[Masthead] Overcast and Breezy ~ 32°F  
High: 37°F ~ Low: 9°F
Friday, Feb. 10, 2012

Bockstetter opts for bench trial

Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Scott Bockstetter, the Marshall police officer charged Sunday, Jan. 31, with assault on a teenage girl, appeared before Judge James T. "Tut" Bellamy in Associate Court Wednesday, Feb. 3.

Bockstetter, who has been suspended from his duties at the police department pending the outcome of the charges, waived his right to a jury trial and requested a bench trial as soon as possible. Bellamy set the trial for Wednesday, March 10.

Bockstetter is charged with class A misdemeanor assault in the third degree, and if convicted, could be sentenced to up to a year in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000.

Because Bockstetter is a police officer, the investigation was turned over to the Saline County Sheriff's Department; Slater attorney George Stafford was appointed special prosecutor in the case.

A bench trial differs from a jury trial in that the judge rules on conclusions of law and also acts as the "finder of fact," which is normally the role of the jury. It is commonly used in civil trials.

Bockstetter is being represented by Marshall attorney Robert Ravenhill.

Related story:

Marshall police officer arrested after allegedly assaulting teen:

www.marshallnews.com/story/1606998.html

Editor's note: Charges contained in reports provided by law enforcement officials are not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting charges must be presented before a jury, whose duty is to determine if the accused is guilty or not guilty of the charges.

Contact Kathy Fairchild at marshallhealth@socket.net


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on marshallnews.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

This article states that Scott is suspended, however, he is still working. What kind of a suspension is that?

-- Posted by kkmom on Fri, Feb 12, 2010, at 7:32 PM

mrxray I have a little information that isnt available to you and the fact of the matter is scott just went too far not that he isnt a good person or any of that crap but the truth is he did what he is accused of. you will all see soon enough

Good day sir

-- Posted by honest opinion on Mon, Feb 8, 2010, at 12:30 PM

Honest Opinion. The only FACTS in the story are that there was an accusation made and the person who alledgely committed the act was charged. THAT is the only fact regarding the charge. No information regarding the other side of the story has EVER been publishes as of yet and the rest of the facts pertain to process of the courts and not the facts of the actual incident.

My point was NOT that he is or is not guilty but that there are NO FACTS published to base a rational opinion on as of yet. The lack of complete facts and information from both sides prevents rational and intelligent conclusions and therefore you are only judging or speculating using your own predujices and assumptions.

-- Posted by mrxray on Sun, Feb 7, 2010, at 4:06 AM

Mrxray if you dont see the fact in these stories maybe you are the self righteous one we will all find out soon enough

-- Posted by honest opinion on Sat, Feb 6, 2010, at 12:05 PM

I do not see how saying the Police officer (PO) is a good man somehow is the same thing as saying that the girl is automatically guilty of lying.

What I see on these posts on all the stories printed about this issue are people who do not first hand knowledge claiming that somehow because of their personal experience with child abuse that the PO has to be guilty, or saying that the city is somehow trying to give the PO a break so he will not be found guilty in court in some sort of conspiracy theory.

There are a lot of self righteous people who are being very quick to judge.

-- Posted by mrxray on Sat, Feb 6, 2010, at 5:15 AM

Moodyblue.... I agree Mr. Stafford is an exstreamly good person, after going threw my post again it kinda sounds like I made a stab at him. I was not trying to do that because in his court he is a great attourney as well. This just isnt his court.

-- Posted by honest opinion on Fri, Feb 5, 2010, at 3:02 PM

Honest Opinion,

Have to agree with part of your comment on the special prosecutor. Mr. Stafford is a great guy and good civil attorney. Bockstetter hires Ravenhill (not cheap) who is a criminal trial attorney and was also a Circuit Judge for 8 years. Looks like the State is the underdog on their homecourt. I just hope all the facts can be presented in court for Judge Bellamy to make a decision on.

-- Posted by moodyblue on Fri, Feb 5, 2010, at 11:26 AM

do unto others as you would have them do unto you

judge not least the be judged also for what ever you use to judge others will be used to judge you

Let allmighty God do the Judging he is the only one whos knows the truth

also Jesus Knows and will make every thing work out for the best He is for us not against us if

we love him and trust him with our life

He can part the seas if he needs to he did it before he can do it again if needed to make things wright

John 3:16

-- Posted by burningbush on Fri, Feb 5, 2010, at 10:25 AM

Gumby... Here is the fact. Something Happened that night that was wrong. Someone saying i was asaulted by John doe and making a statement dosent mean that john doe gets arrested. However when there is evedince incriminating John Doe then he does get arrested. That being said if Scott did nothing that wasnt exsessive and out of line he would not have been arrested, but scott was arrested and he did go to jail and he did have to bond out. Now the prosecuting ATTOUNEY HAS STEPPED ASIDE AND PUT A MUCH LESSER LAWYER IN HIS PLACE(i didnt think there was such a thing)and scott asked for a bench trial so that it is quick and pressures this stand in. The city is not trying to make it a secret that they are going out of there way to see that scott gets the best chance at getting another chance to throw this girl threw a wall. Good luck to both sides and may justice prevail(cause it usually does not in this area) and good luck to tut because this has to be a hard case to bench.

-- Posted by honest opinion on Fri, Feb 5, 2010, at 9:15 AM

xmarshallx,

Maybe you should not convict a man either. You do not know of anything inside of this household, but you judge the man? So before you rant and inform us all to throw away a mans life, you need to also know the facts, which you do not!

-- Posted by Gumby on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 9:22 PM

I have personally known Scott and his family for many years. (Scott, if you look at the name you should be able to fiqure out who this is. After all, you gave him the name. I know Scott to be a wonderful person, caught up in a bad situation. Most of us have had unruly teens, and know the frustration that goes along with it. Might I suggest that everyone not judge him, or his daughter for what has happned. Unless you were there, you don't know the circumstances, and should let the courts decide. In the mean time, use your time to pray for this family, and the circumstances! Much love to the family members!

-- Posted by Ogreswoman on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 3:35 PM

I think this was a smart move on the officer's part. It is always hard to get an unbiased jury for an officer of the law.

I'll be keeping the entire family in my prayers until the conclusion of this tragic story.

-- Posted by koeller77 on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 1:28 PM

WW - I would never take away the medias right to report the news. In fact it's their duty as reporters to keep us informed. We would have to live in a different country for that to happen and I for one do not want to live there. I do however agree with your point about this blog not being good for the community. Someone please tell me what good it has done. I believe if anything it has divided the community even more. Other than the harmless political discussions a few get into on the front page that most don't read anyway, it's mostly negative and has only caused harm. Some will argue it's freedom of speech. Is it really freedom of speech if you feel you must hide behind a fictitious name to make your point? Myself included.

-- Posted by JustFYI on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 1:21 PM

wicked,

If you want to live in a place where the media prints only good news, you need to go back to Oz.

-- Posted by hat full of sky on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 11:40 AM

are these blogs making our community better? Nothing but glorified gossip. you might say, then don't read it if you don't like it. but it's so intriguing. still that doesn't make it good or right. marshall comes across as a narrow minded little community. we all like to share our stories and that's fine. but when we gossip about other people and their problems, that's not so fine. also sad to see how many arrests make the front page. is that really necessary?

-- Posted by WickedWitch on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 10:38 AM

I cannot believe some of these posts. Just because Scott is a "good" man and well respected police officer, he shouldn't be in trouble? I am curious, spareme, if you do in deed no scott so well and no he would never do anything like this, do you live in his house with him and his family? Do you know what goes on behind closed doors? I highly doubt it. Why don't you think about sticking up for the abused teenage girl rather than the "well respected" family man. You cannor judge how good of person somebody is simply because they may treat you well. Even if this teenager is "rebellious", does that make it okay for you to slap, choke and push them through a wall? Can you really name one teenager who isn't rebellious? I really hope that people start looking pass the fact that you like/respect this man and start looking act the facts.

-- Posted by xmarshallx on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 10:14 AM

I agree completely with kkmom and workingmom. In your strong efforts to support Scott you are throwing this child under the bus. Shame on you for doing this. I have no doubt that Scott loves this child and would die protecting her. My father was the same way. He was also the same man that made us watch while he beat our mother. He was also the same man that held a hammer over my head in anger. These are things you never forget and never quite get over. The only positive thing that came out of any of it for me was it makes me look at things with open eyes and consider all the possibilities. I don't know all the facts because I wasn't there. Neither does anyone else posting on here. What I do know is that this child may or may not have been treated in an abusive manner and I pray that God gives the judge the ability to hear all the facts and make the right decision.

-- Posted by JustFYI on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 9:35 AM

Thank you working mom! I also remember my father saying that I was a lying rebellious teenager who made up abuse to cover my unruliness. The same things being said here. For people who are quick to defend Scott they are quick to drag this girl through the mud.

-- Posted by kkmom on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 8:32 AM

I do not know this family or the details of the situation-- but I just want to remind everyone-- as a childhood abuse survivor myself-- an abusive and controlling dad can be the "nicest, upstanding guy" to every one else except for his family-- my dad was-- I remember hoping everyday that someone would rescue me and my siblings-- but from the outside looking in we had a "great" family living the dream-- good neighborhood, kids excelled in school and activities and we never wanted for anything material-----

just remember no matter how well you know someone they could be an abuser.

-- Posted by workingmom on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 8:26 AM

I love it when people like spareme come on and chastise everyone else about what's said on the blog.

How is it that spareme is so familiar with what's on the blog? Spareme, don't you have something better to do with your time than read the blog you seemingly despise?

I'm particularly shaking in my boots from the threat "your time will come." It's been my experience that it is the ones who have caused the most trouble that say things like "you all are perfect, aren't you?"

Your grasp of rhetoric has lacerated me!

-- Posted by hat full of sky on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 7:26 AM

This young couple's life has been changed forever and all people want to do is trash it even further. Scott Bockstetter is one of the finest young men I have ever known and I wish him nothing but the best. To all of you that have bashed him and everything else around Marshall, can't you find something better to do with your time? How about instead of you reading something into every issue that is a far cry from the truth, you do something productive? This blog is a place for people to hide behind a fake identity and ***** uncontrollably, all the while causing victims undue stress and heartache. Most of the time, those posters wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit them.

None of you are immune to being one of these blog victims. Oh, but I forgot. You are all perfect. Just wait, your time will come.

-- Posted by spareme on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 6:08 AM

i must support Scott, if he used any force at all it was only in a preventive way for the one who showed rebellion. A friend to many, an officer of the law who you respect, as he does you. they certainly are not many marshall pd i respect and some our just plain disrespectful to you.

-- Posted by yank on Thu, Feb 4, 2010, at 3:00 AM

Scott Bockstetter is a well-trained, seasoned officer. I suspect by the time we hear all the facts it will be he was using safe tactics to restrain an unruly teen. We should look forward to seeing him back on the streets.

-- Posted by MG2008 on Wed, Feb 3, 2010, at 10:47 PM

The court room was full today and I mean full....where are their stories?

-- Posted by noshadesofgray on Wed, Feb 3, 2010, at 8:15 PM
Response by Eric Crump/Editor:
Selected stories will appear tomorrow. One is available tonight:

www.marshallnews.com/story/1607992.html

Not all cases are written as stories. Some are reported in the paper in "At the Courthouse" listing of case status.



Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.