|
|
Mostly Cloudy ~ High: 61°F ~ Low: 46°F |
|
Save or Spend?
Posted Sunday, January 25, 2009, at 10:44 PM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Currently, Congress is working toward developing an $825 billion economic recovery package. This package is supposed to allocate about two-thirds of the funds to new government spending and the rest to tax cuts. In addition, reportedly there are separate proposals with the House and Senate that would combine tax cuts for individuals and businesses. The government hopes the economic stimulus packages will encourage consumers to spend money yet some might not be losing their homes if they had saved money. Let me get this straight, we need to start spending money that we may or may not have to pump up the economy. On the other hand, maybe the answer is to save our money so that we will have money when the economy drops even further into the toilet. This way of thinking seems to be an illogicality or in other words, incorrect reasoning.
The goal of the economic recovery package is to infuse money directly into the economy with hopes it brings the nation out of a recession. Yahoo Money reports it would be the largest economic recovery package ever enacted; the White House says the scope rivals the construction of the interstate highway system after World War II. Let's face it, President Obama took on a Titanic of a ship with inheriting the worst economy since World War II, a federal budget deficit of more than $1 trillion and soaring costs for entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The nation lost a total 2.6 million jobs last year as the housing market contracted and financial markets collapsed. Interestingly, the personal savings rate, which is measured by the amount of disposable personal income that is not spent, rose to almost 3% in the second quarter of 2008. The rise in savings comes after almost four years below 1% personal savings rate. Saving more means spending less - which translates into more hard times in retail and other consumer-driven businesses like the auto industry. The top lists of retail outlets from www.247wallstreet.com that are likely to hit the popular "Going Out of Business" sales are Sears which also owns Kmart, Lane Bryant, Gap, Macy's, and Zales the jewelry store. How do we save ourselves? Times seem bleak to me, does anyone else have any thoughts on our economic situation. I have said before it appears Marshall has not suffered some of the losses that have been seen in the larger metropolitan areas. What are your thoughts? Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Karen Mullins-Lamb was born and raised in Marshall. Her blog focuses on hometown events and happenings or national and regional events that affect Marshall residents. She says, "I would like to highlight working toward making Marshall a more attractive place to work and live for future generations. How do we keep our youth here or to return here
after college?" She is very interested in hearing from readers on these issues.
Hot topics Stuck in a "Mind Bump"(16 ~ 4:18 PM, Jun 24)
The Chalk Around Town
Shouldn't We All be Happy Now!
Disruptive Moments and a Grieving Child
Save or Spend?
|
That was an excellent posting NanaDot, and I agree with every point you made.
One other point that I believe is relevant to the theme of your post is the role of the corporate propagandists in securing the people's cooperation by utilizing insidious advertising.
Enlisting hundreds of social psychologists, and "sell out" creative geniuses, television and print commercials became so slick, and subtle that few were able to resist their siren call.
As time went on resistance was weakened in each new generation. By the time those generations of babies who had spent much of their period of early development parked in front of a color television could talk, they could also demand, and demand they did. Partially conditioned parents felt guilt, and desperation when they could not meet those demands, going to absurd financial risks to appease. Then the fully conditioned children became parents with the result that what had once been a rational populace became in a sense, buying zombies. It was a corporate dream, we as a whole were no longer people, we had become consumer units.
In my waning years I still have hope.I do not think that the corporate propagandists have kept pace with technological advances, and are now scrambling like mad to recover lost ground. They are up against devices that eradicate advertisements from television programing, a generation of children who ignore television in favor of electronic games, and the internet where people once again can make choices with out being a captive audience.
Additionally, Corporatocracy became so irrationally greedy that they eroded the wages of the masses to the point that consumer's pockets are empty, and assets are hocked. Try as we might, we can not buy what we are told to buy, even though we are convinced that we want to buy.
It looks to me like we are going to be stretching dollars instead of limousines for a long time. In the long haul we will probably be the better for it.
Just listened to Rep. Marcie Kaptur (D-Ohio) who noted that 95 -98% of all mortgage paper is owned by 5 (five) banks - Citi, Wachovia, Goldman-Sachs, Chase, and HSBC. Morgan-Stanley and G-S were investment (gambling) houses right up until they became 'bank-holding' companies, and thereby eligible for TARP funds, and FDIC insurance. Since it was the safe banks who had been paying into the FDIC insurance for decades and it was the F--ed-Up Five who filed the biggest claims while NEVER having paid into the FDIC fund, who do you think is paying for this one TWICE?
