
What else is new, the Democrats caved again. I would like to hit Obama, and Harry "The Rabbit" Reid upside the head with a brick.
Guess who got the shaft? The working folks, that's who. Did you know that all of us little folks just got a tax increase. Yup, the payroll tax just went back up. Count on your pay in 2013 on the average, being about a thousand dollars less.
Here is the skinny, read it, and weep. I guarantee you that folks making over two hundred fifty thousand will be in no pain from this deal, even those making over four hundred thousand will continue laughing all the way to the bank.
What a crock, Obama could have just waited, and got a better deal. Instead the world's worst negotiator negotiated with himself, and came up big loser. Now that is a hard thing to do! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/01...
Jason,
Republican obstructionism has stopped good, job creating, tax-revenue producing bills from becoming law.
And Republican obstructionism has continued for way too long.
And all so the rich can get richer and folks like you can get poorer mate.
The Republicans lost the election.
The Democrats won the election with a mandate.
Its time for the Republicans to step aside and respect the Will of the People.
Jason1969
The problem is the Republicans.
In the Republican bubble, the Republicans won the Presidential election.
In reality, the cons are the minority and in a democracy the majority rules.
We the People will be kicking that Republican majority in the House to the curb in 2014.
That will solve the problem.
Even if the fiscal deal is pass it sets up 3 fiscal cliffs in the next 3 months Washington is broke on both sides sick in tired of The Republicans are a moderate form of the Democrats. No true opposition. Are Country is Center-left and not balanced. We are not going to see great days for a long time until we actually have a leader.
Republican
Party
1854-2012
RIP
Well it looks like the Republicans prefer the fiscal cliff.
Oh well, there goes the economy.
"House vote on fiscal cliff compromise remains in doubt"
http://www.nbcnews.com/
Welcome to a new year and a new forum. Past Speak Out [religion] forums can be found at www.marshallnews.com/topic/speakout.