|
|
|
|
|
Fair ~ High: 86°F ~ Low: 67°F Thursday, June 20, 2013 |
|
View From the Capitol: Birth control, labor regulations controversiesPosted Sunday, February 12, 2012, at 3:26 PM
Good Day,
This has been a big week, fighting for you -- the good people of Missouri's Fourth District -- and listening to your concerns. As always, it was a privilege to be here on your behalf, advancing your priorities, and pushing back on onerous policies and regulations that would be harmful to you. The focus of one of my biggest concerns was on an assault to our Constitutional freedoms by the Obama Administration's Health and Human Services Department (HHS).
The original HHS ruling would have required faith-based entities to provide health insurance that covers abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, and sterilization. This unconstitutional assault had the effect of forcing religious hospitals, schools, and charities to take actions contrary to their religious beliefs. While you may or may not object to this coverage, no government agency should tell an American citizen what kind of product to buy or stipulate what should be in that product. This ruling was an attack on the freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to our Constitution and trampled on the rights of individuals and organizations to determine their own health care plans.
Friday, following loud outcries from Americans who don't want government telling them how to run their lives, the Obama Administration promised an "accommodation" to deal with this egregious affront to the Constitution. It proceeded to announce a revised version of its mandate. Sadly, the new version -- like the old -- still tramples on Americans' religious rights. This is a gimmick that still requires people to violate their moral beliefs.
The revised version of this Obama health care takeover component will require insurance companies to bear the costs - which will be passed along to policy holders. Furthermore, this idea continues to infringe on the rights of private business owners with religious objections to these mandates.
Hundreds of Missourians who contacted me should know that I am working to right this wrong. I have co-sponsored H.R. 1179, legislation that would allow individuals and organizations to purchase health insurance plans that do not contain health services contrary to their religious beliefs. Private entities, like religious organizations, should never be forced to provide insurance coverage for medication and procedures that violate their religious beliefs. This HHS mandate is just another example of why the President's overreaching health care law is unconstitutional and needs to be repealed.
On another front, this week was "Thank a Farmer Week" and I called on President Obama's Labor Department to withdraw its new regulations restricting the jobs young people can do on American farms. The new rules are ill-conceived and run contrary to common sense as it pertains to growing up on the farm. These new rules would make it very difficult for young men and women to gain the experience with livestock and machinery that today's farming world demands -- and make it difficult for them to learn the skills needed to feed America in future years. These ridiculous rules would, for instance, restrict anyone under 16 from doing such common things as driving a tractor or helping to hook up an implement to a tractor.
As a Missouri farm girl from Cass County I feel confident in saying farm families in Missouri's Fourth District and elsewhere in rural America do not need federal government bureaucrats telling us what to do. I will continue to call for a rescinding of these 'Big Government' rules.
In other action, I sent a letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to inquire about the recent decision to close several USDA offices, including three in Missouri's Fourth District -- in Jefferson City, Buffalo, and Versailles. While we all want more efficient government, I want to ensure the decisions coming out of Washington, D.C. actually save money and that the bureaucracy in Washington is sharing in the burden of cost-cutting measures. The last thing I want is to see Washington trying to balance the budget on the backs of rural America. I will continue to monitor this situation to ensure that doesn't happen.
Finally, I am glad that several individuals and groups from Missouri were able to travel to Washington this week. It is always a blessing for me to get to hear from people I work for and I appreciate them coming. This week, I had good discussions with many Fourth District citizens, including several dairy farmers. We should all be proud that the Fourth District of Missouri has more dairy farms and produces more milk and other dairy products than any other district of the state. I also met with a group from the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America. I worked closely with these efforts as a teacher at Belton High School, sponsoring a youth leadership group and serving as co-chair of an at-risk program for teens. Parental leadership, community support, and prevention efforts play an important role in encouraging teens to make healthy decisions. I applaud their efforts.
In legislative news, the House continued to pass important budget reform and accountability measures as we seek to change the way Washington works. Bills passed include approval of the presidential line-item veto, the Budget and Accounting Transparency Act, the STOCK Act (to ensure no elected official ever benefits financially from insider information) and the Civilian Property Realignment Act to expedite the sale of unneeded federal property and reduce the deficit.
It is always a pleasure to hear from you and to listen to your views and concerns. If you plan to visit the Washington area, please stop by our office at 1023 Longworth House Office Building. In the 4th Congressional District, you are welcome to come by our offices in Jefferson City, Harrisonville, Lebanon, and Sedalia. You can also keep up with us by going to our website at www.hartzler.house.gov
Have a good week.
Vicky
Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Vicky Hartzler is the U.S. representative for Missouri's 4th Congressional District. She was raised on a farm in Archie, and lives with her husband, Lowell and daughter, Tiffany, on a working farm in Cass County. She is a graduate of both the University of Missouri-Columbia in 1983 and Central Missouri State University (now University of Central Missouri) in 1992, graduating summa cum laude with a B.S. in Education from MU and a M.S. in Education from Central Missouri. For more information, visit http://hartzler.house.gov.