I am not saying that we haven't all been living in denial but we didn't do it alone, and we didn't do it without a LOT of 'persuasion' by those who are making TRILLIONS on us... How did we go from being a creditor to a debtor nation? Mortgage companies (banks), credit card companies (banks), auto financers (banks)began to promote 'buy now, pay later' in ever increasing PR blitzes. Even today, try to get an airline ticket or rent a car without a credit card - HAH!
"...but those poor decision weren't all made by big, bad corporations." Really? Who makes the rules? Who owns Congress? Who writes the laws and de-regulations with TEAMS of lawyers? Who sells themselves their own products to post office boxes in the Caymans so they don't have to pay taxes in the US? Who has polluted the world's environment to the point that our planet is truly in peril of no longer being able to sustain human life? Who has paid billions to PR firms, lobbyists, influence peddlers and directly to law-makers to get rid of every safety net, protection, and any demand for 'responsibility' or 'accountability? Who is getting 'bailed out' by tax dollars TWICE while getting bonuses for making HUGE profits for stockholders?
To minimize the role that corporate abuse has played in the current economic and environmental crises while blaming the effects of corporate manipulations on the 'fecklessness' of the working classes is itself denial.
Our Nation's economic turmoil can be viewed in two ways, either devastating or as a needed wake-up call. I think everyone has their attention focused now!
Isaiah 32:8 says, "But the noble man makes noble plans, and by noble deeds he stands." We need to make changes in our lives now so that as economic blemishes appear, the prepared will not fall.
Bottom line? Greed must be regulated at every level of our society.
Some employers took advantage of these kinds of "outs," but others did not. I can't defend every employer, but I can't extend a blanket condemnation, either. Where you work is your choice. How you deal with the benefits you are offered is also your choice. Stay or go, it's up to you.
Plenty of people on every side of the current economic disaster have made extremely poor decisions, but those poor decision weren't all made by big, bad corporations. Some of those poor decisions were made by the very people who are now screaming for relief, and that includes those who signed up for mortgages they could not afford or who expected to make a killing in real estate by driving prices up to ridiculous levels that couldn't posssibly be supported.
If we're going to place blame, let's be sure we spread it around to every corner of where it belongs.
Unfortunately, 401Ks and HMOs were thinly disguised methods for passing these expenses onto workers, and allowing employers to avoid pensions and insurance while making billions for the managers of both HMOs and mutual funds. Corporate profits and dividends started up, bonuses and stock prices went up, and the PSR went down.
You can trace at least some of the change in the PSR to the point at which 401k's became available (early 80's, as I recall). When you look at charts of PSR rates, you can see the sharp downturn at that point pretty clearly. We absolutely don't save enough, no question, but look at what we're up against - pay daily expenses, put away something for retirement, put something in savings for a rainy day, put something aside for your kids' education, maybe help your parents out...a lot of us can't afford to do everything we need to!
Kathy,
You are right the PSR is simply inlays and outlays, it is misleading isn't it. Thanks for pointing that out. Looking back into history, our Personal Savings Rate has been in the mid 20 percent range, far cry from today's 3 percent. We are not saving enough! We are a society of the "I wants".
Back in 1929, the Herbert Hoover Committee on Recent Economic Changes noted '...there are new wants which shall make way endlessly for newer wants, as fast as they are satisfied', and in post-WWII, Victor Lebow declared, 'our enormously productive economy ..demands that we make consumption our way of life, ...that we seek our spiritual satisfaction, our ego satisfaction, in consumption... We need things consumed, burned up, worn out, replaced and discarded at an ever increasing rate' - thus was our 'standard of living' based on how much we use up, NOT on how much we produce..
So, WIT, my sympathy for retailers, especially big box types, is pretty slim to none...
We have the chance to literally CHANGE THE ECONOMY to a more rational model if we can hold out and pay it off and put it away, AND tell our elected geniuses that we are going to continue to do so. Debt slavery to CHINA be damned!!!
The personal savings rate figure is misleading. If you make $50,000 per year and spend $49,000, your personal savings rate is 2%. But - the PSR does not take into account how the money was spent. If several thousand of the $49,000 went into your 401k, that doesn't show up as savings. Neither does appreciation on your home.
We're still not saving enough, but it's not quite as awful as it looks.
NanaDot,
Good advice to me. I understand that retailers will continue to struggle and this puts our economy further down in the dumps. I'm just uncertain if there is a win-win solution to this.
Pay it down, pay it off, and put it away...
The last time one of our elected geniuses told us to 'go shopping', we got Guantanamo Bay... I suggest that we go BACK to what our (great)grand-parents knew: Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without...