|
|
Fair ~ High: 73°F ~ Low: 48°F Monday, May 21, 2012 |
|
Martin Luther King, Jr Day - 2011Posted Wednesday, January 19, 2011, at 8:35 PM
According to research by the various new sources his "editorial" was taken straight from the website of National Vanguard and has been broadcast the last three years. This organization's website says they believe: "The European race is uniquely beautiful and creative. It is imperative that we survive and progress..."
National Vanguard was founded by William Pierce (1933-2002) and is now run by Kevin Alfred Strom. Some of Mr. Storm other writings include:
"Facts are facts, truth is truth," Reese said, adding that he might pre-empt other programming to air the editorial round the clock. He also added: "...all the criticism I'm taking is just because what I'm doing is not necessarily politically correct..."
Many of the claims in Reese's editorial were spun out of FBI efforts in the 1960s to discredit King, including charges of marital infidelities. I find it ironic that Mr. Reese has previously been charged with suspected enticement of a minor and alleged intimidation of a witness and has pled guilty to one count of possession of illicit pornography.
I forgot to mention, Mr. Reese is also a member of the Greeley School Board. The rest of the Board did pass a resolution (after Mr. Reese walked out of the meeting) supporting the holiday and calling the editorial "inflammatory and detrimental to our district and community." He walked out after a judge issued a restraining order barring him taking a firearm to school board meetings. The order was issued over alleged threats he made against a rival radio station.
The obvious intent of broadcasting such an item, during this particular time of the year, can only be to entice hatred, violence or worse. After the recent tragedy in Tucson, the recent venom espoused (by both sides) during last fall's election it seems quite inappropriate. Are these the same ideals our founders envisioned over two hundred years ago?
Perhaps now is the time to revisit Dr. King's dream. A dream based on non-violence, on equality, fairness and the right for every person to succeed or fail based on equal opportunity and a person's own abilities. In his last public speech he declared an ideal first espoused in 1776, an ideal about America and what we could become:
"Let us rise up tonight with a greater readiness. Let us stand with a greater determination. And let us move on in these powerful days, these days of challenge to make America what it ought to be. We have an opportunity to make America a better nation."
Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Ron Monnig has more than 35 years of experience working with civic, community and political groups. He has served in elected, appointed and volunteer positions since high school. He has a Bachelor of Arts degree in History/Government from Columbia College. He is a Democratic party activist; VP of Saline County Democrat Club, Member of Democrat Central Committee of Saline County.
Hot topics Politics, Religion & Viral Chain E-Mail(4 ~ 10:24 AM, Sep 11)
Martin Luther King, Jr Day - 2011
The Cost of Freedom - Democracy for Sale to Highest Bidder
The Democratic Party in the 21st Century
Veteran's Day 2009
|
It sounds like we now have a bunch of these charcters filling up the airwaves. I cant believe he allowed to even sit on a school board or any board in which the public is involved. People should speak out against types like this more often, so thank you for bringing this to our attention.
It's hard to understand how some people can be so bizarre in their thinking. It's also hard to understand how this guy Reese keeps his school board seat. What do you suppose he might be tempted to do with his pistola if some of the other board members opposed his views?
I'm more than a lot disappointed in Obama, thinking (hoping) that he just might have been inclined to make good on some of Dr. King's dreams, but evidently not.
Eurocentrism hasn't lost its focus on manifest destiny.
Ron
Well said
Let us assume for a moment that all of Mr. Reese's assertions are true, that Martin Luther King was an American-hating communist, a sexual degenerate, a copycat, an adulterer, and a plastic god (whatever that means). Assuming Reese is correct, then one of the greatest movements in the long, sad history of human oppression was given its moral character, its significance and substance, by a man who was not only evil, but who was crazy as a bedbug.
The public record, however, does not support the conclusion that Rev. King was either evil or crazy, which is one of the problems with choosing a well-documented figure to rubbish. An ad hominem attack may work on someone who has yet to attempt a thing, but has little affect on someone whose achievements are well-known.
Mr. Reese likely did not know Rev. King, so he couldn't possibly have a personal grudge against him, against who he was. No, Reese holds a grudge against what he did, and since he can't argue with that, he has resorted to calling names and shooting spit wads, to attacking the man himself, something that shouldn't surprise us, and which certainly would not have surprised Dr. King.
Well said by everyone and I'm glad to see some common sense in this blog. Thank you Ron I'm glad to see someone that works for this paper actually standing up for something.
Ron, well said. Slater, ditto. Pei-Li, good point.
Language DOES matter.
"If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said. This matters above everything." Confucious
"Words are some of the most powerful and important things I know....Language is the tool of love and the weapon of hatred. It's the bright red warning flag of danger--and the stone foundation of diplomacy and peace." unknown
Our major obligation is not to mistake slogans for solutions. ~Edward R. Murrow
Yes Sir Mr Monnig!