Hot topics View from the Capitol: Farewell to Saline, other counties not in the new 4th District(5 ~ 3:27 PM, Dec 5)
View From the Capitol -- Anger over administration immigration order
View from the Capitol: Economy threatened by 'fiscal cliff'
View from the Capitol: 'Taxmageddon' looms
View From the Capitol: Pushing for an audit of the Federal Reserve
|
Your representation of the President efforts to obtain contraception services to be covered by insurance as an assault on religion. You really don't have a clue about religion. You are using this effort to ram down our throat some mess you are associating with freedom of religion. What a bunch of compost! It makes me so mad that for years Ike was never allowed to pass out his ideas but come a republican to the district and you get to put your "ideas" up on the newspaper page without any opposition. Compost....just compost! I sincerely hope that redistricting or the election will find you not representing our county! This makes me sick!
Right on NanaDot!
Hartzler,
Have you no shame? If only you actually read these comments.
Apparently Vicky is all for cutting the federal budget, just not in her district.
You neo-cons and your logic.
By the way, insurance companies should pay for contraception. They, like your political bretheren, are just using religion for their own financial benefit. "Hey, we can provide less services and make more profit if we act outraged that we have to cover birth control pills."
And you, my dear, have fallen into line beautifully.
I hope everyone actually understands the motivation of the Catholic Church regarding birth control.
First off, if you are catholic, which most likely happened when you were about 1 year old, you are taught that you will burn in hell forever if you don't baptize all of your children catholic.
Next off, to be a good catholic, you must 'tithe'. 10% of your income to the church. (Is that gross or net income? :)
Then, in the 60's when birthcontrol pills came along, and the church was suffering a decline in the rate it was producing new catholics, the Pope declared that you would burn in hell for using contraception.
The vatican apparently needs more money, therefore they need more catholics to pony up. Also, they can't let the baptists get a leg up by overtaking the No.1 ranking in numbers.
And all this time I thought Jesus had a rather unfavorable position regarding 'the moneychangers.'
To me this is fairly easy to see, but there are none so blind.......
jobs, jobs, jobs, where is your focus??????
An assault on Religous freedom? What about members of the church that want birth control?
Rep Hartzler you aren't representing your district with this bill, you are only representing the extreme right in this nation and misrepresenting citizens of this district to play partisan politics. You should start focusing on your job and the people of this district and less on President Obama's job.
Ms. Hartzler you said, "While you may or may not object to this coverage, no government agency should tell an American citizen what kind of product to buy or stipulate what should be in that product."
Boy did you get that backwards. What the regulations actually do is tell PROVIDERS that they must PROVIDE coverage to PEOPLE. They are not as you state in your confused, or duplicitous opinion telling PEOPLE what they must buy. They are telling non-human entities, mostly corporations that they must OFFER to PEOPLE the choice to buy.
The American people are finally awakening to the ploys, and chicanery of politicians who represent only deep pocket corporations. There will be a change in Washington. It will result in a lot of newcoming strangers greeting each other in the halls of Congress.
Incumbency is no longer the hallowed protection that allows good old boys, and girls to conduct business as usual. Americans are disgusted, and want the whole pack of you that can get nothing done outta there!
You are giving her too much credit, OKR. She is a total greenhorn, but managed to parlay her husbands money into winning a congressional seat.
Millionaire right wing former school teacher goes to Washington. I don't think she knows many folks who have to decide between paying the rent or buying foodeach month. In her world, it's the poor folks fault they are poor. I mean, heck, it was pretty easy for her to get rich, so why haven't they?
She is, however, performing the role of GOP lackey quite nicely.
But what I really wonder is "Do the employees of Hartzler Equipment company have coverage for contraception?" Heck, do they have coverage at all?
Smart Dog has it right. Does your family's business even offer health insurance to all of its employees? Does that company offer contraception? Let's hear from you. You need to answer your constitutants they want to have a dialogue with you.....or do you not want to hear from us!
Did we elect a cheerleader to represent us? We shunned Ike and went with her? WHY?
Many, many people have asked themselves the same question, red dog.
She did a really nice job of selling herself during the trendiness of the tea party joke.
Well said SD. Hopefully even many of the Tea Partiers who have gulped the swill which soothed their anger for a while, have found it to have a very bitter after taste. Cabbage Patch Dolls, Beany Babies and Tea Party favorites have all had their day. Folks now know that none of them are worth a dime.
Much discussion here and mainstream news since Friday fail to mention what Obama has to know from Illinois. He voted for contraceptive exemption there, and it passed their legislature.
Since he was a resident of and lawmaker for Illinois, he had to know about the self insurance conflict. He had to know about Illinois based Christian Brothers, for example.
How does it work to have an insurance company pay if the faith based charitable organization and the insurer are the same? Self insurance as well as businesses and other entities providing clinics and health services to their own employees may be something he wants to get rid of so all the insurance business goes to big insurance companies. He succeeded in making people believe that faith based institutions do not self insure, just because his words implied it on Friday.
I don't know why I waste my time reading these articles. Also I don't know why Rep. Hartzler wastes her time writing them. Spend your time working on creating jobs for our unemployed and underemployed. There are things you could be doing, be a leader not a spokesperson for talking points.
It's 2012. It's time to replace the "faith based" idiocray with "fact based" initiatives.
BTW whome,
Something tells me Vicky propably doesn't write these. I suspect they are probably written by an under insured staffer.