[Masthead] Fair ~ 81°F  
High: 85°F ~ Low: 67°F
Wednesday, June 19, 2013

On flooding, DOD and gay marriage, reigning in regulation

Posted Monday, December 5, 2011, at 4:58 PM

It's been a while since the waters of the Missouri River receded, but the threat of future flooding is first and foremost in the minds of many 4th District residents living along the river. With possible 2012 flooding on the horizon, the House Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee met this week to assess the 2011 Missouri River flooding and to consider operational plans for the future.

I testified before the committee, calling on the Army Corps of Engineers to take steps to prevent future flooding similar to what damaged property this spring and summer. I drove home the point that the levees, which performed remarkably well in protecting 4th District farmland, are weakened and in need of repair NOW, adding that red tape needs to be cut and contracts for repair need to be awarded now.

I further testified that many residents of the 4th District feel that these floods could have been reduced, if not completely avoided, by earlier action and better prioritization of uses by the Army Corps of Engineers. My message is that we must increase reservoir capacity for flood control and act sooner in the event of snowfall or rainfall. About 180 miles of the Missouri River flow through our district, with more than 30 levees lining that stretch of the river. It's time the Army Corps of Engineers prioritizes people and property in its management of the river and makes 'flood control' its Number One priority.

Joining me was seventh generation farmer Tom Waters of Orrick, Missouri, who produces corn, soybeans, wheat and alfalfa in the Missouri River floodplain. Waters, who serves as Chairman of the Missouri Levee & Drainage District Association, is a recognized national leader in Missouri River management issues. He told the subcommittee it is critical for Missouri River levees to be repaired as soon as possible, adding flood control projects both create jobs and save lives.

In another hearing, this week, I joined the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel for a briefing examining the legal and policy rationale leading the Department of Defense to issue guidance, earlier this year, allowing same sex marriage ceremonies on military bases. The guidance issued by the DOD directly violates the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage for all federal purposes to be only between a man and a woman.

While the Defense Department has rescinded that original order, replacing it with a carefully worded memo stating chaplains can conduct "religious ceremonies" but stipulating they must be "gender neutral," they still seem intent on disrespecting the intent of DOMA.

The directives issued by military commanders appear to restrict the ability of military chaplains to speak out freely about the tenets of their faith. I repeatedly questioned the General Counsel to the Department of Defense about DOD's intent and received some assurance that the military will respect the rights of chaplains. I will continue to monitor the situation and work to protect our chaplains who diligently serve our men and women in uniform and work to ensure that the DOD respects the law of the land.

In other news, the House passed two important bills designed to rein in job-destroying federal regulations. The Regulatory Accountability Act (H.R. 3010) would require agencies to assess the costs and benefits of regulatory alternatives and, in most cases, to adopt the least-costly alternative to achieve the regulatory objectives. The Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act (H.R. 527) would require federal agencies to identify and reduce the costs new regulations would impose on small businesses.

One of the major problems standing in the way of maintaining current jobs and creating new ones is what some Americans are calling "Regulation Nation" -- the practice of destroying jobs one rule at a time. Simply put -- there are too many rules!

Employers are concerned about the costs of these new regulations, so they stop hiring, stop spending, and start saving for another bill from the federal government. We need to lift the burden to free small businesses to invest more and to create jobs for American workers. Conservatives in the House realize this and have passed these bills and others to put the halt to out-of-control federal regulations. The simple truth is that job creation is the key to economic recovery and small businesses are the engine that creates jobs. We cannot allow over-regulation to continue to destroy jobs. It is job creators -- not government regulators -- who will ultimately make America's economy grow again.

It is always a pleasure to hear from you and to listen to your views and concerns. If you plan to visit the Washington area, please stop by our office at 1023 Longworth House Office Building. In the 4th Congressional District, you are welcome to come by our offices in Jefferson City, Harrisonville, Lebanon, and Sedalia. You can also keep up with us by going to our website at www.hartzler.house.gov where you can link to our pages on Facebook and Twitter. It is an honor to serve you.

Have a good week.

—Vicky


Comments
Showing most recent comments first
[Show in chronological order instead]

Some of you seemed to miss part of the article. Point #2 deals with 2 conflicting national laws and conflicting constitutional rights.

The original intent of freedom of religion was to protect religion from government, not the other way around. (It is why Congress and the Supreme Court open sessions with prayer; religious belief was seen as good for government.) If a relgious group believes that something violates their religious beliefs, must they comply with the law? Similar to Fugitive Slave laws before the Civil War.

The answer is always simple. If you disagree with those opposing the law then they are megomaniacal haters, but if you are in agreement with them they are the only thing standing between the collapse of society and salvation.

-- Posted by inthemiddle on Sat, Dec 17, 2011, at 9:36 PM

So.....

#1 Priority for this blog is Flood Control. Admirable and good job. We need better management of the Big Muddy to protect some of nations best farm land.

#2 Priority apparently is homophobia. This should be a non-issue except for the fact that you use it to buy votes from fundamentalists.

Did fundamentalists even care about gay folks until politicians told them they should?

I don't care if one thinks God himself, or the King James Bible, told you to campaign against gay rights, but it should be a non-issue. This only exists to stir up controversy for the purpose of dividing voters for a head count.

Anyone who opposes gay rights based on religious views should read the constitution.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion......."

#3 If not for labor regulations, there would still be child labor, unsafe working conditions, and sub-standard wages.

If not for water quality regulations there would be lead in your drinking water and raw sewage dumped into rivers. How do you think all that mercury got into our fish? Years of industrial pollution, that's how. Mother nature sure didn't put it there and we get to live with the fact that it is now unsafe to eat fish that grow in ponds and lakes every day.

I could go on all day about the need for regulation of business. Imagine the fun that is the stock market if there were no insider trading regulations or no laws against fraud. No regulations on banks means your money could just disappear after you deposit it.

Clueless is the best word I can find to describe todays young conservatives.

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

-- Posted by Smart Dog on Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 2:39 PM

More of the same old rhetoric that we get from Congress, Democrats, and Republicans.

They just can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that we are in a new situation, not seen before. It is a situation that begs for new solutions, new solutions that are sometimes bold, even daring.

Unfortunately our system has devolved to the point wherein our folks in Congress have to utilize their time (our time)chasing dollars to be re-elected, or to pursue their next aspiration. Those dollars are readily available, at a price. That price is our Congress becoming no more than mouthpieces for special interests, preponderantly corporate, though not so solely.

We can expect nothing of substantial substance from Congress until we free them from servitude to special interests, and let them do their job for all of us.

Without radical campaign, and election reform it will not happen. We must remove private money from the system, and finance it with tax payer dollars. Congress listens to the money providers. If that is us they will listen to us.

-- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 12:19 PM

Economic benefits from two fuel standard rules alone offset much of modest compliance cost of all Obama EPA rules.

http://www.epi.org/blog/economic-benefit...

-- Posted by cheesehead on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 2:03 PM

Getting the economic facts right during the House regulatory debate

http://www.epi.org/blog/regulatory-legis...

-- Posted by cheesehead on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 2:00 PM

I, for one, am relieved that her district is going away.

I don't like seeing the blog used as a place for her to spew her dogma.

-- Posted by Interested Too on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 7:03 AM
Response from Eric Crump/Editor
We've just recently started posting reports and commentary we receive from all legislators who represent Saline County -- or in the case of Emanuel Cleaver, soon will. There is a posting from Bill Stouffer, there will be one from Cleaver today, and when Joe Aull resumes his weekly reports this winter, we'll post those, too. I will contact Stanley Cox's office and ask to be included on his mailing list, too. We think it's important that people know what their legislators are doing, which issues they think are most important and what they think about those issues.

As always, we will ask that legislators and citizens avoid offensive and disrespectful language in their reports and responses.



Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


Reports from the 4th District
REP. VICKY HARTZLER
Recent posts
Archives
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Login
Vicky Hartzler is the U.S. representative for Missouri's 4th Congressional District. She was raised on a farm in Archie, and lives with her husband, Lowell and daughter, Tiffany, on a working farm in Cass County. She is a graduate of both the University of Missouri-Columbia in 1983 and Central Missouri State University (now University of Central Missouri) in 1992, graduating summa cum laude with a B.S. in Education from MU and a M.S. in Education from Central Missouri. For more information, visit http://hartzler.house.gov.