|
Marshall, Missouri ~ Saturday, November 22, 2008
|
|
Speak Out August 2 to September 8, 2008Saturday, August 2, 2008
The Marshall Democrat-News welcomes views or questions on any issue. We hope you'll express yourself freely and responsibly. We reserve the right to exclude entries that we deem disrespectful, threatening, obscene or in other ways objectionable.
Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.
|
pulpitrider, I believe you're a little off center on this issue.
If you look back over the years you'd see that elements of the media have always asserted their opinions about one side or the other, and this time around is no exception. There's not much the public can do other than to demand that the media take a neutral position and report the facts of a matter, without inflection.
In the case of the Democratic candidate selecting a VP candidate like Palin, the media would react in the very same manner as it has over McCain's choice.
If you're going to bash the media, at least use rational criteria as you argue for or against a point.
Oh, right, Eric. I didn't think about the vantage point being accessible only from the south side of the river.
I have the window open but haven't seen any activity so far. It looks as if all the sections are still in place, but I'm not for certain about that.
"Shame on us if to their detriment, we succumb to our own greed and fear"
We should fear. We import almost 70% of our oil from countries that are hostile to us, or where a shooting war or a major terrorist attack could spike prices and cut supply overnight. If everyone is worried about joblessness, high prices, collapsing dollar, soaring deficits, recessions-depressions or whatever, you will get it quicker and harder than anything with an oil crisis that will make this summer's price hikes look like the proverbial Sunday School picnic. Like it or not, the US economy and indeed the world economy runs on oil.
We need to be energy independent but no one in Washington, Democrat or Republican has led on the issue since the first oil embargo under Jimmy Carter. And its not a case of "either or". We have to become energy independent with resources we have NOW while developing new renewable technologies in some kind of rational order with a timetable that moves us off oil. But we are not going to be able to retool and have whole new technologies in widespread use in 10 years or probably even 25 years. Look at how long it took to electrify the whole country, install phone systems and move from horse and buggies to automobiles. Unfortunately Washington has a tendency to impede and regulate without throwing leadership into the equation.
If the oil spigots are shut suddenly, we are going to crash and give "misery index" a new meaning. However historically, sometimes real crises do spur new development and change, but at a very painful cost and far more so than the vast majority of Americans can imagine or would be willing to endure. And no, I am not a fan of big oil. They do not have the interest of the country or the American people at heart, and will use these situations to make even more profit however they can. They need to be watched like hawks.
And please folks, come on with the snarky name calling like Bimbo and Tammy Faye look-alike etc. etc. Same thing about discussing family issues: even Mr. Obama said that had no place in the discussion and families, especially children were off limits. That type of talk is pretty juvenile and is found at places like the Daily Kos or Huffington Post.
It is legitimate to question and discuss the experience and policy points of any of the candidates. Doing so is what makes a discussion board interesting and potentially valuable. Thank you.
I have been sitting by for a long time watching a relative few folks keep this section a pretty much left leaning place to be. Even those who say they are neutral seem to always have a "but" - and it's usually the buts that expose one's true feelings.
That said, I hate to be disagreeable on my first post, but I have to disagree with the comment posted from the Kansas City Star concerning "if" the Dems had chosen a Palin-like partner for Obama.
No telling what the Republicans would have done, but I can pretty much gaurantee that the media would have eaten it up - showering praise on the party, the presidential candidate, and the choice for vp.
Why ?????
Because the main stream media has become THE most active and aggressive entity backing (pushing) the Pbama candidacy.
Palin could have a halo, a harp, and wings and the media would - while admitting that she may well be an angel - would no doubt leak a few stroies that she is - alas - a fallen angel.
For what it's worth.
"Bimbo is a term that emerged in popular English language usage in the early 20th Century to describe an often attractive, yet unintelligent woman. ..." --Wikipedia.
No defense or support either way on my part. Just saying, giving the origin of the word, it is simply a euphemism (usually misunderstood). In this case, the word supports the opinion, which--as I recall--we are all entitled to?
Nanadot,
How miserable of a person do you have to be to call someone that you probably don't know and have never met a bimbo? Is this to make yourself feel better? Is this because you wanted Hilary to be the first President or VP? Maybe it's just that you feel the need to voice your hatred toward a woman who is successful because it makes you feel inferior. I am curious, as is MrsAKGrizzly to know what you have accomplished to be afforded the right to judge others. I am curious to know if you know Mrs Palin? After all isn't that the only way you would know that she is a bimbo as you called her?
I have been reading this speak out section in amusement for a while now. I don't comment much, because most conversations are not concerning to me. However, this recent conversation has been very concerning to me. I sure hope people around this country don't think the same as some of you do.
Now to get to what concerns me I thought I would give out the "dumbest comment of the speak out section" award.
And the award goes to the comment
Oh it's a tie.
I am voting straight democrat ticket.
I am voting straight republican ticket.
What's funny to me is that the same people who say the above, preach about looking at the candidates and choosing the right one. If you were really doing this, you wouldn't make such a ridiculous statement. I am neither rep. nor dem., I simply chose who I think would be the best person for the job. This has lead me to vote dem, rep and indy. So if you are voting straight one or the other, at least point out why you are voting for each person and not a blanket statement that all rep or dem are bad and I am voting for the other. This statement simply dilutes your precious well thought out comments and makes most people thank you are a crazy liberal or crazy conservative.
Even those who advocate opening every possible location to immediate drilling for oil admit that it is at best a stop gap measure. So, what's the hurry?
I also believe that I am an authentic family man. To me, one important measure of my claim to authenticity is that I am much more concerned as to what will be the plight of my dear grand children, and their chidren after them, than my own circumstances. I hope that all others who proclaim the importance of family values share my concern.
If in fact those are shared family values why is there no consideration being given to the need for oil of those future generations? Surely, their need will be much more desperate than our own. Even if we move ahead with alternative power sources for transportation to the point that in their lifetime oil is not used at all, there are many other things such as plastics that will not be available with out petroleum. It will remain a valuable resource for future known utilizations, as well as others presently unknown to us.
Those thoughts draw me to the conclusion that the "drill every where now crowd" are totally disregarding family values. When family values are considered how can we not keep all those currently off limits areas in reserve for the use of the children, and the unborn? Shame on us if to their detriment, we succumb to our own greed and fear
I have a question. Do the telephone pollsters only call land line numbers, or do they also target a proportionate number of cell phones?
I believe there are different demographics for the two distinct types of telephone service. If I am correct in that belief, the lack of balance may skew the polls to the point that they would be of limited value.
A letter to the editor in the KC Star today pointed out that had the DEMOCRATS picked a female VP with five kid (one of whom is a newborn with Down's Syndrome, one unmarried and pregnant), the Republicans would have been up in arms!!! They would have been shouting from the mountain tops! You've got to love politics!
Thanks for the tip about the MoDot webcam. I'll tune in and see if anything is going on.
You must live some distance outside of Marshall if you'd have a 120-mile roundtrip. About 50 miles roundtrip from Marshall, otherwise, via 240 hwy.
It should be an interesting experience, Eric. Making still photos would certainly be a challenge for me. I never could get the hang of slow motion and stop action. :)
I hope the weather is decent.
Response by Eric Crump/Editor:
I may give it a miss tomorrow, now that I look at the forecast. I don't know if the demolition is weather dependent -- and I can't get to MoDOT's website right now -- but the chances of getting good shots goes down in dim light and rain. May not be worth driving 120 miles roundtrip, especially since they are blowing the thing up in sections and will do it again Tuesday and Wednesday.
MoDOT does have a webcam trained on the bridge, so if their site is available we should all be able to watch that way.
http://www.modot.mo.gov/northcentral/gla...
Is anyoone planning to go watch and photograph the demolition of the bridge at Glasgow starting tomorrow morning?
I would be forever grateful if I could be included in the sharing of photos:
Drew Officer
dofficer@satx.rr.com
QUESTION:
How is it possible for someone born in the state of Georgia in 1950 to grow up not knowing the definition of the term "uppity?"
Congressman Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga), upon being called out for using the term to describe Barack and Michelle Obama, claims he didn't know the definition of the term.
I see the Chiefs came up a little short this afternon.
Must've been all those leaves in the Foxboro vicinity about to change color that distracted them enough for the Patriots to slide by.
I'm curious to know what 'Nanadot' has accomplished and what credentials and qualifications are there to support calling Sarah Palin a Bimbo? What do you do for a living? I'm fascinated to know!
Cheetah, I'm troubled by the repeated attempts to portray McCain as a bigger-than-life war hero. Obviously he bravely served his country, but so did thousands upon thousands of others during the same period. Somehow, and mybe the media is at the forefront, we've reached the point of diluting what for me is the real meaning of the word, hero.
Many of our military personnel have been in prison camps; being a prisoner of war doesn't automatically make someone a hero, nor does it automatically make someone a good person, or good leader, or anything special. I'm not denigrating McCain's experience, or the experience of any other person who had the misfortune to become a captor of the adversary. Hearing this reference over and over makes me think about the points I've made previously regarding anyone who makes a lot of noise in order to draw attention to themselves. Shakespeare had it right when he said, Methinks he protesteth too much. Millions upon millions of Americans quietly go about being patriotic every day of their lives; they don't believe it's necessary to call attemtion to themselves because of their love of country. They exemplify the way all of us should be.
Johnson or Nixon or someone back in that time period called this group the Silent Majority. I'm not certain if the term still applies, depending upon how the quiet ones of today are being defined, but I suspect the term has a new definition.
If Obama had selected Hillary as his running mate, would this have made McCain's choice moot? Most likely, I'd say. I agree that it's a ploy to diminish some of the attention that's been on Obama's campaign. The Republicans (or at least the media talking for them) say it's a race not about issues but about personalities. Can you imagine? That in itself is a laugh, subjectively speaking.
I'd concede that the Republicans had the right idea, but the choice of "contestants" may very well end up leaving a bad taste in their mouths.
I've been plodding along after these political parties for a number of years, and over time I've become increasingly saddened and somewhat disillusioned by the pettiness demonstrated by both sides. We have a great country which deserves a far greater respect than what our current crop of politicians give it, and give the people. Long-term apathy among voters has put us where we are today; you could say we've gotten just what we deserve for not living up to our obligation. The Chad Mitchell Trio said in a song, we have such fine leaders that we elect them over and over again. Every generation has a fair number of people with outstanding mental capacity and the gift of reason. It's up to the American people to select the best-suited candidates to replace all the Senator Paine's whom Jefferson Smith learned after arriving in Washington, were less than patriotic.
We can and we must demand a more cooperative spirit from our parties by "changing" the entrenchment to a revolving door.
I'm moving toward the far end of my generation, but my fervent hope is that all those coming along behind me will have a strong and respected nation in which to raise their children, but the only way I see that happening is for everyone to give up thinking and acting in terms of "me" and to begin thinking and acting in terms of "we."
"WE, THE PEOPLE, IN ORDER TO FORM A MORE PERFECT UNION..."
Cheetah - in response to your 'what if', I was cynically aware that this was an opportunistic, hypocritical and totally LAME choice on McCain's part. Insulted? No more than the Republican party has been an insult for the past three decades - all that tripe about 'family values' while literally gutting every family-friendly legislation that ever came up is about as insulting as you can get - just more of the same...
As far as the McSame/Palin 'ticket' goes, what terrifies me is what if McCain actually DID pop off and leave the Bimbo in charge? Does anyone actually think she can stand up to Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld or any of the rest of the neo-con sharks... ? It's ludicrous! Terrifying is right up there, too.
McCain's economist thinks the economy is 'just fine', going strong, blah, blah, blah -- and his campaign director thinks this election is about 'personalities'?!!! HELLOOOOOOO... Fannie May and Freddie Mac just tubed, there are still over a million homes in danger of foreclosure in the next 12 - 18 months, unemployment is OVER 6%, and inflation would be in double digits if the Feds actually still counted food, heating, gas, and medical costs (which they don't cause it 'looks' bad), we're still spending $12 BILLION A MONTH on the war in Iraq, and the stock market is dropping like a rock...
The economy is strong and the election is about personalities? How far out of touch can one man with so many houses he can't count them all GET? And now he has an Annie Oakley/Tammy Faye look alike for a running partner who wants to ban books from the library and teach creationism?
The REALLY scarey part is that so many 'hockey moms' on the Right actually think this is OK!!
Slater,
Sorry for the delayed response. The "what-if" seemed obvious to me.
Though I intend no reflection on McCain individually, I do firmly believe the Republican party has become quite adept at "tatical maneuvering" of the spotlight. Frankly, I think selecting Palin as McCain's running mate is a ploy on the part of the Republican party selection committe.
(What if) McCain found himself as the "old war dog" in a new game--a new era. Though respected (and deservedly so) for his service to his country, his story isn't all that unfamiliar. It was time to regain some ground in the media race that Obama and Hillary were clearly winning.
The man will be 72 years old on election day, making him the oldest person ever elected President if he wins. As a matter of humor, I'm guessing the first two questions he posed for Palin were, "Can she text? Can she email? Yes? She's hired".
Also (since I'm feeling a tad ornery anyway), I'll go on to speculate (since this is a global level discussion involving people you and I will likely never meet) there may be an interesting timeline that developed between Obama's selection of Biden and McCain's selection of Palin. I believe the Repubs saw an open window of opportunity to boost McCain's popularity when the Dems didn't choose Hillary.
On a more positive note, it looks as if the administration has finally found its weapon of mass destruction!! Thanks for the link NanaDot:)
KF, no sign of the Bette Davis movie, and how odd that is! I'm working on building a complete collection of her movies since she's my all-time favorite female Hollywood star, and it appears I may end up shelling out some bucks to get all of them. All the movies I've collected so far I've gotten for free. That site I mentioned is free and I've spent hours looking through some of it and I've only touched the surface.
www.imdb.com is a fantastic resource also (for information). Once upon a time I was attempting to write a history of the evolution of movie theatre ownership in America, but I ran into so many dead ends I just pushed it aside and went on to other things.
We're getting a number of those musical programs here, also. Our PBS station (KLRN) has them on a cycle,I think. :) I've watched all of them at least once and some twice.
I don't have that movie, but I'm going to go into the site and see if anyone has posted it.
Wow Kathy, that sounds fantastic!!!!!
The late, great Elvis Presley once said of Roy Orbison, "He has the best singing voice I have ever heard."
That is quite a compliment especially when considers the source of the compliment -- the King of Rock and Roll.
And that is quite a line up of greats along with Roy Orbison KCPT has there.
I sure do wish we could get KCPT here in Sydney as I am a HUGE FAN of Roy Orbison (and now I will be happily humming..."Pretty woman, don't walk away, pretty woman"...for the rest of the day). What an incredible singer he was and those that knew him say he was just as incredible a human being in his private life as he was in his professional life -- kind and compassionate and they say he always had a postive view on life.
Thanks Kathy for that and a big thanks to KCPT for having the show!!!
Slater: Do you have "All This and Heaven, Too" in your collection? Old fave of mine.
And for you oldies-lovers here, KCPT is running a 20-year old Roy Orbison show this evening (it's on until 10:30). If you haven't seen it, it's great - among the musicians with ol' Roy are Tom Waite, J.D. Souther, Elvis Costello and a very young Bruce Springsteen, and the backup group is Bonnie Raitt, Jennifer Warnes and k.d.laing. The looks on their faces say just one thing, "Oh, man, I can't believe I'm onstage with ROY!"
News...hmmmm...
There's a character in the movie Stalag 17 who was given the nickname News.
Are there any classic movie fans in here? I've started a collection of films from around 1930 to the 1960s - about 125 so far. I came across a forum which has over 9,000 movies posted, along with over 10,000 music albums, a childrens section, software/tutorials section, and a number of other sections. Here's the address if anyone is interested: www.ourparadiseisland.com
News, I think the guy who started this site is in Oz.
It's been up for around 8 months and already has such an amazing amount of stuff there.
AND NO PORNOGRAPHY!! :)
Your neutrality is duly noted Kathy.
I was merely pointing out that Palin's postition regarding the life of the mother has been pointed out not only by you but by me and others as well previously in comments.
In addition, I wanted to comment on the fact that her extremist positions are a mute point given the precidents set in Roe v Wade and other High Court rulings and by the basis of our legal system which is crucial to an orderly society.
In addition, I wanted to point out that the very choice she insisted is her daughters right as an American woman is the very right she wants to take away from your daughter -- a double-standard if I have ever seen one and hypocricy to the highest degree -- a hypocricy that has permeated the policies of the Republican ruling elite in Washington for the past 8 years.
KF, we depend on you to keep us out of hot water. :)
Sorry gang. I figured it out. The link does work. I just needed to open the article. DUH!!!!
news across: I appreciate your comments, but please don't mistake my comments on Palin as any indication of support for her or her positions on my part.
No Slater,
That link was not my posting nor is it my comment.
However, I think the facts are clear that the Republican Party is the party of double-standards, doubl-speak, torture, wars of aggression in order to control other country's natural resources -- at the cost of our childrens' lives, and I think its very clear that the Republican Party is the party of hypocrisy.
So now this same party is attempting to convince us that they aren't the party that is responsible for all that has gone wrong for the past 8 years and that somehow they are the party that will fix it.
Anyone that really believes that crud they are trying to shove down our throats, please signify by standing on your head.
Oh wait! OKReader must have posted the link. I better go wash these glasses. :)
OKReader, Palin is one of those contestants who would try to sabotage any girls ahead of her in the pageant. heh heh
What??? Oh, you kid!!!!
Hey news, did you post this link at the top of your post? It's dead the way it sits, but I didn't mess with it to see if I could get it to work.
www.pensitoreview.com/2008/09/05/palin-c......
sent by rgernreich since 1 day 1 hour 21 minutes, published about 15 hours 52 minutes
Palin Wed. night: "To the families of special-needs children all across this country, I have a message: For years, you sought to make America a more welcoming place for your sons and daughters. I pledge to you that if we are elected, you will have a friend and advocate in the White House." In fact, Palin cut funding for services for Alaska's special needs children by 60 percent, according to an analysis of state budgets.
Can the Republicans as represented by Mrs. Palin say anything that isn't baloney? It is established that she will use her family in any way to further her ambition. The above quote from her speech was an obvious reference to her Down's syndrome baby, an I share your pain, and I understand message. What a hypocrite.
Yes Kathy Palin does make an exception as regards the life of the mother and we have covered that numerous times over the course of the comments regarding this issue.
It should also be pointed out that the Supreme Court has already set a precident in this matter and it is their opinion that the 14th Ammendment rights of women to have exclusive control of their own bodies is clear. Unless the right wing believe they can pass a new Constitutional Ammendment -- a long shot at best given that the majority support the right to choice -- reversing the 14th Ammendment, Roe v Wade is a done deal -- no going back at this point with out passing a Constitutional Ammendment.
In additon, in Roe v Wade the Supreme Court ruled that in fact there are limits to the right of women to make the choice of whether or not to have an abortion. The High Court ruled that the right of choice only extends to the point at which the fetus becomes viable -- which doctors agree is at 6 months. Thus the Court has ruled in Roe v Wade that states certainly have the right to prohibit abortions beyond the second trimester and most states in fact do. If a woman wants to have a growing fetus removed at 6 months she may do so but the operation is completely different from an abortion. At that point it becomes a cessarian delivery and most states -- if not all states -- require the physicians and nurses take all possible steps to keep the neonate alive. However, abortions beyond the 1st trimester are very rare and cessarian deliveries of neonates beyond 6 months are even more rare.
In the end, the Constitution remains supreme -- your right to control your own body and make your own medical decisons, Kathy, remains exclusively your own and as a result, the state cannot interfere in your medical choices.
Palin's position on abortion is really mute point since, even if somehow she and McCain managed to get elected -- a very unlikely prospect -- and if McCain died leaving Palin in the White House, she would have no way of reversing Roe v Wade despite the fact that she would be able to appoint any vacated seat on the High Court. It should be duly noted here that our entire legal system is based on case law and thus precidents are the foundation upon which our legal system operates. The Supreme Court Justices are well aware of this and they know that to reverse their own precident would leave our legal system with out guidance and in chaos. The likelihood that they would do such a thing is slim at best.
However, what Palin's position does demonstrate is the same double-standard Republicans have clinged to for at least 8 years now. Palin recently said "...my daughter made her choice and will keep the baby." Many of us find her position hypocritical in that she would defend her daughter's right to make that choice and yet favors taking away your daughter's (and the daughters of all Americans) right to make that choice. Such hypocricy, is for many of us, not representitive of the change Americans want to see in Washington but rather represents the status quo that the Bush/Cheney Regime have set.
That is one reason this independent voter is voting straight democrat ticket this election -- we want and need change in a direction opposite from the hypocritical double-standards set by the governing Republican party now in the White House.
Palin does make one exception for abortion - to save the life of the mother. That isn't often mentioned, so I thought I'd just bring it up again to be sure it isn't overlooked. I'm not defending or supporting her in any way, just keeping the record straight, based on what I've read in print and online.
rr3yco said, "I think we are all pro-choice in the sense that we have the choice to make the right decisions before there is a baby. We shouldn't be making the decision after the fact. Pro-abortion is PRO-MURDER so we need to call it what it is!!!!!" When a woman is raped or a child is a victim of incest they did not and do not have a choice to "make the right decision before there is a baby"!! Should every woman and young girl be on birth control just in case she is raped or molested, therefore preventing any unwanted pregnancy that might result in such an occurence??!! The movement is called PRO-CHOICE...not Pro-Abortion. I believe if a woman or young girl is raped/molested that would be trama enough, much less having to carry an unwanted pregnancy to full term and deliver a baby after such a horrendous event. I'm not saying I think people should use abortion as a form of regular birth control. Yes, there are better means of birth control than that. However, I believe there should always be an opportunity to terminate pregnancy in the case of rape and incest. It is my understanding that Ms. Palin is Pro-Life and believes there should be absolutely no exceptions even the in the case of rape or incest. A woman (or a young girl and her parents) should have the right, after consulting with a qualified health care professional, to be able to make the best decision for her well-being and the government should stay out of it! If not women will have to go back to being butchered in some back alley by whomever, medically qualified or not, to terminate unwanted pregnancies. I find it hard to believe that anyone would want to return to the days when that was how a woman with no choices had to deal with such matters.
So, what is your "what if," Cheetah?
Do you mean Palin is entitled to equal press? Certainly she's entitled to the opportunity for the people to get to know her, but timing seems to be everything in this case.
Springing a surprise on the country at this late date may very well scuttle the plan, especially if any missteps are uncovered during the examination of her history over the next few weeks.
One way people view this last-minute "secretive" choice is that there may be things in her past which are unfavorable. No one knows for certain about that yet, but I'm sure we'll have a ruling on that soon enough.
I read the open letter posted by NanaDot, along with the comments, and in the eyes of other media people it's a genuine accounting of some of Palin's history. The woman painted Palin as a power monger who would betray most any trust if she believed it would work in her favor, and that she's a vindictive person who takes revenge on anyone opposing her. A basic personality flaw that I see is her obvious lack of self-esteem and self-efficacy: she can't share control with anyone when she perceives it to be a show of inadequacy; every action has to appear as being of her own creation. I wouldn't necessarily say that she's strictly ego-driven, although that's a part of it. With people like her, there's no such thing as compromise - it's going to be her way or else.
It may turn out that she's committed no ethics or criminal violations, but the fact remains that her persona has the potential to do the greater harm.
I have a "what-if".
But let me first preface by saying this: I am completely pro-woman and hugely supportive of equal rights--so, the following is NOT intended to be biased against women, and I will apologize now for any offense anyone may feel:
For nearly two-months, Obama and Hilary dominated the media coverage, mostly for their touting back and forth at one another, but also because of the historical significance associated with each of their candidacies. For that time, it was as if John McCain had fallen completely off the media radar. Media-wise, you'da thunk there was only 2 running for President.
Then McCain announces Palin as his running mate--a female--and BOOM! Media coverage explosion for the Republican presidential nominee. I'll give it to the Repubs--they sure know a thing or two about marketing; second, maybe, to Madonna the Material Girl (pun and inference intended). And if my suspicions are correct, all women should be offended at the use of their gender to garner political support of any kind. That idealism doesn't give much credance to the Republican interpretation of "equal rights".
BTW, historically I've been a Republican. 'Course, we all know what a credible teacher history can be.......
Good reading, ND! Thanks for sharing.
Found this on Palin; worth a read, but LONG (fair warning - this is NOT a sound-bite...)
http://thepoliticalcarnival.blogspot.com...
I am pleased to read here in the Marshall Democrat that Marshall's parks will be receiving an overhaul.
Its nice to know the City elders haven't forgotten about Marshall's best resource for the future -- the children. Good on you Marshall!!! Please keep up the good work!
The following is posted on the Drudge Report, a conservative blog.
ENQURIER RESPONDS TO MCCAIN/PALIN
Wed Sep 03 2008 18:19:21 ET
"The National Enquirer's coverage of a vicious war within Sarah Palin's extended family includes several newsworthy revelations, including the resulting incredible charge of an affair plus details of family strife when the Governor's daughter revealed her pregnancy. Following our John Edwards' exclusives, our political reporting has obviously proven to be more detail-oriented than the McCain campaign's vetting process. Despite the McCain camp's attempts to control press coverage they find unfavorable, The Enquirer will continue to pursue news on both sides of the political spectrum."
NOMORONS: The Palin information came from moveon.org. Before someone begins a rant about aha! left wing subversion, go to the site, read the sources they list for each comment. Then if you believe any are not true, please cite their source, and comment why the source, and the statement are not credible. It will make your own comment more credible.
Very interesting, ghostwriter! About the coverage, I mean. I'm in San Antonio, and none of the network stations carried the Democratic convention.
I know these stations are biased, but I never figured they'd resort to that tactic.
Thanks again for the wake-up.
Slater41, if the convention coverage was as you stated in the Marshall-Slater area, you were half lucky. Where I live, it was on all the networks all the time and on several cable channels all the time. Both parties. Only thing worse could be the Olympic coverage which I enjoyed.
As for the Palin information. Most of it is available on the web somewhere just type in name. Problem is that much of the internet has incorrect information. Check against credible sources and recheck those.
As for news stories on white gangs out to kill Obama. Three or four men were arrested near the Democratic convention then later released on lack of evidence of intent. One of them was to have said they were there to kill Obama but no hard evidence was ever found. I don't they had any weapons in their possession when arrested. This according to St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
It's amazing to me when someone from the left is surprised that the Republicans pick someone with conservative views as Governor Palin. Doesn't the left pick candidates with liberal views such as Senator Biden? Wow amazing news flash!!! I think Governor Palin is an excellent choice and I know that everyone will not agree but that is one of the freedom's we have in this country because of men and women willing to fight for the freedom's that we take for granted. I think we are all pro-choice in the sense that we have the choice to make the right decisions before there is a baby. We shouldn't be making the decision after the fact. Pro-abortion is PRO-MURDER so we need to call it what it is!!!!!
I have one other question:
Can anyone tell me why the GOP convention was covered by all the networks and the Democrats were relegated to PBS only?
Does this say anything about the electronic media?
I know, that's another question when I said I have one more. I meant to say I have a two-part question. (smile)
I am curious as to where bsc1223 found all of this profound knowledge about this little known woman. I am very interested in reading the same articles/sources you used in your post.
I was talking with a Scottish friend, and he asked me about the death threats being made by white supremacist groups against Obama. He said he's heard reports by the news people over there indicating this. Has anyone heard anything like that? I haven't, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Editor Crump,
Thanks for the link to slate.com. I'll reserve my conclusion regarding its objectivity until I've had ample time to study the site.
In the meantime, after reading Thompsom's FAQ list, I have to say that his points raise about as many questions as he attempts to answer, starting with his headline, EVERYTHING you ever wanted to know about Palin. I hardly believe he's able to tell us EVERYTHING we want to know about her, but he's made a start.
Like the Bridge to Nowhere, he leaves us dangling in several instances.
I'm not interested in rumor, no matter what the topic or focus. Thompson has given us a base to build on, and I'm certain more of the facts will be forthcoming, regardless of the illusions created by the Republicans so far.
Did you watch Sarah Palin's speech? The speech told us a lot about her.
It told us that she can distort the facts and deliver mean-spirited zingers with the best of them. It told us that if Rush Limbaugh or Ann Coulter ever need a stand-in, she'd be a great pick.
It told us that she can be condescending and dismissive of the real work Barack Obama did helping real people on the South Side of Chicago. It told us that she can uphold the long Republican tradition of lying about Democratic tax cuts--even though Obama's plan would give Americans a bigger break than McCain's.
But the speech--written by one of President Bush's speechwriters--didn't tell us the truth about Sarah Palin's extremist positions. And the more that people know her far-right views, the less they support her. (There's a partial list below.
)
One of the best ways to get the word out about Palin is to write a letter to the editor of your local paper.
Palin's speech and the reaction to it also made clear why McCain picked her. It wasn't a decision about who's most qualified to serve a heart-beat away from the presidency--it was a political decision about pleasing the far-right base of the Republican party.
Writing a letter to your local paper is a great way to make sure voters understand that. The opinion pages are the most widely-read pages of the newspaper. Write today, and your letter's a lot more likely to get published because it's so topical.
Here are a bunch of points you might want to include in your letter:
Palin recently said that the war in Iraq is "God's task." She's even admitted she hasn't thought about the war much--just last year she was quoted saying, "I've been so focused on state government, I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq.
" 1, 2
Palin has actively sought the support of the fringe Alaska Independence Party. Six months ago, Palin told members of the group--who advocate for a vote on secession from the union--to "keep up the good work" and "wished the party luck on what she called its 'inspiring convention.
'" 3
Palin wants to teach creationism in public schools. She hasn't made clear whether she thinks evolution is a fact.
4
Palin doesn't believe that humans contribute to global warming. Speaking about climate change, she said, "I'm not one though who would attribute it to being manmade.
" 5
Palin has close ties to Big Oil. Her inauguration was even sponsored by BP.
6
Palin is extremely anti-choice. She doesn't even support abortion in the case of rape or incest.
7
Palin opposes comprehensive sex-ed in public schools. She's said she will only support abstinence-only approaches.
8
As mayor, Palin tried to ban books from the library. Palin asked the library how she might go about banning books because some had inappropriate language in them--shocking the librarian, Mary Ellen Baker. According to Time, "news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire Baker for not giving "full support" to the mayor.
" 9
She DID support the Bridge to Nowhere (before she opposed it). Palin claimed that she said "thanks, but no thanks" to the infamous Bridge to Nowhere. But in 2006, Palin supported the project repeatedly, saying that Alaska should take advantage of earmarks "while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.
" 10
The plain fact of the matter is that Sarah Palin did a bang-up job delivering a Karl Rove-style political attack speech last night. That makes her a skilled politician but it doesn't make her views any more palatable for voters. Americans don't really want another far-right, anti-science ideologue in the White House.
Please help get the word out about where Sarah Palin really stands on the issues.
http://www.slate.com/id/2199362/
FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS, HERE IS AN INTERESTING ARTICLE REGARDING THE VARIOUS OPINIONS OF PALIN THAT YOU DON'T WANT TO MISS:
IT INCLUDES A MUST SEE CLIP FROM THE DAILY SHOW -- IT KIND OF PUTS EVERYTHING INTO PERSPECTIVE FOR A LOT OF US,
ENJOY!!
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Stewart_sl...
I just finished watching a documentary titled: "a.k.a. Tommy Chong".
As we approach the election I implore everyone here to go and rent it. Netflix has it and maybe video stores will as well. Take a look at what the govt.(we) did to this man and the reasons they did it and ask yourself if this is really the country you want to live in. If after watching it you feel that this is the country you want then congratulations because let me tell ya buddy you already got it. John Ashcroft's heavy handedness is sickening and we are still suffering his effect on our nation. I am ashamed that he hails from Missouri and I'll be ashamed of us all if we continue to support an adminstration that encourages such abuses of power. But then again it seems like abuse of power is all we really know these days.
"When the Music Plays...",
Your comments regarding Palin sounds eerily like Palin's speech...a lot of crud and no substance.
Veiled personal attacks on the commenters here as well as wild accusations about traditionally conservative publications will not help your Party win this election -- the American People are hip to your Party's standard smear and inuendo campaign tacticts, and frankly sonny boy, that dog just won't hunt.
...and I would hardly call the National Enquirer -- the publication that was dead on right regarding Edward's affair and the publication that states that it can prove its allegations of Palins extra-marital affair -- a "liberal blogger" or "left-wingnut."
Further, while neither you nor I may at this point know what statements Palin's brother-in-law and sister may or may not have made in the heat of a nasty child-custody case, one thing is for sure -- Palin's using her office for personal gain is a serious crime in Alaska and the good people of Alaska are demanding their laws be enforced and their State Legislature is listening -- and rightly so. There is no justification for breaking the law. As an elected offical she had an obligation to set aside her personal ambiguities and focus only on the Peoples' business. That is what she is being paid to do -- not to use the Peoples' State Office as her personal tool of retribution.
How odd it is that an already corrupt Republican party that chooses a State Governor with quite a few legal and personal problems as their Vice Presidential candidate doesn't bother you, but the American People commenting on the bones in her closet does bother you. I bet you voted for Bush didn't you...twice! Didn't you? Clearly, you have no problem with corruption allegations when they are directed at a Democrat, but let the People investigate corruption allegations of one of your party and you errupt like a volcano. This despite that fact that in the last 8 years your party, the Republican Party, has produced so much corruption that one might wonder if they have a corruption factory in operation churning out corrupt politicians as fast as it can.
Finally, you state that you are "just trying to think about this logically" and yet your comment is all emotion and no logic at all. I don't think that kind of approach is good for you or for our Country. It is probably one of the reasons that Bush and Cheney "feel" they don't have to consider what the overwhelming majority of Americans want. It is perhaps the kind of "thinking" that brought us to the point where we have a Government engaged in lying to its people on a regular basis, spying on its own citizens, and making torture a standard practice with pow's and others.
Well, "When the Music Plays...",...its like I said,...
sonny boy, that dog just won't hunt!
I first voted in the 1964 general election, and over the 44 years since that time I've observed a common characteristic of Republican supporters, and that is, they never have definite, clear, rational reasons for voting. When asked why they favor their choices, the response is either vague and ambiguous, or we get the Maynard Krebs-type analysis.
Last night after Palin finished her speech a delegate from Tulsa was asked for his opinion of her. This delegate had been quizzed about her prior to her speech and had admitted to knowing very little about her and wasn't sure if McCain had made the best choice. His response after the fact was to say she was great, wonderful, AWESOME! End of analysis.
Surely there's more substance to a candidate than to be described by a convention delegate as "wonderful, awesome, great." And so it goes...
By his own admission McCain has a muddled understanding of economics, he believes our troops should remain in Iraq for 100 years (as justification he says we've had troops stationed around the world for 100 years), a prominent member of his party describes McCain as possessing a temper. I guess that's one of the earmarks of current policy McCain wants to extend. That'll get us a long way in diplomatic relations. Come to think of it, he DOES remind me in appearance and demeanor of Nikita Kruschev.
Carrieliz42 says she's proud to admit she'll be voting for the Republican ticket. She says it's her decision and I concur. My hope is that everyone who votes for the Republicans does so with a clear head and comprehensive understanding of how the GOP intends to solve the problems.
1/3 Republican+ 2/3 Democrat = partial disaster
3/3 Democrat = Total Disaster
I refer to the 1/3 being the office of the President and the other 2/3 being the House and the Senate. Total control by any party is just that - TOTAL. the checks and balances must remain in unbalance in order to eliminate the chance of total control by either party.
In addition, if the Democrats have 2/3 the power they have to share 2/3 the blame.
notgvnasht- Soooo...let me get this straight; you're saying that all of the things you listed are only the fault of the Republican Party? Because if I read that right I think you might be sadly mistaken. I am not on here to start anything and the odds are against me ever writing on here again but I have to say that you can't just blame one political party for the down falls of our country. I'm pretty sure there were plenty of Democrats, Republicans, and everything else in between that had helping hands in the situation we find our nation in now.
Oh and I'm not ashamed or embarrassed at all to say I will be voting for McCain and Palin in November. To each his own, we all vote based on what is important to us and that's exactly what I plan to do.
"when the music plays..
Being proud to vote Mcain is not a good thing. You should hide the fact you support the downfall of this country. Your love of the Republicans is an embarassment. Our country, thanks to Bush has become a joke in the eyes of the rest of the world.
We have the worst schools, all our jobs are going overseas, our healthcare system is a dissaster, working people pay way too much in taxes while the rich get big tax breaks. Oil compainies are screwing us hard and getting the largest profits they have ever had. The rich get richer, and the middle class becomes poor. Then theres you. Proud to vote Republican. Congradulations, you are a proud supporter of the downfall of what makes this country so great. People like you are the reason this country has become what it is.
WTMP,
That fact that I wouldn't even vote for a "good" republican is the fault of the republicans to begin with. Like you I am an independent and hold no allegiance to any party. Call it a protest vote if you like but I would'nt vote for a republican for dogcatcher at this point. I am but a lowly citizen and since no one else will hold the republicans accountable, then all I can do is not reward them with my vote. This goes far beyond wheter or not Sarah Palin is a good person or even a good republican. This is about holding the republican adminisrtation to at least some accountabily. I blame congress but not enough to leave these criminals in power.Make no mistake these are criminals and what they have done makes Watergate and Monica Lewinsky look like Ozzie and Harriet. Now it seems as if any critique of Palin brings cries of sexism when the only sexism I see is the simple fact that John McSame picked her soley for the gender vote. Great. Just what we need in our next president. So I ask you again, just exactly what have the republicans actually done to deserve my vote?
Music, here's a statement by Friedrich Nietzsche which perfectly describes the Republican political philosophy:
...and those who were dancing were thought to be insane by those who couldn't hear the music.
I'll agree with you that there are good and bad members in both parties, but the primary difference is that the Republicans have no interest in joining forces to "right the ship," so to speak. It's either their way or the highway for anyone who identifies even a single point of contention.
If you truly believe in the goodness of America, and I'm sure you do, I can't see how you can believe our country is sound economically, diplomatically, and spiritually after the past eight ruinous years. I live in Texas, where Bush was governor before moving east, and where the state treasury had a nearly $400. million surplus accumulated during the stewardship of Ann Richards. By the time Bush left, that surplus had turned into a multi-BILLION-dollar DEFICIT. He's been a failure in every venture he's gotten into, so I'm not the least surprised of his failures as our president.
McCain wants to continue the status quo and expects to be elected to, in my opinion, run our country completely into the ground by extending many of the already-failed policies of the current group. Even if I were a member of the Republican party I could never in good conscience vote for anyone who insists the Bush administration has been good for the nation.
NO WAY, NO HOW, NO McCAIN, as Hillary expressed it.
When the same liberal bloggers and left-wingnuts claim Palin's youngest son was in fact her daughter's son and that she faked her pregnancy to cover it up, then turn and say they can prove she's an adulteress, I go, "Okay, suuuure; be a moron, see what I care!" (I'm refer to the stupid bloggersphere as moronic, not you, just so you know.)
And the so called breach of ethics to get her former brother-in-law fired has many accusations flying from both sides, but one verifiable fact that both agree on is this; when the jerk was in the custody battle with Palin's sister, he is quoted as saying, "If you go to a lawyer, I'll kill your father!" (That, by the way, would be Palin's dad.)
I'm just trying to think about this logically, and if some A-hole threatens to kill my dad, I'm going to threaten him back, no matter what my position is; how about you?
And you know what I liked about her speech, she can throw conservative cliches just as much as Obama can throw his liberal ones, and she can do it much more convincingly, in my humble opinion.
I'm going to step away from my computer now, so anyone can say anything they want now, with no fear of me breaking their train of thought.
Palin is also under investigation for criminal ethics violations of which there is a hell of a lot of evidence to indicate her guilt such as taped conversations of her aids making threats, statements by her aids indicating that she ordered them to make threats, multiple phone calls from her home to the victims, et al. She is also facing possible impeachment in the AK legislature after the independent investigator's report is in on Oct 31, 2008. In addition, there are a number of reports from the same folks that busted John Edwards that Palin has committed adultery a number of times -- not a characteristic I find appealing in a Vice Presidential candidate.
They were dead on right about Edwards and they say they can prove the allegations against Palin as well.
Her speach at the RNC was as empty a speach as I have ever heard, filled with empty, partisian statements, Republican party talking points, a lot of crude, and no substance. To say the least, I was not impressed.
And as if that was not enough to keep from voting for her, her positions on abortion are down right scary. She supports forcing rape victims to carry the rapists baby to full term and delivering same. She supports forcing incest victims to carry the baby to term and delivering same.
In fact, I can't think of a single position she stands on that I agree with. Further, we may think we vote for individuals, but we don't -- we elect party platforms. Politicians who don't follow the party platform don't receive a second nomination -- so they follow the platforms to the tee. The current Republican Party platform is almost identical to the 2004 Party platform -- which means they are promising us the same as we have gotten from the list of criminals I posted below.
Frankly, I doubt this Nation could survive 4 more years of Republican rule. Thus there is no way I can or will support any Republican candidate for office at any level. I am shocked and offended at what they have done to my Country and I would be failing as a citizen and a patriot to vote for any of them.
That is why this independent is voting straight Democrat ticket this time around.
News across, every single person you list (that I'd heard of) were the Republicans I was NOT referring too.
I was talking about people like Palin, who has gone against her party to do what's right, who has gone against oil companies to do what's right, who has quit her own job to do what's right.
Because of that and more, she's straightened out her state economy and earned herself the best approval rating of any governor anywhere!
If she were running for president against Obama I'd vote for her!
But no, her competition is with Joe Biden (a good ol' boy) and the liberals are going with Biden.
Did you know that according to feminist guidelines, Barracuda Sarah doesn't qualify as a woman! Seriously! If that's not one of the stupidest things ever contrived on this planet I don't know what it is.
By the way, this independent is still going to pick and choose who he supports, but I've made up my mind, vote McCain + Palin!
Sarah Palin is Pro-Life and that is one of the many reasons I would not consider voting for the McCain/Palin ticket. Pro-Choice does not mean Pro-Abortion. Pro-Choice gives women many options, only one of which is abortion. Just as people have freedom of speech in this country a women should have the right to make an informed decision with her doctor about her body that is none of the government's business. IF a women decides that abortion is the right decision for her then that is between her and her God and nobody else. I know Ms. Palin has a downs syndrome baby that she made a choice to keep…that was her decision…her choice! However, what if Ms. Palin's teenage daughter was pregnant by Uncle Chester who molested and raped her. What if being forced to have a child after that experience would be so psychologically damaging to her teenage daughter that she begged her mother to allow her to terminate the pregnancy. Would she be so absolutely Pro-Life in that matter, as I understand her belief is no abortions under any circumstances including rape or molestation. I believe anyone who is that Pro-Life should take it upon themselves to adopt several of the unwanted children in the world, particularly those with issues such as fetal alcohol syndrome or crack babies, those born with AIDs, or just ones who have emotional issues from being abused by parents that didn't want them in the first place. Pro-Choice means having a CHOICE, which is and should remain every woman's right. I would not want to elect someone who would work to take that right away.
Yeah and lets name some of those "get 'er done" republicans:
GEORGE BUSH: lied the American people into war so the Muliti-national oil companies (biggest contributers to his campaigns) could control Iraqi oil resources, "outed" an American CIA agent (putting her life and the lives of her family in danger) in violation of our law for politcal purposes then lied about it, approved and ordered the torture pows and others, denied American civilians inside the USA their Constitutional right to habeas corpus (ie: Jose Padilla), racked up the biggest debt the USA gov has ever had with his irresponsible borrow and spend policies, responsible for the deaths of more than 4000 American men who died to make the multi-national oil companies richer, responsible for over 1 million innocent Iraqi civilian deaths -- 55% of whom the current Iraqi Gov estimates were women and children, multiple violations of Title 50, Chapter 36, FISA law, multiple violations of Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 118 -- Federal War Crimes Act, created one of the worst economic crisis in American history by failing to respond to the housing crisis in a responsible and timely manner -- leaving individuals homeless while bailing out the finance companies responsible for the crisis, left residence of New Orleans to suffer, and in some cases, die after Katrina while he and John McCain ate cake, questionable ties to convicted criminal Jack Abramoff.
DICK CHENEY: Co-conspirator of the Iraq War lies, lied to the American People regarding Iraq and the rush to war, Co-conspirator of the outing of a CIA Agent in violation of American Law for political reasons, Co-conspirator in policy of torture of pows and others, lied about Scooter Libby's leaking name of CIA agent to press, responsible for creating most secret government in history of USA, signer of PNAC document calling for World military and economic domination by usa and for multiple wars in Mid-East, multiple violations of Title 50, Chapter 36 Federal Acts, multiple violations of Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 118 -- Federal War Crimes Act, et al.
DONALD RUMSFELD: -- do I even have to list his crimes? (If your answer is yes, scroll up, see George Bush section, same thing)
TOM DELAY, REPUBLICAN, US CONGRESSMAN FROM TEXAS: Under inditement on Texas State campaign finance law, felony money laundering and conspiracy counts -- multiple charges, currently awaiting trial in Texas.
SCOOTER LIBBY, CHIEF OF STAFF FOR DICK CHENEY: Convicted of Perjury and lying to Federal Grandjury.
LARRY CRAIG, US SENATOR: Plead guilty to making unwelcomed "adult" advances to undercover police officer then lied about it after admitting his guilt.
MARK FOLEY, REPUBLICAN, US CONGRESSMAN FROM FLORIDA: explicit internet messages of an "adult nature" with current and former congressional pages under the age of 18, resigned under disgrace and admitted his wrong doing.
WILLIAM FRIST, REPUBLICAN, SENATOR FROM TENNESSEE:
subpoenaed by the SEC on 3 counts of criminal indictment for fraud and insider trading.
JACK ABRAMOFF, REPUBLICAN LOBBYIST: plead guilty to three counts of conspiracy, honest-services mail fraud and tax evasion.
RANDY DUKE CUNNINGHAM, REPUBLICAN, CONGRESSMAN FROM CALIFORNIA: admitted taking $2.4 million in bribes, currently serving time in prison.
BOB NEY, REPUBLICAN, CONGRESSMAN FROM OHIO: plead guilty to conspiracy and making false statements. He acknowledged taking money, gifts and favors in return for official actions on behalf of Abramoff and his clients.
Those are but a few of the big names. There are more -- many more but too many to list in this forum.
Yeah those "get 'er done" Republicans can really be counted on for "getin' us good."
Thats why this Independent voter will be voting straight Democrat Ticket this election.
I recomend you good folks do the same.
Who said anything about voting for the bad Republicans over the good Democrats? Not me.
You just said if "Jesus Christ himself came back tommorrow and ran as a republican" you wouldn't vote for him, meaning you'd take the good and the bad Democrats over the select few awesome Republicans (i.e. Palin).
I pick and choose the good Democrats to vote for and the good Republicans to vote for and the good Libertarians to vote for, and the corrupt can their bureaucratic politics and stick it where the sun don't shine.
Party loyalty means nothing to me, American loyalty is what I'm about.
WTMP,
Aside from treason, war crimes, human rights violations and shredding the constitution, just what exactly have these "good ol' boy" "git r' done" Republicans actually gotten done?
I admit, I could have settled for much less of Rudy Giuliani. But don't sweat it, aen2012, if WTF would vote for corrupt, bureaucratic Democrats over the good, decent, "get 'er done!" Republicans, just let him; he'll regret it later!
What the f....
What are you talking about? If you are talking about Sarah Palin you are a little confused!!! Gov. Palin is awesome. She did a great job last night and she will be the next VP of the United States!
This is a great newspaper! The Marshall Democrat always does a great job covering stories in Saline County! Thanks so much for keeping us informed!!!
As I watched the convention last I realized that if Jesus Christ himself came back tommorrow and ran as a republican I wouldn't vote for him.
I know this may be a bit off topic, but I wanted to comment on this Newspaper, The Marshall Democrat.
The Marshall Democrat is as old a tradition as any in Marshall -- not just a Newspaper in Marshall, it has become a trusted institution. It was always me and my family's first choice for news when I was growing up and when I was an adult in Marshall. The Marshall Democrat has always been a paper we could trust to give us the straight news. While they certainly cover State and National news well, they are also the best source for local news. In fact, when I was living up there on top of Montegue hill and needed equipment or tools for my small farm, the Marshall Democrat classifieds was the first place I would look, and I was always able to find a good deal there.
My Grandparents and my Parents, always kept a yearly subscription of the Marshall Democrat and I continued that tradition until the day I left Marshall to move to Oz. In our home you could always find the latest copy of the Democrat, and while the internet version is great, its no replacement for the good old printed version. In fact, if there was any reasonable way to do it, I would be recieving the Marshall Democrat by mail everyday here in Australia. However, I am so far away now that it would take about two weeks for each copy to get here in Australia and the cost would be non-feasable. So I may go ahead and subscribe to the subscription version on the net.
Reading the Marshall Democrat is lot like spending time with an old family friend -- it always has a good story and its a newspaper you can trust!
WTF, I forgot to respond to your comment about the polls.
The pollsters are trying to be sophisticaed and they're giving us numbers by age group. For example, when you see that McCain is a percentage point or two ahead of Obama, that's the number that represents white males in McCain's age range. Overall, Obama is 8-10 points ahead (that was the number given last night).
So, when you see numbers, they'll most likely be reflective of a particular age bracket. Also, some of the polls are not statistically significant. I say that not from fact, but it's my feeling that the data is not significant because of the kinds of questions being asked and the way they're asked. I can't speak factually for the polling services, but I've done a lot of that kind of work in the past and I know that validity is often compromised when this kind of polling is done.
news, you make a great appeal for the people of America to think clearly and don't be fooled by the smokescreen the Republicans are laying down.
I do believe our nation is on the threshhold of becoming just another land mass unless we unite behind the Democrats and work our tails off to set things right.
I listened to some of Palin's speech tonight, and I was not impressed with her delivery or her sniping at the Democrats. Someone recently described her as a Barracuda. Well, if she's a Barracuda, then Joe Biden is a Great White shark and he should show her no mercy.
Obama is going to have to be the toughest he's ever been in his life as he matches up with McCain from here on.
Last night Orrin Hatch was asked about Palin and he said he didn't really know anything about her, then not two minutes later he was praising her, saying she's so skilled and is the absolute best choice. The Republicans were talking tough but it sure sounded like they aren't very confident.
