Want sustainable ag? Don't look back; Look around

Posted Wednesday, August 26, 2009, at 9:39 AM
View 7 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Thank you! I have grown up in the agriculture business. I ate beef almost everyday, still do. I would like to think that I am a healthy young lady.

    I would encourage anyone that wants to learn more about the truths of American Agriculture to ask a farmer. We love what we do and would be more than glad to talk to you about our passion.

    Marcia, I hope you don't mind but I want to include a link to your letter on my blog. I hope you send this out to lots of newspapers. They need to hear this side of the story.

    Crystal Young


    -- Posted by cdycattle on Wed, Aug 26, 2009, at 1:10 PM
  • Good job Marcia--glad to read something that makes sence regarding agriculture and our way of farming. We feed most of the world with the best food in the world, produced by farmers who care about our animals, our enviornment, and saving our soils for future generations. I am so tired of being told that we don't handle chemicals and fertilizers well and my reply to that is "if you knew what they cost, you would understand that no one would use more than absolutely necessary"!! Keep up the good work and I hope someone can read your writings that are in areas other than farm country!!

    -- Posted by farmerwife on Wed, Aug 26, 2009, at 2:46 PM
  • Thank you Crystal.

    Thank you also farmerwife. You are right about the chemicals and fertilizers. The Time article also erroneously attributed the ocean deadzone to agriculture. While fertilizers and chemicals do end up in the ocean, many studies and many municipalities are now acknowledging that much of that comes from city and suburban lawns. There is now more land in lawns in the U.S. than in use for food production.

    There is no doubt that spring flooding mean some chemicals and fertilizers are taken into the river - but that isn't something the farmer wants or can control.

    Since farming is a very low margin business, we cannot afford for our fertilizers to be wasted, so we don't use more than the plant can use. If we did, we wouldn't be in business long.


    -- Posted by Marcia Gorrell on Wed, Aug 26, 2009, at 3:27 PM
  • OMG, Marcia did you speak real TRUTH to the reading public. Farm Chemicals are so costly that a friend of my got badly burnt trying to rescue farm chemicals from the family home fire. He did not try to rescue anything else but chemicals. And don't get me started about the pallid sturgeon and the muddy mo. What idiot decided to dump dirt into the Missouri river should be taken behind the woodshed and knock some sense into them. Isn't the goal to stop the dead zone in the gulf???? If suburban lawn and garden shops only sold the fertilizer and pesticides needed for PROPER lawn management they would only sell half of what they do now. People with lawns should be required to grid test their soil for fertility before fertilizer could be purchased and applied. It is not natural to have a lawn looking like a golf course. Golf courses have a specific sporting purpose and should be more like aaaaaa golf course. But a lawn would be healthier if it was more like a meadow than some hedonistic mono-culture of grass too disease prone to survive. I have city friends who think nothing of throwing on some more fertilizer and water if the grass doesn't look like it was freshly painted. It is nonsense. I just shake my head and sigh.

    I live on my family farm in which the most recent land purchase is in our 100th year of production. Our family has been farming in the county for 150 years. Yes I'm proud of our agriculture traditions. Those traditions include chemicals for crops and medicines for the livestock when needed and no more. The chemicals we used in the 40's, 50's and 60's were more toxic than we use today. With GMO crops and low toxicity chemicals we have less erosion and more production. AND LESS TOXINS, YEA!

    Yes there is room in the big tent for alternative agriculture, truck farming and specialty crops. but if we are to feed, clothe and provide energy for the Billions of people on the planet to prevent hunger, disease and poverty we Americans, Chinese, Russians, Western Europeans, Argentineans, Brazilians and all other areas of the world that provide foodstuffs WE MUST PRODUCE IN THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY WHICH IS MODERN AGRICULTURE.

    -- Posted by salinemg on Thu, Aug 27, 2009, at 12:30 AM
  • Down here we have Bermuda lawns. However we are in a difficult yard zone (Oklahoma City), even for Bermuda.

    So most folks absolutely pour on the chemicals, over water,or water too frequently while failing to water deep enough. They also cut their lawns far too short. This despite frequent tips to the contrary on the evening news.

    My neighbor next door waters every day, but not enough to cause the roots to go deep to search for water. They lost two Bradford pear trees to winds of only forty miles per hour, because the roots were never challenged to gain any depth.

    I seldom put anything on my lawn except for deep watering when absolutely necessary. Of course that creates a "weed" problem because I refuse to use weed killers. Some weeds such as dandelions I find to be delightful, and nutritious. Some others do annoy me for various reasons, so benign neglect may not always the answer.

    I pondered the problem, and decided to instead of giving up on my philosophy of benign neglect to take it a step further.

    When summer heat, and drought began, I did not water my front yard at all. The weeds gave it up, and were fried. Tough old Bermuda did not thrive, but did continue to grow some, reaching ever deeper for moisture.

    At that point I simply took my garden rake, and raked off the surface debris left by my mulching mower. Then I broadcast corn gluten, yup! nasty old corn gluten which has a high nitogen content. Then we were blessed with unusual mid summer rains. The Bermuda absolutely took off. Meanwhile the corn gluten retarded new weed growth.

    Now I have a nicer lawn than my neighbors on either side who continue their robotic behavior, with twice weekly near scalpings of their Bermuda, and over the top applications of water, and everything else.

    So, thank you Marsha for being an initial source of that nasty old corn gluten.

    I know that Bermuda is not a primary lawn grass up there. My point in adding this lengthy post is that we all should consider our practices, and think out side the box now, and then. It can help us be better stewards of our land ,whether it is half a hectare, or thousands of acres.

    I enjoyed you column, as always.

    -- Posted by Oklahoma Reader on Thu, Aug 27, 2009, at 1:07 PM
  • Thank you Salinemg - yes, according to statistics we will need double the food production in the next 50 years to keep up with the population growth. It will be a challenge and going backwards won't do that.

    Thank you too, OKR. I learned something new today. I first wasn't sure what corn gluten was, and then had no idea it could work as a fertilizer! I looked it up just a few minutes ago! Good for you for doing what you can to be a steward of your land. That is what we do as well. After reading about corn gluten, I am wondering if they are considering using it on farm crops? I didn't find anything - but talk about recycling!


    -- Posted by Marcia Gorrell on Thu, Aug 27, 2009, at 5:46 PM
  • Thanks Marcia!! As always, I really really enjoy your articles!! I will say however that someone else has a sign-in really close to mine (how wierd) and I am the "Farmer Wife" that talked about it at the lake LOL :)

    -- Posted by Farmer Wife on Sat, Aug 29, 2009, at 10:24 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: