Login | Register
Mostly Cloudy ~ 71°F   Dense Fog Advisory
[Marshall Democrat-News]
Marshall, Missouri ~ Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (3)

OBTW/Tired of taxes? Talk to the guy behind the tree

Friday, April 4, 2008

The late Senator Russell B. Long of Louisiana, long-time chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is famous for his definition of tax reform:

"Don't tax you, don't tax me. Tax that guy behind the tree."

And wouldn't it be great if that's the way it worked?

Wouldn't it be wonderful if every time a new highway or a new bridge needed to be built or an old one repaired we could just look to "that guy behind the tree" to empty his pockets on our behalf?

Or better yet -- what if we could just have all the services we need (and expect) suddenly appear, with no effort on our part, courtesy of "that guy?"

Yeah, that's it, that's the ticket - get "that guy" to take care of it.

Reality check, everyone.

"That guy" is us.

Like it or not, we all have to kick in some of the money for good roads, safe bridges, county and city facilities, wages and benefits for the people who manage all those resources -- we even have to toss something into the hat to support the process of voting on all of it.

Where else would the money come from, if not from us?

For four years in the recent past, I was president of the homeowners association of a condominium complex of 25 units.

Within the complex were six buildings of varying sizes, a swimming pool and pool house with a hot tub and two bathrooms, a soft-surface tennis court, a couple of acres of grounds with lawns and landscaping, streets, driveways and parking areas.

Condo owners pay a monthly fee for the upkeep of all the facilities within the complex. The idea is that everyone pays a small portion of the total cost of maintenance, spread out over the amount of time they live there, no matter how long (or short) a period of time that is. Cost-sharing is one of the upsides to condo living.

It's the job of the president, assisted by a board made up of owners elected to their positions by the rest of the owners, to manage the funds generated by the monthly fee.

In short, it's a lot like managing a city or a county. It's smaller, of course, but the issues and the problems are pretty much the same.

It's one of the wonders of the modern world that anyone would want to shoulder that responsibility, especially as a volunteer, because a more thankless job than this one would be hard to find -- maybe even impossible.

Absolutely none of the homeowners believe that increases in the association monthly fee are ever necessary. In fact, most of them believe the fees should be reduced. Some even believe the fees should be eliminated.

They do, however, expect that the swimming pool will always be sparkling clean, the leaves that drop from the multitudes of trees will be removed, the tennis court always in good repair and ready for play at a moment's notice, the bushes and trees trimmed, the grass mowed, the driveways free of potholes, the snow removed before 7 a.m. and the trash picked up on time.

They also expect the roofs on all the buildings will be maintained or replaced on a regular basis, the gutters will always be free of leaves and the buildings will be painted on a 5-year schedule.

A $10 increase in the monthly fee sends them screaming into the stratosphere; even an increase of $5 per month sets off a torrent of rage, followed by verbal abuse of the board members.

Everyone who lives in a condo is an expert, by the way. Fully half of them are experts on roofing, painting, pool cleaning and driveway maintenance. The other half are experts on tree-trimming, tennis court maintenance and snow removal. A lucky few are experts on all of these issues and in financial matters, to boot. They know everything there is to know about these items and will be happy to share their expertise with the board.

Very few of them, however, want to share this "expertise" by volunteering to be on the board. They're too busy with other important things in their lives to get involved.

And the annual meeting -- the one where the budget is presented and new board members are elected?

Our "experts" are nowhere to be found. They're too busy to attend. Fewer than half of the residents will show up for meetings of any kind.

But none of them are too busy to complain about the new budget and the new board -- which they will do, endlessly and exhaustingly, until the next year's meeting and vote, when they will again be too busy to become involved.

A familiar pattern, isn't it?

Because that's the way it is with human nature.

We want someone else -- the guy behind the tree -- to pay the taxes, to fix the problems, and to take the punishment when things do not go the way we want them to.

But it's not up to the guy behind the tree.

It's up to us, the taxpayers, to take the responsibility for our government, no matter how small or large it is.

It's all up to us.

We have the right and the duty to help decide how we're taxed, by whom we're taxed and for what purpose the taxes will be used.

We have the right and the duty to participate actively in local, state and national government.

We have the right and the duty to vote.

On Tuesday, April 8, we have another opportunity to exercise those rights and those duties.

Instead of complaining about government and taxes, we can do something about it -- we can vote.

If you don't want to vote, that's fine with me.

But if you don't vote, don't complain to me about taxes and government, because I will have done my job by voting and I don't want to hear from you.

If you want to discuss it with somebody, though, I've got a suggestion.

Go talk to the guy behind the tree.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.

Don't worry...

I'll be voting..against it..

Of course your article misses the point completely..

A recession and gasoline headed for 3.50 a gallon by Memorial day is not the time to put an issue to increase taxes on the ballot..and once a tax issue is defeated it makes it that much harder to pass a second time around..

You ask for a reality check...how about a common sense check.

-- Posted by Hombre on Sat, Apr 5, 2008, at 5:02 PM
Response by Kathy Fairchild/Staff writer:
My *sole* point was that it is important to vote when the opportunity presents itself. I'm pleased that you will be voting - how you vote is up to you.

You're right, Oklahoma. There are many all-too-willing guys behind the trees who will happily pay for what we taxpayers will not. When that happens, we get what the guy behind the tree wants, not what we want. Federally-financed election campaigns may be the answer to the problem. But the problem is whether votes are willing to get out and vote for that option. History proves voters are a pretty lazy bunch. Case in point - with all the fuss and bother and uproar both in our Speak Out blog and elsewhere last winter about problems in the Marshall school district, and the election right in front of us, attendance at the candidate forum was, in my view, astoundingly low.

-- Posted by Kathy Fairchild on Sat, Apr 5, 2008, at 8:36 AM

Sometimes the guy behind the tree does pay for things that sadly we the tax payers will not. Case in point, the campaigns for election to federal office. The guy behind the tree is a corporate mogul, or a union boss, or (you name the vested interest). Depending on the size and circumstance of the hand out, the guy behind the tree has the candidate's attention at the least, or on a leash at worst. Sadder still, when this scenario occurs, most of us are too disinterested to see who is the guy behind the tree from whom the candidate has just walked away with a grin on his face, and a fistful of cash. I speculate that eight out of ten have no idea who has filled the pockets of their favorite candidate. I believe that paying a tax to federally finance all congressional, and presidential campaigns should be not just a duty, but a privelege. Only then could we say with certainty, and pride, that is my candidate. Sometimes another tax could save us money in the long haul.

-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Sat, Apr 5, 2008, at 1:39 AM
Response by Kathy Fairchild/Staff writer:
You're right, Oklahoma - there are many all-too-willing guys behind the tree who are happy to pay for what we as taxpayers will not. When that happens, we get what "that guy" wants, which in many cases is precisely what we do *not* want. In the long run, we might be better off with federally-financed campaigning. Getting people to vote for that - indeed, getting them to vote at all - is the problem. Case in point - after all the fuss and bother in the local school district this past winter and with the election at hand, turnout for the candidate forum was, in my view, astoundingly low. Lots of complaining and griping in our Speak Out blog and elsewhere - but little public response when it counted.


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

 

John Rector LR