Higginsville man sentenced to 7 years for theft

Monday, November 9, 2009
By Kathy Fairchild/Staff Writer

After a stop in Lafayette County to face charges there, William P. Willbanks, 40, of Higginsville, will be spending the next seven years in Missouri Department of Corrections as the result of a sentence handed down by Circuit Court Judge Dennis A. Rolf Monday, Nov. 9.

A grand jury indictment was filed for the case in December 2008; Willbanks pleaded guilty to class C felony theft in Rolf's 15th Circuit Court in March and was given a five-year term of probation.

According to unofficial online court records, a motion to revoke probation was filed in June. Following a hearing July 13, Willbanks was released on his own recognizance after he posted a $10,000 bond. Monday's sentence was the result of another probation violation filed Oct. 16.

Willbanks is accused of class B felony financial exploitation of an elderly or disabled person in Lafayette County and is scheduled for a hearing there Monday, Nov. 16.

Willbanks' criminal history includes convictions for theft and for passing bad checks.

Contact Kathy Fairchild at marshallhealth@socket.net

Comments

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on marshallnews.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Just to clarify, the sentence in this specific case is 7 years DOC, not probation.

-- Posted by Kathy Fairchild on Tue, Nov 10, 2009, at 1:46 PM

I am not sure "who" should be to blame here, but this is just ridiculous. Everyone gets probation and their sentences just in my eyes dropped.

-- Posted by Curiousintown on Tue, Nov 10, 2009, at 11:26 AM

Gumby,

Don't you think maybe some of the blame should be placed on the prosecuter for the light sentences????

-- Posted by granny08 on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, at 10:39 PM

Gray hair,

My apologies, I am so accustomed to seeing concurrent sentences in our courts that it has stuck in my brain. I did say concurrent but I indeed meant consecutive. Thank You for enough interest that you follow my comments and correct me...hmmm

That's what you get for going to MU.....

-- Posted by Gumby on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, at 9:21 PM

Gumby, if you are a recent law school graduate and it is your desire to see Mr. Wilbanks do "some" time, then wouldn't you want to see him get a consecutive sentence instead of a concurrent sentence? I believe concurrent means running at the same time as his present sentence while consecutive means running after his present sentence is served. Just helping you a bit with what you apparently did not learn in Law school. GH

-- Posted by Gray hair on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, at 7:11 PM

ADVOCATE,

What about this article suggest that Kathy Fairchild has a hidden agenda in her reporting of this case??

Sounds like this is another defendant that has been given every break in the book by Rolf? I hope he gets conncurrent time on his next case pending. That way he might actually do some time!

Kathy is the first to tear me up on my comments, but I respect her right to do so and my right to argue my point with her. But I fail to understand your comment on this article. Maybe you could make your next comment in english??

-- Posted by Gumby on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, at 7:02 PM

Advocate: If you have a complaint, please state it.

-- Posted by Kathy Fairchild on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, at 6:47 PM

Do you have a hidden agenda, Ms. Fairchild?

-- Posted by ADVOCATE on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, at 5:37 PM

Response by Eric Crump/Editor:

Why do you ask?