WTF, what do you suppose your dad would think of news' post?
news across,
Those were excellent and sad points you made in your last post. It's frightening to me that if one believes the polls that the republicans are virtually neck and neck with the dems. While I am upset with the democratic congress I am baffled how anyone in this country could still support the GOP after the past 8 years. I guess abortion and gay marriage are the only 2 things that really matter to them. Free country my ass.
Gal66,
That was an interesting post. I think you make some good subtle points.
As a Marshalite, an American, now living in Australia with my Australian wife, I watch this election with great interest. While I live under the laws and policies of Australia and am not subject to most of the laws and policies of the United States while I live in Australia, I still have 3 grown sons living in the USA, as well as sisters and brothers and cousins and parents living in the USA -- so of course I remain concerned at what happens in this election -- and of course as an American citizen who still maintains a residence in Missouri (though I live in Australia), I will be voting in this and all American elections to come -- if we have any more elections after this one.
I find it amusing that both parties claim they are the party of change since both have had a hand in the policies that clearly seem to be pushing the United States into the category of 3rd World dictatorship status. In fact, I find it most amusing that the party that was mostly responsible for the failed policies that have lead the USA down a path of self-destruction over the last 8 years is now claiming they will bring about change despite the fact that their positions on the issues and their party platform remain largely unchanged.
I might add one correction to your posting, most of the World no longer looks to the United States for leadership. In Australia the major trading partner is China and while Australia has a small population, they look to the British Commonwealth for their protection. Let's not forget the UK is a major nuclear power and still has one of the most powerful armies and navies in the World -- so the Aussies don't look to the USA as its protector. In addition, since Australia recently signed the Kyoto Protocal, the United States now stands as the only country in the World that still refuses to do anything concrete and substantial to reduce the emmissions that cause global warming. And pulling their troops out of Iraq was a big part of why they fired the equivalent of the Republican party (here called the Liberal Party) from office. The Australians seem very pleased that their equivalent of the American Democrat Party, the Labour Party, who is now in charge here, has moved ahead with progressive policies such as their recent withdrawl of Australian troops from the "coalition of the willing." I guess you could say the Australian people are no longer "willing" to be a part of that shameful "coalition."
In many major countries around the World, many countries have switched from basing their currency on the dollar to the Euro -- another indication that the USA has lost most its credibiliity in the World.
However despite the complete failures of Republican policies over the last 8 years, despite the substantial loss of credibility the Americans have lost in the World over the last 8 years, despite the fact that medical care costs and insurance costs in the USA are increasing geometrically, and despite the economic tailspin towards economic depression the USA is currently in as a result of Republican Party policies over the last 8 years, from here it looks as if Americans are poised to keep the party that is the major cause of these problems in the White House.
That really is sad.
I wish you good luck with that...you are really going to need it!
Bill Balsamico has it right. Thanks for this post, Gal66!
just wanna thank the swimming pool peoples for the doggie plunge last nite! my lil pit bull and i met a lot of others friendly doggers and had a great time swimming!!!! see ya next year!!
A little something I found on the web
Casa D' Ice Address on America
"Two score and eighteen years ago our leaders brought forth on this continent the greatest nation on earth, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that no other nation could equal us. Now we are engaged in a great challenge of endurance and survival, testing whether that nation, or any other nation that was so strong and so powerful can long endure. We are meet on a great battlefield, it is a new war consisting of economic, industrial and political struggles. We are losing many of these battlefields as our congress and politicians allow the out sourcing of our jobs and companies, along with the failure to remedy our broken borders. This is not why many gave their lives so that this nation may live. It is also fitting and proper that we correct this. But in a larger sense, we cannot Dedicate, we cannot Consecrate- we cannot hallow this country. The brave men and women, living and dead, who struggled here, have Consecrated it, far above our politicians to add and detract. The world has always looked to America for assurance, support, leadership and assistance which she gave unconditionally. It is for us the VOTERS rather than remain complaisant but take back the country which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us--that is to vote out every incumbent in the Senate and Congress. After all anything has to be better than what we have now. That from these new and fresh politicians we can take increased devotion to our cause for which many gave the last full measure of devotion. That we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain- that this nation under God, shall have NEW GROWTH--- NEW BUSINESS--and NEW JOBS, along with ENERGY INDEPENDENCE and BORDER SECURITY----and that Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
Bill Balsamico
Casa D'ice
N. Versailles Pa. 15137
Well slater41,
politics in Australia are like poltics everwhere. the Liberal party, which is Australia's version of the American Republican party got voted out of power last year by record numbers of people. It was a landslide victory for the left-wing. The right-wing in Australia are pretty racist and like the Republican Party, with the Australian right-wing, the poor and middle class get poorer and the rich get richer. So we fired them last year. Of course since I am an American and not yet an Australian citizen, I was not able to vote in that election, but my aussie wife did. I will be voting in the next National election here though as I will have dual citizenship at that time. I did however work the polling places on behalf of the Labor Party (Australia's equivelent of the American Democrats). All I had to do was remind folks that Howard was a pal of Bush and that was all it took. Howard not only lost the Prime Ministership, but even lost his own seat in Parliment.
Things have been much better since we fired the right-wing. We signed the Kyoto Protocal and we pulled all our troops out of Iraq. In addition, the working class is doing much better now that the right-wing is out of power. The economy has improved considerably and they are eliminating the anti-worker legislation passed by Howard and his right-wing party. But like anyplace, there are still a lot of things to do and not everyone is happy.
News, here's one from someone in your part of the world. The tone seems to indicate his displeasure with the Australian Labor Party, I'm guessing:
The Squirrel and The Grasshopper
The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
Come winter, the squirrel is warm and well fed.
A social worker finds the shivering grasshopper, calls a press conference and demands to know why the squirrel should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others less fortunate, like the grasshopper, are cold and starving.
The ABC shows up to provide live coverage of the shivering grasshopper; with cuts to a video of the squirrel in his comfortable warm home with a table laden with food.
The Australian press informs people they should be ashamed that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so while others have plenty.
The Labour Party, Greenpeace, Animal Rights and The Grasshopper Housing Commission of Australia demonstrate in front of the squirrel's house.
The ABC, interrupting a cultural festival special from St Kilda with breaking news, broadcasts a multi-cultural choir singing 'We Shall Overcome'.
Bill Shorten rants in an interview with Laurie Oakes that the squirrel got rich off the backs of grasshoppers and calls for an immediate tax hike on the squirrel to make him pay his 'fair share' and increases the charge for squirrels to enter Melbourne city centre.
In response to pressure from the media, the Government drafts the Economic Equity and Grasshopper Anti Discrimination Act, retroactive to the beginning of the summer. The squirrel's taxes are reassessed. He is taken to court and fined for failing to hire grasshoppers as builders for the work he was doing on his home, and an additional fine for contempt when he told the court the grasshopper did not want to work.
The grasshopper is provided with a Housing Commission house, financial aid to furnish it and an account with a local taxi firm to ensure he can be socially mobile. The squirrel's food is seized and re-distributed to the more needy members of society - in this case the grasshopper.
Without enough money to buy more food, to pay the fine and his newly imposed retroactive taxes, the squirrel has to downsize and start building a new home.
The local authority takes over his old home and utilises it as a temporary home for asylum seeking cats who had hijacked a plane to get to Australia as they had to share their country of origin with mice.
On arrival they tried to blow up the airport because of Australians' apparent love of dogs.
The cats had been arrested for the international offense of hijacking and attempted bombing but were immediately released because the police fed them pilchards instead of salmon whilst in custody.
Initial moves to return them to their own country were abandoned because it was feared they would face death by the mice.
The cats devise and start a scam to obtain money from people's credit cards.
A 60 Minutes special shows the grasshopper finishing up the last of the squirrel's food, though spring is still months away, while the Housing Commission house he is in crumbles around him because he hasn't bothered to maintain it. He is shown to be taking drugs.
Inadequate government funding is blamed for the grasshopper's drug 'Illness.'
The cats seek recompense in the Australian courts for their treatment since arrival in Australia.
The grasshopper gets arrested for stabbing an old dog during a burglary to get money for his drugs habit. He is imprisoned but released to enter a drug
rehabilitation program for a few weeks. He is placed in the care of the probation service to monitor and supervise him.
Within a few weeks he has killed a guinea pig in a botched robbery.
A commission of enquiry, that will eventually cost $10 million and state the obvious, is set up.
Additional money is put into funding a drug rehabilitation scheme for grasshoppers.
Legal aid for lawyers representing asylum seekers is increased.
The asylum seeking cats are praised by the government for enriching Australia's multicultural diversity and dogs are criticised by the government for failing to befriend the cats.
The grasshopper dies of a drug overdose.
The usual sections of the press blame it on the obvious failure of government to address the root causes of despair arising from social inequity and his traumatic experience of prison.
They call for the resignation of a minister.
The cats are paid $1 million each because their rights were infringed when the government failed to inform them there were mice in Australia.
The squirrel, the dogs and the victims of the hijacking, the bombing, the burglaries and robberies have to pay an additional percentage on their credit cards to cover losses, their taxes are increased to pay for law and order, and they are told that they will have to work beyond age 65 because of a shortfall in government funds.
THE END
Hey news,
Yes, I'm always on the lookout for lighthearted tidbits of that nature. I'm glad you enjoyed it. :)
slater41
That is the funniest thing I have read in a long time. I can't stop laughing. Thanks for posting that!
For anyone wanting a little humor...
There's a guy named Scott Williams who lives in Newport, RI. He thinks of himself as an archaeologist, and whatever he digs up in his back yard he sends to the Smithsonian with a detailed technical description of his find. Apparently this has been ongoing for quite a while.
I've pasted a copy of the letter from the Smithsonian which responds to his latest "contribution" to science:
Smithsonian Institution
207 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington , DC 20078
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labelled "93211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post . . .Hominid skull". We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago.
Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie Doll, of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, believes to be "Malibu Barbie". It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar with your prior work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings. However, we do feel there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin:
1. The material is moulded plastic. Ancient hominid remains are typically fossilised bone.
2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimetres, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-hominids.
3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time.
This latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you have submitted in your history with this institution, but the evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that:
A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie doll that a dog has chewed on.
B. Clams don't have teeth.
It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request to have the specimen carbon-dated. This is partially due to the heavy load our lab must bear in its normal operation, and partly due to carbon-dating's notorious inaccuracy in fossils of recent geologic record. To the best of our knowledge, no Barbie dolls were produced prior to1956 AD, and carbon-dating is likely to produce wildly inaccurate results. Sadly, we must also deny your request that we approach the National Science Foundation Phylogeny Department with the concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name Australopithecus spiff-arino.
Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy, but was ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin. However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institution, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your Newport back yard. We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it.
We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous ions in astructural matrix that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus Rex femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench.
Yours in Science,
Harvey Rowe, Chief Curator - Antiquities
What the f
Yeah I agree, vegimite is terrible but the aussies love it. They actually make sandwiches out of it - and they think we are crazy to eat peanutbutter and jelly sandwiches. When you are considering Australia you should remember, its a different Country that is also the most remote Country in the World. They have their own foods and their own ways. In fact, if it wasn't for the fact that I am a pretty good cook and that they have McDondalds, burger king, and kentucky fried chicken here, I would probably have starved to death a long time ago lol.
But still, Australia is a very cool place.
It is sad to lock things up... when our initial instinct is that everyone is good.
Keep a level head and don't over react, labgirl. Don't make your son the ultimate victim by trying to protect and shield him from the way our world is. Continue to show him right from wrong and let him see your resolve to win out over the crooks.
Get that neighborhood watch group started and show the police that all of you are willing to do your part in keeping the neighborhood safe. Ask the police to come and talk to you and your neighbors and offer advice and suggestions to help keep everyone safe. When they see that you're sincere, they'll reciprocate by supporting your efforts.
I remember Marshall whenever I was younger, riding my bike after dark and running all over this town, no worries about anything. I had the police take fingerprints and pictures, because I am hoping they will be caught, I'm scared to bring my child up in this kind of a world. It really makes me want to lock him inside and never send him out. A woman can't go in public without some man hollering, stealing a purse, and now I can't sleep at night because of worries of people breaking and entering on or in my property!!!! I shouldn't be so hasty though because I do know that there is alot of great, wonderful people here that are victimized also. It's just a great shame. I would like to start a neighborhood watch, my friends right down the street from me were also victims lastnight, I think if we could get everybody to agree with it, that we could really help out with some of what goes on.
labgirl and typesetter,
I know exactly how you feel, since I've been victimized also.
I learned to lock my car after the night someone got into it and helped himself to a few things while I was attending a wedding reception. Miraculously the police caught the thief and I got my property back, but that's a rare occurrence, I'm sure.
It seems that thieves have become much bolder nowadays, maybe because of the sheer numbers of people who, in times past, might not have been tempted to break the law. Our legal system being what it is tends to encourage law-breaking, and the end result is that honest people have lost the freedom of being able to trust others to honor that trust.
labgirl,
Isn't it just a sad fact of our society today that you cannot even trust your neighbors anymore? A lot of people still believe that since we live the small town life that their vehicle will be safe when parked in their own driveway, but this isn't 1965 and we don't live in Mayberry! It's a sad commentary on our world when we must lock up our possessions and that they still may not be safe just because some people don't understand the concept of "thou shalt not steal." I can see my vehicle out the window from where I work, but I still lock the doors everyday. When I visit family members that live in town and I leave my car in their driveway, I lock the doors when I go inside. I know it is upsetting when someone takes your things and I can empathize with you. I know it makes you angry and it should! I don't know what can be done about it, but I just wanted you to know I understand where you are coming from.
news, what a coincidence re your service time location. I was in Germany from '61-'63, A Company, 10th Engineer Battalion, 8th Infantry Division, and our battalion headquarters was located in Wurzburg. I was caretaker of the company's quartermaster supply detail. A Company was located in Bamberg when I first arrived over there, and later we moved to Schweinfurt.
Although my German language knowledge was rudimentary at best, I preferred mingling with the natives. In every group there was always at least one person who spoke enough English for all of us to understand one another. The vast majority of those I had the opportunity to share thoughts with were most accepting of having the American military present in their country. I wonder about now, since conditions are dramatically different with the end to the cold war.
Talking a little more about the transit systems over there, I was aware right off that most people used public transportation to go to and from work and other travels. I'd see people driving their cars on weekends and concluded that since public conveyance was so good it made perfect sense to leave the car in the garage.
It was during a trip to Copenhagen that I learned what could have been the primary reason why people didn't drive their cars much. I rented a car while I was there, and before returning it I paid over $2.00 per gallon for the gas to refill the tank. That was a shock, to say the least. This was in 1962 that gas was well over $2./gal. all over Europe, not just in Denmark, so the people over there are well conditioned to paying premium prices. My friend in England recently told me that a gallon of gas costs the equivalent of $9.00 American. All the more reason why this country should be working to develop a comprehensive public transit system.
RE: Democratic National Convention
I watched portions of Obama's speech the other night. Pretty emotional guy...reminded me of JFK is some ways. A lot of what he said and the way he said it, I expected. Let's face it...he's still got to sell himself. So, there are going to be the usual political promises of lower taxes and bringing our troops home, boosting the economy, alternative fuel searches, education, yada yada.
Then the man said something that completely swayed me in his direction; something no other candidate I've ever watched or listened to has ever said. I paraphrase the following:
He more or less said, "I can't do it by myself". Then he issued the call to parents, "If you want your child to get a quality education, make sure they show up to school to get it". He said to the fathers, "If you want your children to know the value of work, get off your butt and WORK". He went on to make other challenges to parents; teaching respect and so forth. He basically said it is time to stop expecting the government to raise our children.
The man may have ZERO experience in foreign policy. At this point my opinion is until we get things right on our own dirt we have little right to anyone else's. Sounds like Obama's on the right path...
I know that this is a little off the subject... but what is with the people here in Marshall anymore? I can't believe that I cannot park my car in my driveway and have to worry about punks breaking into it and stealing out of it! I work so hard to provide for my family and for us to have stuff, and here this kids or whatever just go and steal stuff out of cars and sell it for money just so they don't have to work. I just don't get it!!!! Ok, I'm sorry I just had to vent!!!
WTF, did your father agree to consider what you had to say about Obama and the need to elect the Democrats? I oftentimes blame the news people for creating a false impression. In their haste to be first with a report they don't bother gathering all the facts before broadcasting the story. Maybe they come along later and retract some errors, but by that time maybe people who saw the initial report formulate their opinions and beliefs based on erroneous information and might not see retractions or corrections.
Now, before all you local news folks round up the rar and feathers, I must say present company is excepted. :)
BTW, do people make a habit of eating that catfish bait? I know some people enjoy eating worms and bugs. :) Not for me, thank you!
A guy work with just got back from Australia. He brougt back a small jar of vegimite. I've heard about for years and wanted to try it. First time I'm ever actually tasted catfish bait! Yeeecccchh!! It's horrible.
slater41
Yeah Marshall is pretty special to me and I carry her in my heart no matter where I am.
By the way, I too served in Germany while I was in the service. I was at Emery Kasern in Wurzburg, 1974 to 1976. B Company, 3rd Supply and Transport, 3rd Infantry Division, 3rd Army.
Yeah the train system in Germany is very much like the one in Sydney. Its too bad that in America we don't put enough emphasis on public trans. It is good for the environment and good on the wallet or pocket book as well.
news, your climate is much like the climate here in south texas, but it may be a bit cooler here during the winter months. When people ask me what the weather is like here, I tell them we have two seasons - one hot, and one not quite as hot.
Even after all these years I still miss the changing seasons. Fall is my favorite and I have many fond memories of playing in the leaves - rake up a big pile and then go jump in, and I remember that smell when they burned.
Yes, I'm sure you're homesick sometimes. Any time your attachment to a place is strong and spans generations like yours, you'll always miss it.
I was born and raised in Slater, born in the house my dad had built three years earlier. My roots are there, and no matter how the town changes and no matter where I might be, it'll always be my home. I've been gone from there for nearly 48 years, but the ties are still strong.
My wife played the violin years ago, and she's now talking about getting hers checked and in good playing order so she can play it again. I joke with her that it's a good thing for me that my hearing is diminished. heh heh heh
I like the fact that you have all that public transportation at your disposal. The love that people in America have for their cars is ridiculous and is responsible for our present energy crisis. Well, I won't flog that dead horse again. When I was in the Army I spent time in Germany, and I was very impressed by their public transit systems. I have a great love of trains, so naturally I loved traveling on the trains, which would take you anywhere you wanted to go. I can well imagine what the system is like there.
This is a coincidence - I'm having a Granny Smith apple as I write this. (smile)
My eyes are telling me it's time to get up from here. See you on the next page!
NanaDot,
Well the one good thing about living in another country is I don't have to live under Bush or McCain or any American government lol.
As to the new Constitution, I feel confident that our Prime Minister, the Honorable Kevin Rudd and his party, the Labour Party (the aussie equivalent of the democrats) will be looking at a number of things when they get ready to form the new Constitution. In the mean time, the aussies have a pretty good government now and we are very free here. We also have a great ecomony here, socialized medicine (which is fantastic), and a surplus in our National Treasury. So things are pretty good in Oz. I will have dual citizenship by 2010 making me both American and Australian by the time we vote on a new constitution and I will proud to be a part of a new republic.
That will also mean I will be able to cast my vote, my left of center vote, in not one but two countries!
I am really looking forward to that lol.
slater41
No I have never played the Sydney Opra House -- I wish I was that good lol lol lol. They only have big name solo violinists there. I am pretty much relegated to weddings, parties, and teaching violin. What can I say...it pays the bills.
But thanks for asking.
newsacross - it sounds so wonderful, and I love Aussies! But I have heard from friends overseas, too, that Americans are having a VERY difficult time, or the locals are literally praying for Obama to win.. and are terrified of McCain winning.. can't say I blame them...
I hope the Aussies reconsider the form of constitution that they use... some of the post WWII revised European constitutions include more affirmative, not just prohibitive, language - and it makes a REAL difference down the road.
Thanks for the glowing report, news across! The pictures and video of Sydney show it to be a very appealing destination. I've always had an interest in visiting the country, and maybe some day I will. One of my lifelong friends will be there at the end of October. They start in Aukland, NZ with a cruise that ends in Sydney, where they'll spend two or three days I believe.
