[Masthead] Heavy Rain ~ 55°F  
High: 72°F ~ Low: 51°F
Friday, Apr. 29, 2016

Old hospital named to historic register

Friday, December 7, 2012

Old Fitzgibbon Hospital, formerly PahloArt Center, was recently placed on the National Register of Historic Places.
(File photo) [Order this photo]
This year was a weary one for the current property owner of the old Fitzgibbon Hospital as well as the prospective buyer whose request for rezoning was not permitted.

Although Sunflower Development Group no longer plans to purchase the property, its involvement spurred something exciting for history buffs.

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources notified building owner Pat O'Hanlon and local officials that the old Fitzgibbon Hospital has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places as of Oct. 17.

"It took an interesting path to get there," Eric Crump, chairman of Saline County Historic Preservation Commission, said in a meeting Thursday, Dec. 6.

The property was actually nominated by Sunflower Development Group, which planned to renovate the building for affordable senior housing.

Sunflower ran into a roadblock as the local housing authority didn't support the project, but the nomination was already submitted, Crump noted. The preservation commission, as well as Saline County commissioners, supported the nomination.

The property now joins more than 30 locations within the county on the national register. A list of locations can be found on the preservation commission's website.

The building has been used in recent years as PahloArt Gallery and Kazoos!, a children's hands-on art center. Commission members agreed to notify Sunflower of the listing as a courtesy.

During their meeting, members once again discussed the idea of defining a historic district -- first in Marshall where surveys have been completed, followed by other interested areas throughout the county.

Jo Ann Radetic, a certified local government coordinator with the state historic preservation commission, is tentatively scheduled to visit the county for the group's January meeting. Commission members hope to give her a tour of the eastern portion of Marshall where they'd like to determine a national historic district.

The district can grow or be added onto in the future.

Another starting point for members may include a 1-mile square that borders Mitchell Street to the south, Brunswick Avenue to the east, Miami Avenue to the west and Lacy Street to the north.

"Would this tie into the scenic byways trail that's coming through the county," Southern Commissioner Monte Fenner asked.

Fenner referred to a proposed scenic byway that's spearheaded by Old Trails Regional Tourism Partnership. Crump seemed to think it could be added to the byway's list of attractions, but wouldn't physically connect.

Board member Jim Steinmetz questioned if businesses within that mile square could then apply for grant funding. Qualifications most likely include businesses within buildings that were part of the original historic district, but newer buildings would not.

Board members hope to get feedback on the Pisgah Church during Radetic's visit, which is located near Elmwood. According to researchers, the church was formed in 1854 and the present building was built in 1883. Additionally, the church has saved the sessions book, which they say survived the Civil War.

The first step to have the Pisgah Church listed on the national register is filling out an eligibility assessment. State officials would review that information from that point.

During the meeting, advisory board member Bill Sleeper gave a presentation on the history of Saline County Courthouse and surrounding buildings. Additionally, new members Amy Arndt and Jessica Goodman were introduced.

The next regular meeting is scheduled at 6:30 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 3. The meeting will take place in the Wood & Huston Bank Community Room, located on the north side of Marshall's downtown square.

Contact Sarah Reed at sreed@marshallnews.com



Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on marshallnews.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

It would have been nice to tear the eye sore down and do something useful with the property. Now we are stuck with it till it falls down on it's own. Hopefully that will not take long

-- Posted by countyliving on Sun, Dec 9, 2012, at 10:38 AM

I am glad it has been added to the registry. It is such a neat building, it's just a shame we can't figure out what to do with it.

Does putting it on the registry create restrictions when/if someone does decide to do something with it? Will it make it more difficult, or will the historic factor actually increase it's appeal to potential buyers?

Response by Sarah Reed/Staff writer:

I don't think having a building listed on the national register restricts renovations at all, but will double check. I believe the only time restrictions would come into play is if an owner of a historic structure uses grant money to change/renovate it.

-- Posted by MHS Library on Fri, Dec 7, 2012, at 12:47 PM
Response by Eric Crump/Editor:
Sarah's right. The National Register listing does not limit what the property owner can do with the building. It's an honorary designation intended to recognize and honor the historic character of the building. Restrictions only apply if state and/or federal money is used for redevelopment or renovation projects.

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: