|
|
Fog/Mist ~ High: 59°F ~ Low: 41°F |
|
Cost too high of proposed new school
Posted Friday, September 25, 2009, at 1:20 PMRead comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
From Walt Keith
Marshall "They are doing it again!" I appreciate the effort of all those working on the current school bond campaign, as I was a member of the 2002-03 facility committee. However, I still think we are not learning from past mistakes. There is a reason that it takes 37 years to pass an issue. At that time, the vote had already failed on two previous campaigns, the last of which was for around $13 million dollars. We toured several new schools, including Sedalia, Columbia, and Moberly. The Columbia school was 2 stories, but stairs were not very appealing. I believe the best was Gratz-Brown in Moberly, a beautiful building for grades 3-5. (Current enrollment is 523 students). Gratz-Brown was state-of-the-art, with a classroom-accessible media room, smart boards, and completely furnished for $5.1 million. I called the contractor and asked if he could come to Marshall and build a similar school for that price. He said yes, but the cost would be about $5.5 million since the Moberly school was about 2 years old. Our plan at that time was over $7 million, unfurnished! After furnishing and adding other school needs, the price tag grew to $11.9 million! I felt that we were spending more money than we needed to and could no longer support the plan. We might have passed a bond issue for much less, and by now we could be thinking about a second building. Now we are talking $20 million for one school! In this economy! Wow! With the current assessment increase and the bond issue, my tax will increase 22 percent in one year. While our kids should have the best education we can provide, we must remember that many homeowners simply cannot afford that kind of increase. I think we should take smaller, positive steps toward a long-range plan. Maybe we should buy the land first, after more input from all concerned, so that land would no longer be part of the issue. You cannot please everyone, but I think most people would approve a good land site. What is it we say about doing the same thing repeatedly, each time expecting better results? I cannot support this proposal. Editor's note: This letter appeared in The Marshall Democrat-News Monday, Sept. 14, 2009. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
As the Nov. 3 election approaches, voters in the Marshall Public School District will have much to say about the bond issue on the ballot and the proposed new elementary school the district will build if the issue is approved.
Anyone who is interested in the issue can contribute an entry to this blog. However, only signed commentary will be posted as blog entries, but any MDN website user can post comments on the entries, just like on any other blog.
We recommend community members use the Letter to the Editor form to submit their views on the issue. Commentary posted in this blog will also be published in the newspaper. We hope to see a wide range of views, with reasons given for positions taken, questions asked and concerns respectfully expressed.
Hot topics Old school buildings no longer fit educational needs(18 ~ 11:26 PM, Nov 16)
Writer supports kids but opposes tax increase to build new school
Property owner questions school district's process for selecting site for proposed new school
New school should be added to list of Marshall's recent additions
New school proposal appears well-researched
|
I am in support of this new school, makes no sense to me to always be critical of where and why, the why is everyone's knowledge. so now let us do something for our kids. if this fails then lets go back to kids going to same area school for first 4 years and build a new jr high school on high school grounds.
I looked up the info on moberly's new grade school, you had your figures alittle off. Let me school you. The cost was $ 7.6 million and the school ground breaking was started in 1998 and finished in 2000, thats 9 years ago. There is no way they would build that school or any building that size for that today. please get your facts straight.