Have you performed at the Opera House?
It's 930pm on Monday here, so, let's see...it would be around 230pm Tuesday there? I'll have to consult the world clock. (smile)
Gotta go tend to Ms. Vivid, the cat.
I was talking to my dad today who is 74 yrs old. I asked what he thought about the upcoming election. He professed that there were things he liked about both canidiates and went on to say that he doubted he would be able to vote for Obama because he was a muslim. I was heart broken about how uniformed he was. Naturally I corrected the misconception. I know this is probably what he is being told in church and I know alot of others folks that keep forwarding me e-mails that are outright lies about Obama. They never bother to check the facts or maybe they just don't care.
To them I say you are part of the problem. Get off your lazy asses and do a little research. There is too much at stake. If you do vote for McCain then do it for the right reasons. If you vote for John McCain will you be able to know in your heart that you truly feel he's the right man for the job or will it be because of simple party loyalty? Maybe your scared of change? Change is never easy but it is nescessary. Are you better off than you were 8 years ago? It really boggles the mind that any American would consider giving the republicans another shot. If you have teenage children keep in mind that McCain supports reinstating the draft and probably would not hesitate to draft females. Our miltary has been decimated by these guys but they won't hesitate to keep them in a prepetual state of conflict. War,War,War, Kill,Kill,Kill. This is what America has become. Enough!
slater41,
Yes I have photos of me and my lovely Aussie wife on the Sydney Harbour Bridge and at the Sydney Opra House.
I am a solo violinist and as such my Australian wife and I got to concerts at the Sydney Opra House quite often. It is a beautiful building and the accoustics there are said to be the best in the World. The last show we saw there was Nigel Kennedy (perhaps the finest solo violinist in the World). We live about 10 miles from the Sydney Opra House and so we go down there quite a bit.
The Sydney Opra House is very near the Sydney Harbour Bridge and the area in-between is called Circular Quay (prounced "key). It where the Harbour ferries load and unload and where they meet the train system. The ferries can take you almost anywhere in the Sydney area including to Taranga Zoo -- which is on an island and is spectacular. I love riding the ferries -- especially when the water is rough and the boats bounce all over the place -- and they are part of the public transportation system here -- which is also incredible. They even have a rivercat system that is also public transportation and will take a person to various points up the Parramatta river.
Australia is a truly remarkable place to live. Crime here is very low and you can go anywhere you want in the city or suburbs with out fear of being mugged or attacked, and they have the commuter train system which can take you almost anywhere in Sydney very quickly. Many people in Sydney and the suburbs don't own cars as they don't need them here. Of course many people here do have cars too lol. We do -- my car and her car -- but I rarely drive as the bus/train/ferry system is so extensive and inexpensive -- not to mention that even after 3 years I still have trouble driving on the left side of the road.
They have kangaroos here -- that is no secret. There are extensive public parks everywhere in Sydney and in fact the one in our suburb has quite a number of Kangaroos. The biggest kangaroos are the Western Red Kangaroos and they stand 6 feet tall and have a full length of about 12 feet if you include their tails. We have a couple of big reds at our local park and a whole bunch of Eastern Grey Kangaroos which are slightly smaller than the big Reds.
Sydney is the most beautiful city I have ever seen. Its nick-name is the "emerald city" because there are so many trees -- mostly gum trees and palm trees. The weather here is wonderful. its Winter right now and most days are sunny and warm -- mildly warm ranging from 65 degrees to 75 degrees during the day and usually in the high 50s to 65 at night -- and that is in the coldest month of July (yep we have Christmas in Summer here). The Summers have occasional hot days but its usually not hot very long and the average Summer time daytime temp is 80. Sydney has hundreds of beaches along the South Pacific Ocean which is crystal clear blue and the beaches are easy to get to using the extensive public transport system here. People surf and swim here year round too. It is always green here. The trees don't lose their leaves in the Winter and the grass doesn't turn brown. In fact, I have to mow my lawn year round lol. So even when its Winter, it looks and feels like Summer.
At the Western edge of Sydney are the Blue Mountains. We go there a lot too. They look a lot like the Smokey Mountains and during the depression the Australian Government built thousands of miles of well built trails through out the mountains. In fact, the mountains system is so extensive that many areas are to this day unexplored. But the best thing about the mountains is that you can hop on a commuter train and be there in about an hour and the cost is negligable. In fact, you could spend your morning hiking in the mountains here and your afternoon on a South Pacific beach all in the same day with no problem -- Winter or Summer -- the weather is great!
The Aussies are the nicest people I have ever known. They are very easy going and pleasent -- real laid back. The love their "footy" which is their version of football and their game of Cricket -- which is sort of like baseball but slower and more boring lol. Cricket games can go on for days and often as long as a week. The Aussies love to drink also. There are open air pubs and cafes everywhere because the weather is so temperate. However, they have very few dui problems here because of the public transport system and very strict penalties for violations of their dui laws. A dui or dwi can land one in prison here -- they mean business when it comes to keeping the roads safe. But you rarely ever hear about someone having that problem because the people are very conciencious about obeying the law and besides, a person can easily just catch a bus not far from their door step and take the bus to any pub they want to go to -- day or night and most of the pubs have their own busses. When we want to go out, we just call the pub and they send their shuttle bus over to our house to pick us up, and then when we are ready to head home we just hop on the shuttle bus and they take us right back to our house. My wife and I don't drink much but we do enjoy a glass of wine once in a while at the open air pubs and we never set one foot in the car when we do -- we don't have to.
Yes Australia is a very wonderful place to live, but yes I do often miss my fellow Americans and I am always home-sick for Marshall. My family goes way back in Marshall's history and I was the last one to live in Marshall. I have family at both cemetaries in Marshall and going all the way back to the mid 1800s in our oldest cemetary down by the park. While I do love Sydney, Marshall will always be my real home, and while I may admire the Australian people, no-one will ever replace the good people of Marshall in this Marshalite's heart. I guess that is why I keep the Marshall Democrat bookmarked and why we make a point of visiting Marshall when ever we take an American vacation.
Yes, slater41, I really am a long ways from home -- but make no mistake about it -- i am loving it lol!!
news across, you're a long way from home.
You make an interesting point when you say that being American in a foreign country can be hard. I have friends in Germany and the UK and they report the same thing. They're natives of those areas, but they say that respect for America is very low.
A year or so ago I was watching the Charlie Rose discussion program and he had some foreign journalists on, talking about Obama and how excited Europeans were that he could be the next president.
All of us know that Bush and Co. realize how they appear to people around the world, but they seem to have no concern at all. It baffles me that ANYONE with good sense would support a party that created and maintains without a care the perceptions that people worldwide have of the US.
ND is right about foreign exchange students not wanting to come here. Lots of talk has taken place regarding the state of education in this country, and what I've heard educators say sounds like some believe in NCLB and some don't. More of the blind allegiance to the party, you suppose?
The more we discuss all the issues facing our nation, the more there seem to be, and the more severe they seem to become as we share information and thoughts.
So, have you had your photo taken as you stood atop that bridge with the Sydney Opera House in the background? (smile)
slater41,
I am not suprised to learn that European students consider a year in American highschool a "lost year."
I am an American living in Sydney, NSW, Australia. The Australian people have a long history of standing by America - even when America is wrong. They fought along side us in WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War 1, Afgansistan, and Iraq. They have long admired our Constitution and in fact even now the Aussies are planning a new Constitution modeled after the American Constitution and declaring Australia a republic in 2010 (verses a constitutional monarchy which is what they are right now). They have been historically, typically, profoundly pro-American -- but not anymore.
What I am hearing here from the Aussies is disgust for the Bush Administration and the Republican Party and what this party has done to America and the World. Most Aussies I have talked to (and remember, I live in Australia, so everyone I talk with here is an Aussie), have come to the point where they despise America. America under the Republican "leadership" over the last 8 years has reduced the general Aussie attitude from one of respect and honor for America to fear and loathing of what they often refer to as "the World's Bullyboy." With out exception, Bush is regarded here in Australia as a brutal dictator. Australians laugh at our education system and Americans are generally regarded here in Australia as being dumb as a sack of hammers. That doesn't mean we are dumb, but they do regard Americans -- in general -- as "under educated." Frankly, the Republican Party in America -- through their policies -- have made life for Americans here in Australia very difficult at best, and from what I am hearing from American friends living in Europe, its the same there. Predjudice in Australia against Americans is now at an all time high. I even lost a job not long ago because my boss didn't like Americans -- his words, not mine. I wish I could say my former boss's attitude is the exception here but in fact it has become the rule. What ever good reputation our Nation once had in the World is now gone -- completely -- and the Australians seem quite bewildered at how Americans allowed their Country to sink so low.
Yes Repubican rule in America has been a very sad chapter in our History but we now have a chance to change the road we are on. Aussies here desperately ask me all the time if I think Obama will win -- I hear the desperate hope in their
voices when they ask.
All I can tell them is I hope so.
ND, I don't know if the Jaywalking segment is put on, but if not...
A year or two ago I read a report with results of a study done on 2-year and 4-year college graduates, testing their ability to perform moderately complex tasks, like balancing a checkbook and understanding the terms of a credit card agreement.
The conclusion was that about 75% of the 2-year students failed the test, and around 50% of the four-year students failed.
Perhaps Leno's skit isn't so far-fetched after all.
I've watched about 1/3 of it (a 2 hr 40 min film), and I kept thinking, Gee, if I didn't know better I'd say that Cheney wrote the transcript. There's a primary focus on regimentation, as is standard fare for the military, even today's version.
I've been gathering photos and file footage of WWII and have collected a fair amount. This is a part of history I haven't spent much time studying, so I'm hoping to develop a better understanding. I spotted a video about Japan from like 1940-1945 and I'll be downloading it.
I was born four days after Pearl Harbor, so I don't have any memories of that period, other than what I've been told by my family.
slater41 - so how familiar does the Soldaten indoctrination sound? Like anyone we know? I'm afraid this goes beyond 'scare tactics' = I've seen some of the old German films, and if I remember them correctly, they sound an awful lot like Bush, Rumsfeld and gang while trying to make up excuses for ANOTHER war...FEAR, TERROR and 'ONLY WE CAN *SAVE* YOU!!!